Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

KingCharlemagne

(7,908 posts)
Fri Oct 31, 2014, 06:39 PM Oct 2014

If there are no indictments (state or federal) in the Michael Brown murder, what

sorts of civil disobedience should protesters engage in?

Myself, I'm leaning towards suggesting protesters go to the predominantly white, upper middle-class suburbs of St. Louis County and render them impassable to vehicular traffic.

Just saw a post in LBN that there are no federal civil rights charges expected:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/1014933686

This is fucking outrageous.

30 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
If there are no indictments (state or federal) in the Michael Brown murder, what (Original Post) KingCharlemagne Oct 2014 OP
Whatever happens, I hope no one (especially the protesters themselves) gets hurt. nomorenomore08 Oct 2014 #1
You know, I agree with you in principle. But there comes a point where KingCharlemagne Oct 2014 #2
Like I said, they need to send a message to the state and the country. Whatever it takes. nomorenomore08 Oct 2014 #3
Myself, I think the message(s) need to be sent to the mainly-white upper class KingCharlemagne Oct 2014 #6
Go to the voting booth in droves. Dont call me Shirley Oct 2014 #4
With all due respect, that's not 'civil disobedience.' It's 'citizenship.' Maybe KingCharlemagne Oct 2014 #5
Oops! You are correct, voting is citizenship not civil disobedience. Dont call me Shirley Oct 2014 #9
I like the OP's idea better. KamaAina Oct 2014 #12
Just throwing out ideas. Not competing. Dont call me Shirley Oct 2014 #14
Fair enough, Shirley. KamaAina Oct 2014 #15
... Dont call me Shirley Oct 2014 #17
Not arguing with you. I think the protesters need a clear strategic vision and a sense of their KingCharlemagne Oct 2014 #19
True. But many of those drivers support wilson and mccullough. It may backfire on the Dont call me Shirley Oct 2014 #22
I'm channeling my inner Napoleon right now, but I'd like to see the KingCharlemagne Oct 2014 #13
That would be a powerful and awe-some event! Masses of people crossing the bridge. Dont call me Shirley Oct 2014 #20
yeah, and have their votes flipped by the black box voting machines, or the easily rigged tabulators kath Oct 2014 #24
Set up and man vote registration stations outside every place more than 10 people congregate Vincardog Oct 2014 #7
With all due respect, that's not 'civil disobedience.' It's 'citizenship.' Maybe KingCharlemagne Oct 2014 #10
Another guy was shot 46 times and no charges there either. onecaliberal Oct 2014 #8
You know, I've said I can't advocate that others commit civil disobedience because KingCharlemagne Oct 2014 #11
It is just hard to believe. onecaliberal Oct 2014 #18
I had already planned to do an early withdrawal from my IRA to shoot $$ to KingCharlemagne Oct 2014 #21
Well, that guy had mental illness, so it's okay KamaAina Oct 2014 #16
Thank you to all who have contributed so far. I'm going for a walk now to see if KingCharlemagne Oct 2014 #23
They will marym625 Oct 2014 #25
I don't see what the end of the protest would be. cheyanne Oct 2014 #26
When you say "I don't see what the end of the protest . . . ," I assume by KingCharlemagne Oct 2014 #28
No, you're right. I meant purpose. cheyanne Nov 2014 #30
There's a very good chance that the DOJ will MannyGoldstein Oct 2014 #27
Manny, I lack your sharp wit and penchant for biting satire, but I sure KingCharlemagne Oct 2014 #29

nomorenomore08

(13,324 posts)
1. Whatever happens, I hope no one (especially the protesters themselves) gets hurt.
Fri Oct 31, 2014, 06:41 PM
Oct 2014

On the other hand, someone needs to send a message. Big time.

 

KingCharlemagne

(7,908 posts)
2. You know, I agree with you in principle. But there comes a point where
Fri Oct 31, 2014, 06:44 PM
Oct 2014

the social contract is irretrievably riven and this is one of those moments.

I cannot advocate that people of color there engage in civil disobedience since I cannot be there to lend my own body and voice to the struggle. But if and when they do commit civil disobedience, I will support them as I am able, up to an including their rendering St. Louis itself ungovernable.

nomorenomore08

(13,324 posts)
3. Like I said, they need to send a message to the state and the country. Whatever it takes.
Fri Oct 31, 2014, 06:47 PM
Oct 2014

I'm hoping for nonviolence, but certainly not demanding it.

