Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

sheshe2

(83,791 posts)
Sun Oct 19, 2014, 08:26 PM Oct 2014

TEN YEARS AGO, MASSACHUSETTS INTRODUCED US TO GAY MARRIAGE



http://lgbtworld.info/ten-years-ago-massachusetts-introduced-us-to-gay-marriage/#comment-11

BOSTON – When Julie and Hillary Goodridge walked into City Hall and applied for a marriage license 10 years ago, they did it with a police escort at their side. As the plaintiffs in the landmark case – Goodridge v. Department of Public Health – that brought same-sex marriage to the first state in the country, the Goodridges, six other couples, and their attorney Mary Bonauto broke an historic barrier on May 17, 2004.

A decade later, 17 other states and the District of Columbia have legalized same-sex marriage. The Supreme Court struck down the Defense of Marriage Act which had long deterred other states from following Massachusetts’ lead, and gays and lesbians now serve openly in the military without fear of being discharged. President Obama and many elected leaders have come to embrace marriage equality as have a majority of Americans. Just last week, the NFL drafted its first openly gay player.

While many have championed the successful legal strategy that saved same-sex marriage in the state of California, for civil rights activists, it’s hard to overstate the importance of Goodridge which set an example for the country in terms of equal rights and the freedom to marry.

“Without Goodridge and Mary Bonauto and what was accomplished there, none of the rest of this would have ever happened,” said Roberta Kaplan, who successfully argued before the Supreme Court in the United States v. Windsor, the case which brought an end to a federal ban on same-sex marriage.

Great Site!!!! Well Done Bill! Bravo~
Give it some DU Love.

Read More~ http://lgbtworld.info/ten-years-ago-massachusetts-introduced-us-to-gay-marriage/

