Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

cali

(114,904 posts)
Sun Nov 16, 2014, 05:23 AM Nov 2014

Why the Gruber tapes are so damaging to democrats and

why the republicans will continue to exploit the living hell out of them:

It's simple. The message has swiftly been distilled by the republicans and the MSM to:

Democrats think YOU are stupid.

82 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Why the Gruber tapes are so damaging to democrats and (Original Post) cali Nov 2014 OP
'Dumb and Dumber To' leads Friday box office IADEMO2004 Nov 2014 #1
If I may be so bold -- Nuclear Unicorn Nov 2014 #2
+1 YarnAddict Nov 2014 #11
Can't help but wonder . . . YarnAddict Nov 2014 #14
I'm assuming you're saying "you" in the rhetorical sense. Nuclear Unicorn Nov 2014 #17
I meant to reply to the OP YarnAddict Nov 2014 #21
's all good, my sister from another mister. Nuclear Unicorn Nov 2014 #24
Good on us-- YarnAddict Nov 2014 #25
Gruber was just working out of the Administration Playbook, Jackpine Radical Nov 2014 #37
"Retarded liberals??" n/t YarnAddict Nov 2014 #39
Here's a sampling-- Jackpine Radical Nov 2014 #40
The comment refers to Rahm Emanuel when he was White House former9thward Nov 2014 #41
Ouch. Never heard that. n/t YarnAddict Nov 2014 #44
That's because it didn't happen. jazzimov Nov 2014 #50
Please refrain from injecting facts into these types of discussions pkdu Nov 2014 #55
Meanwhile the media pays no attention to geek tragedy Nov 2014 #3
I dunno. Romney's "47-percent" video seemed to have made the charts. Nuclear Unicorn Nov 2014 #4
Mitt Romney vs some MIT professor? geek tragedy Nov 2014 #6
Gruber isn't just "some MIT professor." He got a sole-source consulting contract. Nuclear Unicorn Nov 2014 #7
Which makes him a legislative player, how? nt geek tragedy Nov 2014 #8
Because he was the one that wrote the lies that Pelosi couldn't see until she passed it. nt Nuclear Unicorn Nov 2014 #9
Oy. You really, really hate Obamacare. geek tragedy Nov 2014 #15
Post removed Post removed Nov 2014 #19
So you favor repeal then. geek tragedy Nov 2014 #27
I have agreed to no RW lies. I have taken Gruber at his word. Pelosi too. Nuclear Unicorn Nov 2014 #32
On what basis have you decided to agree with the Tea Party geek tragedy Nov 2014 #33
This thread is about Gruber admitting he used lies and accounting gimmicks to make the law Nuclear Unicorn Nov 2014 #35
More Teahadist talking points. geek tragedy Nov 2014 #46
You can't explain away Gruber's numerous and repeated comments so you play the chump option. nt Nuclear Unicorn Nov 2014 #48
Gruber is an arrogant tone deaf asshole. geek tragedy Nov 2014 #58
What is a sole source consulting contract? Wella Nov 2014 #56
Why can't we discuss this issue without bringing in unrelated matters? Mojorabbit Nov 2014 #45
So what? geek tragedy Nov 2014 #47
Is there nothing you will not twist into a pretzel to defend for this admin? nt Mojorabbit Nov 2014 #51
Rejecting the wingnut talking points du jour should be the default. geek tragedy Nov 2014 #57
Yet they lie on a daily basis with no media push back. JaneyVee Nov 2014 #34
Not to mention all Gruber's completley wrong statements ShadowLiberal Nov 2014 #61
You mean like what you are doing right here? Kingofalldems Nov 2014 #5
Truth be told Boom Sound 416 Nov 2014 #10
That isn't the truth Shrek Nov 2014 #13
True. But this is website coverage Boom Sound 416 Nov 2014 #16
Hate to tell you this but you are wrong. Even my local news channel talked Autumn Nov 2014 #54
Well yeah, we think they are stupid. lonestarnot Nov 2014 #12
Stupid is as stupid does! Elect people who want to take away your safety net??? Pisces Nov 2014 #18
That is the message and truth. greytdemocrat Nov 2014 #20
Can't help but wonder . . . YarnAddict Nov 2014 #22
Centrists and people who don't follow politics? JaneyVee Nov 2014 #31
So did you know all along YarnAddict Nov 2014 #36
The bipartisan oligarchy thinks we are stupid, woo me with science Nov 2014 #23
As I wrote in Post #17 Nuclear Unicorn Nov 2014 #26
+100000 You see clearly. woo me with science Nov 2014 #30
+1 L0oniX Nov 2014 #29
oh, woo me, there you go gumming up the works with facts magical thyme Nov 2014 #42
"cut his health insurance by 20,000" woo me with science Nov 2014 #66
+1000 nt Mojorabbit Nov 2014 #52
"We are pulled to the right. We are manipulated like fools." joshcryer Nov 2014 #62
One made quite effective.. sendero Nov 2014 #67
It's going to be good when people dig up the HRC quote. joshcryer Nov 2014 #71
Here's.. sendero Nov 2014 #72
Gruber should removed from any political position ChazII Nov 2014 #80
Actually our plutocracy depends on enough stupid people staying home for elections. Rex Nov 2014 #70
It was stupid to believe Obama campaigning on single payer. L0oniX Nov 2014 #28
It's a PR disaster. What are Obama and the Democratic Party... WorseBeforeBetter Nov 2014 #38
well, Pelosi tried to claim she never heard of Gruber and brush him off as nonexistant magical thyme Nov 2014 #43
LOL Isn't she the one who said we have to wait for the bill to pass, WorseBeforeBetter Nov 2014 #49
I don't really care what this insignificant guy says or thinks. Ykcutnek Nov 2014 #53
The MSM is pushing the "Liberal elitists" meme super-hard right now Odin2005 Nov 2014 #59
Something tells me newblewtoo Nov 2014 #60
Liberals are doing a pretty good job of pushing the liberal elitist meme, sadly Recursion Nov 2014 #64
It would be easier to refute if so many Democrats didn't, in fact, think Recursion Nov 2014 #63
Did he say what he said or did he not? If he did, the problem isn't what the Right or the Corporate sabrina 1 Nov 2014 #65
kick woo me with science Nov 2014 #68
That's funny considering Repukes want to burn us at the stake. Rex Nov 2014 #69
Because he is a Republican? kentuck Nov 2014 #73
If the reports are true, Gruber belongs in jail Man from Pickens Nov 2014 #74
GRUBER belongs in jail? He wasn't the one who passed the law. hughee99 Nov 2014 #75
He appears to have been a key conspirator in certain fraudulent acts Man from Pickens Nov 2014 #78
Which fraudulent acts? hughee99 Nov 2014 #79
One is specifically detailed in this article Man from Pickens Nov 2014 #81
This guy worked FOR the administration hughee99 Nov 2014 #82
Of course Democrats don't think people are stupid... hughee99 Nov 2014 #76
Did the GOP fredamae Nov 2014 #77

