Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Scuba

(53,475 posts)
Sun Oct 19, 2014, 08:45 PM Oct 2014

Top Doc Says Ebola Shows Skewed Priorities

http://www.progressive.org/news/2014/10/187889/top-doc-says-ebola-shows-skewed-priorities


Dr. Walter Tsou, past president of the American Public Health Association and the former health commissioner for Philadelphia, says that the Ebola crisis shows the skewed priorities of the U.S. health care system. “Our chronic disease-oriented health care system is ill-equipped to address an acute infectious disease outbreak,” Dr. Tsou, a board adviser to Physicians for a National Health Program, tells The Progressive. “We don't have enough biocontainment units, sufficiently trained experts on how to control for highly infectious disease agents, trained sanitation crews who can clean up and properly handle waste disposal.”

Tsou says that the Ebola epidemic has uncovered big flaws in the global health system, too. “We have known about Ebola since 1976 and yet we still have no vaccine or treatment,” he points out. “The fact that we are now scrambling to find some type of vaccine and treatment only speaks to the paucity of research that we have invested in the developing world. In the cruel economics of the pharmaceutical industry, unless the drugs promise a significant return on investment, they are unwilling to invest in it essentially condemning most of the developing world.”

The Ebola crisis has also made apparent the impact of drastic health budget cuts. Bloomberg News reports that there’s been a nearly one-fifth reduction in public health employees at the state and local levels in just the last six years, with 60,000 fewer people employed than in 2008. This manifests itself in many ways.

...

“The World Health Organization is a shadow of what it should be and is unable to mount a ‘boots on the ground surveillance, mitigation and quarantine program,” he says. “The United Nations has called for the world to donate $1 billion to confront the Ebola crisis, but we only have $100,000 in the bank so far.”
4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Top Doc Says Ebola Shows Skewed Priorities (Original Post) Scuba Oct 2014 OP
This is the real problem we face here in the US when it comes to this outbreak. iemitsu Oct 2014 #1
US ignores early detection/ Prevention ErikJ Oct 2014 #2
we need to hear more KT2000 Oct 2014 #3
We have lots of nasty emerging diseases in the US that are not getting any attention. greatlaurel Oct 2014 #4

iemitsu

(3,888 posts)
1. This is the real problem we face here in the US when it comes to this outbreak.
Sun Oct 19, 2014, 09:14 PM
Oct 2014

We have a shitty health care system. It is designed to make money not to promote a healthy society.
I'm afraid that until we get the profit out of health care we will never be equipped to handle this sort of occurrence. It simply cost too much to train people and equip facilities with rarely used items.

 

ErikJ

(6,335 posts)
2. US ignores early detection/ Prevention
Sun Oct 19, 2014, 11:42 PM
Oct 2014

The main reason for universal health care is to contain epidemics which even benefits the very rich.

Red states like Texas have left up to 1/4 of their residents uninsured. That means if a guy feels sick and thinks he should have them checked out but cant afford it, he may end up spreading ebola to 10 other people before he comes in.

KT2000

(20,584 posts)
3. we need to hear more
Mon Oct 20, 2014, 01:14 AM
Oct 2014

from public health specialists. They are the ones with the big picture. Doctors and bean counters do NOT have any concept of the big picture.

greatlaurel

(2,004 posts)
4. We have lots of nasty emerging diseases in the US that are not getting any attention.
Mon Oct 20, 2014, 01:15 AM
Oct 2014

There is lots of potential for zoonotic diseases to emerge in North America, too. As more and more previously uninhabited or sparsely inhabited areas are taken over for human habitation, there are more interactions with native animals which increases the risk of disease transmission. Hantavirus is pretty worrisome.

Then we have some really nasty diseases that cross into farm animals, but not humans such as EHD http://www.michigan.gov/dnr/0,1607,7-153-10370_12150-26647--,00.html
We had an outbreak of EHD near our where we live and it killed between 40 and 50 deer. The game warden said the meat was safe to eat. I would have to be pretty hungry to try that. The vultures in the area ate well for quite awhile. It is a really gruesome disease, but all the hemorrhagic diseases are pretty awful.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Top Doc Says Ebola Shows ...