113 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
TEN YEARS AGO, MASSACHUSETTS INTRODUCED US TO GAY MARRIAGE (Original Post) sheshe2 Oct 2014 OP
And the world hasn't ended, all the straights have not turned gay, married straights RKP5637 Oct 2014 #1
But it's coming, just you wait mythology Oct 2014 #2
... RKP5637 Oct 2014 #5
What about those cats and dogs, and lions and lambs? They're not "gettin' it on" yet? MADem Oct 2014 #101
Oh, that's because they prayed away the gay, but it failed on just humans! RKP5637 Oct 2014 #107
And my heterosexual parents are still married shenmue Oct 2014 #3
... sheshe2 Oct 2014 #7
Thank Goodness .. We've come such a long way for Gay Rights since 2004 when Cha Oct 2014 #4
Hard to believe that was 10 years ago now! sheshe2 Oct 2014 #6
Yay! shenmue Oct 2014 #8
I will check out the music some time, she.. thank you! Cha Oct 2014 #9
I just put on the headphones while I read DU~ sheshe2 Oct 2014 #10
Yeah, it's a good idea.. I'm watching netflix now.. going back and forth between Cha Oct 2014 #11
LOL Iliyah Oct 2014 #12
The sky was supposed to be falling by now!!11! xfundy Oct 2014 #13
Alaska! Major Hogwash Oct 2014 #14
Arizona! Major Hogwash Oct 2014 #15
Idaho! Major Hogwash Oct 2014 #16
And here I thought Sarah and family owned... sheshe2 Oct 2014 #17
"We are one." ~ Bill Hicks Major Hogwash Oct 2014 #31
As allies we help to make it happen. sheshe2 Oct 2014 #81
Well, Sugar bear, you are not going to believe this! Major Hogwash Oct 2014 #103
I thought New Paltz, NY was first. LostInAnomie Oct 2014 #18
No sheshe2 Oct 2014 #19
Uhhh... isn't Feb. 27, 2004 before May 17, 2004? LostInAnomie Oct 2014 #22
How can the OP ignore this? Luminous Animal Oct 2014 #26
Probably too busy being pissed about having to look up wikipedia links. LostInAnomie Oct 2014 #28
They were not barred in MA. sheshe2 Oct 2014 #34
You're the one that got snippy about being wrong. LostInAnomie Oct 2014 #37
Yes. February is before May. Why did you say no? What kind of revisionist history are you trying to Luminous Animal Oct 2014 #27
10 years ago on February 12th, San Francisco introduces marriage equality! First in the nation. Luminous Animal Oct 2014 #20
You are the 2nd person that sheshe2 Oct 2014 #21
Link and I was there handing out flowers... Luminous Animal Oct 2014 #23
Yet sheshe2 Oct 2014 #29
So what. The title of you OP is a lie. It denies those who came first. And it denies the pioneers of Luminous Animal Oct 2014 #30
You want to have squatters rights? sheshe2 Oct 2014 #39
I want the truth. You seem unwilling to tell it. You take something factually beautiful and diminish Luminous Animal Oct 2014 #49
Your posts to me are very rude and ugly. sheshe2 Oct 2014 #95
Post removed Post removed Oct 2014 #96
Hold all the crap you posted me (ahem) sheshe2 Oct 2014 #99
Yup, those gay marriages were declared void! Major Hogwash Oct 2014 #33
Does that mean they didn't happen? Will you deny that marriage equality was INTRODUCED in Luminous Animal Oct 2014 #35
Since you want to jump on the OP for no apparent reason William769 Oct 2014 #41
Oh, I know that. And she was a peach! Totally off the grid. I wish I had an opportunity to Luminous Animal Oct 2014 #52
Ya think! sheshe2 Oct 2014 #40
This right here is why I stopped posting. William769 Oct 2014 #45
aaaah William.... sheshe2 Oct 2014 #51
I set them "straight". William769 Oct 2014 #53
I ain't strait. And I've been a member of queer politics for 3 decades. Luminous Animal Oct 2014 #55
Then act like it. nt William769 Oct 2014 #65
I am acting like it. San Francisco was the first in the nation to declare marriage Luminous Animal Oct 2014 #73
So you are denying what happened in Boulder in 1975. Alrighty then. William769 Oct 2014 #74
Apparently, you have no problem with the OP denying it. In fact, you seem to encourage her to deny. Luminous Animal Oct 2014 #78
The article is about a State legalizing Gay marriage. William769 Oct 2014 #82
Really? Massachusetts INTRODUCES US to marriage equality. INTRODUCED US? Luminous Animal Oct 2014 #86
Apparently, you also sent the OP "straight." Luminous Animal Oct 2014 #58
Not at all, from a leagel point of view she is correct. William769 Oct 2014 #60
It was legal in San Francisco when Newsom declared it so. Luminous Animal Oct 2014 #61
It was legal in Boulder too when it was issued. So whats your point? William769 Oct 2014 #62
So why aren't you ripping the OP a new one? Why are you not taking her to task for Luminous Animal Oct 2014 #69
So you agree with the OP that Massachusetts introduced the country to marriage equality. Luminous Animal Oct 2014 #64
Legally yes. William769 Oct 2014 #66
Nope. Legally, San Francisco did. What kind of person denies this.? Luminous Animal Oct 2014 #71
The same person that denies Boulder did it in 1975. William769 Oct 2014 #72
Boulder did not. A wonderful women did. Boulder and the state of Colorado denied her initiative. Luminous Animal Oct 2014 #77
That lady started the ball rolling. William769 Oct 2014 #79
So you agree. Massachusetts did NOT introduce us to marriage equality. Luminous Animal Oct 2014 #83
They did legally. I know it doesn't fit with what you are trying to sell. But there it is. William769 Oct 2014 #85
What am I trying to sell? Both San Francisco and New Paltz preceded Massachusetts, legally. Luminous Animal Oct 2014 #90
Then why were all those licenses voided by the Supreme Court if they were legal? William769 Oct 2014 #92
Really, William? They were legal when they were issued. They were legal when hundreds of Luminous Animal Oct 2014 #97
Shiiiitttttt, gurl, I knew that! Major Hogwash Oct 2014 #50
That's right. Gavin Newsom did it first. Then, it was the guy in New Paltz, NY. LostInAnomie Oct 2014 #24
Truly. Luminous Animal Oct 2014 #25
You are so wrong. William769 Oct 2014 #42
Maaannn! So the OP's article was wrong by 29 years and 2 months. LostInAnomie Oct 2014 #47
Not at all. William769 Oct 2014 #48
Well, since we are fighting over semantics. LostInAnomie Oct 2014 #67
Any reasonable sane person in touch with reality undtstands the article. William769 Oct 2014 #68
Meh... That's your prerogative to be demonstrably wrong. LostInAnomie Oct 2014 #75
You have yet to show where it's wrong. nt William769 Oct 2014 #76
Yeah, I did in two different ways. LostInAnomie Oct 2014 #91
Stupid thing to argue about. cherokeeprogressive Oct 2014 #32
No it isn't. I fucking hate revisionist history. It is a fucking fact that San Francisco INTRODUCED Luminous Animal Oct 2014 #36
No they didn't. Want to wipe the egg off your face now? William769 Oct 2014 #43
Nope. As GOVERNMENT policy, San Francisco was the first. Luminous Animal Oct 2014 #56
Just admit you were wrong and move on. William769 Oct 2014 #59
If I am wrong, then so is the OP. Take her to task. The balls in your court. Luminous Animal Oct 2014 #80
How is the OP wrong? William769 Oct 2014 #84
"Introduced gay marriage". It's like Columbus discover America. Luminous Animal Oct 2014 #87
So are you saying they did not legally introduce Gay marriage 10 years ago? William769 Oct 2014 #89
I am saying that Massachusetts did not introduce marriage equality. Luminous Animal Oct 2014 #93
I just got the low down on you. William769 Oct 2014 #94
Mind blowing that some politicians took almost a decade to agree MannyGoldstein Oct 2014 #38
Thanks for link! burrowowl Oct 2014 #44
You are so welcome! sheshe2 Oct 2014 #46
Ense petit placidam sub libertate quietem William769 Oct 2014 #54
I took Latin for several years... sheshe2 Oct 2014 #70
It's amazing how much has changed in twenty years. WhiteAndNerdy Oct 2014 #57
WhiteAndNerdy sheshe2 Oct 2014 #63
Excellent! Behind the Aegis Oct 2014 #88
Thank you my dear sweet BtA~ sheshe2 Oct 2014 #98
I know you have our backs. Behind the Aegis Oct 2014 #100
... sheshe2 Oct 2014 #112
I am glad we did not listen when so many here on DU told us to STFU, Jamastiene Oct 2014 #102
I never listen to people who say that. Major Hogwash Oct 2014 #104
If the rest of us listened to people like that, Jamastiene Oct 2014 #105
LET'S POST THIS FOUR TIMES In ALL CAPS mrsadm Oct 2014 #106
What's your Problem? Cha Oct 2014 #113
Message auto-removed Name removed Oct 2014 #108
After the fiasco in this thread last night over a much ado about nothing, I thought this appropriate William769 Oct 2014 #109
Actually it was pipi_k Oct 2014 #110
Thanks William! sheshe2 Oct 2014 #111