 

KingCharlemagne

(7,908 posts)
6. Myself, I think the message(s) need to be sent to the mainly-white upper class
Fri Oct 31, 2014, 06:52 PM
Oct 2014

enclaves.

They can have their racism and white supremacy OR they can have their cushy lives. But they don't get to have both.

 

KingCharlemagne

(7,908 posts)
5. With all due respect, that's not 'civil disobedience.' It's 'citizenship.' Maybe
Fri Oct 31, 2014, 06:49 PM
Oct 2014

you don't think protesters should engage in civil disobedience? It's OK if you don't; perfectly valid position to take.

Dont call me Shirley

(10,998 posts)
9. Oops! You are correct, voting is citizenship not civil disobedience.
Fri Oct 31, 2014, 07:03 PM
Oct 2014

Peaceful civil disobedience.

They could block the bridge that crosses the Mississippi River. Surround the arch, unfurl a banner from the arch. March in Jeff City.

Flashmobs in popular hang out spots, city halls, Capitol house. Flashmobs are perceived as fun, so they may get the message across more effectively. Churches could organize these.

 

KamaAina

(78,249 posts)
12. I like the OP's idea better.
Fri Oct 31, 2014, 07:05 PM
Oct 2014

The bridge connects St. Louis City with Illinois. St. Louis City is separate from St. Louis County, where Ferguson is. The Arch could work, though, since it's the iconic symbol of St. Louis.

Dont call me Shirley

(10,998 posts)
14. Just throwing out ideas. Not competing.
Fri Oct 31, 2014, 07:13 PM
Oct 2014

The Bridge crossing may bring in federal troops though. Although that may not be a good thing. Plus, msm belies every good protest.

Blocking streets in white neighborhoods will do nothing but piss off the drivers, detracting from the protestors message.

The Flashmobs may be a really effective tool of peaceful protest.

 

KingCharlemagne

(7,908 posts)
19. Not arguing with you. I think the protesters need a clear strategic vision and a sense of their
Fri Oct 31, 2014, 07:17 PM
Oct 2014

goals. To wit, what will constitute a 'victory'? In my mind, a 'victory' will consist of one of two things: the indictment of Wilson and\or the recusal of DA McCulloch.

So if drivers get pissed at protesters, they can make that anger go away easily by pressuring the party establishment in St. Louis to get McCulloch to step down.

Dont call me Shirley

(10,998 posts)
22. True. But many of those drivers support wilson and mccullough. It may backfire on the
Fri Oct 31, 2014, 07:29 PM
Oct 2014

protestors like at the Cardinals and Rams games.

The protestors do need a clear strategy with a short strong effective message. Create a message the way Frank Luntz does, short yet to the point, a little sound bite goes a long way these days.
Liberals need to start using that type of messaging, but in a good healing way, not a dark FL way.

 

KingCharlemagne

(7,908 posts)
13. I'm channeling my inner Napoleon right now, but I'd like to see the
Fri Oct 31, 2014, 07:08 PM
Oct 2014

masses in East St. Louis rise up and march across that bridge and swarm St. Louis (and St. Louis County).

Easy for me to say. My ass isn't (yet) on the line. I'm so fucking pissed.

Dont call me Shirley

(10,998 posts)
20. That would be a powerful and awe-some event! Masses of people crossing the bridge.
Fri Oct 31, 2014, 07:18 PM
Oct 2014

That would make a gigantic statement.

kath

(10,565 posts)
24. yeah, and have their votes flipped by the black box voting machines, or the easily rigged tabulators
Fri Oct 31, 2014, 08:14 PM
Oct 2014

For the optical scan ballots.
Elections are a joke in this country.

Vincardog

(20,234 posts)
7. Set up and man vote registration stations outside every place more than 10 people congregate
Fri Oct 31, 2014, 07:01 PM
Oct 2014

and stay there until FergiSTAN is 100% registered voters. Then GOTV .

 

KingCharlemagne

(7,908 posts)
10. With all due respect, that's not 'civil disobedience.' It's 'citizenship.' Maybe
Fri Oct 31, 2014, 07:04 PM
Oct 2014

you don't believe protesters should engage in civil disobedience. It's OK; it's a perfectly valid position to take.

