Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

RandySF

(58,972 posts)
Mon Nov 10, 2014, 12:11 AM Nov 2014

Can Republicans hold on to Senate majority in 2016? There’s reason for doubt.

Congratulations, Republicans! You won the Senate majority! Now, can you hold on to it for more than two years?

Looking at the 2016 Senate map, there’s reason for doubt. Republicans will have to defend 24 seats, compared with 10 for Democrats. And the raw numbers don’t even tell the whole story. Seven seats held by Republicans — Florida, Illinois, Iowa, New Hampshire, Ohio, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin — were carried by President Obama in 2008 and 2012. And there is chatter about potential Republican retirements in Arizona and Iowa. If either John McCain or Chuck Grassley decided to call it a career, each of those races would be major Democratic targets.

On the other side of the coin, Republican takeover opportunities are few and far between. By far, the most endangered Democrat is Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, who survived in 2010 but could face Nevada Gov. Brian Sandoval (R), who won a second term Tuesday with more than 70 percent of the vote. Reid has said he will run again, although his demotion from majority leader to minority leader might make him rethink those plans. The only other Democrat who starts the 2016 cycle in serious jeopardy is freshman Michael Bennet (Colo.), who, like Reid, was a surprise winner in 2010. The convincing win by Cory Gardner (R) over Sen. Mark Udall (D) on Tuesday in the Rocky Mountain State will undoubtedly energize Republicans, though it’s less clear what the GOP bench looks like in a race against Bennet.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/can-republicans-hold-on-to-senate-majority-in-2016-theres-reason-for-doubt/2014/11/09/e3c18a70-6825-11e4-b053-65cea7903f2e_story.html

4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Can Republicans hold on to Senate majority in 2016? There’s reason for doubt. (Original Post) RandySF Nov 2014 OP
The republicans chances of keeping the Senate are actually pretty good if... BillZBubb Nov 2014 #1
Party who wins the Presidency probably takes the Senate also nt pstokely Nov 2014 #4
I like our chances of a blowback win in 2016 Algernon Moncrieff Nov 2014 #2
They think they have a mandate. So obviously they will be out on their arse. One_Life_To_Give Nov 2014 #3

BillZBubb

(10,650 posts)
1. The republicans chances of keeping the Senate are actually pretty good if...
Mon Nov 10, 2014, 12:17 AM
Nov 2014

the Democrats nominate someone who doesn't light a fire under the base and draw in new voters. And our Senate candidates have a better message than "we aren't crazy like the republicans".

Algernon Moncrieff

(5,790 posts)
2. I like our chances of a blowback win in 2016
Mon Nov 10, 2014, 02:22 PM
Nov 2014

Feingold's old WI seat, IL, and NH should all be winnable. We may be able to take Florida IF we don't try to run Charlie Crist again. I'd like to see if we can also target Vitter in LA.

Grassley and McCain retirements seem likely. We can at least make those states competitive.

If we run Stephanie Herseth-Sandlin instead of Weiland, against John Thune, we could at least make SD interesting.

One_Life_To_Give

(6,036 posts)
3. They think they have a mandate. So obviously they will be out on their arse.
Mon Nov 10, 2014, 03:05 PM
Nov 2014

They have already convinced themselves this is about healthcare and immigration. So the same voters that put then in office will be quick to throw them out when they too ignore the people.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Can Republicans hold on t...