RKP5637

(67,111 posts)
1. And the world hasn't ended, all the straights have not turned gay, married straights
Sun Oct 19, 2014, 08:36 PM
Oct 2014

are not lining up for divorce in huge numbers and the sun still rises and sets! And the haters in life still hate!

 

mythology

(9,527 posts)
2. But it's coming, just you wait
Sun Oct 19, 2014, 08:44 PM
Oct 2014

Otherwise all of the hyperbolic panic some people had over gay marriage will just look silly.

MADem

(135,425 posts)
101. What about those cats and dogs, and lions and lambs? They're not "gettin' it on" yet?
Mon Oct 20, 2014, 02:42 AM
Oct 2014

Thought that was just around the darn corner, too!!!! After all, "the natural order of things" was somehow 'disturbed' by the change in the law!!!

Cha

(297,323 posts)
4. Thank Goodness .. We've come such a long way for Gay Rights since 2004 when
Sun Oct 19, 2014, 09:02 PM
Oct 2014

Julia and Hillary Goodridge made that historic walk into City Hall in Massachusetts!

"While many have championed the successful legal strategy that saved same-sex marriage in the state of California, for civil rights activists, it’s hard to overstate the importance of Goodridge which set an example for the country in terms of equal rights and the freedom to marry."

Mahalo she for your OP and the link to Bill's site.. it's brilliant!

sheshe2

(83,791 posts)
6. Hard to believe that was 10 years ago now!
Sun Oct 19, 2014, 09:14 PM
Oct 2014

Steps toward equality for all, sometimes baby steps yet we will get there.

Yes the site is brilliant and check out the music~ It's wonderful, something for everyone. I am listening to a collection of Flower Power!



Glad you have your power Cha, close call for you all!

Cha

(297,323 posts)
9. I will check out the music some time, she.. thank you!
Sun Oct 19, 2014, 09:23 PM
Oct 2014

And, mahalo for your well wishes for Hawaiians!

sheshe2

(83,791 posts)
10. I just put on the headphones while I read DU~
Sun Oct 19, 2014, 09:47 PM
Oct 2014

I gotta say it can make some of what you read here a little easier on the soul. I am using it as a substitute for the ignore feature, Cha~

Cha

(297,323 posts)
11. Yeah, it's a good idea.. I'm watching netflix now.. going back and forth between
Sun Oct 19, 2014, 09:55 PM
Oct 2014

that.. And, Pandora's box.. I'm trying to drown out my neighbor's boom boom boom music that he left on too loud and left his place. He's not answering the door.

Yeah, the Ignore Feature of DU.. glad we have it! Thank you, Skinner, EarlG, and Elad.

sheshe2

(83,791 posts)
17. And here I thought Sarah and family owned...
Sun Oct 19, 2014, 11:15 PM
Oct 2014

or punched the daylights out of the people of Alaska...

Poor wandering ones...

They are going to lose.

U.S. Supreme Court rules Alaska same-sex marriages can go forward; state vows to keep appealing

The U.S. Supreme Court denied Alaska’s request for an emergency stay Friday morning, allowing same-sex marriages to resume in the state.

The one-line response came at 11:01 a.m., just one minute after a stay from the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals dissolved as scheduled.

