General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsMall Santa Turns Away Girl with Autism Because of Pit Bull Service Dog
From the ada.gov site....... Under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), privately owned businesses that serve the public, such as restaurants, hotels, retail stores, taxicabs, theaters, concert halls, and sports facilities, are prohibited from discriminating against individuals with disabilities. The ADA requires these businesses to allow people with disabilities to bring their service animals....snip... The service animal must be permitted to accompany the individual with a disability to all areas of the facility where customers are normally allowed to go. An individual with a service animal may not be segregated from other customers.
From http://www.peoplepets.com/people/pets/article/0,,20878830,00.html
Abcde Santos, 7, waited in line for half an hour with her service dog Pup-Cake to see Mr. Claus, but was greeted with an upsetting surprise once she finally reached the front of the line. St. Nick refused to see Abcde pronounced ab-suh-dee because he was leery of the 5-year-old pit bull accompanying her. The Santos family offered to take Pup-Cake outside so Abcde could have her turn, but the Santa still refused.....The Santos family contacted The Shops at Mission Viejo shortly after being turned away, and posted on Facebook that the mall reacted quickly and supportively. Shortly after receiving the family's complaint, The Shops issued a personal apology to Abcde and also posted one publicly to their own Facebook page.
"We do not condone the behavior displayed by Santa and have worked with our partners at Noerr, the company that hires our Santas, to replace this Santa with one that is more compassionate to our guests' needs," The Shops at Mission Viejo wrote. "We look forward to welcoming back the Santos family and Pup-Cake for a special Santa experience."
Noerr also reached out to Abcde and her family to apologize and offer the little girl her own private visit with Santa, Pup-Cake included.
The pictures at the website with the little girl & service dog, which I couldn't move here correctly here are very charming.
I am glad the mall owners & the santa employing company made it right so fast, good on them.
niyad
(113,576 posts)belzabubba333
(1,237 posts)his back against a tree. oh remember the woman and the cute little chimpanzee
joeybee12
(56,177 posts)Second, the dog is a service dog, so he has been trained to do this since he was a puppy...this dog would not attack...never....take your misplaced rage elsewhere.
belzabubba333
(1,237 posts)LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)Were I afraid of dogs, I'd attempt to rationalize it too.
Gormy Cuss
(30,884 posts)Chimps kept as house pets are still not domesticated animals.
Aerows
(39,961 posts)Gormy Cuss
(30,884 posts)uppityperson
(115,681 posts)LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)"Neither are Pit Bulls."
Editorial or objective fact? If the latter, what is the peer-reviewed source? If the former, how... adorable you are.
Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)uppityperson
(115,681 posts)baldguy
(36,649 posts)Right - ZERO.
Now you should apologize for being such a fool.
Taitertots
(7,745 posts)goes right next to "it is unsinkable".
You can join the millions of people who thought that way, right up to the point that they were contradicted by reality.
Douglas Carpenter
(20,226 posts)and selected for their very special purpose.
ASDA dogs must possess a particular temperament, intelligence, health, age and weight, and are raised from puppy-hood in our extensive training program for their important job.
We require the primary caregiver to train with us at ASDA headquarters so that they can learn to handle their service dog, become an ADA certified handler, and begin initial bonding. Phase two takes place with our trainer, but in the environment that the dog will actually live and work in. Both phases are essential for long-term success.
And it is the law -- By federal law (Americans with Disabilities Act, or ADA) a service dog is allowed access to any environment your child with autism is allowed access: schools, parks, doctors offices, restaurants, beaches, movie theaters, etc. And while the service dog may go out on occasion without the child, the child does not go anywhere without his or her service dog. Time together solidifies the relationship, keeps skills sharp, and helps the child grow in life skillstime together is not only permissible, but necessary.
http://autismservicedogsofamerica.com/faqs/
Taitertots
(7,745 posts)Do a quick google search and you would see that service dogs can (and do) bite people.
AND The ADA allows people to prohibit service dogs under a wide variety of conditions. The assertion that an animal can go anywhere a child can go is incorrect.
Ms. Toad
(34,092 posts)Title III 28 CFR Part 36 Nondiscrimination on the Basis of Disability in Public Accommodations and Commercial Facilities, Subpart A, Section 36.302 (C) (7), issued under the authority of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. 12181)
The exceptions:
(i) The animal is out of control and the animal´s handler does not take effective action to control it; or
(ii) The animal is not housebroken.
