Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Vattel

(9,289 posts)
Fri Nov 14, 2014, 10:25 PM Nov 2014

I think Obama's planned executive order on immigration is completely awesome.

Unless it is reversed by the next administration, it is actually better than the immigration reform bills that Democrats have proposed. No stupid fines, no going to the "back of the line," just families allowed to stay together and make a living in the US.

From the NYTimes:

President Obama will ignore angry protests from Republicans and announce as soon as next week a broad overhaul of the nation’s immigration enforcement system that will protect up to five million unauthorized immigrants from the threat of deportation and provide many of them with work permits, according to administration officials who have direct knowledge of the plan.

Asserting his authority as president to enforce the nation’s laws with discretion, Mr. Obama intends to order changes that will significantly refocus the activities of the government’s 12,000 immigration agents. One key piece of the order, officials said, will allow many parents of children who are American citizens or legal residents to obtain legal work documents and no longer worry about being discovered, separated from their families and sent away.

That part of Mr. Obama’s plan alone could affect as many as 3.3 million people who have been living in the United States illegally for at least five years, according to an analysis by the Migration Policy Institute, an immigration research organization in Washington. But the White House is also considering a stricter policy that would limit the benefits to people who have lived in the country for at least 10 years, or about 2.5 million people.

http://www.nytimes.com/2014/11/14/us/obama-immigration.html?_r=1

45 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
I think Obama's planned executive order on immigration is completely awesome. (Original Post) Vattel Nov 2014 OP
Agree. Kath1 Nov 2014 #1
I like it. There are lots of very decent people contributing to our society who deserve this. Hoyt Nov 2014 #2
Thank you Mr President! sheshe2 Nov 2014 #3
I applaud his move BrotherIvan Nov 2014 #4
i agree. DesertFlower Nov 2014 #5
Can he do one on Pharaoh Nov 2014 #6
I wish. Unfortunately, he doesn't have the authority to address those issues. Vattel Nov 2014 #8
perhaps then he could enforce Pharaoh Nov 2014 #18
I hope Republicans try to impeach him for it. True Blue Door Nov 2014 #7
That would be a good lesson. I doubt that the Republicans will impeach in response to Vattel Nov 2014 #9
They will instead choose to use it as an election issue. True Blue Door Nov 2014 #10
I agree that they will use it as an election issue. Vattel Nov 2014 #12
We have used these UglyGreed Nov 2014 #11
Well-said: "We have used these people for too long, it is only right to get them out of the shadows Vattel Nov 2014 #13
Thank you UglyGreed Nov 2014 #14
I should add, however, that the extent to which those who Vattel Nov 2014 #15
Well here on long island UglyGreed Nov 2014 #16
A lot of "American citizens" don't want those LukeFL Nov 2014 #29
Yeah that's the meme UglyGreed Nov 2014 #31
Also housing cost are UglyGreed Nov 2014 #33
What I can tell you is that I don't LukeFL Nov 2014 #34
I agree whole heartily UglyGreed Nov 2014 #40
Will you feel the same when the next Republican President does the same thing? forthemiddle Nov 2014 #17
I myself have criticized Obama for playing fast and loose with the law on many occasions. But Vattel Nov 2014 #19
Lets hope you are right! forthemiddle Nov 2014 #22
Any President, regardless of party, should have that power. Ykcutnek Nov 2014 #20
Sell your bullshit about immigration being all Obama's fault because of the ACA geek tragedy Nov 2014 #25
Thanks for pointing it out, and what Obama did was not a violation of anything still_one Nov 2014 #27
This message was self-deleted by its author Corruption Inc Nov 2014 #21
Gotta do something or those oft discussed demographic changes will mean shit. TheKentuckian Nov 2014 #23
I love it when morality and political advantage point in the same direction! Vattel Nov 2014 #24
Absolutely, but the do nothing and stand for nothing but everything crew TheKentuckian Nov 2014 #35
They have at least 3 Hispanic candidates for yeoman6987 Nov 2014 #30
I don't suggest that at all but for some that is apparently the whole game TheKentuckian Nov 2014 #36
I agree and I also believe they may try to impeach him on it, depending how still_one Nov 2014 #26
I really hope they extend this to agriculture workers riderinthestorm Nov 2014 #28
as the picture beside my name suggests, i totally agree Vattel Nov 2014 #37
Ag workers still are in limbo as far as I can tell riderinthestorm Nov 2014 #38
I know. I am worried too. Crossing my fingers. Vattel Nov 2014 #39
That gauntlet is being thrown DOWN! WinkyDink Nov 2014 #32
I know this is an old thread, but there is nothing awesome about not lunamagica Nov 2014 #41
You put your finger on the real limitation of his plan: it is temporary. Vattel Nov 2014 #42
I completely agree wit everything you wrote, but lunamagica Nov 2014 #43
very true Vattel Nov 2014 #45
k&r... spanone Nov 2014 #44
 

Pharaoh

(8,209 posts)
6. Can he do one on
Sat Nov 15, 2014, 12:56 AM
Nov 2014

The minimum wage and universal healthcare too?

