General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThe Passion of John Singer Sargent: El Jaleo’s Dancer
El Jaleo: Danse des Gitanes by Sargent, 1882, Isabella Stewart Gardner Museum, Boston
[IMG][/IMG]
Isabella Stewart Gardner was an imperious and eccentric art collector and wealthy socialite in Boston in the latter years of the 19th century. She created a museum where she, and she alone, dictated the terms of the paintings exhibition. Mrs. Gardner specified in her will that none of the paintings in her collection can be rethought, rehung or rearranged. If her edict is not carried out, the entire collection must be auctioned off and the museum closed.
El Jaleo is one of 60 paintings by John Singer Sargent (whom she befriended) that she bought for her collection. She had definite ideas of how to show it.
Here is her tableaux for this painting in the museums Spanish Cloister.
[IMG][/IMG]
Painted in Sargents Paris studio, El Jaleo was first exhibited in the Paris Exhibition of 1882.Sargent had depended on passion and memory in creating the canvas. He had been to Spain and fell in love with the Flamenco music he experienced and believed that (because of some Jewish ancestry in his family) he was himself somehow related to gypsies, a distrusted, if not despised group in Europe in the second half of the 19th century.
At the same time, Flamenco music performance was becoming popular in Paris. Flamenco evolved from a dance form in India. And indeed, the somewhat contorted hand motion that El Jaleos dancer exhibits shows a consistency with this theory. Flamenco had been performed in caves at one point during the gypsies early persecutions.
Here is a performance of this art form
Watch the incredible similarity of Indian and flamenco dance movements here
El Jaleo, roughly translated, is the ruckus or hubbub. That title is somewhat misleading as the dance is carefully prescribed and performed. The dancers slow advance across the stage is highly stylized and definitive, although her sculpted" white satin skirt appears too heavy and too elegant to be authentically Gypsy but Sargent had a passion for sumptuous textiles. The aforementioned dancers hand motion, the guitar and percussive strikes of sticks, the dancers foot stamping and flipping of her skirt, the hand clapping and singing are measured. Even the cries of the musicians and the other female dancers watching are timed and rhythmic to the Flamenco idiom -- their own sonata form as it were.
Sargents audience at the Paris Salon must have been largely ignorant of the culture that produced the subject of El Jaleo and also that of Georges Bizets Carmen (a sexy and rebellious woman) which debuted in 1875 at the Opera-Comique. As Trevor Fairweather, author and former curator of Bostons Museum of Fine Arts, writes
Carmen embodied the allure and the threat of both Gypsies and independent women: the double standards of the day...Bizets opera scandalized the public and most critics, and was considered a failure...
The cultural blindness and ignorance (plus prejudice against the gypsy culture), prevented a larger discussion of this painting. More is the pity.
However, I look at El Jaleo in the Gardner, which I did in late September this year, and there is something amiss. A looping brushstroke interferes. What is going on? I didnt see that coming...
Photography largely corrects this and that is interesting to me. Here is a painting that looks strangely better in photographs (because photography coheres brush strokes) than in real life.
Go figure. That is a mystery to me.
Sargent studied in Madrid and had seen, and was influenced by, the works of both Velasquez and Goya. In this painting, he has combined the use of black, white and red (and the nice touch with the little orange) of the former while incorporating, with the dancers not-beautiful face, the Goya in his later phase. If nothing else, it is an interesting comparison.
elleng
(130,933 posts)THANKS, yank!
CTyankee
(63,912 posts)I'm off to France a week from tomorrow so I thought I'd get this in now.
If you ever get a chance, go to the Gardner. What an interesting place! That woman was on a mission!
elleng
(130,933 posts)CTyankee
(63,912 posts)Sargent at the MFA! I'm going to the Goya exhibit there in early December and will do a review here at DU on it. I'm very excited about it...
Warpy
(111,267 posts)contributed to the sense of movement, rather than detracting from the subject.
Then again, I tend to prefer the oil or pastel sketches that preceded a refined final work for the same reason. The sketches convey life and movement, while the finished painting is so realistic that everything looks static and artificial, as in wax fruit.
