Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

RiverLover

(7,830 posts)
Fri Nov 21, 2014, 10:12 PM Nov 2014

The Other Canadian Tar Sands Pipeline Quietly Snaking Into the U.S. Without a Permit


The Other Canadian Tar Sands Pipeline Quietly Snaking Into the U.S. Without a Permit
By Zoë Schlanger 11/18/14
?itok=2OWdkCVX

While the country focuses on the pending Senate vote to approve or reject the Keystone XL pipeline, another Canadian company is quietly pressing ahead on a pipeline project that will significantly raise the volume of tar sands oil transported through the U.S. The company is pressing ahead without a permit, and environmental groups say it is flouting the law.

The company, Enbridge, is the same firm that spilled more than one million gallons of thick, sticky tar sands crude into the Kalamazoo River in Michigan in 2010.

Inside Climate News reports that Enbridge applied for a State Department permit two years ago for its latest project: a bid to increase the capacity of its “Alberta Clipper” pipeline from 450,000 to 800,000 barrels of tar sands crude per day. The Clipper crosses the border from Canada into the U.S. in North Dakota, so a Presidential Permit from the department would be required by law.

But, frustrated with the lengthy permitting process, Enbridge engineered a work-around that appears to get the job done, without a permit. By running a connection between two parallel Enbridge pipelines right on the border with the U.S., the company will be able to swap the contents of each. As the crude approaches the border with Canada in the Alberta Clipper pipeline, it will be diverted into the parallel “Line 3” pipeline, and swapped back into the Clipper once it reaches the U.S.. The move is projected to increase capacity to 570,000 barrels per day. But by the middle of next year, the company says it will transport 800,000 barrels per day of Canadian tar sands into the U.S. with "no additional permit," according to Enbridge attorney David Coburn.

In a letter to the State Department, Enbridge’s lawyer made clear its intention to press ahead with the plan without the Presidential Permit....

http://www.newsweek.com/all-eyes-keystone-xl-another-canadian-tar-sands-pipeline-quietly-snakes-us-285256



And at least one person who profits from it is Former Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner~

http://www.desmogblog.com/2014/11/14/former-treasury-secretary-timothy-geithner-warburg-tar-sands-exports
6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The Other Canadian Tar Sands Pipeline Quietly Snaking Into the U.S. Without a Permit (Original Post) RiverLover Nov 2014 OP
Geithner, it figures. nt Mnemosyne Nov 2014 #1
Well, well, well. Geithner. woo me with science Nov 2014 #2
kick, kick, kick..... daleanime Nov 2014 #3
More info on Enbridge Inc. Multichromatic Nov 2014 #4
Haha! You did it! RufusTFirefly Nov 2014 #5
Shady shit. blackspade Nov 2014 #6

woo me with science

(32,139 posts)
2. Well, well, well. Geithner.
Fri Nov 21, 2014, 11:49 PM
Nov 2014


What a pick for Treasury Secretary he was. Right up there with all the other Wall Street cronies. And even now his corporate gifts keep coming and coming...

Multichromatic

(14 posts)
4. More info on Enbridge Inc.
Sat Nov 22, 2014, 12:11 AM
Nov 2014

This is also a Tar Sands pipeline by Enbridge. It seems that Enbridge will ship Tar Sands Oil to Flanagan, IL by rail and then pump it to Cushing, OK.

This passes by Bloomington-Normal's source of water Lake Bloomington and it crosses large parts of the Mahmout aquifer in IL.

This is as dangerous as the Keystone XL pipeline. It is a backdoor tar sands pipeline the Army Corps of Engineers has illegally approved.

Most of it is already built in IL and is moving on to other states.


Background Info

http://thinkprogress.org/climate/2014/02/26/3252291/flanagan-south-tar-sands/

http://www.midwestenergynews.com/2014/08/26/enbridge-case-reflects-broader-effort-to-fast-track-pipelines/

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/steve-horn/labor-day-news-dump-ferc_b_5749710.html


Mahmout Aquifer Map




Enbridge Inc. Flanagan South Pipeline Route Map



Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The Other Canadian Tar Sa...