Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

kpete

(71,996 posts)
Sun Oct 12, 2014, 09:45 PM Oct 2014

Slave photo from Robert E. Lee's home discovered on eBay

National Park Service curator Kim Robinson holds the photo of Selina Gray, right, who was in charge to care for Arlington House where Gen. Robert E. Lee had lived in for 30 years. (AP)
?ve=1&tl=1

An “extremely rare” Civil War-era photograph of the enslaved woman who helped save Confederate Gen. Robert E. Lee's Virginia home has been obtained by the National Park Service after a volunteer spotted the image on eBay.

The previously unknown photograph depicts Selina Gray, the head housekeeper to Lee and his family, along with two girls thought to be her daughters. The photograph was unveiled Thursday at the Arlington House plantation overlooking the nation's capital that was home to Lee and dozens of slaves before the Civil War.

An inscription on the back of the image reads "Gen Lees Slaves Arlington Va."

Park officials said this is only the second known photograph taken of slaves at Arlington.


.......

http://www.foxnews.com/us/2014/10/12/slave-photo-discovered-from-robert-e-lee-home-on-ebay/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+foxnews%2Fnational+%28Internal+-+US+Latest+-+Text%29
23 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Slave photo from Robert E. Lee's home discovered on eBay (Original Post) kpete Oct 2014 OP
A stereopticon card? Jackpine Radical Oct 2014 #1
I think you are correct. dballance Oct 2014 #4
In my wifes grandmothers stuff madokie Oct 2014 #5
We had one around when I was a kid. Jackpine Radical Oct 2014 #6
My wifes mother had a bunch of photos with it madokie Oct 2014 #9
My husband has his grandmother's stereopticon with her collection of cards csziggy Oct 2014 #17
Try crossing your eyes to put one image over the other - it is a stereo photo. marble falls Oct 2014 #8
Looking at the two photos you can see they were taken madokie Oct 2014 #10
Thats how stereographic photos were made 2 camera's each with different... Historic NY Oct 2014 #14
Can't do it - jimlup Oct 2014 #11
Whaddya know, that works! Thanks. nomorenomore08 Oct 2014 #13
Actually, you need to let your eyes *diverge* ... eppur_se_muova Oct 2014 #20
Remember these? Spitfire of ATJ Oct 2014 #16
Amazing photography from back then. Rhinodawg Oct 2014 #2
Fascinating bit of history! CaliforniaPeggy Oct 2014 #3
I've bought more than a dozen over the past year... Historic NY Oct 2014 #7
was it the same photographer ? JI7 Oct 2014 #19
E & H T Anthony were the most widely known Historic NY Oct 2014 #22
Hmmmm ... could you stitch them together with QuickTimeVR ... eppur_se_muova Oct 2014 #21
WOW Iliyah Oct 2014 #12
"Comments are currently closed for this article" Spitfire of ATJ Oct 2014 #15
Those dresses are enormous. n/t Calista241 Oct 2014 #18
I can see it in 3D. Here is how: thereismore Oct 2014 #23

madokie

(51,076 posts)
5. In my wifes grandmothers stuff
Sun Oct 12, 2014, 10:05 PM
Oct 2014

we have one of the old stereopticon card holders of viewers or what ever its called. Her grandmother was born 1889 and passed away in 1991 at 102. We took care of her the last 4 years of her life. up to the last 5 or 6 months she was still sharp as a tack. When she started going down hill she went down fast. Anyways we have the viewer that you would use for that type picture I'll have to drag it out and check it out viewing this picture.

Jackpine Radical

(45,274 posts)
6. We had one around when I was a kid.
Sun Oct 12, 2014, 10:08 PM
Oct 2014

I remember that there were a lot of black & white battlefront pictures from WW I with it.

madokie

(51,076 posts)
9. My wifes mother had a bunch of photos with it
Sun Oct 12, 2014, 10:29 PM
Oct 2014

but all we have left is the viewer. Her mother has been dead for 30 years now and my wife has no idea where all the photos went. The viewer was being thrown away when I seen it and said I think I'll keep this if you all don't mind and they (wifes family) all said go for it we don't have any use for it. My wife and I have it stashed back, not really knowing what its was for until now.

csziggy

(34,136 posts)
17. My husband has his grandmother's stereopticon with her collection of cards
Mon Oct 13, 2014, 12:30 AM
Oct 2014

A nice box of them. He's collected a few more since he inherited her old collection, but most are ones she collected.

Someday I will get around to scanning and cataloging them. It's been a long time since I looked at them so I don't remember which ones she had.

jimlup

(7,968 posts)
11. Can't do it -
Sun Oct 12, 2014, 10:36 PM
Oct 2014

my eyes are too imbalanced but yeah - that is exactly what it is.

I'm surprised at how good the photo is actually. Many of the photos from that era are compromised by poor photography. Guess the technology had already started to mature by the time this one was taken and/or the photographer was good at his craft.

Wow!

eppur_se_muova

(36,266 posts)
20. Actually, you need to let your eyes *diverge* ...
Mon Oct 13, 2014, 01:03 AM
Oct 2014

this is very hard to do if the distance between corresponding points on the two photos is larger than the distance between your eyes, so you may have to shrink the photo to a size appropriate for your interpupillary distance. I have eyes which diverge very easily (needed therapy for that several years ago) so I have lots of practice with this. Try relaxing the focus of your eyes to infinity while holding the photos directly in front of you, about 15" away; your eyes will diverge to parallel lines of sight, which should put one image in front of each eye, in about the same position. If you see two copies of the same feature, restrict your attention to that feature until your eyes spontaneously combine the images and refocus to the appropriate distance. Perhaps the most important thing to do is to get the two images on the same level -- tilt your head from side to side if one image appears higher than the other. Once they are on the same level your brain can combine the two images much more easily.

Some stereoscopic photos really are cross-eyed, but these are rare.

Placing a sheet of paper (card, manilla folder) perpendicular to the photos so that each eye can see only one image also helps sometimes.

Stereoscopes contain positive lenses which change the focus of your eyes to a short distance even when they are fully relaxed; thus you feel like you are looking at a distant object, and your eyes naturally diverge for distance vision. A pair of cheap glasses for farsightedness could do the same thing -- a +2.5 diopter lens, for example, should give you a viewing distance of about 40 cm (16&quot , IIRC. If you are naturally nearsighted, you might have better luck viewing stereoviews with no glasses. (In my case, my eyes are *too* nearsighted, but I can easily see the stereo effect from the pic in the OP with my glasses on)

Historic NY

(37,449 posts)
7. I've bought more than a dozen over the past year...
Sun Oct 12, 2014, 10:11 PM
Oct 2014

most were taken at a popular local Hudson River site. People would pose for the photgrapher. Whats interesting when I put them together you can see different prospectives on the same location. They run from the late 1850-1860-s

thereismore

(13,326 posts)
23. I can see it in 3D. Here is how:
Mon Oct 13, 2014, 12:36 PM
Oct 2014

put a sheet of letter-sized paper between your eyes so each eye can see only one image. The paper should extend from your nose all the way to the screen, lengthwise. Look at one face but let your eyes see into infinity, behind the screen. After a while, a 3D picture will pop into your brain. After I removed the paper, I could not sustain the view, but it's there, in stereo.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Slave photo from Robert E...