General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsVoter-ID ruling to carry consequences in Wisconsin
Posted with permission.
And how does anyone combat this?
http://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/voter-id-ruling-carry-consequences-wisconsin
Voter-ID ruling to carry consequences in Wisconsin
10/07/14 12:41 PMUpdated 10/07/14 12:43 PM
By Steve Benen
A federal court in April ruled against Wisconsins voter-ID law, concluding that the restriction violated the Voting Rights Acts ban on racial discrimination. Last month, however, a three-judge panel on the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals featuring three Republican-appointed jurists lifted the lower courts injunction, creating some election chaos in the Badger State.
Yesterday, as Zach Roth reported, the same 7th Circuit panel finished the job, ruling on the merits.
The law has likely disenfranchised voters already. When the appeals panel abruptly put the law into effect last month after it had been blocked for over two years, hundreds of people had already returned absentee ballots without ID, since the ID requirement wasnt in effect at the time they voted.
Elections-law expert Rick Hasen was clearly disgusted: Judge Easterbrook picks out the evidence from the record he likes, and dismisses the evidence he does not like . The opinion is also full of things that make my blood boil.
The Wisconsin Supreme Court has also already approved the voting restrictions, concluding that voter fraud is a legitimate concern. The ruling specifically pointed to a Republican voter in Milwaukee accused of 13 counts of voter fraud none of which, ironically, would have been prevented by a voter-ID law.
Voting-rights advocates still hope that the U.S. Supreme Court will intervene before thousands of Wisconsin voters are disenfranchised for no reason, but few consider it likely.
The consequences of this may very well swing the elections in the Wisconsin GOPs favor next month which is very likely why voting access was curtailed in the first place.
Claire Groden reported on just how many voters are at risk.
Even Hoods low-end estimate of 167,351 disenfranchised voters is enough voters to swing a tight election. Walker won in 2010 by only 124,638 votes. According to the Huffington Post Pollster, Walker is currently leading Burke 48.3 to 46.3.
Remember, Wisconsin Republicans approved this law to address a problem that didnt exist. Its simply a matter of candidates choosing their preferred voters, rather than voters choosing their preferred candidates.
Making matters slightly worse, the Wisconsin State Journal recently reported, Three state agencies charged with implementing voter ID for the Nov. 4 election say they have no additional money set aside to help voters and state workers comply with the newly reinstated requirement.
Even by the low standards of the war on voting, the restrictions imposed by Wisconsin Republicans are indefensible. That these GOP tactics may rig the elections in the GOPs favor is a democratic embarrassment.
Scuba
(53,475 posts)Bortman33
(102 posts)it's a fucking crime and an act of fascist rule and should be treated as such.
Fred Sanders
(23,946 posts)frauds and defending this law only on that basis would be opening ID shops for free voter ID on every corner alongside registration booths....they lie, they lie by the clear evidence of intent,