General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsHillary bounces back in latest presidential poll
WASHINGTON -- Hillary Clinton has a comfortable lead among Democrats for the 2016 presidential nomination, while the Republican race remains a free-for-all, according to a new McClatchy-Marist poll.
Clinton was the top choice of 64 percent of Democrats and Democratic-leaning independents. She showed strong appeal among virtually every demographic and political group.
A former secretary of state, U.S. senator from New York and first lady, Clinton has been a front-runner before. In 2008 she was doing well at this early stage, but she lost the nomination to Barack Obama... She had shown a hint of vulnerability this summer during her tour to promote her memoir, Hard Choices. Since then, Clinton has been campaigning for 2014 candidates...
... the poll shows that no other Democrats have caught on. Vice President Joe Biden was a distant second at 15 percent, followed by Massachusetts Sen. Elizabeth Warren, who has said repeatedly she does not want to be a candidate, at 8 percent.
Three who may be interested in waging campaigns trailed far behind. Sen. Bernie Sanders, a Vermont independent who held town meetings in Iowa at the same time Clinton was visiting, polled 4 percent. Maryland Gov. Martin OMalley recorded 2 percent, and former Virginia Sen. Jim Webb was at 1 percent.
Clinton also did well against potential Republican challengers, topping 50 percent in each instance.
She led New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie, whose appeal to moderate voters could make him formidable, by 51 percent to 42 percent, up from 47 percent to 41 percent in August.
Clinton did better against former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush, winning 53 percent to 42 percent, up from 7 percentage points in August. She tops Kentucky Sen. Rand Paul 52 percent to 43 percent, up from 6 points in August.
Read more here: http://www.sacbee.com/2014/10/03/6758417/two-years-out-poll-shows-hillary.html#storylink=cpy
cascadiance
(19,537 posts)... as well. And as many here who get upset when we talk about primary contenders for her say when we bring up someone like Elizabeth Warren, shouldn't we be focused now on 2014 elections that are a month away?
MohRokTah
(15,429 posts)Nobody wants to be blamed for having taken the wind out of their party's sails by declaring before the midterms.
Dawson Leery
(19,348 posts)hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)Tarheel_Dem
(31,235 posts)Robbins
(5,066 posts)Before I can hold my nose and vote for her In November 2016.Although I won't be voting for whoever republicans put up.
If there Is good opporent In Democratic primary I will vote for that person and donate to the campagin.
My main problems with her are her hawkish ways and her more friendly than obama to COrporations.
A major issue for me Is perserving the social safety net.If i had her promise not to cut it to pay for wars that would make me feel like
I could hold my nose for voting for her.
If she can help convince democrats to vote In November then so be it.
JI7
(89,252 posts)doesn't look like o'malley has much appeal and i'm not surprised by it.
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)Campaigning for candidates is good for the party because electing Democrat candidates will serve them well in the future. The most important time to poll well is at election time. Yes, Hillary polls very well, good for the DNC.