Title III 28 CFR Part 36 Nondiscrimination on the Basis of Disability in Public Accommodations and Commercial Facilities, Subpart A, Section 36.302(c)(2) issued under the authority of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. 12181)
If the animal is out of control (not if someone thinks it might become out of control and bite someone) AND the handler does not control it, then it can be excluded. Or if it is not housebroken. That's about it - 2 circumstances is not what I consider a "wide variety of conditions."
Taitertots
(7,745 posts)"There may be a few circumstances when a public accommodation is not required to accommodate a service animal--that is, when doing so would result in a fundamental alteration to the nature of the business"
http://www.ada.gov/archive/animal.htm
Links?
Ms. Toad
(34,092 posts)is based on the general rule ADA for accommodations. It predates the specific regulations implementing the ADA with respect to service animals.
Even so, the example given is consistent with the regulations I quoted to you: Generally, this is not likely to occur in restaurants, hotels, retail stores, theaters, concert halls, and sports facilities. But when it does, for example, when a dog barks during a movie, the animal can be excluded.
In other words there are a few rare exceptions, not "a wide variety of conditions." Specifically two exceptions, and the example falls within the exception that the "animal is out of control and the animal´s handler does not take effective action to control it."
As for links, I gave you the citation to the regulation which I quoted. Let me google that for you Rule 36.302
notadmblnd
(23,720 posts)and the damn santa still refused. There was no chance what-so-ever of that dog biting santa.
etherealtruth
(22,165 posts)http://www.ada.gov/service_animals_2010.htm
As stated in a prior post, essentially, a service animal can be prohibited if they are not under control or are not housebroken. Allergies, fear of dogs (or service animal), etc are NOT acceptable reasons.
cleanhippie
(19,705 posts)which that dog most likely was not.
etherealtruth
(22,165 posts)seriously, if you have info please provide (I would prefer to be informed if wrong).
The info I can find:
There is no such thing as a universally or legally-recognized certification, registration or training standards for Service Dogs or trainers. While some trainers and organizations may say they certify their graduates, that status is something granted by them and is not recognized under law, and often not by other trainers or organizations. Anyone can call themselves a trainer and because there is such a wide variety of training techniques, styles, schools, online courses and more, there is no universally recognized standard. Some of the best trainers in the world have never graduated from a course, as well, some of the best Service Dog teams do not come from programs.
Dogs may be trained by an individual trainer, an organization or by the disabled handler themselves.
As said above, there are no universal standards for Service Dog trainers. Service Dogs may be trained by an individual trainer, an organization or by the disabled handler themselves.
http://www.anythingpawsable.com/service-animals/how-can-i-tell-if-a-service-dog-is-legitimate/#.VIHHdmea9JY
cleanhippie
(19,705 posts)Douglas Carpenter
(20,226 posts)napi21
(45,806 posts)"Service dogs are selected for their temperament, intelligence." They are trained from puppies for their mission in life. The reason all service dogs, not only pit bulls, are so expensive is because they are extensively trained by professionals for at least nine monthe, THE they continue the training with the dog & it's master for 3-4 weeks. They are socialized with every situation possible from when they are puppies, cats, kittens, other dogs, kids of all ages, men, women, old and young and of all races so they are used to most everything and won't be distracted from their orders.
The Pit Bulls people are afraid of, and mostly with cause, are either not trained at all and left to do as they wish, or worse, trained to be "like a junk yard dog". Some people think it'os fun to have people afraid of THEIR dog!
Dogs that harm people or other animals are simply not trained not to do so. Lazy owners. Too lazy to do the work it takes to properly train a dog, or too lazy & stupid to know where to find out HOW to properly train their dog. It's a shame that the dogs have to suffer because of people.
irisblue
(33,033 posts)like seeing eye dogs attaching while on duty, but I did find the service dog being attacked by other dogs while on duty. (Military and the SS dogs are another matter). And by Federal Statutes, poorly behaved service dogs are excluded.......See... U.S. Code of Federal Regulations § 36.202(c)(2):
(2) Exceptions. A public accommodation may ask an individual with a disability to remove a service animal from the premises if:
(i) The animal is out of control and the animals handler does not take effective action to control it; or
(ii) The animal is not housebroken.
