Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
One billionaire you can admire (Original Post) packman Nov 2014 OP
Why not 99%? Niko Nov 2014 #1
He said he plans to be broke when he dies ctaylors6 Nov 2014 #2
They all need to give the money back. azmom Nov 2014 #3
I had serious issues with his son;s political ideology, but if I *had* to choose a republican Raine1967 Nov 2014 #4

ctaylors6

(693 posts)
2. He said he plans to be broke when he dies
Tue Nov 11, 2014, 06:21 PM
Nov 2014

He's already given away 80% and plans to give away more.
At least that's how I read the linked article.

azmom

(5,208 posts)
3. They all need to give the money back.
Tue Nov 11, 2014, 07:34 PM
Nov 2014

No one earns billions of dollars. Somewhere along the line there were some shenanigans .

Raine1967

(11,589 posts)
4. I had serious issues with his son;s political ideology, but if I *had* to choose a republican
Tue Nov 11, 2014, 07:40 PM
Nov 2014

nominee, I would have liked John Huntsman, Jr.

His father is not a bad man, not from anything I have seen. Jon Huntsman, Jr. wasn't a bad person either. It a shame the polical discourse would not let that happen.

I disagree with him about privatization, but I appreciate what he is doing.

Huntsman doesn’t believe that public funding works with cancer research. “We’ve tried to have public and private partnerships but you know it’s hard to work with a bureaucracy,” he says. According to Huntsman, private research holds scientists accountable. Unlike with government bureaucracy, Huntsman says his researchers are, ”not in a situation where people don’t care about them or have lost them in the shuffle somewhere. We feel that private philanthropy is far more effective and productive.”

According to a study in the New England Journal of Medicine, public funding for medical research in the United States has stalled since last year's government shutdown and the automatic spending cuts known as the sequester went into place. The National Institutes of Health took a 5.5% funding cut-- a total of $1.55 billion-- in March 2013 and has seen a 25% decrease in funding since 2003.


It should not be this way.




Latest Discussions»General Discussion»One billionaire you can a...