Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Blue_Tires

(55,445 posts)
Mon Nov 24, 2014, 01:19 AM Nov 2014

More from ol' Grandstandin' Rand:

WASHINGTON — Senator Rand Paul is calling for a declaration of war against the Islamic State, a move that promises to shake up the debate over the military campaign in Iraq and Syria as President Obama prepares to ask Congress to grant him formal authority to use force.

Mr. Paul, a likely presidential candidate who has emerged as one of the Republican Party’s most cautious voices on military intervention, offered a very circumscribed definition of war in his proposal, which he outlined in an interview on Saturday. He would, for instance, limit the duration of military action to one year and significantly restrict the use of ground forces.

Unlike other resolutions circulating on Capitol Hill that would give the president various degrees of authority to use force against Islamic militants, Mr. Paul would take the extra step of declaring war — something Congress has not done since World War II.

The president has said he will ask Congress for the explicit authority to fight the Islamic State, though administration officials have insisted that he has the legal power to continue the current campaign. That position has rankled many in Congress who are concerned that the White House has been waging war without the proper oversight or accountability.

http://www.nytimes.com/2014/11/24/us/politics/rand-paul-calls-for-a-formal-declaration-of-war-against-isis.html?partner=rss&emc=rss&_r=0

Any of the Randoids care to chime in?

3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
More from ol' Grandstandin' Rand: (Original Post) Blue_Tires Nov 2014 OP
If a Republican politician's lips are moving, SamKnause Nov 2014 #1
Weren't the Republicans the ones that criticized President Obama TexasTowelie Nov 2014 #2
Will he lose this essential support group? freshwest Nov 2014 #3

SamKnause

(13,106 posts)
1. If a Republican politician's lips are moving,
Mon Nov 24, 2014, 01:46 AM
Nov 2014

they are lying. (The Tea Party is the fringe of the Republican party for clarification)

It should be included in dictionaries as part of the definition.

I base my statement on personal observations as a political and news junkie.

I base my statement on my continuing education on the political history of this country.

Politicians of all parties can be vile and loathsome.

I think of them as selected or elected criminals.

In this scenario trickle down truly does work.

In the scenario of economics it has destroyed this country.

4 decades of PROVEN failed economic policies and the Republican's lips continue to move.

TexasTowelie

(112,198 posts)
2. Weren't the Republicans the ones that criticized President Obama
Mon Nov 24, 2014, 02:04 AM
Nov 2014

for setting a date to cease hostilities in the previous engagements in the Middle East?

If you declare war, then you are all in--there are no limitations as to the length of the war or the breadth of forces to be used. Rand Paul is an idiot for making this suggestion.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»More from ol' Grandstandi...