Nuclear Unicorn

(19,497 posts)
2. If I may be so bold --
Sun Nov 16, 2014, 08:17 AM
Nov 2014

Many here outright say as much as a reflexive response any time the American public's preferences don't coincide with their own. And if the "You're stupid!" line of argumentation isn't winning back the public they'll leap for the ever-gentler, "You're racist!"

But that belies the point Gruber has now been seen repeatedly asserting to using subterfuge and accounting gimmicks to hide the intentions of his construct. He was paid handsomely via sole-source contracts.

Those who are in denial of this fact will scream, "You're stupid!" to try and scare people away from discussing it but repeating what Gruber said only underscores what Gruber said, not diminish it. "You're stupid," is a defense but usually the Defense is employed after the Offense has been rendered. In this instance the Defense IS the Offense. There is no fallback position now.

 

YarnAddict

(1,850 posts)
14. Can't help but wonder . . .
Sun Nov 16, 2014, 10:56 AM
Nov 2014

Exactly WHO did Gruber think was so stupid they had to be lied to? R Reps & Senators? Obviously not, since not a single one of them voted for it. The old white farts who showed up to protest at townhall meetings? Well, no, since they were against it from the start. The general public? Well, since a whole lot of them voted against Obama, who had been promising this sort of program, it must be more specific than that.

