General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThe Contest that Sparked the Renaissance. Which one is Better? You Choose!
Last edited Mon Jun 26, 2017, 04:46 PM - Edit history (1)
[IMG][/IMG]
The Baptistry in Florence
[IMG][/IMG]
The competition panels portraying the Old Testament story of the Sacrifice of Isaac.
The Finalists
Lorenzo Ghiberti, an eminent Florentine goldsmith, sculptor and designer, whose panel is pictured here on the right
Filippo Brunelleschi, an architect and engineer, whose panel is on the left
The Competition
The competition was sponsored by Florences Cloth Guild in 1401, to determine who would design the second set of the massive 17 feet high doors to the Baptistery, an octagonal building containing 3 sets of doors (the first set had been done in the 14th century by Andrea Pisano). The elements of the panel telling this story that were to be included were strictly prescribed, had to be contained within a quatrefoil and they were to be in bronze.
What Happened
As you can see, Ghibertis is the simpler told tale --the stark reality shown in the anguished face of Abraham as he is poised to kill his beloved son Isaac because God has commanded it. He has portrayed Isaac fully nude in the classic Roman or Greek style. The angel above him appears as a spirit body, suspended in foreshortened form in the air, to prevent Abraham from carrying out the sacrifice of Isaac now that Abraham has shown his devotion to Gods Word.
Brunelleschis interpretation is disturbingly more violent (in an already inherently violent scene). His pro-active angel is an intrusion, physically restraining the hand of Abraham. Abraham has pulled back the head of Isaac and has twisted the boys body. Isaac is portrayed in a loin cloth, not nude as in Ghibertis version.
My theologically informed friend (who helps explain the Biblical exegesis of religiously themed art works for me) has told me of a Reform Jewish midrash of this story, which has the voice of the angel as Sarah's. When Abraham leaves with Isaac to go to Mount Moriah, Sarah knows something isn't quite right and she is overcome with a vision. She sees what Abraham is doing and understands his intent. She screams his name. And it is a mother's love and fear and anxiety that stays Abrahams hand, although Abraham believes it is his faith. The Christian meaning of the terrible calling of Abraham has to do with obedience, the willing sacrifice, and atonement. It is a test of faith, an instruction for daily living, and a foreshadowing of Jesus' sacrifice for humanity on the cross.
The Guilds Decision
The Guild decided in favor of Ghiberti, who was to go on and design the third door. Brunelleschi stormed off to Rome, where he studied architecture and engineering and was to return to Florence to win the award of designing the dome of the cathedral. This architectural wonder of its day has survived over six centuries and is the quintessential landmark of the city of Florence.
Adored by generations of artists including Michelangelo, reputed to have given them the name Gates of Paradise the gilded bronze doors of the Baptistry in Florence are among the seminal moments of the Italian Renaissance. Ghiberti decorated them with evocative and magically atmospheric scenes from the Old Testament, each carried out in relief ranging from high to low.
The merciless torrents in the Florence flood of 1966 wrenched open the doors and knocked off several of Ghibertis panels. They would have been lost had they not been kept back by a protective railing.
[IMG][/IMG]
A restoration of the doors was started in 1990 and took over 20 years to complete, saving the legendary gold-leafed bronze doors from certain destruction.
Today, the "Gates of Paradise" situated in the Baptistry are a copy of the originals, substituted in 1990 to preserve the panels from further exposure and damage.
These two original bronze panels by Ghiberti and Brunelleschi of the Sacrifice of Isaac can be seen today at the Bargello Museum in Florence.
cyberswede
(26,117 posts)B's composition is more of a pyramid & seems more static, while G's is a more dynamic use of the space (really directing the viewer's attention to Abraham & Isaac).
CTyankee
(63,912 posts)the scene basically was. But the more I looked at them the better I like Ghiberti's. There really is more strong feeling in Abraham's anguished face in his, where Brunelleschi attempts to include too much and crowd the panel.
lapislzi
(5,762 posts)The beautifully controlled geometry and symmetry of Ghiberti is what makes this Renaissance. It's classical in the classical sense of the word.
On the other hand, Brunelleschi looks ahead to the next century of Mannered composition, with its twisted forms and high drama. It's all movement, movement, movement. It found eerie and violent expression in the almost-surreal canvases of El Greco a century later. He's an extreme example, but you can see the forms being de-formed already in the early 15th century.
You can also see this in the gentle distortion of Michelangelo's St. Peter's Square. The perfect Renaissance circles, domes, and angles have been tweaked just a tad to create a new aesthetic.
Me? I like the Mannerist composition better, but I'm a romantic gal.
CTyankee
(63,912 posts)Mannerism has some craziness, IMO. I truly don't like El Greco, but some Mannerism is very pleasing (e.g. Veronese and Bronzino). And figura serpentinata has its limits...
Ghiberti's panel says a lot without a lot crowding the space, IMO. He has the emotion of your Mannerism in Abraham's face, but he suggests the mountain so beautifully it is hard not to marvel at his work here.
CTyankee
(63,912 posts)(both aged 19) took a trip to Florence by way of an art class at college, drank a bottle of Chianti and fell asleep on the steps of the Duomo, much to the amusement of the fiorentini. Ah, I guess it is what you do when you are 19 and you are a little crazy...
CTyankee
(63,912 posts)Hekate
(90,804 posts)...with great enjoyment. Perhaps my kick will bounce your OP back to the top.
Happy TG, CTyankee.
CTyankee
(63,912 posts)My first love in art was the early Italian Renaissance. I tore through several art history books on it and started doing serious research on it while my husband was recuperating from back surgery. It saved my sanity!
I have some other ideas for Friday afternoon art essays which I'll be developing. And in December I am slated to see the Goya exhibit in Boston's MFA. I'm very excited about that trip! And I'll post a review here...
Brigid
(17,621 posts)I have heard that some theorize that Abraham was duped by a "bad" angel posing as God, but God learned of what was happening and sent a "good" angel just in time to save Isaac.
CTyankee
(63,912 posts)I never heard that one but found some Jewish midrashes that quibbled over the term "sacrifice," saying the correct translation from the ancient texts would be "offering." That way, it avoids the whole idea of a father murdering his beloved son.
bhikkhu
(10,724 posts)"The Feud That Sparked the Renaissance" is one of the better books I've read in the past few year. It may be a bias from the book, but I've always been in the Brunelleschi camp - an amazing person, really, for his time or any time.
CTyankee
(63,912 posts)It is one of the two books on the story of the competition for design on the dome that I read in preparation for a study intensive in Florence in 2010. Art historians seem to disagree about these panels since both panels have great merit taken individually. I do like the harmonious way Ghiberti has fashioned his panel, tho. There is something very pleasing in it to me...