It goes both ways.

As for my part I would never do that.
You are probably right.
And of course not all of you are idiots.
The real dumbs are the powerfull dems who planted "Hillary or the Chaos" and "Hillary is inévitable" into masses minds.

It is going to be a long primary season.

Peace to you.

RWer?
Fascist?
Sexist?
Conspiracy nut?

but whining sure seems to be a constant.

and becomes a Hillary vote slave.

no evidence of said widely observed true fact = whining

If you have links to the posts in which you are called

RWer?
Fascist?
Sexist?
Conspiracy nut?

That would be different and should have been put in the OP to begin with.

I was talking about a global current situation in the whole lefty political blogosphere.

Tomorrow... who knows?

There should be a spot on DU's front page that's kept up to date with the current disgusting reason that's the only possible reason that anyone wouldn't love the Inevitable One.

who looked at Reagan's inaction on AIDS and cheered for more death, voted for Reagan a second time then for Bush....Hillary looks better every day.
Warren should have explained herself long, long ago. We will not allow her to rewrite important history to sell her false narrative. If she can not speak about her past right wing toxicity, she deserves not one Democratic vote. If that means it's Hillary then so be it.
Silence = Death
Knowledge = Life

Id far rather prefer to have a former RW who had opened her eyes, than that a, even if lifelong registered liberal, persons who is so luch friendly with corporates and dirty methods

And why don't I recall you posting similar screeds about Hillary's vote that killed hundreds of thousands of innocents in Iraq, and her desire to kill more people in the Middle East today?

Interesting.

And not to make light of any disease... but how many Americans had died of AIDS when Reagan was re-elected in 1984? Among causes of death, how did it rank? Was there any reason to believe that the effort arrayed against it was was lower than for other diseases, adjusted for it's dangerousness?

On Mon Nov 10, 2014, 03:53 PM an alert was sent on the following post:

Since the alternative is a lifelong anti gay Republican millionaire Reagan/Bush voter
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=5797545

REASON FOR ALERT

This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.

ALERTER'S COMMENTS

An undeserved, unfactual, disruptive, and over-the-top attack.

You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Mon Nov 10, 2014, 04:04 PM, and the Jury voted 3-4 to LEAVE IT.

Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Waste of an alert.

Every time someone pushes the alert button a kitten dies. Please think of the kittens.
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: A stupid post but not really ban worthy.
Juror #3 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #4 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #5 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Unfactual isn't a word. Nonfactual? Prove it. If you don't like what's being said, leave the thread or prove them wrong. I'm not hiding just because you don't like what is being said.
Juror #7 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given

Thank you very much for participating in our Jury system, and we hope you will be able to participate again in the future.

Wish they would have provided an explanation on why they thought it should be hidden.

They just like the imaginary power of the hide, I guess.
I was #6.

prejudices. I was #1, yeah my response was snarky but I would prefer to see the system used for real problems not this, I am offended you don't think like me stuff.

Most of the time I explain; sometimes I am too distracted by other things, or just not in the mood.

those are the ones who have shown interest in another run . Warren said she is not going to run. although if she does run i think that's where Hillary or others will attack her the most and may hurt her.

Hillary refuses to announce; Warren has said any number of times that she is not running.

Sanders says he will run, if he sees support.

Ten others may still come forward, or not. We just don't know. It's way too soon to say it's going to be Hillary vs Warren, full stop.

were on the same page. She has zero integrity. We can do better.

I found that amusing and annoying at the same time.

You love the leader.

nomination. That is puma.

who say they will not vote for her and a group that doesn't like her but promises to vote for her no matter what, maybe volunteer too. IOW, full spectrum. Even one lone poster who says she will have to consider emigrating if Hillary is the nominee. (That would be me.)

The election is two years away. I see no need to take a loyalty oath now.

advocacy is not permitted.

I don't think we should be looking to ban members for giving opinions.


I also detested puma in 2008 and I detest it now.

before election season officially starts.

I don't think we should be looking to ban members for giving opinions.

I also detested puma in 2008 and I detest it now.

I remember on mirt this came up and we were told not to nuke unless it was close to election time. I think that waslast year or early this year.


As I said I did not like when people did it in 2008 and I don't like it now. That is just my opinion.

In any event, it's a rule and I try to obey board rules if I post on a board. As I said, who knows what happens in two years anyway? She hasn't even committed to run yet. Why do I have to commit two years in advance?

If she runs she has my support.

to other people and try to encourage potential candidacies.

In the end, the voters are needed. I don't think HRC should be annointed, nor do I think any candidate should be annointed by the party bigwigs, or the media. It's always good to have a vibrant primary, and no one should be insulting anyone who wants that. Once the candidate is selected, things change. Before that, the more the merrier.

Nobody has announced their candidacy, so I am not an HRC supporter at this time. I'll wait to see how this all plays out. 6 years ago, the HRC BO battle almost tore DU apart.

I've already read this book and I know how it ends.

I was not talking about myself. I stated a general observation of what is actually happening in todays blogosphere.

I plan on having waffles instead on voting day if shes on the ballot.

If she's the nominee, write in someone for President, and vote down ticket.

I'm seeing claims of victim hood already. From both camps. I'm just not going to play this game here. I am new to this forum so can only imagine what the obama vs hillary 08 threads looked like.
I'm not going to self deport because of who I support and neither should anyone else. The idea that factions within the dem party would demand a purge after we lost so much on Tuesday to me sounds like a GOP plan.

If he ain't on the ballot, I'll write him in.

and should change your name to: "CallmeSane&Smart"

I will write in Joe's name too. Never thought of it will you mentioned it. The Senator from Alaska who couldn't get her name on the ballot with the party's blessing won with a write-in vote....Mrkowski as it?

I've forgotten why it had to be a write-in ??

but still had enough grass root support for the primary.
I could be wrong. That was soo last week.

I remember "way last week" better than 15 minutes ago.

Then again, it's all the same stuff whenever you're not a Stepford poster.

and I don't consider myself to be any of the things you listed.
If folks think I am, that's cool; I am not too worried about what they think, here or in real life.

Considering that she is.

She is....but she has already be forgiven by the masses.....you know she is sooooo popular.....when you are popular, everything is due and forgave. You gets a kind of divine right.

At this time, I support Vermine Supreme. We need a performance artist in the White House.

That may change as others make official declarations.

I think we should do away with ridiculous attacks on people who don't support our candidate.

I think Democrats who do not support Vermine Supreme are allowed their honest differences of opinion. I think the same of those who support Hillary Clinton as a possible candidate, or anyone else.

Hillary plays it coy, as though it's a prom date; Warren says definitely not and Sanders says he'll run if he sees support. So, it looks like Vermine Supreme could pull ahead early and make it! Fingers crossed.