Not to mention a jobs program.........

 

Vattel

(9,289 posts)
8. I wish. Unfortunately, he doesn't have the authority to address those issues.
Sat Nov 15, 2014, 07:22 AM
Nov 2014

His discretion as the chief executive in setting priorities for federal law enforcement allows him to address immigration.

True Blue Door

(2,969 posts)
7. I hope Republicans try to impeach him for it.
Sat Nov 15, 2014, 12:59 AM
Nov 2014

I hope they scrounge up every little ounce of courage in their rat-like selves and declare, loudly and arrogantly, their intention to reverse the 2012 election.

His approval numbers will skyrocket, just like Clinton's did, and we'll have a little history lesson about the Bush regime's crimes that the GOP didn't even think worthy of Congressional hearings let alone impeachment investigations.

 

Vattel

(9,289 posts)
9. That would be a good lesson. I doubt that the Republicans will impeach in response to
Sat Nov 15, 2014, 07:30 AM
Nov 2014

Obama's immigration order. The impeachment would have to be based on claiming that he failed to enforce immigration law. That would be a stretch in terms of the Constitution's "high crimes and misdemeanors" standard. As chief executive, Obama could in principle pardon immigrants who have entered the country illegally.

True Blue Door

(2,969 posts)
10. They will instead choose to use it as an election issue.
Sat Nov 15, 2014, 07:32 AM
Nov 2014

In which case they're fucked anyway, because America is no longer terrified of immigration.

 

Vattel

(9,289 posts)
12. I agree that they will use it as an election issue.
Sat Nov 15, 2014, 07:44 AM
Nov 2014

Whether it helps them or Democrats is up for grabs, but it will help Democrats with the Latino vote.

UglyGreed

(7,661 posts)
11. We have used these
Sat Nov 15, 2014, 07:36 AM
Nov 2014

people for too long, it is only right to get them out of the shadows and treat them fairly. That said, many Americans have had their wages effected by this labor pool and perhaps we can help them with retraining and such. I want all people to be able to live a safe comfortable life.

 

Vattel

(9,289 posts)
13. Well-said: "We have used these people for too long, it is only right to get them out of the shadows
Sat Nov 15, 2014, 07:48 AM
Nov 2014

and treat them fairly." I also agree with you that addressing the impact on employment for citizens is crucial.

 

Vattel

(9,289 posts)
15. I should add, however, that the extent to which those who
Sat Nov 15, 2014, 08:05 AM
Nov 2014

immigrate illegally compete for jobs with citizens appears to be surprisingly small. Also, because of the indirect benefits illegal immigration has for the economy, illegal immigration probably creates jobs.

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/02/17/magazine/do-illegal-immigrants-actually-hurt-the-us-economy.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0

UglyGreed

(7,661 posts)
16. Well here on long island
Sat Nov 15, 2014, 09:11 AM
Nov 2014

most of the trades are dominated by Hispanics and that is also the case in the factories. Are they all illegal immigrants? I can not say, but I have had work done on my home and most of the workers don't speak English.

Please don't think I'm being a racist or anything I'm just going by what I see. I used be a Carpenter hanging doors and such and I treat all workers fairly. I buy them lunch, always offer water and such, since when this was done for me it made me feel appreciated, not like a servant.

I have worked in East Hampton and in many "rich" neighborhoods and sad to say those folks would not offer anything and even if I asked to use a bathroom I was given the stink eye.

It was always the middle class and elderly people that treated me well, so I do what I can for all the workers who come to my home, I don't care about their legal status. I hope I made my point clear since I don't want another label added to my list.

LukeFL

(594 posts)
29. A lot of "American citizens" don't want those
Sat Nov 15, 2014, 07:29 PM
Nov 2014

Jobs anymore. Carpenters, landscapers, bathroom cleaners, etc... I highly doubt these type of workers who happen all to be immigrants are taking these jobs away from Americans.