(3) If an animal is properly excluded. If a public accommodation properly excludes a service animal under § 36.302(c)(2), it shall give the individual with a disability the opportunity to obtain goods, services, and accommodations without having the service animal on the premises. U.S. Code of Federal Regulations § 36.202. I found this at http://www.anythingpawsable.com/things-service-dogs-public/#.VH_In2ccQkM.
belzabubba333
(1,237 posts)and as a person who has been bitten by and dog who "wouldn't hurt a thing" any rage I feel (which I don't ) is well in it's place in this post
Why is DU's popularity waning? (Title edited, explanation within.)http://www.democraticunderground.com/10025904116
maybe it's all the fucking civility people on this board have for each other if youre not part of the right clique
joeybee12
(56,177 posts)Maybe I don't have an axe to grind like some people.
irisblue
(33,033 posts)The girl and her service dog are very cute. For the record, my dog would never agree to wear antlers and bells.
cleanhippie
(19,705 posts)But was instead simply "designated" one by the family.
liberalhistorian
(20,819 posts)and your condescending disdain is disgusting. I raised a son with a form of autism. Many, many children with autism have service dogs who are specially trained for it. It helps them tremendously.
I have never known a mean pit bull. Each and every single one of them that I've interacted with has been friendly and easy to deal with. A former neighbor had one and he was the biggest baby you'd ever seen. The two times I was bitten or threatened by a dog, one was a beagle and the other a lab.
cleanhippie
(19,705 posts)If this was not a professionally trained service dog, it had no business at the mall, regardless of the breed.
If you are unable to see why people shouldn't bring their pets to the mall, were never going to agree.
liberalhistorian
(20,819 posts)professionally trained? Is there any indication in the article to show that? No, there isn't. Only your desire to show contempt for this child and her family. I've noted that people who are stingy enough to not like the fact that service animals even exist are always quick to fall back on the "but it's probably not professionally trained and not a real service animal" wagon. And they're usually wrong.
And yes, animals do not belong at a mall unless they're in a pet shop or are service animals. Whether you like it or not, there are many conditions for which people need and have trained. service animals and they are permitted to be in most public places.
cleanhippie
(19,705 posts)Douglas Carpenter
(20,226 posts)Douglas Carpenter
(20,226 posts)Enrique
(27,461 posts)quote of the day.
Erich Bloodaxe BSN
(14,733 posts)Naming a kid Abcde, I mean.
snooper2
(30,151 posts)Blue_Tires
(55,445 posts)and/or at the end of their frustration by trying to come up with that "perfect" trendy name that isn't already used by half the kids on their street...
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)skamaria
(329 posts)They probably pronounce it AB sea dee and call her Abby.just a wild ass guess.
Xithras
(16,191 posts)I don't know where the name originated, but I've met several small children named "Absidy" or "Abcity" over the past decade. All went by "Abby" as a nickname. I'd never heard the name before this past decade, so I have to assume that it came from a book or movie somewhere.
"Abcde" sounds like a cutesy spelling variation.
sammytko
(2,480 posts)I've heard of this, but thought it was an urban legend. Lol
Ms. Toad
(34,092 posts)pronouned Fuh-geezh.
I assumed Abscde was an attempt to provide anonymity to the child - until I saw the pronunciation guide. Sad.
LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)Says the guy calling himself Bloodaxe...
Erich Bloodaxe BSN
(14,733 posts)Erich Sebastian Bloodaxe, RN, PhD, MSA, BA, BS, BSN, ADN
I decided if I were to post behind a fake name online, I'd be much more tempted to act like a jerk, since I see so many people who hide behind made up names acting like jerks.
Codeine
(25,586 posts)That's beyond cool.
Erich Bloodaxe BSN
(14,733 posts)I tried substitute teaching for exactly one day...8th or 9th grade, I can't recall now. After being called 'Mr Bloodass' several times, I decided substitute teaching wasn't for me...
So it has its ups and downs. Heck, even 'Erich' confuses a lot of people. Half the time I get phone calls from people who want the E to be a long E sound, and the rest as 'rich'. It's actually pronounced the same as 'eric' in english or german, although it doesn't bother me when Austrians say it their way, which sounds like 'air-itch'.
RobinA
(9,894 posts)pronounce Erich? Sheesh, some people need to get out more, that's just sad.
customerserviceguy
(25,183 posts)It's like these parents sentenced this kid to a hard life. Maybe developing autism was the reaction to it...