The order allows marriages to proceed. However, with state offices closed in observance of Alaska Day, it was impossible for couples to apply for a marriage license or pick up licenses that had been issued earlier in the week. Marriages are set to resume Monday.

http://www.adn.com/article/20141017/us-supreme-court-rules-alaska-same-sex-marriages-can-go-forward-state-vows-keep-0

No group can stand alone, it is past time, we need to stand together, none of us can win on our own. It's not just about Women or PoC or LGBT or our Jewish brothers and sisters that are being targeted it is about all of us raising our voices for the equality we so rightly desearve. It is time for allies to stand up and support each other. Our collective voices are far stronger than a single voice.

We have all tried it alone, it's time to do it together. Equality!

We can do this together MH! Yes we can.

Major Hogwash

(17,656 posts)
31. "We are one." ~ Bill Hicks
Mon Oct 20, 2014, 12:04 AM
Oct 2014

There is a YouTube video of Bill talking about this very thing, how we are all ONE with each other.

In just one day, 76 gay couples were married on Wednesday in Boise this last week.
I think they said over 108 gay couples were married on that one day alone in the state.

We are truly changing the face of America, sheshe!!
They can't take it away from us!

Just like you said in that poignant thread that you made last week, "it is mine, they can never take it from me!!"

Man, that was powerful writing!
Take a bow, you deserve it!!!!


<--- sheshe taking a bow

sheshe2

(83,791 posts)
81. As allies we help to make it happen.
Mon Oct 20, 2014, 01:45 AM
Oct 2014

"In just one day, 76 gay couples were married on Wednesday in Boise this last week.
I think they said over 108 gay couples were married on that one day alone in the state."


Go Boise and Go America!

We grow stronger. No...they can't take that away from us, not ever.

Thank you Major~

Major Hogwash

(17,656 posts)
103. Well, Sugar bear, you are not going to believe this!
Mon Oct 20, 2014, 03:43 AM
Oct 2014
But, this issue of gay marriages came up in the first face-to-face public tv debate our Republican Governor had with his Democratic opponent, on the very same day as the day when the Supreme Court struck down the Idaho law banning gay marriages because it was unconstitutional!!!!

But, but, but . . the Republican Governor said that he was going to fight, fight, fight to keep gay marriages from ever occurring in the state of Idaho in that public debate.
Even after the Supreme Court had said that Idaho's law banning gay marriages was unconstitutional.
That's how stupid our Governor is.
But, that same Republican Governor also stated in that debate that he would uphold Idaho's Constitution, thinking that somehow, some way they could overturn the Supreme Court's decision.

So, just today, almost 10 days after the Supreme Court told the Governor of Idaho that his case against allowing gay marriages was NOT constitutional, the Democratic challenger released a new tv ad.
No, sadly, Chuck Toad was not in this one saying that the Republican Governor had disqualified himself.

But, the former acting Governor was in that new tv ad!
Standing right next to our present Governor in several frames in that ad.
Why?
Because he was the one that was so loud and proud about signing that anti-gay bill in to law that banned gay marriages in Idaho back in 2006!
And now that same former acting Governor is our U.S. Senator.
You see, the Republicans here just keep changing the deck chairs on the Titanic.
Then they play a round of the cakewalk game to see who will be sitting in a public office this election year.
And that particular Senator is up for re-election this year!

So, in just 1 fell swoop, the Democratic challenger for Governor in this year's mid-term election, trying very hard to become our next Governor, struck out at both of those Republicans in his ad, for them both being anti-gay bigots, without ever really saying that they are both anti-gay bigots!!

sheshe2

(83,791 posts)
19. No
Sun Oct 19, 2014, 11:24 PM
Oct 2014

New Paltz marriages[edit]

On February 27, 2004, New Paltz Mayor Jason West married 25 same-sex couples before a cheering crowd in front of the New Paltz Village Hall. Not long thereafter, the Ulster County District Attorney charged West with nineteen misdemeanors in connection with these marriages.[6] A court later dismissed the charges against West, a ruling which the state appealed. Ulster County Court Judge J. Michael Bruhn ruled in favor of the state, reinstating the charges against West, arguing that this criminal case did not concern whether the state constitution mandates same-sex marriage, but rather whether West violated his oath of office in performing illegal marriages. The May 2005 charges against West were reinstated; these were dropped by the prosecutor on July 12. After Liberty Counsel filed a civil lawsuit challenging the validity of the marriages, a state court judge issued a permanent injunction barring West from solemnizing same-sex marriages.[7][8]


On February 27, 2004, Nyack, New York, mayor John Shields announced that he would recognize the New Paltz marriages and on March 1, 2004, Ithaca mayor Carolyn K. Peterson declared that she would recognize same-sex marriages performed in other jurisdictions.[9]

Two days later, then-Attorney General of New York Eliot Spitzer, a supporter of same-sex marriage, issued an "informal opinion" stating that municipal clerks should not issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples since the New York State Legislature had not intended for the Domestic Relations Law to cover same-sex couples.[10]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Same-sex_marriage_in_New_York

sheshe2

(83,791 posts)
34. They were not barred in MA.
Mon Oct 20, 2014, 12:12 AM
Oct 2014

From my link,

After Liberty Counsel filed a civil lawsuit challenging the validity of the marriages, a state court judge issued a permanent injunction barring West from solemnizing same-sex marriages.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Same-sex_marriage_in_New_York
Amazing, absolutely amazing that you make this a cat fight. That is just sad.

