General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsDoes Our Military Know Something We Don't About Global Warming?
http://www.forbes.com/sites/jamesconca/2014/11/14/does-our-military-know-something-we-dont-about-global-warming/...
At a time when Presidents Ronald Reagan and Bush 41, and even British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher, called for binding international protocols to control greenhouse gas emissions, the U.S. Military was seriously studying global warming in order to determine what actions they could take to prepare for the change in threats that our military will face in the future.
The Center for Naval Analysis has had its Military Advisory Board examining the national security implications of climate change for many years. Lead by Army General Paul Kern, the Military Advisory Board is a group of 16 retired flag-level officers from all branches of the Service. This is not a group normally considered to be liberal activists and fear-mongers. This year, the Military Advisory Board came out with a new report, called National Security and the Accelerating Risks of Climate Change, that is a serious discussion about what the military sees as the threats and the actions to be taken to mitigate them.
The potential security ramifications of global climate change should be serving as catalysts for cooperation and change. Instead, climate change impacts are already accelerating instability in vulnerable areas of the world and are serving as catalysts for conflict.
newfie11
(8,159 posts)For the most part heads in the sand, climate deniers.
2naSalit
(86,780 posts)I find it interesting that they continually insist on exemptions from EPA/Clean Air Act/Clean Water Act regulations and ESA protections on their bases. It is also interesting someone would make such a suggestion given that the military is one of the largest consumers of fossil fuels on the planet and have very little interest in efficiency regarding their fossil fuel use.
This may just be them singing a sing of deflection trying to convince the rest of us that they care or are interested in our concerns regarding the decimation of the biosphere.
bemildred
(90,061 posts)To everybody.
Recursion
(56,582 posts)It hits the global south first and hardest, and is going to have (is already having) significant national security implications.
On the other hand, it occasionally works for peace: India and Sri Lanka were getting close to a shooting war over a tiny uninhabited rock between them. They came out for the new round of saber rattling a couple of years ago and the rock was submerged.
Excellent post!
Droning Predator
(82 posts)They know the facts!
AverageJoe90
(10,745 posts)BTW, don't take this as a denial of climate change......yes, it is real, and it *is* a problem. However, though, I don't believe the military necessarily has access to so-called "top secret", or whatever, climate info that we, on the street, don't have. Though perhaps this is just a case of poor wording by Forbes, more than anything.
CK_John
(10,005 posts)military problem???
Or what happens if Long Island is suddenly submerged???
Hope that the military are putting in place plans for the worst case situations now and not when they are happening.
Quantess
(27,630 posts)the masses of poverty stricken climate refugees will be lovingly embraced and welcomed by the wealthy elites of greener pastures. Live and let live!
former9thward
(32,082 posts)No scientist says that. 50 million people are not going to suddenly move to a new area. Nonsense.
CK_John
(10,005 posts)September 21, 1938 The New England Hurricane of 1938 (Also Called "The Long Island Express" makes landfall on Suffolk County (Long Island) as a category 3 hurricane on the Saffir-Simpson hurricane scale.
Wind gusts of 125 mph (200 km/h) and storm surge of 18 feet (5 m) washes across part of the island. In New York 60 deaths and hundreds of injuries were attributed to the storm. In addition, 2,600 boats and 8,900 houses are destroyed.
former9thward
(32,082 posts)Hurricanes have been around forever although diminishing in recent years as far as the U.S. And 50 million people did not suddenly move somewhere else. People are moving gradually from the North and East to the South and West. Part of that is economic and part is weather. Who wants to live in the frigid north all your life when you can live in decent weather in the SW.
XemaSab
(60,212 posts)Johonny
(20,888 posts)They have the same information as everyone else. Their job is to scenario plan future conflict and the decline in resources like water and food due to temperature change is very important to predicting future conflict. It is no surprise to the military that conflict is currently raging in areas of the world completely strapped for water resources and it will get worse.
rock
(13,218 posts)Does not last long unless it is reality based.