Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsUS Military Ebola Team in the US - when the only thing you fund is the military,
the mil is the only tool our government has.
I can see where all this is going. Don't like it.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
6 replies, 672 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (1)
ReplyReply to this post
6 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
US Military Ebola Team in the US - when the only thing you fund is the military, (Original Post)
elehhhhna
Oct 2014
OP
Earth_First
(14,910 posts)1. I agree.
The CDC has had it's budget effectively decimated.
There is no reason why a civilian response team cannot be funded, created, trained and deployed.
The option of last resort being our military is a situation I am not the least bit enthusiastic about either...
dixiegrrrrl
(60,010 posts)3. About that CDC budget
The CDC will get a RAISE, actually.
How it chooses to spend its budget is another story.
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention will see an 8.2 percent budget increase for fiscal 2014, thanks to a $1.1 trillion spending bill announced by Congress Jan. 13.
This influx of cash will raise the CDC budget to $6.9 billion, which is $567 million more than it received in 2013.
This is more than the agency anticipated, because the president's fiscal year 2014 budget request for it was just $6.6 billion -- a decrease of $270 million from fiscal 2012.
Of the $6.9 billion, $1.3 billion was allocated to protect the United States from foreign and domestic threats, both intentional and naturally occurring.
$255 million will go to support bio-defense efforts, and $160 million will be set aside for states to address their most pressing public health needs.
The CDC will get $30 million for Advanced Molecular Detection (AMD), which will help identify potential disease outbreaks earlier and more accurately.
This influx of cash will raise the CDC budget to $6.9 billion, which is $567 million more than it received in 2013.
This is more than the agency anticipated, because the president's fiscal year 2014 budget request for it was just $6.6 billion -- a decrease of $270 million from fiscal 2012.
Of the $6.9 billion, $1.3 billion was allocated to protect the United States from foreign and domestic threats, both intentional and naturally occurring.
$255 million will go to support bio-defense efforts, and $160 million will be set aside for states to address their most pressing public health needs.
The CDC will get $30 million for Advanced Molecular Detection (AMD), which will help identify potential disease outbreaks earlier and more accurately.
http://www.bizjournals.com/atlanta/news/2014/01/17/cdc-wins-in-budget-deal.html?page=all
Anyone can read the CDC Budget summary here, free download:
http://assets.bizjournals.com/atlanta/pdf/cdc%20budget%20req%20sum%202014.pdf
bemildred
(90,061 posts)2. +1. One trick pony, that's us. nt
Adrahil
(13,340 posts)4. Well, that's PARTLY true...
But keep in mind that the U.S. military has massive logistical capabilities. We're not exactly sending over mechanized infantry battalions.
SidDithers
(44,228 posts)5. Where is it all going?...nt
Sid
HereSince1628
(36,063 posts)6. The alternative is something like Halliburton, Bendix or KBR
Like those better?
It wouldn't surprise me if some corporations must be involved in support of this military effort anyway.