Go for it, take first rights, I don't give a damn.

A right to choose who to love and who to marry is a right. You want to make something beautiful a fight, then go for it. there is no happiness or beauty left on DU. It is always an ugly fight.

Goodnight to you.

LostInAnomie

(14,428 posts)
37. You're the one that got snippy about being wrong.
Mon Oct 20, 2014, 12:22 AM
Oct 2014

Gay marriages took place in SF and New Paltz months before MA. So, unless you are stretching the word "introduced" to the point of meaninglessness, MA didn't introduce gay marriage.

Luminous Animal

(27,310 posts)
27. Yes. February is before May. Why did you say no? What kind of revisionist history are you trying to
Sun Oct 19, 2014, 11:59 PM
Oct 2014

peddle here? And why?

San Francisco first. New Paltz second. Historical fact.

sheshe2

(83,791 posts)
21. You are the 2nd person that
Sun Oct 19, 2014, 11:34 PM
Oct 2014

stated something without a link, Luminous Animal. You may very well be correct, yet I don't feel like doing the research for you all.

The last poster was wrong. I found that link.

I am kindly asking for some facts.

Thank you in advance.
sheshe2

Luminous Animal

(27,310 posts)
23. Link and I was there handing out flowers...
Sun Oct 19, 2014, 11:38 PM
Oct 2014

One of the happiest experiences of my life. And 4 days before my daughters bday and what inspired one of her best friends, age 14, to come out to his family. His mom did not take it well, so he moved in with us.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/San_Francisco_2004_same-sex_weddings

sheshe2

(83,791 posts)
29. Yet
Mon Oct 20, 2014, 12:00 AM
Oct 2014

On August 12, exactly six months after the first licenses were issued to same-sex couples in San Francisco, the state Supreme Court ruled unanimously that the City and County of San Francisco had exceeded its authority and violated state law by issuing the marriage licenses. In a 5-2 decision in Lockyer v. City and County of San Francisco, the court also declared all same-sex marriages performed in San Francisco on the basis of those licenses to be void. It expressed no opinion on the constitutionality of the denial of marriage rights to same-sex couples.[12][13]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/San_Francisco_2004_same-sex_weddings

Good for you LA. I too would have been a proud supporter of my friends so many of them gay. I stand with them. They deserve our support.

Luminous Animal

(27,310 posts)
30. So what. The title of you OP is a lie. It denies those who came first. And it denies the pioneers of
Mon Oct 20, 2014, 12:02 AM
Oct 2014

equality. That is bullshit.

sheshe2

(83,791 posts)
39. You want to have squatters rights?
Mon Oct 20, 2014, 12:23 AM
Oct 2014

Go for it. Take it, it's all yours.

You take something beautiful, something you say you love and support and make it into ugly insults to me.

That is just shameful. I am aware that you don't like me much, yet to trash me and my thread about equality for LGBT, I am beyond amazed. Too much hate and no equality for all. No wonder we lose every damn time!

Luminous Animal

(27,310 posts)
49. I want the truth. You seem unwilling to tell it. You take something factually beautiful and diminish
Mon Oct 20, 2014, 12:47 AM
Oct 2014

it by posting a FACTUAL inaccuracy.

That is, you deny the pioneers. That one human being that made state supreme courts take action. That one human being that led the movement all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court... those human beings that lined up on the steps of the San Francisco city hall in order to get married.

You deny them as being PIONEERS. You deny this city as being PIONEERS. You take credit for something that is not your's for which to take credit.

TELL THE FUCKING TRUTH. It is not about you or me IT IS TELLING THE FUCKING TRUTH.

How difficult is that?

sheshe2

(83,791 posts)
95. Your posts to me are very rude and ugly.
Mon Oct 20, 2014, 02:05 AM
Oct 2014

I did not do that to you LA.

And you yell at me as well.

TELL THE FUCKING TRUTH. It is not about you or me IT IS TELLING THE FUCKING TRUTH.

How difficult is that?


Your comments are painful, I do not understand your anger and ridicule that you have displayed in this thread. Kudos you handed out flowers at LGBT marriages and your daughters friend had the courage to come out, yet you trash me here on my thread.

I support LGBT! And you F**King trash me.

As I said, if you wish squatters rights then they are yours.Go for it and rule!

I will go with the peoples rights, all the people.

Response to sheshe2 (Reply #95)

sheshe2

(83,791 posts)
99. Hold all the crap you posted me (ahem)
Mon Oct 20, 2014, 02:32 AM
Oct 2014

close to your heart. That may comfort you.

I too seek honesty on those that truly support LGBTQ Rights.

