General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWhat would Romney have done??
Romney says that Obama cannot continue to blame his predecessor for the bad economy.
He says that Obama has been a failure. He took a bad situation and made it worse.
Oh, really?
What would Mitt Romney have done differently? What would he have done to stop the avalanche of job losses in 2009? In the very first month of the Obama Presidency, we lost 750,000 jobs. What would Romney have done?
When the American auto industry was about to go under, what would Romney have done? Would he have let them disintegrate and what impact would that have had on the economy?
Like most Republicans, he talks a good game but he doesn't walk the walk.
The American people had better march into the voting booths with their eyes wide open. If they think for an instant that the economy would have been better under Romney, then they should disabuse themselves of such delusions...
.
ducduc
(16 posts)And -- Osama Bin Laden would still be alive under a Romney presidency.
liberal N proud
(60,346 posts)Proud Liberal Dem
(24,438 posts)Last edited Fri Apr 20, 2012, 08:17 AM - Edit history (2)
The problem is that there will be a certain segment of the population whose lives have not significantly improved during the last 4 years and whom will somehow believe that that is President Obama's fault despite the actual complexities and nuances of the situation and will vote for somebody "different" thinking (hoping) that they will do a better job somehow- sort of like what happened in 2010. President Obama will have to work hard to show how everything he has done has benefited everybody in some way and how disastrous the policies that the GOP plans to implement under a R.MONEY "autopen" Presidency would be to the economic recovery and the well-being of middle class voters in general. I think that, given that the Republicans are not offering anything other than failed Bush economic policies (or worse), it should not be an incredibly hard case to make as long as most people still hold Bush accountable for the state of the economy that President Obama inherited. President Obama needs to also make the case that Republican obstructionism is largely to blame for more not getting more done in Congress, which shouldn't be too hard of a case to make either. I don't quite understand where the "magical thinking" that R.MONEY would be "better" for the economy comes from- though, I guess, the default assumption in our society is that businessmen are somehow better equipped to manage the economy than anybody else despite the overwhelming evidence to the contrary.
safeinOhio
(32,727 posts)Bush? Pleas, someone, ask him.
kentuck
(111,110 posts)All I've heard is that he would have let everyone go bankrupt and let the market take care of everything. Like Bush, he would cut taxes more for the wealthy and do away with more regulations. I have heard him say nothing that would not make everything worse than it is now. He would be a true disaster.
izquierdista
(11,689 posts)1) Get control (leveraged buyout, buy election, etc.)
2) Crank up the debt
3) Sell off the assets
4) Crank up some more debt
5) Cut wages
6) Take out a few loans
7) Raid the pension and benefit funds
8) Rehypothecate for another round of debt
9) Leave someone else holding the bag.
The only question remaining is: Is there much left in the United States that hasn't been squeezed already?