General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsHow the New York Times Tries to Marginalize the Left
Published on
Thursday, November 20, 2014
by
The Providence Journal
http://www.providencejournal.com/opinion/commentary/20141120-john-r.-macarthur-new-york-times-tries-to-marginalize-the-left.ece
How the New York Times Tries to Marginalize the Left
by
John R. MacArthur
A typical media analysis was provided by The New York Times, which almost immediately started promoting the inevitability of Hillary Clintons nomination as the next Democratic candidate for president. Midterms, for Clinton Team, Arent All Gloom declared its front-page headline on Nov. 7. According to the papers reporter, Amy Chozick, the misfortune of President Obama and Senate Majority (soon-to-to-be-Minority) Leader Harry Reid equaled good news for Mrs. Clinton and her advisers, among whom a consensus formed
that it is time to accelerate her schedule. This move toward a more rapid coronation was due to pressure on the former First Lady to resurrect the Democratic Party, since Mrs. Clinton is already being scrutinized as the partys presumptive nominee.
-------snip-------
Chozick evidently couldnt be bothered to call anyone identified with the left. She did mention an additional silver lining for the Clinton campaign: the diminished
likelihood that former Gov. Martin OMalley, another Democrat, would emerge as a serious primary challenge to Mrs. Clinton. But, again, it doesnt appear that Chozick tried to call OMalley or his advisers. Nor, apparently, did she attempt to contact former Sen. Jim Webb, D-Va., or Sen. Bernie Sanders, D-Vt., both of whom are contemplating challenges to Clinton from this mysterious region that sits to the west when one is facing north. Mysterious because nowhere did the Times define the left or what might excite its opposition to Clinton. Our imaginations are allowed to run wild: is the left a terrorist organization? A part of the outfield? Or is it just not worth mentioning?
I favor the latter explanation, since the Times so often exhibits contempt for leftists and their insistence on alternative narratives to the one the paper likes to pedal. Given that the voice of the left in America is rarely heard in the corridors of power, the Times doesnt feel its important to report on it.
The Times only pays lip service to the left, mostly through its star columnist Paul Krugman, the Nobel Prize winning economist who often sounds like a leftist compared with the other Times editorial and op-ed writers. But Krugman appears to be a highly reluctant leftist so reluctant that before the midterm elections he wrote a cover story for Rolling Stone defending Barack Obama against leftist critics who think the Presidents agenda has favored the rich and the powerful: Theyre outraged that Wall Street hasnt been punished, that income inequality remains so high, that neoliberal economic policies are still in place. All of this seems to rest on the belief that if only Obama had put his eloquence behind a radical economic agenda, he could somehow have gotten that agenda past all the political barriers that have constrained even his much more modest efforts. Its hard to take such claims seriously.
Is Krugman serious? Obamas efforts were so modest that he failed to propose even a small increase in the minimum wage during his first term, the initial two years of which were presided over by big Democratic majorities in both houses of Congress. Nor did he back restoration of the Glass-Steagall Act (a relatively tame New Deal law whose reinstitution now has the bipartisan support of senators John McCain, Angus King, Elizabeth Warren and Maria Cantwell), or price controls on prescription drugs, or a reform of job-killing, Clinton-sponsored North American Free Trade Agreement (as he pledged during the 2008 campaign). He did manage to push through Obamacare, the Romneycare knockoff that has reinforced the power of rapacious health-insurance companies and caused many employers to cut full-time workers to part-time.
Continued at:
http://www.commondreams.org/views/2014/11/20/how-new-york-times-tries-marginalize-left