General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsGrowing Wealth Could Be As Simple As Having A Family Meal
Weve heard it a million times: Sitting down for a family meal is good for us.
Studies show it keeps us connected, instills healthy eating habits, and even helps our kids get better grades.
But heres a new twist: It can make you wealthier.
Its true: A soon-to-be-released study from professors at the University of Georgia looked at 8,000 families over the course of a decade, and found that those who ate together at least four times a week were more likely to be financially secure.
http://www.businessinsider.com/family-dinners-and-finances-2012-4
Cleita
(75,480 posts)not the other way around. A family, with a single parent or even both parents working more than one job and probably doing shift work do not have that luxury.
RC
(25,592 posts)So many people get cause and effect mixed up and come up with bull shit.
Just look at the source. A wealthy business web site.
Their About:
FarCenter
(19,429 posts)The connection that we made was that for parents to be able to spend mealtimes with their families, just by a regular schedule, requires some commitment to their children, concern for the childs wellbeing, Chatterjee said. To be able to do that requires a high self-regulation.
By self-regulation he means a process of setting standards for oneself, monitoring ones actions and making focused interaction to stay on track with ones personal goals whether dieting, saving money, or making sure that eating together is a priority.
To assess financial success, he tracked families in a survey from 1994 through 2004. Those who dined together at least four times a week increased their wealth 71 percent, from $39,000 in 1994 to $66,500 in 2004. For those who did not , wealth also increased but started out lower and rose less by 62 percent, from $23,161 to $37,500. Wealth was measured as net worth: home equity plus financial assets minus credit cards and other loans. Results of the regression analyses linking the two were also statistically significant.
Families who eat together may be more adept at implementing and monitoring financial management, according to their paper, which Chatterjee said is scheduled for publication this year in the Applied Economics Research Bulletin.
So read it on the Boston College web site (Although BC is probably also a bastion of priviledge, allegedly supported by those notorious 1%ers, the Kennedys!).
Skittles
(153,209 posts)actually, that's probably WHY I did better -no dependents
TheWraith
(24,331 posts)As always, correlation is not causation. Sheesh.
eridani
(51,907 posts)--water is wet, and babies, puppies and kittens are cute.
Reminds me of a study published in the late 80s on how women independently earning money that put them in the top 20% of earners were almost never subject to spousal violence. They concluded that higher educational levels gave them better communications skills. Jeebus. Or maybe a wallet full of credit cards could get them into a hotel if they faced such threats? Or they would be highly disinclined to marry seriously insecure men?
HiPointDem
(20,729 posts)they eat together because they're financially secure.
All these bloody studies from the toadies of the 1%-ers are supposed to prove that if you emulate the cultural practices of the upper-middle class you'll become part of the upper-middle class, and if you're not part of them, it's because you don't live as they do.
Causation is otherwise; if you become part of the upper-middle class you'll start to act like they do.
tkmorris
(11,138 posts)It's a common and completely avoidable error. It's kind of maddening that people still commit this logic felony but what can ya do?
Fallacious conclusion.
DiverDave
(4,887 posts)I'm calling bs.
I wonder how much money this 'study' cost?