Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

loyalsister

(13,390 posts)
Mon Nov 24, 2014, 07:23 PM Nov 2014

The Great Debate Missouri governor’s pre-emptive state of emergency is an alarming mistake

I know, water is wet.
It's still a good read.



As America awaits a St. Louis grand jury’s decision on whether to indict a Ferguson police officer in the fatal shooting of unarmed black teenager Michael Brown, Governor Jay Nixon’s decision to declare a preemptive state of emergency in anticipation of the announcement has heightened the anxiety.

Under Missouri law, the governor can lawfully invoke a “state of emergency” on the “actual occurrence of a natural or man-made disaster of major proportions in the state, when the safety and welfare of inhabitants are jeopardized.”

There is no actual disaster in Missouri. Just the governor’s unfortunate presumption about what could unfold over the next week. In fact, Nixon’s emergency order rests on two presumptions: first, that the grand jury will not indict officer Darren Wilson, who is white; second, that the majority black Ferguson community, which has largely been engaged in lawful, constitutional protests since the shooting in August, will react violently and illegally.

http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/2014/11/24/missouris-governor-pre-emptive-state-of-emergency-is-an-alarming-mistake/


Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The Great Debate Missouri...