Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BrentWil

(2,384 posts)
Fri Nov 21, 2014, 11:04 PM Nov 2014

In Secret, Obama Extends U.S. Role in Afghan Combat

Amazing Story.

http://www.nytimes.com/2014/11/22/us/politics/in-secret-obama-extends-us-role-in-afghan-combat.html?hp&action=click&pgtype=Homepage&module=first-column-region&region=top-news&WT.nav=top-news&_r=0

President Obama signed a secret order in recent weeks authorizing a more expansive mission for the military in Afghanistan in 2015 than originally planned, a move that ensures American troops will have a direct role in fighting in the war-ravaged country for at least another year.

Mr. Obama’s order allows American forces to carry out missions against the Taliban and other militant groups threatening American troops or the Afghan government, a broader mission than the president described to the public earlier this year, according to several administration, military and congressional officials with knowledge of the decision. The new authorization also allows American jets, bombers and drones to support Afghan troops on combat missions.


So we will be doing combat missions in Afghanistan.
19 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
In Secret, Obama Extends U.S. Role in Afghan Combat (Original Post) BrentWil Nov 2014 OP
As the president said in the Rose Garden in May, PumpkinAle Nov 2014 #1
. NRaleighLiberal Nov 2014 #2
Its their problem, let them figure it out. We have problems here in the US. RiverLover Nov 2014 #3
Shit, these wars will never end. Autumn Nov 2014 #4
No outside power has ever been able to subdue Afghanistan, Mr. President. amandabeech Nov 2014 #5
+1 ~nt RiverLover Nov 2014 #6
It's called the graveyard of empires for a reason... truebrit71 Nov 2014 #13
I think they meant a "Not so secret order." Agnosticsherbet Nov 2014 #7
This message was self-deleted by its author 1000words Nov 2014 #8
Same war, economic, and police state policies no matter which party is in power. woo me with science Nov 2014 #9
+1 delrem Nov 2014 #12
+1 tjl148 Nov 2014 #15
2003-9 we ignored Afghanistan for Iraq, MisterP Nov 2014 #10
Well it can't be to big of a secret if it's in the New York times. nt William769 Nov 2014 #11
Gee why wasn't that on TV? nt Dreamer Tatum Nov 2014 #14
This message was self-deleted by its author 1000words Nov 2014 #16
It's very challenging for a politician to admit we lost...again. Tierra_y_Libertad Nov 2014 #17
kick United oligarchy, not gridlocked democracy. woo me with science Nov 2014 #18
kick woo me with science Nov 2014 #19

PumpkinAle

(1,210 posts)
1. As the president said in the Rose Garden in May,
Fri Nov 21, 2014, 11:09 PM
Nov 2014

“I think Americans have learned that it’s harder to end wars than it is to begin them.”

No, Mr. President it is not. What is hard is to say no to the military industrial complex and all those warmongers on Capitol Hill.

RiverLover

(7,830 posts)
3. Its their problem, let them figure it out. We have problems here in the US.
Fri Nov 21, 2014, 11:18 PM
Nov 2014

Just ONCE, I would like to hear a US president say those words. And mean it.

 

amandabeech

(9,893 posts)
5. No outside power has ever been able to subdue Afghanistan, Mr. President.
Fri Nov 21, 2014, 11:21 PM
Nov 2014

The Afghans are going to have to sort this out for themselves, just like the people who live in the former Ottoman Empire.

No matter when we leave, the result will be the same, so we might as well leave now.

Bin Laden is dead, GM is alive, and we have the ACA (for now). But a big reason that I voted for Obama was because I thought that he was going to keep us out of unwinnable wars. This is very disappointing.

Response to BrentWil (Original post)

woo me with science

(32,139 posts)
9. Same war, economic, and police state policies no matter which party is in power.
Fri Nov 21, 2014, 11:35 PM
Nov 2014

Of course he extends the US role in the Afghan conflict. Just as he has continued and expanded virtually every other major Bush war, economic, and police state policy.

One party, two faces.

We have united oligarchy, not gridlocked democracy. That's what the Princeton study revealed. Our form of government has changed. So much corporate money floods Washington now that the people have no influence on policy at all. We are ruled by an obscenely wealthy elite and their purchased corporate politicians in both parties.

We need to rally on policies, not party. No more corporate sellouts regardless of party. No more Third Way vultures in Democrat suits. No more lesser of two evils.

We need to become the 99 percent and stand against this garbage. We need to stop playing their manipulative partisan "lesser of two evils" game and rally behind someone like Bernie who recognizes and vows to fight to reverse what has been done to this formerly democratic nation.

delrem

(9,688 posts)
12. +1
Sat Nov 22, 2014, 01:12 AM
Nov 2014

Thank you for your posts. Your focus in post after post is spot on.
Keep it up, it helps in every kind of way.

MisterP

(23,730 posts)
10. 2003-9 we ignored Afghanistan for Iraq,
Sat Nov 22, 2014, 12:55 AM
Nov 2014

2009-13 we ignored Iraq for Afghanistan, now we're ignoring Afghanistan for Iraq again

Response to Dreamer Tatum (Reply #14)

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»In Secret, Obama Extends ...