Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Galraedia

(5,027 posts)
Wed Apr 18, 2012, 12:22 AM Apr 2012

Senate returns to debate on how to cut Postal Service, not how to save it

The Senate is turning its attention back to the Postal Service, which "everyone" agrees is in crisis. That is to say, the Postal Service is a victim both of legitimate shifts in how we live our lives and communicate with our loved ones and of a manufactured crisis resulting from simultaneous congressional demands that it "run like a business" and congressional restrictions preventing it from running like a business in ways that would help.

The policy world debate over what to do about the Postal Service centers around cuts cuts cuts: Should post offices and processing centers be closed or just downsized? Should Saturday delivery be cut now or in a couple years? And so on. There are other possibilities that would bring the possibility of the Postal Service adapting more fully to the rise of the internet; for instance, a report conducted for the National Association of Letter Carriers by Ron Bloom, who headed up President Obama's auto rescue, finds that leading proposals for cuts would worsen the situation (manufacture more crisis, in other words), and suggests that:

[...] the agency should raise its stamp prices, which are among the lowest in the world, and find new ways to profit more from its built-in advantage as the only entity to reach every American home every day. It should also replace its multilayered governance system with a corporate- style board of directors whose members have entrepreneurial experience.


Read more: http://www.dailykos.com/story/2012/04/17/1084080/-Senate-returns-to-debate-on-how-to-cut-Postal-Service-not-how-to-save-it

At the very end of 2006, Congress passed the Postal Accountability and Enhancement Act of 2006 (PAEA). Under PAEA, USPS was forced to “prefund its future health care benefit payments to retirees for the next 75 years in an astonishing ten-year time span” — meaning that it had to put aside billions of dollars to pay for the health benefits of employees it hasn’t even hired yet, something “that no other government or private corporation is required to do.”

Contact your congressional leaders and tell them to end the PAEA mandate that is killing the USPS http://www.contactingthecongress.org/
5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Senate returns to debate on how to cut Postal Service, not how to save it (Original Post) Galraedia Apr 2012 OP
that has been their goal all along Skittles Apr 2012 #1
Write your senators. elleng Apr 2012 #2
The PAEA is the greatest burden the USPS has to deal with tularetom Apr 2012 #3
Here's a few ideas Prophet 451 Apr 2012 #4
Ah, but my dear Prophet HeiressofBickworth Apr 2012 #5

elleng

(131,163 posts)
2. Write your senators.
Wed Apr 18, 2012, 12:25 AM
Apr 2012

A sample letter:

I understand the Senate is presently considering taking action to stabilize the U.S. Postal Service with a short-term cash infusion while delaying most decisions on closing post offices and ending Saturday mail delivery.

I expect you recognize the real solution to this problem would be to end the ill-considered PAEA mandate that is killing the USPS. Your support of such action would gain my contuing support.

Yours truly,

tularetom

(23,664 posts)
3. The PAEA is the greatest burden the USPS has to deal with
Wed Apr 18, 2012, 12:35 AM
Apr 2012

But there are others. I have a large rural style mail box and some days it is literally 90% full of unsolicited advertising circulars, grocery store mailers, catalogs and other junk mailed at heavily discounted bulk rates. This stuff is not even opened, it goes immediately into the recycle bin. And I've talked to many of the other customers along our mail route and to a person their reaction to this crap is identical to mine. I'd venture to say that just on our route alone the monthly amount of bulk rate junk mail is at least a ton..

I'd be more than willing to spend a buck for a first class stamp if it would save me from having to deal with the unwanted mail I get.

Prophet 451

(9,796 posts)
4. Here's a few ideas
Wed Apr 18, 2012, 01:54 AM
Apr 2012

I'm unclear on how much of this US post offices already do but here (UK), our post offices deal with all kinds of stuff. Almost all of our routine official licenses (i.e. fishing and hunting licenses) are done through the post office, they offer basic banking services (i.e. basic deposit and debit service but not checking or loans), you can change foreign currency (bills only, no coins) and we have a service called PayZone or PayPoint where most of your household bills have a barcode which can then be used to pay them over-the-counter at the post office. They partnered with one of the big insurance companies (can't remember which) to offer insurance services too and with one of the big telecom companies to offer basic phone and internet. Take a look at the services we can do through the post office (http://www.postoffice.co.uk/) and there's no reason US post offices can't do most of the same services.

Essentially, if you take all the times all of us need to deal with various forms of "oficial-dom", most of them can be done through the post office and as a result, post offices here are still thriving centres of the community. Some offices need to be closed or moved as the population changes, of course, but there's simply no need for huge cuts, especially if that ridiculous PAEA law is removed.

HeiressofBickworth

(2,682 posts)
5. Ah, but my dear Prophet
Wed Apr 18, 2012, 02:04 AM
Apr 2012

you missed the point entirely. The US congress is not interested in offering ADDITIONAL services through the Post Office or any other agency of the government. Every effort is being made to REDUCE and ELIMINATE services. The intention being that whatever services are cut are either a) not necessary, or b) can be done for profit by one of their contributors. The goal is to privatize every necessary service in this country. The PAEA is the strangle-hold until the final and fatal blow is delivered.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Senate returns to debate ...