At least it gives you an excuse to have a pit bull.
a la izquierda
(11,797 posts)And yes, I expect my first hide and no, I don't care. You really do take the cake with some of your comments.
baldguy
(36,649 posts)Orrex
(63,224 posts)Not a big fan of hyper-clever names, but she can take that up with her parents.
belzabubba333
(1,237 posts)now it's back to the unemployment line for santa
Orrex
(63,224 posts)yeoman6987
(14,449 posts)Children with disabilities. ADA was wrong on this. Hope the mall sues so that more Americans know of this dangerous practice. The Santa had every right to turn this child away. His life was at severe risk. Heck even if he ends up fired, at least he is alive.
uppityperson
(115,681 posts)I keep thinking you are serious and then you come up with a belly laughing whopper of a post.
yeoman6987
(14,449 posts)etherealtruth
(22,165 posts)Pay special attention to the 2013 award winner Elle (I'll tip you off, she's a therapy dog and a pit bull)
http://www.herodogawards.org/
liberal_at_heart
(12,081 posts)WorseBeforeBetter
(11,441 posts)You know at one time they were considered nanny dogs? Sure you do.
What's changed between then and now? Fuckers like Michael Vick, who decide to fight them? Speaking of Vick...
Hector, a former Vick dog. Poor little guy died recently from Babesia.
Handsome Dan, another Vick dog, thriving:
Tillie, used as bait:
Patrick. We all know his story thanks to that POS woman up in Newark who starved him and threw him down a trash chute.
Thor.
Killers, indeed.
liberal_at_heart
(12,081 posts)I never really considered myself a dog person until my husband got a guide dog. Now I am definitely a dog person.
WorseBeforeBetter
(11,441 posts)have stuck to cats just because they're lower maintenance. I've gotten into transport for dog rescues and when retired, plan to start fostering. Yeah, I'll admit I'm a bit of a junkie with the rescue sites on Facebook!
MillennialDem
(2,367 posts)liberal_at_heart
(12,081 posts)MillennialDem
(2,367 posts)Odin2005
(53,521 posts)...but I don't assume all people with Bipolar are violent monsters.
MillennialDem
(2,367 posts)chances.
B. I can tell by outward appearances whether a dog is a pitbull, pitbull mix, or similar breed. I can't do that with a person with bipolar disorder.
C. Dogs are far more likely to randomly attack strangers than humans.
D. I've seen many other pitbulls that bark or are otherwise very aggressive besides the two that almost bit a finger off.
baldguy
(36,649 posts)Try it. Here are pictures of ten dogs. None of them are purebred. They are all mixed breeds. ONLY ONE IS PART PIT BULL. Your job is to FIND THE PIT BULL!!
Dog 02
Dog 07
Dog 08
Dog 22
Dog 33
Dog 54
Dog 58
Dog 79
Dog 89
Dog 111
MillennialDem
(2,367 posts)pet your dog.
I'm not going to take it away from you or vote for anti pitbull ordinances so calm down.
(though I do think it should the law that all pets whether dog or not should be leashed, inside, or fenced in).
I don't really care for german shepherds, rottweilers, dogo argentinos, or many other breeds either.
baldguy
(36,649 posts)MillennialDem
(2,367 posts)baldguy
(36,649 posts)I don't think you can. Prove me wrong.
MillennialDem
(2,367 posts)are similar breeds by my definition of similar breed. And yeah I'm not going to play the game that only one of them is a true pitbull and one is a bull mastiff and one is a dogo argentino. All square headed bulky body dogs are bad mojo to me.
Also I'm using OR in the inclusive sense not exclusive. In other words I'm saying that I may not be able to tell the difference between a pitbull and a bull mastiff, but I can tell the difference between a pitbull type dog and a newfoundland.
Again not going to vote to ban them, so get over it. Not sure why you want everyone to love your pitbull rather than just want you to keep it in the house and have all the fun in the world you want with it.
baldguy
(36,649 posts)The American Staffordshire Terrier, the Staffordshire Bull Terrier, and the American Pit Bull Terrier. So this is a relatively simple request, given that the great majority of shelter dogs are classed as "Pit Bulls" & all the dogs in my post #175 are shelter dogs
Unfortunately for you, your irrational & il-informed racial prejudice against all "square headed bulky body dogs" puts you at a great disadvantage.
So, one more time: Prove me wrong.
Or can we establish that you're a bigot who has no clue what you're talking about?
MillennialDem
(2,367 posts)through, what is your end game here? To make me like pitbulls or other square headed bulky body dogs? Or what?
Again, I see a square headed bulky body dog, I'm not going to associate with it. What is the problem here?
baldguy
(36,649 posts)rather than on what they actually do. You put the blame of a few individuals' bad behavior on the backs of millions who have done nothing to deserve it & never will.
The fact is, you can't "tell by outward appearances whether a dog is a pitbull". You're just full of shit.
MillennialDem
(2,367 posts)Pitbulls (or dogs or even their owners) are not harmed by my opinion of them whatsoever. Even if I bought your premise about blame (I don't by the way), it is of NO CONSEQUENCE to dogs. Dogs do not understand collective blame. Dogs do not care why someone does not want to associate with them.
