Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

denem

(11,045 posts)
Sun Apr 15, 2012, 05:09 AM Apr 2012

An Apology to General Discussion.

RE: "How could DU'ers be fooled by John Edwards? Because you chose to be fooled."

I put this together at the height of communication problems with DU3. When I hit post, the page froze.

About ten minutes later I thought better of it. I decided, I finally had bury my feelings about the 2004 primaries. But for over half and hour I couldn't get back onto DU. Each occasion I tried, O go got another time out. Eventually I gave up. I wasn't ever sure, if the OP get posted.

This is the last occasion I will write anything about John Edwards. In my opinion 2004 we had two genuine capital P progressives running IMO, Howard Dean and Wes Clark. I would have been happy with either of them. By progressive I mean classical progressive, people in office who would challenge "invisible government, owing no allegiance and acknowledging no responsibility to the people". How often do Democrats get a real shot, at nominating a electable progressive for president.

In my opinion we had two. Dean was taken down by media, Clark crushed by narrative to a Kerry vs Edwards two man race. Please, I do not want to revisit Dean v Clark, the only thing I want to say were both were strong social reformers as well.

When ended up with a Liberal - John Kerry who after all those years in Washington had learnt the rules of the game. a firm liberal but not a progressive. And then we also had John Edwards, VP nominee. But JE was not talking about corporate power, and corporate democrats then: that came later in the 2007-08. In 2004, only Dean was explicitly talking taking the system on, and, as far as I know, Clark was the first primary candidate to grace the cover of The Advocate.

My abiding frustration is that I was sure Edwards was a phony in 2004. Every intuition I had screamed fake. When he positioned himself as a firm progressive in 2007, I still felt the same. But in 2004, I was so sure, I was literally screaming it.

I have nothing to say about Edward's affair, or the current politically motivated trial. I believe I will always morn the 2004, but it's time to but those emotions away in a drawer. Time to move on.

So again, my apologies that earlier OP did not get self deleted. Kicking a man when he's down is not what I'm about. You wont see any more posts along those lines again from me

8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
An Apology to General Discussion. (Original Post) denem Apr 2012 OP
you're from Australia, right? quinnox Apr 2012 #1
I'm married to my American sweetheart. denem Apr 2012 #2
that explains it quinnox Apr 2012 #3
... denem Apr 2012 #4
Actually, denem, I had to agree with you. I think in some ways I DID choose to be fooled CTyankee Apr 2012 #5
Clark would have made a great VP IMO, denem Apr 2012 #6
I don't know about progressive DUers leaving over Edwards. But I am not that clued in to CTyankee Apr 2012 #7
So where IS Wes Clark these days? Bake Apr 2012 #8
 

quinnox

(20,600 posts)
1. you're from Australia, right?
Sun Apr 15, 2012, 05:13 AM
Apr 2012

I just thought its interesting how you use "we", as if you were an American. That's interesting that some people in other countries follow US politics so closely.

About the apology to general discussion forum, I wouldn't worry about it. I doubt many people remember many threads anyway or are holding some kind of grudge for a thread you posted...

 

denem

(11,045 posts)
2. I'm married to my American sweetheart.
Sun Apr 15, 2012, 05:24 AM
Apr 2012

'We' now hove a grandson. We, I guess meant DU. I was following DU at the time, and participating on Wes Clark's board, and Dean for America.

 

quinnox

(20,600 posts)
3. that explains it
Sun Apr 15, 2012, 05:30 AM
Apr 2012

I thought something like that might be the case, not that people can't be interested or follow American politics from other countries who don't happen to be married to one, especially countries like Australia, and the UK, I noticed many from there seem to really follow the American politics, but married to an American, that would make it a close subject.

CTyankee

(63,912 posts)
5. Actually, denem, I had to agree with you. I think in some ways I DID choose to be fooled
Tue Apr 17, 2012, 09:03 AM
Apr 2012

by JE. I ignored (rather huffily) the "I feel pretty" video on youtube. I bought the narrative of the loving husband, attentive to his sick wife's needs. I cried so hard when I read her account of their son's death I literally had to stop reading and put the book aside. I liked the fact that he was the only one talking about the two Americas and highlighting the plight of the poor in our country. I had been devastated by Kerry's loss in 04.

I feel I was suckered now but I can see how my own feelings colored my thinking on him. While I don't berate myself for this, I do think of it as a "lesson learned" and have vowed never to do it again.

P.S. I liked Clark and Dean. I was disappointed that Clark didn't make it further than he did. I certainly didn't diss him over Edwards.





 

denem

(11,045 posts)
6. Clark would have made a great VP IMO,
Tue Apr 17, 2012, 09:15 AM
Apr 2012

With hindsight, he was the just right man to sink the swiftboaters, and there was no questioned he was qualified to be Commander in Chief. I still remember when he endorsed Kerry - 'Army, to Navy, permission to come onboard'. Oh well, I'll always be morning those primaries. As for 2008, a lot of progressive DU'ers who backed Edwards, left for good. It's not so much the man, Edwards, it's the polemic and the people he took down with him. I'm glad your still here.

CTyankee

(63,912 posts)
7. I don't know about progressive DUers leaving over Edwards. But I am not that clued in to
Tue Apr 17, 2012, 09:25 AM
Apr 2012

some of the internal politics here, so maybe you're right.

I would have loved to see Clark advanced and put in at VP. I guess it was just politics, plus the idea that JE would have more appeal to the South (which didn't pan out). And I couldn't understand how the voters would treat two Yalies, both members of Skull and Bones, so differently. It just didn't make sense to me...

Bake

(21,977 posts)
8. So where IS Wes Clark these days?
Tue Apr 17, 2012, 09:55 AM
Apr 2012

I liked him a lot. And Dr. Dean, of course, is still around.

Bake

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»An Apology to General Dis...