Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

FarCenter

(19,429 posts)
Wed Apr 18, 2012, 09:33 AM Apr 2012

Studies Question the Pairing of Food Deserts and Obesity

It has become an article of faith among some policy makers and advocates, including Michelle Obama, that poor urban neighborhoods are food deserts, bereft of fresh fruits and vegetables.

But two new studies have found something unexpected. Such neighborhoods not only have more fast food restaurants and convenience stores than more affluent ones, but more grocery stores, supermarkets and full-service restaurants, too. And there is no relationship between the type of food being sold in a neighborhood and obesity among its children and adolescents.

Within a couple of miles of almost any urban neighborhood, “you can get basically any type of food,” said Roland Sturm of the RAND Corporation, lead author of one of the studies. “Maybe we should call it a food swamp rather than a desert,” he said.

Some experts say these new findings raise questions about the effectiveness of efforts to combat the obesity epidemic simply by improving access to healthy foods. Despite campaigns to get Americans to exercise more and eat healthier foods, obesity rates have not budged over the past decade, according to recently released federal data.

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/04/18/health/research/pairing-of-food-deserts-and-obesity-challenged-in-studies.html

4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Studies Question the Pairing of Food Deserts and Obesity (Original Post) FarCenter Apr 2012 OP
what bullshit. "within a couple of miles" cali Apr 2012 #1
Highly questionable definitions, imo. elleng Apr 2012 #2
This is a quality vs quantity issue MrScorpio Apr 2012 #3
While not trying to downplay the importance of this issue, I think we should be thankful razorman Apr 2012 #4
 

cali

(114,904 posts)
1. what bullshit. "within a couple of miles"
Wed Apr 18, 2012, 09:39 AM
Apr 2012

And that phrase shows what right wing dogshit that study is.

It doesn't take a fucking genius to realize that food deserts are real, that it's far, far fucking harder to eat healthily if you're poor rather than middle class or more.

I'm poor. I eat healthily. I'm also educated and a fine cook and I grew up in a home where convenience foods of any kind were shunned. It's hard to do what I do. It takes time, imagination and work. And that's without any children to care for.

MrScorpio

(73,631 posts)
3. This is a quality vs quantity issue
Wed Apr 18, 2012, 09:48 AM
Apr 2012

As well as convenience plus advertising.

For one, bad choices are heavily marketed in inner city and non-affluential areas. It's been that way since the bad old days of cigarette billboards.

And markets in urban areas may be more plentiful, but they usually tend to be smaller, with poorly stocked inventories of inferior products, if you compare them to their suburban counterparts.

Now it's true that people who live in the city may tend to walk more, but if their diet choices and other eating habits and lack of exercise overwhelms whatever caloric benefit of not always having the convience of a car, you're going to have that obesity problem that we have today.

razorman

(1,644 posts)
4. While not trying to downplay the importance of this issue, I think we should be thankful
Thu Apr 19, 2012, 12:49 PM
Apr 2012

that we live in a country where we can complain about the quality of the food that poor people eat, rather than its non-existence. I have been to countries where someone would knife you for a Big Mac.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Studies Question the Pair...