Again you have still not asserted any type of end game of what you are trying to accomplish with me, you just throw insults. I, in my bigoted ways have actually tried to have a conversation... if I dislike pitbulls, so then what? And you just throw more insults. If you do it again without answering "so what?" don't bother as I will not respond.
And finally, I stated I know what a pitbull or similar breed looks like - ie I can tell the difference between a square headed bulky bodied dog and a poodle. I didn't say I could tell the difference between a pitbull and a boxer. Your assertion of me saying that I could tell the difference between a pitbull and a boxer is either
a. flat out false
or
b. you do not understand the difference between inclusive or and exclusive or.
baldguy
(36,649 posts)Try reading the OP.
MillennialDem
(2,367 posts)baldguy
(36,649 posts)Thank you, at least for admitting how evil you really are.
MillennialDem
(2,367 posts)Khan, Osama bin Laden, and Nero.
baldguy
(36,649 posts)Just the small, pathetic, banal evil of taking Christmas away from a little autistic girl because of your own stupidity.
liberal_at_heart
(12,081 posts)autistic and one blind. My husband had a guide dog and that guide dog was a kinder more loving being than most humans I come across including some so called progressives on DU. You are not someone I want to associate with. You are going on ignore.
kelly1mm
(4,734 posts)Odin2005
(53,521 posts)WorseBeforeBetter
(11,441 posts)Should that breed be banned? Bad owners, bad dogs. And some dogs are just neurotic. A tightly-wound Cairn Terrier took a chunk out of friend's leg.
Pit bulls are not the vicious killing-machines they're made out to be.
MillennialDem
(2,367 posts)Sure acted like she was about to. I disliked that dog too and my mom would never restrain her while she was barking up a storm at any delivery or mail person.
MillennialDem
(2,367 posts)To behave but she just utterly hated me and another person.
DrDan
(20,411 posts)created apologists to accompany the vintage photos of kids and pits
WorseBeforeBetter
(11,441 posts)I believe it's the English Staffordshire Bull Terrier that's consider the nanny dog, because they're loyal, affectionate, and tend to be good with humans. Even little humans.
The problem is that they're too eager to please, and dog-fighting monsters exploit that. They're not for everyone, though. Just like an Akita, German Shepherd, Mastiff or Dogo might not be for everyone.
baldguy
(36,649 posts)And will post any amount of lies to promote that view.
WorseBeforeBetter
(11,441 posts)and I should have let it go. Alas.
tblue37
(65,488 posts)Last edited Thu Dec 4, 2014, 10:14 PM - Edit history (2)
and I insist that she be controlled when I visit, or I won't enter the house. She growls at anyone not close family who enters their home. They insist she doesn't really *mean* it, but I won't approach any growling dog who is not completely controlled. She is that way because she is that way, though, not because she's a pibbie.
WorseBeforeBetter
(11,441 posts)whether a pit bull or any other dog. I'd like to adopt a PB, but it's just not feasible with my work schedule.
KittyWampus
(55,894 posts)made that story up.
SammyWinstonJack
(44,130 posts)WorseBeforeBetter
(11,441 posts)Sweet little Calista, also used as bait.
Some people get lost on Pinterest, I get lost on pit bull (and pit bull type) rescue sites!
Odin2005
(53,521 posts)etherealtruth
(22,165 posts)... regardless of breed. The dogs are placed based on their individual temperament.
The 2013 "Hero Dog of the Year" was a pitbull service dog.
Ignorance is never an attractive trait
belzabubba333
(1,237 posts)im not alone in my thinking
Do a quick google search and you would see that service dogs can (and do) bite people
and btw unless you know everything youre ignorant about something so remember what's said about the accusing finger
see this http://www.democraticunderground.com/10025904116
baldguy
(36,649 posts)Art_from_Ark
(27,247 posts)The little darlings are just oh-so-sweet-and-cuddly.
Except when they're not:
http://www.dogsbite.org/dog-bite-statistics-fatalities-2014.php
liberal_at_heart
(12,081 posts)loving owners have bitten people? Some pit bulls bite people. So do other dogs. Most of the time it has to do with bad owners not properly training them and people not knowing how to act around dogs. Service animals are very, very vigorously trained and are well behaved, loving animals who do a great service to their owners.
Art_from_Ark
(27,247 posts)And if you looked at my link, you would find that lots of family members were viciously attacked by pit bulls in this year alone.