Good night!

Major Hogwash

(17,656 posts)
33. Yup, those gay marriages were declared void!
Mon Oct 20, 2014, 12:08 AM
Oct 2014

I guess you have just met up with some rather dubious characters here on DU, huh?


William769

(55,147 posts)
41. Since you want to jump on the OP for no apparent reason
Mon Oct 20, 2014, 12:34 AM
Oct 2014

It's time for you to eat some humble pie.

The first marriage license issued in the United States was in 1975! And it was not in San Francisco.

If you want to argue the facts with me go right ahead (you will lose BTW) but lay off the OP.

Luminous Animal

(27,310 posts)
52. Oh, I know that. And she was a peach! Totally off the grid. I wish I had an opportunity to
Mon Oct 20, 2014, 12:55 AM
Oct 2014

hug her. Thanks for the reminder.

sheshe2

(83,791 posts)
40. Ya think!
Mon Oct 20, 2014, 12:33 AM
Oct 2014

Read what I posted to them.

I for one will not sully something beautiful by claiming squatters rights. They want to claim their territory then they can have it. I don't give a damn. They want to insult me, again I don't give a damn. This thread should not be a pissing contest.

It's about equality for all and we have to have all the ugly. I am so damn tired.

I am an ally and stand for LGBT rights, I always will.

Thanks MH!

sheshe2

(83,791 posts)
51. aaaah William....
Mon Oct 20, 2014, 12:54 AM
Oct 2014

Tears.

So much ugly for no reason at all. I don't think I will ever understand the hate.

I posted something I believed to be uplifting about a minority rising, then as a minority I am slapped in the face. I am piled on and insulted.

I am tired.

Luminous Animal

(27,310 posts)
55. I ain't strait. And I've been a member of queer politics for 3 decades.
Mon Oct 20, 2014, 01:01 AM
Oct 2014

Member of Lesbian Avengers. Member of Act Up. Member of Queer Nation. Co-producer of the publication 'Anything That Moves'.

I do not crawl into any hole.

Lovely that you can thing using "straight" against me as an insult. Lovely that you think that you can use "straight" as an insult to anyone.

Luminous Animal

(27,310 posts)
73. I am acting like it. San Francisco was the first in the nation to declare marriage
Mon Oct 20, 2014, 01:35 AM
Oct 2014

equality, on a government level, a legal contract.

William769

(55,147 posts)
82. The article is about a State legalizing Gay marriage.
Mon Oct 20, 2014, 01:46 AM
Oct 2014

What do you fail to see about that? Are you now saying it didn't happen?

Luminous Animal

(27,310 posts)
86. Really? Massachusetts INTRODUCES US to marriage equality. INTRODUCED US?
Mon Oct 20, 2014, 01:52 AM
Oct 2014

Every post that you have sent to me says that that is not true.

William769

(55,147 posts)
60. Not at all, from a leagel point of view she is correct.
Mon Oct 20, 2014, 01:10 AM
Oct 2014

ETA: In case you have not figured it out yet. I'm Bill.

William769

(55,147 posts)
62. It was legal in Boulder too when it was issued. So whats your point?
Mon Oct 20, 2014, 01:18 AM
Oct 2014

This is not the first time you have tried to derail a supportive LGBT thread and I am positive it won't be your last, and that's just sad I mean really sad.

Luminous Animal

(27,310 posts)
69. So why aren't you ripping the OP a new one? Why are you not taking her to task for
Mon Oct 20, 2014, 01:31 AM
Oct 2014

spreading disinformation?

And show me the links EVER that I have derailed a LGBT (um) Q thread ever. Not once ever.

Luminous Animal

(27,310 posts)
64. So you agree with the OP that Massachusetts introduced the country to marriage equality.
Mon Oct 20, 2014, 01:20 AM
Oct 2014

Except when you don't. Okey-doke. So it is written on DU; so it shall be done. IN CAPS!

William769

(55,147 posts)
66. Legally yes.
Mon Oct 20, 2014, 01:24 AM
Oct 2014

I know you don't care about the fact though, you just want to argue. What kind of person does that? That's a rhetorical question BTW.

Luminous Animal

(27,310 posts)
77. Boulder did not. A wonderful women did. Boulder and the state of Colorado denied her initiative.
Mon Oct 20, 2014, 01:41 AM
Oct 2014

San Francisco's government, opened up a national movement for marriage equality.

William769

(55,147 posts)
79. That lady started the ball rolling.
Mon Oct 20, 2014, 01:44 AM
Oct 2014

And the National movement was well before San Francisco those are the fact, deal with them.

William769

(55,147 posts)
92. Then why were all those licenses voided by the Supreme Court if they were legal?
Mon Oct 20, 2014, 02:01 AM
Oct 2014

That hole keeps getting deeper.