Must be he meant the D Reps & Sens, who actually voted for the bill. Must be he meant those of us who supported the bill all along, and those who voted Obama/Biden in 2008.

So, since he must have been specifically calling YOU stupid, how do you feel about his remarks now??

Nuclear Unicorn

(19,497 posts)
17. I'm assuming you're saying "you" in the rhetorical sense.
Sun Nov 16, 2014, 11:01 AM
Nov 2014

That being said, I honestly never wholeheartedly supported the ACA.

Any *thing* that relied on private, for-profit corporations means only one thing: codified profiteering. Not markets, not efficiency, not cost-cutting. Just profiteering by force of law.

I'm just a stupid hick country girl. Certainly no match for the wits of a big city MIT economist -- but I know bullshit when I smell it.

Jackpine Radical

(45,274 posts)
37. Gruber was just working out of the Administration Playbook,
Sun Nov 16, 2014, 11:53 AM
Nov 2014

the one put together by Rahm Emanuel for dealing with the fucking retarded liberals.

Jackpine Radical

(45,274 posts)
40. Here's a sampling--
Sun Nov 16, 2014, 12:08 PM
Nov 2014
http://www.salon.com/2012/10/16/rahm_emanuel_takes_liberal_base_bashing_to_a_whole_new_level/

Among the least effective ways to help a struggling candidate is to berate that candidate’s base voters. Self-evident as it is, this basic lesson is nonetheless often ignored by President Obama’s most vocal supporters. Typically, they criticize liberals who have not merely the audacity to hope – but also the audacity to cross-reference the president’s record with his original campaign pledges. So anathema is such an act to Democratic partisans that Obama administration officials now brazenly defy their most crystal clear promises – and then openly mock those who object to the duplicity.

Now, though, as the election enters its final death throes and the spasms of partisan desperation get ever more intense, Democrats are flinging out a special version of the old berate-the-base tactic. Rather than copping to the president’s betrayals and explaining them away as allegedly necessary compromises, one of the president’s chief surrogates, Rahm Emanuel, is publicly insisting that the president’s most loyal supporters are downright stupid because they believe Obama made specific promises which he supposedly never made.


http://inthesetimes.com/article/7080/was_rahm_right
In 2009, then-White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel infamously said that progressives are “fucking retarded.”


former9thward

(32,025 posts)
41. The comment refers to Rahm Emanuel when he was White House
Sun Nov 16, 2014, 12:12 PM
Nov 2014

Chief of Staff. He said certain liberals were "fucken retarded".

White House chief of staff Rahm Emanuel apologized to the head of the Special Olympics today after the Wall Street Journal reported the fiery Chicagoan privately called a group of liberal activists "f—ing retarded."

http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2010/02/rahm-apologizes-for-privately-calling-liberal-activists-retarded/

You notice he did not apologize to liberals, just the Special Olympics.

jazzimov

(1,456 posts)
50. That's because it didn't happen.
Sun Nov 16, 2014, 01:12 PM
Nov 2014

Some Liberals were discussing advertising against less-Liberal Democrats. Rahm said that IDEA was "fucking retarded". He never called the Liberals themselves retarded.

pkdu

(3,977 posts)
55. Please refrain from injecting facts into these types of discussions
Sun Nov 16, 2014, 01:49 PM
Nov 2014

they are not helpful to those who are still waiting for their glitter-shitting pony, and in fact are likely to give them a " sad ".

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
6. Mitt Romney vs some MIT professor?
Sun Nov 16, 2014, 10:18 AM
Nov 2014

How much attention did McConnell's blatant lies about repealing Obamacare but keeping Kynect get?

Response to geek tragedy (Reply #15)

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
27. So you favor repeal then.
Sun Nov 16, 2014, 11:27 AM
Nov 2014

You seem to have the DKF position--agree with all Teahadist lies about the ACA such as the claim it has already failed--but of course you support single payer.

Nuclear Unicorn

(19,497 posts)
32. I have agreed to no RW lies. I have taken Gruber at his word. Pelosi too.
Sun Nov 16, 2014, 11:40 AM
Nov 2014

And then you play this silly game --

but of course you support single payer.

Ah, I see. So the only option left is to support corporate profits by force of law with no real expansion in access to medical care.