At any rate, pit bulls are one of the most dangerous breeds in the US:
"The deadliest dogs
"A review of 82 dog bite cases at a level 1 trauma center where the breed of dog was identified concludes that attacks by pit bulls are associated with higher morbidity rates, higher hospital charges, and a higher risk of death than are attacks by other breeds of dogs. Bini, John K. MD; Cohn, Stephen M. MD; Acosta, Shirley M. RN, BSN; McFarland, Marilyn J. RN, MS; Muir, Mark T. MD; Michalek, Joel E. PhD; for the TRISAT Clinical Trials Group, Mortality, Mauling, and Maiming by Vicious Dogs, Annals of Surgery (April 2011, Vol. 253, Issue 4, pp. 791797).
"Merritt Clifton, editor of Animal People, has conducted an unusually detailed study of dog bites from 1982 to the present. (Clifton, Dog attack deaths and maimings, U.S. & Canada, September 1982 to November 13, 2006; click here to read it.) The Clifton study show the number of serious canine-inflicted injuries by breed. The author's observations about the breeds and generally how to deal with the dangerous dog problem are enlightening. According to the Clifton study, pit bulls, Rottweilers, Presa Canarios and their mixes are responsible for 74% of attacks that were included in the study, 68% of the attacks upon children, 82% of the attacks upon adults, 65% of the deaths, and 68% of the maimings. In more than two-thirds of the cases included in the study, the life-threatening or fatal attack was apparently the first known dangerous behavior by the animal in question."
http://dogbitelaw.com/dog-bite-statistics/all-dog-bite-statistics.html
If a child of mine needed a service dog, a pit bull would be the absolute last dog I would consider.
baldguy
(36,649 posts)& has been debunked so many times it's no longer funny, and uses data from a liar:
The Academic Impostor Behind the Pit Bull Hysteria
The fact that you link to this notorious site, even after it has been repeatedly proven to be full of lies shows you have only evil intentions.
etherealtruth
(22,165 posts)Are you insinuating ignorance is a positive trait?
For those ignorant of what the ADA covers:
http://www.ada.gov/service_animals_2010.htm
Edit to add (from the link above):Allergies and fear of dogs are not valid reasons for denying access or refusing service to people using service animals. When a person who is allergic to dog dander and a person who uses a service animal must spend time in the same room or facility, for example, in a school classroom or at a homeless shelter, they both should be accommodated by assigning them, if possible, to different locations within the room or different rooms in the facility.
baldguy
(36,649 posts)They believe unfounded bullshit from charlatans about Pit Bulls & dutifully hate them, so they feel they can ignore the ADA & the welfare of the the people it benefits, and cheer when innocent dogs are executed. They believe unfounded bullshit from charlatans about vaccinations & dutifully hate them, so they feel they can ignore the diseases they prevent & the welfare of the the children they benefit. They believe unfounded bullshit from charlatans about climate change & dutifully deny that its happening, so they feel they can ignore the ice caps melting & the desertification & the billions of people it harms.
Odin2005
(53,521 posts)...the rights of people with service animals, despite the "inconvenience" it may cause.
etherealtruth
(22,165 posts)Americans with disabilities have rights .... despite bias, prejudice and ignorance of others!
Odin2005
(53,521 posts)liberal_at_heart
(12,081 posts)Douglas Carpenter
(20,226 posts)process and matching process - the children spend a great deal of time learning to work with these very specially selected and rigorously trained dogs
http://autismservicedogsofamerica.com/
By federal law (Americans with Disabilities Act, or ADA) a service dog is allowed access to any environment your child with autism is allowed access: schools, parks, doctors offices, restaurants, beaches, movie theaters, etc. And while the service dog may go out on occasion without the child, the child does not go anywhere without his or her service dog. Time together solidifies the relationship, keeps skills sharp, and helps the child grow in life skillstime together is not only permissible, but necessary.
http://autismservicedogsofamerica.com/faqs/
LisaL
(44,974 posts)Not pitbulls.
baldguy
(36,649 posts)5 Adorable Pit Bulls Who Are Changing Minds. Pit Bulls make great service and therapy dogs, too!
Booker the Pit Bull Service Dog
Lucas the Pit Bull Service Dog
Pit Bull Discrimination Is Never OK -- Especially For A Superhero Therapy Dog
This Pit Bull Defies All Stereotypes As The Perfect Therapy Dog
Louisiana Family Fights To Save Beloved Pit Bull After Town Bans 'Vicious Dogs'
The ADA was established precisely to prevent the the kind of unfair, ignorant & discriminatory bigotry you're advocating.
etherealtruth
(22,165 posts)You will be enlightened and understand that "service dogs" are not specific breeds .... but are chosen by individual temperament
JI7
(89,271 posts)but she was still refused.
belzabubba333
(1,237 posts)brendan120678
(2,490 posts)Because she's a minor.