CTyankee
(63,912 posts)I guess I was surprised to see how different it looked to me the second time I saw it.
I absolutely love what Mrs. Gardner did with this picture's presentation...
Warpy
(111,267 posts)I've been to a few museums in which the works tended to clash because the museum was small and the budget limited.
Mrs. Gardner bought according to her own taste and ran with it, often creating the perfect settings for her paintings. You're right in that this is one of her best.
CTyankee
(63,912 posts)My daughter and i were actually at a lecture on the art of landscape design and the speaker referred to "landscape design as ecstasy," speaking of the Gardner museum, which is landscape inspired.
I had asked if we could visit a few minutes earlier so I could visit El Jaleo and a few steps later, wow, there was El Jaleo...sheesh
flamingdem
(39,313 posts)CTyankee
(63,912 posts)lindysalsagal
(20,692 posts)They're like family. Without the gossip.
mopinko
(70,112 posts)i envy your time spent with these great works.
but re photography, they taught me in art school that good photography is more important than good work. jurors have been surprised more than a few times to find the actual work falling short of those precious "slides". in these days of photoshop, i suspect that is only getting worse.
big paintings (like mine) tend to lose a lot in photographs. small works tend to look a lot better in a photo, as the details show up better.
CTyankee
(63,912 posts)folks like you to fill me in.
I go to Europe every year and see great works of art. I can tell you that I have never seen a great painting that has had the same effect on my as El Jaleo. Uniformly, they ALWAYS look basically just like they do in real life. El Jaleo was different.
I'm going to edit this with an exception: Vermeer's "View of Delft" in the Hague in the Netherlands. In real life, Vermeer had mixed ground glass into his paint to elicit a better light result in this painting. I was stunned when I saw it, with the ambient light of the Mauritshuis museum in the
Hague. That is what made the difference...
CTyankee
(63,912 posts)mopinko
(70,112 posts)it is hard to accurately photograph artworks.
a painting of this renown probably got the best possible photography. 8 x 10 transparency would have been the standard for a great work like this. not even accessible for most artists.
with the high definition photography available now, my work would have looked a lot better than it ever did. even tho i got the best that was available to me back in the day, my iphone probably takes higher definition pictures.
kids these days dont know how easy they have it. grumble grumble.
immoderate
(20,885 posts)I have been a tap dancer for over 60 years. (Boy, am I tired.) And I always had an interest in flamenco. In tap dance circles, flamenco was "tap dancing without the shuffle." (This is admittedly oversimplified.) But if you do enough tap dancing eventually you come across something that is flamenco-esque or flamenco-ish for your repertoire. And what makes it work, are the postures and hand movements. And lots of stomping and scuffing.
--imm
CTyankee
(63,912 posts)but I found Spain pretty much enchanting also...I can't wait to go back.
Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)I don't consider him a "Great" artist like Picasso, or Renoir, or Monet, but, for me he's the one I like to look at the most.
CTyankee
(63,912 posts)but trying to pin down what makes a great painting is a pretty daunting task....
mopinko
(70,112 posts)i dont paint like that, but i do still admire someone who could capture that kind of light, mood and detail.
mopinko
(70,112 posts)i would love to show you my work, and drag you through the museums here.
no need to go to europe.
CTyankee
(63,912 posts)You wouldn't need to drag me...I'd do a good job dragging myself! I spent an entire day in the National Gallery in London...my arthritic back was not happy...
mopinko
(70,112 posts)whatever it takes.
and the mca, too.
I read the NYT weekly art Section that has a roundup of current offerings at the best museums all over the world so that I can plan on what is do-able. So when I plan a trip to LA to see my daughter I check on LACMA and the Getty. With flexible scheduling I can see some great exhibitions. Currently, a trip to Chicago would have to be one of those trip deals and the schedule of my friends who live in Glencoe.
Hekate
(90,704 posts)Tuesday Afternoon
(56,912 posts)CTyankee
(63,912 posts)the feminist view of this painting is quite an interesting angle. But not just feminists as you can see from the quote from Trevor Fairweather.
panader0
(25,816 posts)I have stared many times at the folds in her dress....