You must be a insurance corporation stockholder.
 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
33. On what basis have you decided to agree with the Tea Party
Sun Nov 16, 2014, 11:42 AM
Nov 2014

that the ACA has already been proven to be a failure?

Nuclear Unicorn

(19,497 posts)
35. This thread is about Gruber admitting he used lies and accounting gimmicks to make the law
Sun Nov 16, 2014, 11:47 AM
Nov 2014

palatable. If the law was destined to be such a rousing success why would he lie?

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
46. More Teahadist talking points.
Sun Nov 16, 2014, 12:47 PM
Nov 2014

He is a computer modeler. He did not draft the legislation.

Your true colors are showing.

Mojorabbit

(16,020 posts)
45. Why can't we discuss this issue without bringing in unrelated matters?
Sun Nov 16, 2014, 12:24 PM
Nov 2014

I am pissed off at the comment. How did such a politically tone deaf asshole get the position he had in the first place.

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
47. So what?
Sun Nov 16, 2014, 12:49 PM
Nov 2014

This has no substantive bearing on the law. This is a coordinated wingnut publicity scheme to grease the skids for the SCOTUS to gut the law.

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
57. Rejecting the wingnut talking points du jour should be the default.
Sun Nov 16, 2014, 03:47 PM
Nov 2014

You ought to question why you're pushing a Koch brothers-funded meme.

 

JaneyVee

(19,877 posts)
34. Yet they lie on a daily basis with no media push back.
Sun Nov 16, 2014, 11:45 AM
Nov 2014

The media basically serves as a daily platform for republican lies and propaganda.

ShadowLiberal

(2,237 posts)
61. Not to mention all Gruber's completley wrong statements
Mon Nov 17, 2014, 12:13 AM
Nov 2014

A lot of the things Gruber says in the videos are simply not true, such as his claim that it was vital the CBO score the mandate as a 'duty' and not a 'tax', and it scoring the mandate as a tax would kill the bill. That's simply wrong, no matter what the mandate was called it would still bring in the same amount of money when the CBO ran the numbers. Maybe politically it would be a tougher sell, but not with the CBO.

That's just 1 of many things he obviously gets flat out wrong.

 

Boom Sound 416

(4,185 posts)
16. True. But this is website coverage
Sun Nov 16, 2014, 11:01 AM
Nov 2014

And the CBS is linked to slate.

There is very little broadcast coverage otjer than the five.


Autumn

(45,107 posts)
54. Hate to tell you this but you are wrong. Even my local news channel talked
Sun Nov 16, 2014, 01:22 PM
Nov 2014

about it. It has even been mentioned on other TV shows this morning.

greytdemocrat

(3,299 posts)
20. That is the message and truth.
Sun Nov 16, 2014, 11:15 AM
Nov 2014

But since it makes POTUS look bad a lot
here don't want to hear it.

What Gruber said said was insulting.

 

YarnAddict

(1,850 posts)
22. Can't help but wonder . . .
Sun Nov 16, 2014, 11:19 AM
Nov 2014

Exactly WHO did Gruber think was so stupid they had to be lied to? R Reps & Senators? Obviously not, since not a single one of them voted for it. The old white farts who showed up to protest at townhall meetings? Well, no, since they were against it from the start. The general public? Well, since a whole lot of them voted against Obama, who had been promising this sort of program, it must be more specific than that.

Must be he meant the D Reps & Sens, who actually voted for the bill. Must be he meant those of us who supported the bill all along, and those who voted Obama/Biden in 2008.

So, since he must have been specifically calling YOU stupid, how do you feel about his remarks now??

 

YarnAddict

(1,850 posts)
36. So did you know all along
Sun Nov 16, 2014, 11:52 AM
Nov 2014

what the Cadillac tax was going to cost actual people, or did you buy the line about the employers paying it? Did you believe that "if you like your plan you can keep your plan," etc.

woo me with science

(32,139 posts)
23. The bipartisan oligarchy thinks we are stupid,
Sun Nov 16, 2014, 11:19 AM
Nov 2014

and they continue to count on it, by making this into yet one more sham Red vs. Blue "battle" to distract us from the fact that both corporate parties wanted this thieving corporate system.