Now what Americans want are behind the desk jobs.. I can assure you that in my line of work where I have posted jobs for tile installers for MONTHS not ONE "AMERICAN" applied.

UglyGreed

(7,661 posts)
31. Yeah that's the meme
Sat Nov 15, 2014, 07:49 PM
Nov 2014

it may be true or it may be the contractor's who look to cut the workers down so their profits margins rise. All I know I did that work that no American will do. Until I got injured on the job and the contractor would not give his WC info and fought tooth and nail to deny me my benefits. By the way I've had two back operations and now five herniated discs and two levels of stenosis in that area I did not injure that day. The carrier CNA, spied on me until I could not take anymore and settled my case. Just Sayin"

UglyGreed

(7,661 posts)
33. Also housing cost are
Sat Nov 15, 2014, 08:06 PM
Nov 2014

sky high here and many so called scabs can not afford to live here anymore so that may be a part of the problem also.

LukeFL

(594 posts)
34. What I can tell you is that I don't
Sat Nov 15, 2014, 08:15 PM
Nov 2014

Like the jobs that big companies are giving to supposedly professionals from other countries because we don't have professionals here. - which is not true- Americans are graduating from college at a higher rate now than ever before, and are actively looking for jobs- and a lot of these jobs are bring lost to Peiple from India who are being transferred here with H1B visas.

The H1B visas must be eliminated.

UglyGreed

(7,661 posts)
40. I agree whole heartily
Sat Nov 15, 2014, 09:44 PM
Nov 2014

with what you wrote. Greed and money is a factor in both problems I feel. The workers, be it those who come here for a better life or those who have H1B visas are pawns to be used by corporations and greedy people who take advantage of those who must live in the shadows. Thank you very much for the replies, it is very difficult subject to discuss.

forthemiddle

(1,381 posts)
17. Will you feel the same when the next Republican President does the same thing?
Sat Nov 15, 2014, 09:30 AM
Nov 2014

There will be a future GOP President, will you feel the same way when they decide they will tell the attorney general to not enforce laws against LGBT discrimination for example? Or telling not enforcing the contraceptive provision of ACA?
Or when a GOP President tells the feds not to enforce federal gun laws?

It will go both ways, and will set precedence. So while we may love this President flexing his power, will we feel the same way next time?

Although you may not believe a thing Paul Ryan has to say (with good reason) he stated that the GOP did have a comprehensive immigration bill, that would have passed in a bipartisan manner last session. But when President Obama started changing the ACA through Executive orders the support dropped right off. The GOP realized that if their immigration bill was signed, President Obama would interpret it in whatever way he wants.

We complained about Bush's EOs, yet President Obama (who complained the loudest) now has taken them to a new level.

I agree with President Obama most of the time, but I also respect the three branches of government more, and in my opinion no President is allowed to make new laws, which is what he is doing, whether you agree with the law or not.

 

Vattel

(9,289 posts)
19. I myself have criticized Obama for playing fast and loose with the law on many occasions. But
Sat Nov 15, 2014, 11:40 AM
Nov 2014

in this specific case, he is exercising his genuine authority to discretion in the enforcement of the law. I agree with you that it sets a somewhat dangerous precedent, and so there is a real trade-off here. I respect your opinion that the benefits are not worth the risks, but I guess I feel strongly that here the benefits are so great that they are worth the risk. The last Republican president had no respect for the law and I doubt that the next one is likely to be influenced by Obama's behavior on the immigration issue. And even if I am wrong about that, I think the benefits of what Obama plans to do are apt to far outweigh the cost.

forthemiddle

(1,381 posts)
22. Lets hope you are right!
Sat Nov 15, 2014, 06:35 PM
Nov 2014

Sorry I posted and ran, I got called out of town unexpectedly.
I am hoping you are right. I do not question the authority of the executive order, I just question the almost absolute power it gives one branch of government. I also truly fear a future GOP President using all of these orders as precedence to "interpret" laws in the ways they may see fit. I was never happy (or quiet about it) when Bush decided he was the "dictator", and I can't change my mind now.
I really don't want someone "interpreting", or selectively enforcing gun laws, or abortion laws.
The only good part about doing it now is that it will be a forgotten issue by the 2016 election, kind of like the Government shutdown was never brought up during this one.

 

Ykcutnek

(1,305 posts)
20. Any President, regardless of party, should have that power.
Sat Nov 15, 2014, 11:46 AM
Nov 2014

I'll complain about the contents of the Executive Orders by a Republican president, but I'll never complain about the issuance of executive orders.