Me, I've had enough.

onecaliberal

(32,916 posts)
8. Another guy was shot 46 times and no charges there either.
Fri Oct 31, 2014, 07:02 PM
Oct 2014

Seriously what does a cop have to do in order for the Federal Government to bring a civil rights trial.

This is beyond ridiculous. It's open season on black people. My heart is breaking.


 

KingCharlemagne

(7,908 posts)
11. You know, I've said I can't advocate that others commit civil disobedience because
Fri Oct 31, 2014, 07:05 PM
Oct 2014

I can't be there to put my own body and voice on the line.

I'm rethinking that position. I am so mad.

onecaliberal

(32,916 posts)
18. It is just hard to believe.
Fri Oct 31, 2014, 07:16 PM
Oct 2014

If Michael were a white kid, there is no chance Wilson would be skating. My head is about to explode.....

 

KingCharlemagne

(7,908 posts)
21. I had already planned to do an early withdrawal from my IRA to shoot $$ to
Fri Oct 31, 2014, 07:21 PM
Oct 2014

the protesters' bail funds. Now I'm thinking I'll pack my beater car and head east. My life ain't worth shit if there is no justice for Mike Brown is the way I'm thinking now.

 

KingCharlemagne

(7,908 posts)
23. Thank you to all who have contributed so far. I'm going for a walk now to see if
Fri Oct 31, 2014, 07:49 PM
Oct 2014

I can get my head screwed on straight again.

If Mike Brown could be killed for jaywalking and his federal civil rights weren't violated, then none of us have any federal civil rights. The whole concept is one big fucking joke.

cheyanne

(733 posts)
26. I don't see what the end of the protest would be.
Fri Oct 31, 2014, 09:29 PM
Oct 2014

At this point, no one wants the city to reassure everyone that all is going alone just fine. So what do you want from them? Is there some other legal channel that can we can force the city to take? What about a citizen panel to follow-up on police violence? Sheriff resign? Can we ask that the justice department put the police department under their supervision.

They have effectively stonewalled the prosecution. Some concrete demands need to be made. Form a citizen's council to go to the mayor et al. and put the demands to them.

 

KingCharlemagne

(7,908 posts)
28. When you say "I don't see what the end of the protest . . . ," I assume by
Fri Oct 31, 2014, 11:14 PM
Oct 2014

Last edited Sun Nov 2, 2014, 12:06 AM - Edit history (1)

'end' you mean 'purpose'?

To me, the purpose of the protests at its broadest is to secure justice for Mike Brown's homicide, so that his family and his fellow residents of Ferguson can achieve some closure and move their lives forward, but also for society, to reaffirm the principle that no man, whether ordinary citizen or law enforcement officer, is above the law.

There will be no justice so long as DA McCulloch -- himeself exuding either conflict of interest or its first cousin, the appearance of conflict of interest, with his every utterance and action -- presides over a Grand Jury that refuses to indict Wilson. And there will be no justice so long as the Federal Government refuses to use its awesome power to prosecute Wilson and other members of the Ferguson police force for violating Mike Brown's civil rights.

I have spoken for myself here. Please let me know if I misunderstood your intent.

cheyanne

(733 posts)
30. No, you're right. I meant purpose.
Sat Nov 1, 2014, 11:19 PM
Nov 2014

I asked that because I feel that there is no way that the authorities are going to allow Wilson to be indicted. From what I understand, the usual course of action is to indict a suspect right away before the grand jury. then the police go about actually assembling evidence to support the indictment. Then the police can arrest the suspect.

So the claims that the grand jury needed to "research" the situation are just smoke and mirrors, giving a legal cover for the non-indictment. I assume to try to drag the whole situation over a long time to defuse the protest. And the judges will go along with the grand jury.

So assuming that there will be no indictment for Wilson, there will be no justice for Brown. But there are demands that can be made because of the outrage and publicity. Those are the avenues that need to be explored now. I hope I clarified my thinking on this.

 

MannyGoldstein

(34,589 posts)
27. There's a very good chance that the DOJ will
Fri Oct 31, 2014, 11:05 PM
Oct 2014

note some room for improvement in the report they're working on.

That's pretty big.

 

KingCharlemagne

(7,908 posts)
29. Manny, I lack your sharp wit and penchant for biting satire, but I sure
Fri Oct 31, 2014, 11:18 PM
Oct 2014

can appreciate it.

Somewhere in heaven or in hell, Dean Swift is smiling his approbation.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»If there are no indictmen...