No WAY corporatists on either side will allow the mandate to be repealed; it is already skyrocketing insurance company profits beyond their wildest dreams. The insurance companies wrote the thing, and it was *designed* to entrench an exploitative, profit-sucking system of middlemen that keeps costs spiraling at the expense of human beings who need care. Look instead for more "loopholes" like the one the Obama administration *already* carved out in order to help the companies shift even more costs to patients.

If most people understood how it is rigged, and how much is being stolen, they would be outraged. The mandate was a corporate wet dream - it ensures that obscene levels of money that should be going to health care instead are given as a cut to these thieving health insurance middlemen. It ensures continued spiraling costs. And it ensures a continued motive to deny care for profit.



"Why Health Insurance Shareholders Are Loving Obamacare"
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10025517310

Aetna Health Insurance will double Revenues to $100 billion by 2020 thanks to Obamacare
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1014670789

ObamaCare Enriches The Health Insurance Giants and Their Shareholders
http://www.forbes.com/sites/robertlenzner/2013/10/01/obamacare-enriches-only-the-health-insurance-giants-and-their-shareholders/

So far in 2013 the value of the S& P health insurance index has gained 43%. Thats more than double the gains made in the broad stock market index, the S & P 500. The shares of CIGNA are up 63%, Wellpoint 47% and United Healthcare 28%.


Obama administration quietly approves new Obamacare loophole benefiting insurance companies.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10024970298



How bad is it?

Medical Debt: A Curable Affliction Health Reform Won’t Fix
http://www.pnhp.org/news/2013/june/medical-debt-a-curable-affliction-health-reform-won%E2%80%99t-fix

The high frequency of medical bankruptcy was often cited by advocates of health reform during the debate over the ACA. Yet the debate largely ignored the fact that most medical debtors actually have coverage. In order to protect Americans from bankruptcy, coverage must be truly comprehensive, that is, it must cover virtually 100 percent of all needed medical care. Unfortunately, the insurance policies mandated under ACA are required to cover only 60 percent of expected health-care costs.



http://www.nerdwallet.com/blog/health/2014/03/26/medical-bankruptcy/

56 MILLION Americans under age 65 will have trouble paying medical bills.

Over 35 MILLION American adults (ages 19-64) will be contacted by collections agencies for unpaid medical bills.

Nearly 17 MILLION American adults (ages 19-64) will receive a lower credit rating on account of their high medical bills.

Over 15 MILLION American adults (ages 19-64) will use up all their savings to pay medical bills.

Over 11 MILLION American adults (ages 19-64) will take on credit card debt to pay off their hospital bills.

Nearly 10 MILLION American adults (ages 19-64) will be unable to pay for basic necessities like rent, food, and heat due to their medical bills.

Over 16 MILLION children live in households struggling with medical bills.

Despite having year-round insurance coverage, 10 MILLION insured Americans ages 19-64 will face bills they are unable to pay.

1.7 MILLION Americans live in households that will declare bankruptcy due to their inability to pay their medical bills.

Three states will account for over one-quarter of those living in medical-related bankruptcy: California (248,002), Illinois (113,524), and Florida (99,780).

To save costs, over 25 MILLION adults (ages 19-64) will not take their prescription drugs as indicated, including skipping doses, taking less medicine than prescribed or delaying a refill.








Nuclear Unicorn

(19,497 posts)
26. As I wrote in Post #17
Sun Nov 16, 2014, 11:24 AM
Nov 2014
I honestly never wholeheartedly supported the ACA.

Any *thing* that relied on private, for-profit corporations means only one thing: codified profiteering. Not markets, not efficiency, not cost-cutting. Just profiteering by force of law.

I'm just a stupid hick country girl. Certainly no match for the wits of a big city MIT economist -- but I know bullshit when I smell it.

woo me with science

(32,139 posts)
30. +100000 You see clearly.
Sun Nov 16, 2014, 11:30 AM
Nov 2014

Bullshit fumes only cover so much.

"Codified profiteering." What an absolutely perfect label for what has turned out to be the overarching agenda of this corrupt, purchased, bipartisan corporate government we have now.

The TPP and the TISA will be the best examples of Codified Profiteering yet.


