Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Veilex

(1,555 posts)
Fri Oct 24, 2014, 04:51 PM Oct 2014

BP's Politico puff piece wasn't just shady journalism ethics -- it was mostly a lie

Originally posted here.

BP, with a huge assist from the popular Beltway-insider website Politico, stirred up the muddy waters of the Deepwater Horizon spill aftermath this week when it published a corporate-love-letter-disguised-as-news entitled, "No, BP Didn't Ruin the Gulf." Anyone expecting humility from a firm whose court-certified wanton negligence killed 11 people and seriously polluted America's most precious natural resource clearly hasn't followed the story lately.

The story hit the Internet Wednesday morning and caused an immediate stir -- but mostly on the topic of journalism ethics. For one thing, the story initially had the trappings of a news article, without the large label of "Opinion" that such an op-ed is expected to carry (that changed after the outcry); readers got to the bottom of the piece before learning it was written by BP's in-house spin-doctor-in-chief, corporate spokesman Geoff Morrell. What's more, enterprising reporters noted that BP has been a long-time major advertiser with Politico, raising eyebrows whether the favorable treatment was an ethically dubious quid-pro-quo.

All of that troubled me, to be sure. Anyone who cares about open and fair public discourse should be worried about the state of modern journalism. But the ethics controversy wasn't what troubled me the most. What bothered me about the piece -- and should bother all readers -- is that the claims by Morrell are sometimes dubious, sometimes misleading, and much of the time just an old-fashioned lie. Those of us who've followed the story for the last four years can feel pretty confident in saying this:

Yes, BP actually did ruin the Gulf.

Let's look at some of the key points in Morrell's argument:

-- Remarkably, Morrell peddles a bogus storyline about the 2010 oil spill -- that in his words, "most of the environmental impact was of short duration and in a limited geographic area." In reality,the widely respected National Wildlife Federation reported just this year that devastating impacts on marine life, on tourism, and on animals as well as humans, remain. I'd like to see Morrell sell his "short duration" line to the Gulf's sea turtles -- who are stranded, in distress, at five times the rate before the 2010 disaster, or to dolphins still struggling with disease and miscarriages four years after the spill.


http://www.dailykos.com/story/2014/10/24/1338848/-BP-s-Politico-puff-piece-wasn-t-just-shady-journalism-ethics-it-was-mostly-a-lie?detail=facebook
11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
BP's Politico puff piece wasn't just shady journalism ethics -- it was mostly a lie (Original Post) Veilex Oct 2014 OP
Wasn't Morrell a steno for one of the Wellstone ruled Oct 2014 #1
Wouldn't surpise me. Veilex Oct 2014 #2
A seamless transition from the Pentagon to BP. GeorgeGist Oct 2014 #3
This message was self-deleted by its author Aerows Oct 2014 #4
When the media is complicit, we all suffer Wella Oct 2014 #5
Kick to the corporate pants of BP Octafish Oct 2014 #6
Agree that BP assets should have been seized and the company nationalized. Scuba Oct 2014 #10
Is it not implied when you say Politico? Mass Oct 2014 #7
"Is it not implied when you say Politico?" Generally, I tend to agree with your assessment. Veilex Oct 2014 #8
Agreed Mass Oct 2014 #9
K & R !!! WillyT Oct 2014 #11

GeorgeGist

(25,321 posts)
3. A seamless transition from the Pentagon to BP.
Fri Oct 24, 2014, 05:36 PM
Oct 2014


Last week, BP America hired former Department of Defense spokesman, Geoff Morrell, as its head of communications.

The move sheds light on the central tenet of American national security policy dating back to President Franklin Delano Roosevelt’s not-so-well-known, but crucial 1945 meeting with then King of Saudi Arabia, Ibn Saud. That is, what Hampshire College Professor of Peace and World Security Studies, Michael Klare, calls a foreign policy of “Blood for Oil,” which was outlined in full as such vis-a-vis the 1980 “Carter Doctrine,” presented as part of President Jimmy Carter’s 1980 State of the Union Address.

'snip'
http://my.firedoglake.com/stevehorn1022/2011/09/14/seamless-transition-pentagon-spokesman-geoff-morrell-moves-to-bp-america/

Response to Veilex (Original post)

 

Wella

(1,827 posts)
5. When the media is complicit, we all suffer
Fri Oct 24, 2014, 06:08 PM
Oct 2014

BP DID ruin the Gulf and their execs should have been imprisoned.

Mass

(27,315 posts)
7. Is it not implied when you say Politico?
Fri Oct 24, 2014, 08:07 PM
Oct 2014

I have stopped reading them because they are nothing more than a stenographer for diverse special interests.

This piece is more ethical than most, as it lists the source as somebody from BP (and yes, those are lies, but as BP wrote the article, is it not obvious that it is at best spin?). Most of their articles are just made up of blind quotes.

 

Veilex

(1,555 posts)
8. "Is it not implied when you say Politico?" Generally, I tend to agree with your assessment.
Fri Oct 24, 2014, 08:23 PM
Oct 2014

All the same, calling it out and shining a light down on it is a good practice.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»BP's Politico puff piece ...