Thanks funflower!

From the link~

"An analysis of more than 35,000 online articles, featuring thew leading candidates tipped to run for the White House in 2016, revealed Warren and Ryan were out in front, when story consumption in page views was compared to total number of stories published.

The study, undertaken by content-sharing platform Outbrain, measured the success of articles published on their network between March and August this year.

Warren topped the ratio chart, appearing to be the most interesting potential presidential candidate."
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

We have to get this news from the UK of course, since mainstream corporate media here just wants to push She who cannot be named.

It's also great that she recently intimated she might be open to run!
http://truth-out.org/opinion/item/27046-did-elizabeth-warren-just-change-her-tune-on-running-for-president

While the stats you're quoting are very probably true, Outbrain is an advertising platform for content marketers. In other words, people pay to have their content pushed to readers. I use it where I work to great affect. The articles often look like a part of any given website - but someone paid for the links to be there.