Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

el_bryanto

(11,804 posts)
Tue Apr 17, 2012, 11:33 AM Apr 2012

If Everybody Paid the Same

Was at the auto shop yesterday when I noticed two guys having a conversation. One was talking about who Liberals won't answer questions; they were going back and forth on the Zimmerman Martin altercation (they feel pretty sure he did something to provoke Zimmerman, but both more or less conceded that the Police had blown it). Then we moved on to more general stuff, and I asked one of them how he felt about Mitt Romney paying a 15% tax rate, lower than all of us.

He came back with how much is that in dollars, and I conceded that in dollars it was probably a lot more than we paid. His comeback was how is that fair. Why doesn't everybody pay the same? Not the same rate - the same amount of dollars. You take the budget each year and divide it up among the population and everybody owes that amount. I told him I didn't think that was practical - that there would be lots of people who couldn't afford that - he said that this would make people pay a lot more attention to what their money is being spent on. He also is upset that we give child credit - which he believes is a ploy to get more votes (all those kids remember that tax credit their parents got and vote Democratic. Are any of you voting Democratic out of gratitude that your parents got a tax credit?)

I'm not the best at responding off the cuff, particularly when it comes to numbers (because I am an numbers person, but I can't do figures in my head) The Population last year was approximately 312,602,730 people. The national budget was $3,728 billion. That works out to $11,925.00 per person. My taxes would go up a bit. We do have 5,502,000 families who make under $12,499 in the United States; and he did kind of make it clear he wanted everybody including kids to pay the same.

He wasn't a bad guy, he had just bought off on the tribal rhetoric of Conservatism. They were both overly concerned over losers who get on welfare and stay on welfare, even after I pointed out that most people get on welfare and then get off once they find new work. Somehow this new taxation strategy would fix that; what it would actually do is make live much easier for people who already have it pretty easy, and much much much harder on the working class.

Oh - and the kicker was he worked as a property appraiser for the city; assessing the amount of property taxes people need to pay.

Bryant

7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

sinkingfeeling

(51,471 posts)
1. Guess he hadn't heard about New Jersey giving $73 million in
Tue Apr 17, 2012, 11:39 AM
Apr 2012

tax collections to corporations. Why do they worry about 'losers who get on welfare' and not what Corporate America is doing?

 

lumberjack_jeff

(33,224 posts)
2. No... he's on the right track. We should be equally responsible for the costs of society.
Tue Apr 17, 2012, 11:39 AM
Apr 2012

I'm happy to pay the $36,000 for my family.

Now that that is out of the way, we should all equally benefit from it. This society generates $50,000 in GDP per person. My family's share is therefore $150,000.

 

Taitertots

(7,745 posts)
4. Many households would own more than they could ever make
Tue Apr 17, 2012, 11:56 AM
Apr 2012

Especially widows with children, single parents, and the disabled.

I wonder if this tool realizes that there are households that would be taxed at a more than 100% rate.

TBF

(32,089 posts)
5. That will work if everyone is paid the same amount no matter
Tue Apr 17, 2012, 11:59 AM
Apr 2012

what work they do & no inheritance - when you die it all goes to the state for re-distribution. Then, yes, it could be fair.

TBF

(32,089 posts)
7. I actually would be for it if we did it that way -
Tue Apr 17, 2012, 12:59 PM
Apr 2012

but we wouldn't be able to do it under capitalism. We'd have to re-think our economic system.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»If Everybody Paid the Sam...