 

magical thyme

(14,881 posts)
42. oh, woo me, there you go gumming up the works with facts
Sun Nov 16, 2014, 12:14 PM
Nov 2014


I never supported ACA. Insurance is not health care. Never has been and never will be. Insurance companies take your money in exchange for zero, zip, nada.

I've have been, and continue to be, excoriated here for not supporting ACA. I don't care. The people who claim I want to take away the sick person's health care don't understand that they seem to want me living in the street to pay for somebody else's health care.

What I found most stunning -- and shows how incredibly out of touch some people are -- was the DUer who bragged about how ACA cut his health insurance costs by $20,000.

That year I barely made $20,000. And I know there are plenty on this board and elsewhere making less than that. And there was a DUer who clearly makes a *lot* of money to be saving more money on health insurance than we earn bragging because we will be forced to subsiding his savings.

I will pay the penalty this year. I will pay the penalty next year. Actually, now that I have read that the penalty is only imposed by withholding tax returns, and not in any other way, and I won't have a tax return because my per diem health care delivery job doesn't withhold my federal taxes so I end up owing...I won't even have to worry about the penalty for not paying the penalty. So I may simply not pay the penalty, after all

In which case I, personally, become neutral on ACA because I can still remain outside the scam that health insurance is.

joshcryer

(62,276 posts)
62. "We are pulled to the right. We are manipulated like fools."
Mon Nov 17, 2014, 12:45 AM
Nov 2014
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10021110837

The paternalistic attitude that liberals are playing the populace is really a right wing meme.

sendero

(28,552 posts)
67. One made quite effective..
Mon Nov 17, 2014, 09:28 AM
Nov 2014

.. by the likes of Gruber. As I have said, this guy should be ostracized from any political job, he is fucking ebola because of his big stupid mouth.

 

Rex

(65,616 posts)
70. Actually our plutocracy depends on enough stupid people staying home for elections.
Mon Nov 17, 2014, 01:03 PM
Nov 2014

That and fear. Notice no more huge fear about ebola in the news? Elections over.

 

magical thyme

(14,881 posts)
43. well, Pelosi tried to claim she never heard of Gruber and brush him off as nonexistant
Sun Nov 16, 2014, 12:15 PM
Nov 2014

that kind of got debunked in a hurry.

WorseBeforeBetter

(11,441 posts)
49. LOL Isn't she the one who said we have to wait for the bill to pass,
Sun Nov 16, 2014, 12:57 PM
Nov 2014

before we'll know what's in it? Why, she's a regular Dennis "That's because I read it" Kucinich!

Wonder how much Obama is even in touch with Reid and Pelosi post-midterm drubbing. He seems a lone wolf, by choice, and that hasn't proven good for the Democratic Party.

 

Ykcutnek

(1,305 posts)
53. I don't really care what this insignificant guy says or thinks.
Sun Nov 16, 2014, 01:22 PM
Nov 2014

Everyone I know is getting good insurance because of the law.

Including me.

This latest anti-ACA story is brought to you by ALEC and anyone who feigns outrage over it is either a useless idiot or a willing participant in their quest to revoke insurance from millions of people.

Odin2005

(53,521 posts)
59. The MSM is pushing the "Liberal elitists" meme super-hard right now
Sun Nov 16, 2014, 04:42 PM
Nov 2014

Something tells me that this "scandal" was timed perfectly to delegitimize the ACA.

newblewtoo

(667 posts)
60. Something tells me
Mon Nov 17, 2014, 12:08 AM
Nov 2014

this is the next to be trotted out.




It is a convenient way to keep your opponent on the defensive and drive a wedge between diverse groups. Think of the White Privilege threads here for example.

Of course lots of people seem to have dirty hands and sticky fingers:

http://my.firedoglake.com/fflambeau/2010/05/08/an-updated-list-of-goldman-sachs-ties-to-the-obama-admin-including-elena-kagan/

we are at a point were the best we can seem to say is my crooks are more clever than your crooks so it should be no surprise this tactic is being employed.



Recursion

(56,582 posts)
64. Liberals are doing a pretty good job of pushing the liberal elitist meme, sadly
Mon Nov 17, 2014, 01:03 AM
Nov 2014

How many post-mortems came down to, "well, if only voters weren't such mouth-breathers..."?

