Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Richardo

(38,391 posts)
Tue Sep 30, 2014, 02:26 PM Sep 2014

Even if 550 agents were sequestered, those involved in Presidential protection shouldn't be, right?

I mean, it IS the primary mission of the entire organization, correct?

Ease up on the counterfeiting investigations if you have to cut corners.


Just my knee-jerk reaction, I'm not following the hearings at all, except for thread titles.

Edited for more clarity, I hope.

10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

meow2u3

(24,774 posts)
2. Even if the President's detail is fully staffed
Tue Sep 30, 2014, 02:36 PM
Sep 2014

the detail that protects the White House itself is probably understaffed. Hence, the ability for intruders to break in the WH.

Richardo

(38,391 posts)
3. Good point, but I meant everything involving the President, not just his family detail.
Tue Sep 30, 2014, 02:42 PM
Sep 2014

I did not articulate very well.

CreekDog

(46,192 posts)
7. if the Secret Service sequestration worked like other departments, all subprograms were cut equally
Tue Sep 30, 2014, 05:11 PM
Sep 2014

you couldn't just move money around to make sure one program was kept whole.

that was the madness of the sequestration.

NutmegYankee

(16,201 posts)
10. That's how government budgets work in general.
Tue Sep 30, 2014, 05:31 PM
Sep 2014

Funds cannot be moved between sub agencies without "reprogramming", which usually requires congressional approval. Each agency got hacked by some fixed percentage and therefore each sub agency. If it sounds dumb, remember that sequestration only came about because congress was too incompetent to fund the agencies right in the first place.

LiberalArkie

(15,730 posts)
4. Role of Secret Service
Tue Sep 30, 2014, 05:01 PM
Sep 2014

The U.S. Secret Service has two distinct areas of responsibility:

Financial Crimes, covering missions such as prevention and investigation of counterfeiting of U.S. currency and U.S. treasury securities, and investigation of major fraud.
Protection, which entails ensuring the safety of current and former national leaders and their families, such as the President, past presidents, vice presidents, presidential candidates, visiting heads of state, and foreign embassies (per an agreement with the U.S. State Department's Bureau of Diplomatic Security (DS) Office of Foreign Missions (OFM), etc.)
The Secret Service's initial responsibility was to investigate counterfeiting of U.S. currency, which was rampant following the U.S. Civil War.

CreekDog

(46,192 posts)
6. The sequester required all programs in all departments to sustain the cutbacks
Tue Sep 30, 2014, 05:10 PM
Sep 2014

Departments and Agencies for most of the sequester couldn't simply allocate the cuts by eliminating one unpopular or one or two less needed programs.

That's not how it worked.

 

MohRokTah

(15,429 posts)
9. Sequestration gets applied equally across the board.
Tue Sep 30, 2014, 05:25 PM
Sep 2014

That's why Obama agreed to Boehner's sequestration plan because allegedly, nobody would be stupid enough to go along with sequestration.

Then the teabaggers proved they were just stupid enough to walk down that stupid road.

And they did it stupidly.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Even if 550 agents were s...