Luminous Animal

(27,310 posts)
97. Really, William? They were legal when they were issued. They were legal when hundreds of
Mon Oct 20, 2014, 02:26 AM
Oct 2014

couples turned out to get married. It's as if you would cite Loving v Virginia prior to it getting to the Supreme Court as justification for their marriage being illegal.

Major Hogwash

(17,656 posts)
50. Shiiiitttttt, gurl, I knew that!
Mon Oct 20, 2014, 12:47 AM
Oct 2014

Last edited Mon Oct 20, 2014, 04:05 AM - Edit history (1)

Don't let them bother you none, hon.
It ain't no big thing, anyways.

The Sioux Indian Nation, just to name one of the tribes as an example, recognized gay marriages over 150 years ago!
White men who think they are large and in charge didn't like it back then anymore than they like it today!
They better get used to it, is all I can say about it.
Ain't no thing to get hung up about, gurl.

My son has been texting me all day, and it looks like he can't spell out real words anymore!!!

hu <---- I think this is supposed to mean "huh", but that's just a guess

k dad <---- at least he agreed with me, "k" is supposed to mean okay to me now, I guess

whut <---- I should smack him up side the head for talking to me like he is a thug

I learned a new one today ----> gurl, spelled with a "U" if she is a hottie!

That is really lazy texting, if you axe me.



I can't meet up with you before Christmas, but I am determined to meet with you this year!
So, keep New Year's Eve open on your calendar, k gurl?

LostInAnomie

(14,428 posts)
24. That's right. Gavin Newsom did it first. Then, it was the guy in New Paltz, NY.
Sun Oct 19, 2014, 11:40 PM
Oct 2014

The OP's article must be getting creative with the word "introduced".

William769

(55,147 posts)
48. Not at all.
Mon Oct 20, 2014, 12:46 AM
Oct 2014

The one the OP is talking about are legal. See the difference? BTW that's my website linked in the OP and I do not like the bullying mentality that was used against shehshe. You two should be ashamed of yourselves.

LostInAnomie

(14,428 posts)
67. Well, since we are fighting over semantics.
Mon Oct 20, 2014, 01:27 AM
Oct 2014

Since all the bans are unconstitutional, they are all legal.

I'm guessing you mean to use "legal" by some kind of strict definition though. Kind of like I like to use the word "introduced". Since gay marriage was apparently "introduced" 29 years before MA did it, the title of the article is bullshit.

You might want to change it on your website.

LostInAnomie

(14,428 posts)
75. Meh... That's your prerogative to be demonstrably wrong.
Mon Oct 20, 2014, 01:38 AM
Oct 2014

It's nothing I would be proud of or advertise on a my own website though.

LostInAnomie

(14,428 posts)
91. Yeah, I did in two different ways.
Mon Oct 20, 2014, 02:00 AM
Oct 2014

1. "TEN YEARS AGO, MASSACHUSETTS INTRODUCED US TO GAY MARRIAGE"

Words tend to mean something. The word "introduced" means: to present (a person, product, etc.) to a particular group of individuals or to the general public for or as if for the first time by a formal act, announcement, series of recommendations or events, etc. Since as you stated down thread the first gay marriage was performed in 1975, it would be impossible to be "introduced" in May, 2004. This is especially true since they were also performed in SF and New Paltz in Feb., 2004.

2. Since gay marriage bans are unconstitutional, the marriages in 1975 and Feb. 2004 were legal.

Even you yourself said down thread "It was legal in Boulder too when it was issued." when you were fighting with LA over if Boulder of SF did it first. You can't have it both ways. They were either legal and your article is wrong, or it wasn't legal when Boulder issued the the marriage certificate and you are just engaging in sophistry to win an argument.

Luminous Animal

(27,310 posts)
36. No it isn't. I fucking hate revisionist history. It is a fucking fact that San Francisco INTRODUCED
Mon Oct 20, 2014, 12:18 AM
Oct 2014

marriage equality to a nation. And that is how the history books should be written.

Luminous Animal

(27,310 posts)
87. "Introduced gay marriage". It's like Columbus discover America.
Mon Oct 20, 2014, 01:53 AM
Oct 2014

She even challenged the fact that San Francisco and New Paltz preceded Massachusetts.

William769

(55,147 posts)
89. So are you saying they did not legally introduce Gay marriage 10 years ago?
Mon Oct 20, 2014, 01:55 AM
Oct 2014

Inquiring minds want to know!

Luminous Animal

(27,310 posts)
93. I am saying that Massachusetts did not introduce marriage equality.
Mon Oct 20, 2014, 02:03 AM
Oct 2014

Even Sheshe challenged two of us when we told her that marriage equality was declared legal on a government level prior to Massachusetts.

I did not question her on the remarkable impact. I questioned her on her historical ignorance.

 

MannyGoldstein

(34,589 posts)
38. Mind blowing that some politicians took almost a decade to agree
Mon Oct 20, 2014, 12:22 AM
Oct 2014

Then they're called "pioneering" on LGBT issues, LOL!

