Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Marr

(20,317 posts)
Sat Nov 22, 2014, 02:42 PM Nov 2014

What do you think another Wall Street crisis would mean for the 2016 elections?

Just hypothetically-- let's say we have another financial industry crisis sometime before the 2016 elections. Who would be hit hardest politically, and who would benefit politically?

5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
What do you think another Wall Street crisis would mean for the 2016 elections? (Original Post) Marr Nov 2014 OP
Dems would go down vadermike Nov 2014 #1
It would be blamed on President Obama. Agnosticsherbet Nov 2014 #2
Yep vadermike Nov 2014 #3
"Obama's industry-stifling regulations" would get all the blame jmowreader Nov 2014 #4
I tend to agree and this is why in some areas, the part of a loaf logic breaks down. TheKentuckian Nov 2014 #5

vadermike

(1,416 posts)
1. Dems would go down
Sat Nov 22, 2014, 03:02 PM
Nov 2014

Just like in 08 bush was blamed and not the Dem congress. You would be looking at all 3 branches Rethug unfortunately ...

Agnosticsherbet

(11,619 posts)
2. It would be blamed on President Obama.
Sat Nov 22, 2014, 03:35 PM
Nov 2014

It is difficult to place the blame on Congress because people do not have a relationship with the institution. Individual Congressmen are reelected every two years by people who think Congress is a cesspool. The negative opinion of Congress does not easily get passed to individuals in Congress.

The President, because he is this big freaking symbol at the top, will get the blame. Who really is to blame, his fault, congresses fault, nobodies fault, is irrelevant.

When you add to that the efficiency that the right wing media (and most of them are right wing media) have at affixing blame to anyone on the left through shrill repetition, it becomes a sure thing that Democrats would carry the blame.

Democrats would go down. It would not matter of we had a Sanders/Warren or Warren/Sanders team at the head of the Democratic ticket, Democrats will be blamed and suffer for it.

vadermike

(1,416 posts)
3. Yep
Sat Nov 22, 2014, 03:43 PM
Nov 2014

Sux but true. We better have our shit ready and we better have a lot of it like Richard Pryor used to say and a lot of it , ya know what u mean ? And hope like holy hell the market doesn't got down 30 plus percent every week in the middle of the election

jmowreader

(50,561 posts)
4. "Obama's industry-stifling regulations" would get all the blame
Sat Nov 22, 2014, 06:20 PM
Nov 2014

One hundred percent of the blame would be laid at the feet of Timothy Geithner and the Dodd-Frank Act, which somehow hamstrung the ability of the private sector to respond to the crisis fast enough. The Republicans, who would suggest complete deregulation of the financial industry as the solution, would benefit.

The sick part of that theory is, it would sell.

TheKentuckian

(25,026 posts)
5. I tend to agree and this is why in some areas, the part of a loaf logic breaks down.
Sat Nov 22, 2014, 06:39 PM
Nov 2014

If you don't do enough but pass SOMETHING that something will either be blamed or the party that passed it will be deemed a failure.

Sometimes you have to press for no less than minimal goals and accept not an iota less come Hell and high water. If you can't get it then you relentlessly and in no uncertain terms blame the ones who stopped you while pleading with the American people to send folks to Washington who don't seek to destroy our country and do it unceasingly.

No bogus bipartisanship, no meeting in the middle, no doing what the industry wants, no phony "disagreement on the edges".

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»What do you think another...