But no...her name actually IS Abcde. I'll admit, that's a new one to me.
sarisataka
(18,774 posts)I'd make extra room on my lap for him to sit too.
Orrex
(63,224 posts)friendly_iconoclast
(15,333 posts)liberal_at_heart
(12,081 posts)Worried senior
(1,328 posts)I know they get such a bad rap, it's really too bad.
My granddaughter married a young man with a pitty, well trained and a loving dog. His father has two, one was his mother's and they just adopted a pitty mix, all good dogs.
liberal_at_heart
(12,081 posts)Odin2005
(53,521 posts)UncleYoder
(233 posts)Pup-Cake!
I love it.
lpbk2713
(42,766 posts)Who knew Santa was such a jerk?
dembotoz
(16,835 posts)simple stuff too.....
he is a jerk i tell you
a jerk
liberal_at_heart
(12,081 posts)Doesn't seem very progressive to me.
xchrom
(108,903 posts)glad he's gone.
TexasMommaWithAHat
(3,212 posts)is that too many are trying to pass off their dogs and other critters as service animals.
We have one women on an avian site I frequent who wants a large parrot as a service animal. First off, parrots would make horrible service animals. They are not domesticated like dogs, and while many are tame, they remain quite independent. They also don't do well in strange situations. I can't imagine the guy sitting behind me in the booth at my local joint with a large macaw on his shoulder!
It's a shame when a good thing suddenly becomes suspicious. Should people with service animals be required to have some kind of license to prove that it's actually a service animal.
And by the way, that is the most adorable pit bull picture I've ever seen. The little girl is adorable, as well.
Liberal_in_LA
(44,397 posts)Ms. Toad
(34,092 posts)the same way to provide useful service. That need not be the case.
Psychiatric Service Animals are trained to assist people with psychiatric disabilities including, but not limited to, post-traumatic stress disorder or schizophrenia.
Service Animals / Dogs are trained to do work or perform tasks that benefit people with disabilities including, but not limited to, alerting people to potential health situations, safely guiding visually impaired individuals through traffic; pulling wheel chairs and / or fetching dropped items for people with mobility challenges; alerting deaf people to sounds, such as phones and doorbells. They may provide protection or rescue work; or they could function as seizure, diabetes or other medical alert animals / dogs.
Service animals require one-and-one, individualized training to perform tasks that are geared to the specific needs of a disabled person.
Under the Fair Housing Act, there are no restrictions on the kind of animals allowed to serve as Emotional Support Animals and - according to one or more court decisions - training is not a requirement. (Ref. Lawsuit: Student Needs Guinea Pig For Support)
Emotional Support Animals don't require training above and beyond the training any pet receives (or should receive, i.e., toilet training [or "diapers"] and aggression management) to enable them to live peacefully amongst people without being a nuisance or a danger to humans or other animals. Their presence is to reduce the effect of an emotional or mental disability caused by (including, but not limited to) anxiety. They don't necessarily need to be dogs, but could be cats, birds or other animals - in some cases, even rats and reptiles - as long as they are able to perform this function.
Rouen Ducks as "Service Animals"
A lizard was classified as an ESA because her owner was allergic to everything else. Individuals allergic to feathers, cats, dogs and other fur could be prescribed a reptile as an ESA, for example, a bearded dragon, eyelash-crested gecko, and others. These animals can also provide comfort and reduce anxiety.
Rats have been effectively employed to alert individuals of impending seizures or unusual health attacks. One ESA rat's function was to alert a person in a wheelchair to a health condition by licking the back of its owner's neck.
http://beautyofbirds.com/emotionalsupportanimals.html
And one example of a parrot service animal:
http://www.forparrots.com/2013/09/07/parrots-as-animal-assisted-therapy/
liberal_at_heart
(12,081 posts)Sad to see such lack of understanding from a progressive website. Thank you for your posts. People obviously need to be educated better about service animals. My husband's guide dog passed away a year ago today. He saved my husband from being hit by a car twice. He was a better sentient being than most humans I encounter. I miss him so much.
Ms. Toad
(34,092 posts)The ADA was supposed to make things better by tailoring accommodations to the actual need - but (at least in education) has turned into non-accommodated children get a choice of 6 chocolates, and accommodated children get a choice from 36 (and if the one they need isn't in that box, too darn bad).
