Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Douglas Carpenter

(20,226 posts)
Mon Oct 27, 2014, 09:07 AM Oct 2014

Campaign Interception: GOP Blasts Dems for Threatening Social Security

That's because the small handful of Democrats who embraced the deficit-reduction plan by former Republican Senator Alan Simpson of Wyoming and former Clinton White House Chief of Staff Erskine Bowles are being hammered by the Republicans for trimming Social Security benefits. It is a remarkable campaign turnabout by the GOP, which has long endorsed entitlement reform to hold down the long-term debt. Now, they are criticizing the few Democratic lawmakers who actually agreed with them.

Bowles and Simpson co-chaired the National Commission on Fiscal Responsibility and Reform that released recommendations in December 2010 -- a controversial document that almost overnight became the gold standard for deficit hawks and government reformers seeking to put government spending on a more sustainable glide path. But nothing is riskier in politics than tampering with entitlement programs -- long known as the "Third Rail of Politics” for the risks in tampering with them. And while Bowles-Simpson became a touchstone for many conservatives and government watchdog groups, few politicians were willing to actually touch it.

In Georgia, the National Republican Campaign Committee posted an ad last week charging that Democratic Rep. John Barrow was "leaving Georgia seniors behind" by supporting "a plan that would raise the retirement age to 69 while cutting Social Security benefits." And in Florida, Rep. Joe Garcia (D) has been accused of "failing seniors" in a new ad put up by the National Republican Congressional Campaign.

The Crossroads ads and others reek of hypocrisy, of course, since Rove and other Republicans previously criticized Obama for failing to support the Bowles-Simpson proposal, The Washington Post noted. "Likewise, the NRCC ads attacking Garcia and Rep. John Barrow for endorsing Social Security cuts come despite many Republicans pushing for just that," Politico reported.

http://finance.yahoo.com/news/campaign-interception-gop-blasts-dems-100000251.html
7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Campaign Interception: GOP Blasts Dems for Threatening Social Security (Original Post) Douglas Carpenter Oct 2014 OP
Any Democrats who supported Simpson/Bowles deserve what they get. See my sig line. Scuba Oct 2014 #1
That was predictable Prophet 451 Oct 2014 #2
now I wonder what lesson we can learn from this? Douglas Carpenter Oct 2014 #3
all the Dems have to attack SS, and twice as hard, because Nader MisterP Oct 2014 #7
Like no one could see that one coming....... djean111 Oct 2014 #4
Ok, Let me get this straight.... fredamae Oct 2014 #5
SS is not known as the "third rail" for nothing n/t Fumesucker Oct 2014 #6
 

djean111

(14,255 posts)
4. Like no one could see that one coming.......
Mon Oct 27, 2014, 09:15 AM
Oct 2014

Doesn't matter what political chess game was being played, the campaign ad says, with complete truthiness, that Democrats proposed cutting Social Security. No one wants to hear that 11th dimensional chess bullshit.
Just fodder for the 30 second sound bite now. Democrats did not just touch that third rail, they humped it.

fredamae

(4,458 posts)
5. Ok, Let me get this straight....
Mon Oct 27, 2014, 09:23 AM
Oct 2014

The GOP has, for Decades (since the beginning of socsec) tried to repeal/eradicate social security and the whole of the "New Deal"...and they Finally get some greedy corporate "democrats" to get on board and Now they attack the Whole Party with it? And these stupid "democrats" didn't see that one coming? Or did they?

One way or the other-this hurts Progressive "old school" Dems. And Corp/Wall Street/Third Way Dems don't want them around either, imo.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Campaign Interception: GO...