Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Guy Whitey Corngood

(26,501 posts) Mon Nov 10, 2014, 11:32 AM Nov 2014

Obama urged the FCC to prohibit 'paid prioritization' deals in which content providers pay to ensure

smooth delivery of their traffic - @Reuters

http://www.breakingnews.com/topic/us-court-strikes-down-net-neutrality-rules/

3 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Obama urged the FCC to prohibit 'paid prioritization' deals in which content providers pay to ensure (Original Post) Guy Whitey Corngood Nov 2014 OP

He probably should've asked Tom Wheeler what his opinion was on this tkmorris Nov 2014 #1

paid prioritization = payola? Downwinder Nov 2014 #2

With a wink and a nod. nt NorthCarolina Nov 2014 #3

tkmorris

(11,138 posts)

1. He probably should've asked Tom Wheeler what his opinion was on this

Reply to Guy Whitey Corngood (Original post)

Mon Nov 10, 2014, 11:36 AM

Nov 2014

Before he appointed him to handle the FCC. Since, you know, that's only the most important issue by light years that the FCC is handling during Obama's entire presidency.

Downwinder

(12,869 posts)

2. paid prioritization = payola?

Reply to Guy Whitey Corngood (Original post)

Mon Nov 10, 2014, 11:38 AM

Nov 2014

NorthCarolina

(11,197 posts)

3. With a wink and a nod. nt

Reply to Guy Whitey Corngood (Original post)

Mon Nov 10, 2014, 11:58 AM

Nov 2014

Reply to this discussion