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
63. It would be easier to refute if so many Democrats didn't, in fact, think
Mon Nov 17, 2014, 01:02 AM
Nov 2014

that low-income conservative voters are stupid and consistently "vote against their own interests" (rather than even acknowledging the possibility that they see their interests differently than we do).

sabrina 1

(62,325 posts)
65. Did he say what he said or did he not? If he did, the problem isn't what the Right or the Corporate
Mon Nov 17, 2014, 01:14 AM
Nov 2014

Media do with it, the problem is the HE SAID IT! Now, what are WE going to do with the knowledge that our own party thinks we are stupid?

 

Rex

(65,616 posts)
69. That's funny considering Repukes want to burn us at the stake.
Mon Nov 17, 2014, 12:59 PM
Nov 2014

Stupid? Maybe, living in south Texas I have met more than my share of stupid Foxnews viewers. What I find most of them to be is ignorant of what their own party is doing. The GOP controls the flow of information, therefore they own the narrative.

Plus anyone that believes Obama is a Muslim agent or Marxist-Fascist puppet for the UN is a fucking idiot. And that makes up a large part of the GOP crowd.

Dems need to control the message and stop letting the M$M carry water for the GOP.

 

Man from Pickens

(1,713 posts)
74. If the reports are true, Gruber belongs in jail
Tue Nov 18, 2014, 12:04 PM
Nov 2014

What he has done is called fraud, and the damage he has done to the Democratic Party is incalculable. Premeditated, in cold blood. He defrauded not only the people as a whole, but all of the parties that paid him millions in contracts as well.

How many ugly parts of that bill did you swallow because you believed that Gruber's claims were true?

hughee99

(16,113 posts)
75. GRUBER belongs in jail? He wasn't the one who passed the law.
Tue Nov 18, 2014, 01:14 PM
Nov 2014

If you pass a massive overhaul of the US health care system, and you make your decisions based on the advice of a single person, you should be booted out of office for gross incompetence.

 

Man from Pickens

(1,713 posts)
78. He appears to have been a key conspirator in certain fraudulent acts
Tue Nov 18, 2014, 01:47 PM
Nov 2014

perhaps even the one who came up with the idea

Ignoring the political end of things, that's a flat-out crime for which John Doe would be busted if he got $1000 for, and this guy walked off with millions!

 

Man from Pickens

(1,713 posts)
81. One is specifically detailed in this article
Tue Nov 18, 2014, 05:50 PM
Nov 2014
http://news.investors.com/ibd-editorials-obama-care/111714-726840-gruber-deception-helped-enact-obamacare.htm

And given the depth of the public record I would be confident, based on what we know now, that we can find the deceptions he created all over the place. This guy got millions to invent lies - lies which led directly to heavy Democratic losses two weeks ago.

hughee99

(16,113 posts)
82. This guy worked FOR the administration
Tue Nov 18, 2014, 06:30 PM
Nov 2014

And from the other articles I've seen, he wasn't acting all on his own, nor were his employers ignorant to the flaws in his analysis. If you want to persue fraud charges, it's not going to all end up on him. As far as blaming HIM for Dem losses, he produced the PR the administration wanted, and the administration touted his findings. To suggest that they're not culpable in this is laughable. In the end, the ACA passed, and it's not going away any time soon.

hughee99

(16,113 posts)
76. Of course Democrats don't think people are stupid...
Tue Nov 18, 2014, 01:17 PM
Nov 2014

although the day after the midterm elections, a whole lot of DUers did.

fredamae

(4,458 posts)
77. Did the GOP
Tue Nov 18, 2014, 01:28 PM
Nov 2014

read and fully understand the Iraq War vote or did they just want war?
Did the GOP read and fully understand the Patriot Act?

The 2006 lame duck vote that is destroying our USPS re: Unreasonable Mandates for Retirement Funding?

I admit the learning curve in the Political World is challenging to me....but all I see here is Another "new" shiny toy to scare and distract from real issues. It's unfamiliar to the masses because "normally" pols on both sides vote everyday under the Same criteria-so yes, "they're" able to sell grubers comments as "OBAMAS Fault---look what the dictator is doing Now-Run" BS!

If we'd start, perhaps---seeing the decades old large picture...when was this scenario (grubers comments) Not the case no matter the party?

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Why the Gruber tapes are ...