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
25. Sell your bullshit about immigration being all Obama's fault because of the ACA
Sat Nov 15, 2014, 06:57 PM
Nov 2014

somewhere else.

Although you may not believe a thing Paul Ryan has to say (with good reason) he stated that the GOP did have a comprehensive immigration bill, that would have passed in a bipartisan manner last session. But when President Obama started changing the ACA through Executive orders the support dropped right off. The GOP realized that if their immigration bill was signed, President Obama would interpret it in whatever way he wants.


Seems like you believe Paul Ryan when he blames everything on Obama.

You are not fooling anyone.

still_one

(92,219 posts)
27. Thanks for pointing it out, and what Obama did was not a violation of anything
Sat Nov 15, 2014, 07:06 PM
Nov 2014




Presidents of both parties have been doing this for years. Remember W?

http://georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov/news/orders/

Response to Vattel (Original post)

TheKentuckian

(25,026 posts)
23. Gotta do something or those oft discussed demographic changes will mean shit.
Sat Nov 15, 2014, 06:42 PM
Nov 2014

For the Republicans to teabag Latinos with even greater fervor for a few more years and wreck any hope of winning the demographic or else namby pamby around some more and end up with a split or actually losing our advantage.

TheKentuckian

(25,026 posts)
35. Absolutely, but the do nothing and stand for nothing but everything crew
Sat Nov 15, 2014, 08:26 PM
Nov 2014

would have us hiding down in a hole, doing what we know to be wrong while shooting ourselves in the foot going forward over the coming several decades.

Winning doesn't come from playing not to lose but more importantly the risk adverse need to process that just because you are on the lowest reward situation it doesn't mean you have selected the least risk.

Further, there has to be acceptance of the fact that there is no permanent majority and no winning everytime. It is about what you do with the opportunities you have.

Stop trying to make the sun stay up forever and focus on making hay while it shines, that's the real game and you'll find you have opportunities enough to get what is needed and put up for the future as well.

 

yeoman6987

(14,449 posts)
30. They have at least 3 Hispanic candidates for
Sat Nov 15, 2014, 07:39 PM
Nov 2014

President in 2016. President Bush received 45 percent of the Hispanic vote at least. I would not put a guarantee on voting with any demographic.

TheKentuckian

(25,026 posts)
36. I don't suggest that at all but for some that is apparently the whole game
Sat Nov 15, 2014, 08:50 PM
Nov 2014

Either way you aren't going to keep it by just counting on it, better earn those votes and sure as shit protect the votes you do have.

still_one

(92,219 posts)
26. I agree and I also believe they may try to impeach him on it, depending how
Sat Nov 15, 2014, 07:01 PM
Nov 2014

Insane the republicans feel

 

riderinthestorm

(23,272 posts)
28. I really hope they extend this to agriculture workers
Sat Nov 15, 2014, 07:07 PM
Nov 2014

Their blood, sweat and tears should be rewarded. I think they are amongst some of the most exploited alongside the butcher plants, working in consistently dangerous conditions for truly despicable $$



lunamagica

(9,967 posts)
41. I know this is an old thread, but there is nothing awesome about not
Sun Nov 16, 2014, 05:38 AM
Nov 2014

having a way to permanently legalize your situation.

Undocumented immigrants were more than willing to get "back of the line" and pay fines if that meant getting a green card, and eventually, citizenship.

Obama's executive order will only grant temporary work permits (note the word temporary). There's not a path to citizenship. That makes them second class "citizens" unable to vote, unable to make long term plans because they have to keep hoping and praying the permit is renewed year after year, always wondering how long will they be allowed to stay.

The cost of renewing the work permit every year, or year an a half will add up and be much higher than any fine.

Sure, it's better than nothing, but far from "awesome".

 

Vattel

(9,289 posts)
42. You put your finger on the real limitation of his plan: it is temporary.
Sun Nov 16, 2014, 07:37 AM
Nov 2014

That's why I said it was better than some immigration reforms if the next President doesn't cancel it. I do think that fines are especially bad because they punish people for behavior that isn't morally wrong. It's not just the money. It's the injustice of being punished that is offensive.

lunamagica

(9,967 posts)
43. I completely agree wit everything you wrote, but
Sun Nov 16, 2014, 10:42 AM
Nov 2014

after eight, ten twenty and more years people are desperate to feel they are home, meaning that they have full rights, and they are not afraid to be thrown out.

Yes, they realize is unjust and offensive, but if that's the way to get a Green Card, they will take it. They can't afford to be offended

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»I think Obama's planned e...