Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Little Star

(17,055 posts)
Sat Nov 22, 2014, 03:03 PM Nov 2014

Ferguson grand jury unusual in many ways

Not much is normal about the Missouri grand jury responsible for deciding whether to charge a suburban St. Louis police officer for fatally shooting Michael Brown.

Not the length of deliberations, not the manner in which it has heard evidence, not the way in which its work could be made public. Then again, the case itself is unusual.
~snip~

EXTRA TIME

At the time of Brown's shooting, a St. Louis County grand jury already had been hearing cases and was scheduled to disband Sept. 10. In one of the first indications that Brown's case would be different, a judge extended the jurors' service until January, the maximum amount of time allowed.

Whereas a typical case might be presented to a grand jury in a single day, this case has stretched over three months.

NO SPECIFIC CHARGE

It's fairly common in Missouri for a prosecutor to first file a complaint charging an individual with a crime, then go later to a grand jury asking it to indict the person for that offense. In this case, St. Louis County Prosecutor Bob McCulloch hasn't publicly suggested any particular charge against Wilson.

http://bigstory.ap.org/article/8a4fc5fecb6c48549d8cae0e9e0d1c81/ferguson-grand-jury-unusual-many-ways

3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Ferguson grand jury unusual in many ways (Original Post) Little Star Nov 2014 OP
Unless of course the prosecutor had no intention of bringing charges in the first place Lurks Often Nov 2014 #1
Is there anyone who doesn't already know the outcome? world wide wally Nov 2014 #2
Well they ajurned until Monday yeoman6987 Nov 2014 #3
 

Lurks Often

(5,455 posts)
1. Unless of course the prosecutor had no intention of bringing charges in the first place
Sat Nov 22, 2014, 03:13 PM
Nov 2014

whether because the prosecutor believed it was a justifiable shooting based on the evidence or because he was covering for Wilson, depending on one's viewpoint of course.

McCulloch dumped it in the Grand Jury's lap due to public outcry and perhaps political pressure.

Viewed in the abstract do we want district attorney's or attorney general's bringing charges when they know the person is innocent or defending laws they feel are wrong?

As an example, there are state legislatures that had passed laws against same sex marriage. Do you want the Attorney General to actively defend those laws even if the Attorney General does not agree with them?

world wide wally

(21,748 posts)
2. Is there anyone who doesn't already know the outcome?
Sat Nov 22, 2014, 03:22 PM
Nov 2014

I am not much of a gambler, but this is one bet I wish I could make. (unfortunately)

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Ferguson grand jury unusu...