Hooray for MA SJC!

WhiteAndNerdy

(365 posts)
57. It's amazing how much has changed in twenty years.
Mon Oct 20, 2014, 01:08 AM
Oct 2014

I came out in 1994, and I was pretty impressed that my city even had a non-discrimination ordinance protecting us back then. We were talking about gays in the military and same-sex marriage, but I couldn't imagine either happening in my lifetime. I've reached an age where "twenty years ago" doesn't feel like very long, so it just amazes me how much has changed, and how fast. Sometimes I have to remind myself that it wasn't really just yesterday, and a lot of people have worked very hard to make it all possible.

Behind the Aegis

(53,961 posts)
88. Excellent!
Mon Oct 20, 2014, 01:54 AM
Oct 2014

Because of this, two weeks ago, Oklahoma finally allowed for my partner and me to become husbands (hasn't happened...YET!!). This is important to the GLBT movement, but Kailani Koenig-Muenster, the author of the piece should be horsewhipped for being a historical revisionist!

No matter how good the news, there will always be someone who, in their quest to feel superior to others, will shit all over the information! You hang in there!




ETA: Goodridge v. Department of Public Health – that brought same-sex marriage to the first state in the country,...

sheshe2

(83,791 posts)
98. Thank you my dear sweet BtA~
Mon Oct 20, 2014, 02:27 AM
Oct 2014

The vitriol in this thread makes my head spin. Something beautiful has to be trashed and ground under ones foot. We can never celebrate, that's not allowed anymore in this country and not at DU as well.

Any step forward is hindered and fought. Truth! Some here can't seem to handle the simple truth that we are moving forward. Yes we move slowly. Yes I wanted it yesterday, I am smart enough to know that will never happen, look where women stand right now.

We need to stand together, all of us. It is Crystal clear to me, we do it together or we will never do it at all.

Hang in there? Yes I will try yet it is not easy, not that I ever expected it to be.

I await your wedding announcement. Mazel tov~

Behind the Aegis

(53,961 posts)
100. I know you have our backs.
Mon Oct 20, 2014, 02:34 AM
Oct 2014

I am sorry to see what has happened (not too terribly surprised), but I have only this to say to you:



Remember that!

As for my marriage, y'all will know! LOL!

Jamastiene

(38,187 posts)
102. I am glad we did not listen when so many here on DU told us to STFU,
Mon Oct 20, 2014, 03:33 AM
Oct 2014

sit down, and wait our turn. We would still be without any rights at all if we listened to those jerks, lol. Thankfully, we had great allies here too.

Major Hogwash

(17,656 posts)
104. I never listen to people who say that.
Mon Oct 20, 2014, 03:56 AM
Oct 2014

They have no idea how silly they look in a Democratic Republic, where EVERYONE, regardless of age, physical ability, sex, gender, sexual orientation, sexual preferences, sexual identity, religion, race, color, or creed has a voice in how this government is managed.

We didn't shut down the federal government last year, the freakin' Republicans did!
And they told everyone who didn't like it to STFU.

But, I didn't listen to them then!!
And I am not listening to them now!!

Ain't life grand?

Jamastiene

(38,187 posts)
105. If the rest of us listened to people like that,
Mon Oct 20, 2014, 04:29 AM
Oct 2014

we would all still be in the dark with no fire and no lights and nothing. No one would have ever invented anything either. It's best not to listen to them. They would only hold us back.

Response to sheshe2 (Original post)

William769

(55,147 posts)
109. After the fiasco in this thread last night over a much ado about nothing, I thought this appropriate
Mon Oct 20, 2014, 02:24 PM
Oct 2014


And yes she is a DIVA!

pipi_k

(21,020 posts)
110. Actually it was
Mon Oct 20, 2014, 03:10 PM
Oct 2014

much ado about LESS than nothing.

Because some people obviously don't know the difference between introducing something and introducing us TO something.

It's true the concept of same-sex marriage didn't originate in Mass. If it did, then it would be proper to say we introduced it.

What the OP said was that Mass "introduced us to same sex marriage". Because it's not a new concept. Mass didn't invent it. Mass only introduced people TO the (preexisting) concept on a state-wide scale.

So instead of this happy event being celebrated, what took place up above was a sad and shameful demonstration of threadjacking for the sake of being "right". Ego stroking.

Brilliant. Just brilliant.


Well, whatever. I don't give a shit if ten other cities or towns thought of it first. I'm still proud of living in a state that didn't explode or fall into the ocean just because gays have been able to marry here for ten years.

sheshe2

(83,791 posts)
111. Thanks William!
Mon Oct 20, 2014, 03:15 PM
Oct 2014

I love Dolly Parton and " Put a Little Love in Your Heart" is perfect.


Lol~ love your smilie!

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»TEN YEARS AGO, MASSACHUSE...