Service animals are too often viewed that way. There are certain standard functions that are familiar to everyone - but if the need being met falls outside of those functions, the service being provided by the animal is minimized all too often by calling the animal a pet, rather than a service animal.
liberal_at_heart
(12,081 posts)been getting food from a food bank. Only some didn't think he was really blind so they were harassing him. Now instead of going to the food bank he just goes without food for days and days. When we know he is out of food we take him some.
TexasMommaWithAHat
(3,212 posts)I'm so sorry your friend had to go through that.
hedgehog
(36,286 posts)blind. We saw the dogs at church, at the store, etc, and knew that they were working animals not to be approached and petted while they were on the job. Dogs trained to guide the vision impaired go through rigorous training and evaluation; a lot of them wash out of the program. I think there is a serious problem today with people labeling almost any animal as a service or support animal with the implication that their animal has received the same level of training as given to Guide dogs.
cleanhippie
(19,705 posts)There is a difference. A HUGE difference.
What actual Service Dog Training did this dog undergo?
Did it under go this minimum standard?
http://www.iaadp.org/iaadp-minimum-training-standards-for-public-access.html
I'm willing to bet it didn't.
etherealtruth
(22,165 posts)... they provide extraordinarily trained dogs and provide invaluable services .... HOWEVER, it is NOT required under the ADA.
From the ADA
To determine if an animal is a service animal, you may ask two questions:
1) Is the dog a service animal required because of a disability?
2) What work or task has the dog been trained to perform?
....
Under the ADA, it is the training that distinguishes a service animal from other animals. Some service animals are professionally trained; others are trained by their owners. However, the task that the service animal is trained to do must be directly related to the owners disability.
TexasMommaWithAHat
(3,212 posts)But a parrot would make a very rare "good" support animal.
Once parrots reach sexual maturity, they tend to get very independent, and some parrots don't reach sexual maturity for years. The same little parrot that was all "cuddly" at six months, might not want any cuddles at 2 years old. Also, parrots whose wings are clipped tend to be emotionally stunted, and would not make a good support animal. My parrots all fly freely in my house under my watchful eyes for a couple of hours every day.
Unfortunately, parrots are one of the least understood "pets." They also require way more time and attention than dogs, of which I have two and love dearly. They are much more sensitive to change than dogs, also, which is why people with a lot of parrot experience would never recommend a parrot as an emotional support animal. It's not fair to the parrot to be dragged around like a dog. I realize I'm going on a tangent...I need to stop.
truegrit44
(332 posts)I couldn't agree with you more!
Ms. Toad
(34,092 posts)Part of my response was based on your apparent (continuing) assumption that all service animals need to be capable of being present with their owner at all times, in all circumstances. That is just not the case - some service animals serve very specific functions, in specific times and places.
So the fact that most parrots would not make a good out-and-about support animals does not mean that there aren't certain parrots that can serve very specific services roles (that may or may not require that particular parrot to serve in a capacity outside of a home environment).
I was responding to your blanket exclusion of parrots as service animals, and the assumption that all service animals have to serve in very similar ways (which require them to be "dragged around" - not making a general assertion that parrots are generally appropriate as service animals.
hedgehog
(36,286 posts)TexasMommaWithAHat
(3,212 posts)that pig was toast.
Or is that "roast?"
Imo, just because a human may get emotional support from an animal, doesn't mean that animal is emotionally, psychologically, or intellectually able to perform the job on a consistent basis in a wide variety of situations.
cleanhippie
(19,705 posts)AndreaCG
(2,331 posts)You have no proof it's not a properly trained service dog. You're not even offering evidence. You're just being obstinant.
And according to the buzzfeed article posted earlier it IS a service dog. Where's my million bucks? And a million to ethereal truth who posted the buzzfeed link too.
cleanhippie
(19,705 posts)There has been no proof offered that it WAS a professionally trained service dog in such a manner as this...
http://www.iaadp.org/iaadp-minimum-training-standards-for-public-access.html
And I'm willing to bet it wasn't. It was most likely the family pet "designated" as one by the family.
And since it probably wasn't PROFESSIONALLY trained, as I stated in my previous post, you owe ME a million bucks.
Pay up, sucka!
AndreaCG
(2,331 posts)According to the family's public relations person, it is a trained service dog. Go ahead, disprove that. You're not providing any proof that it wasn't. You keep using the weasel word "probably". I'm going to refrain from saying what you're "probably" full of.
cleanhippie
(19,705 posts)The family just stated that is was a "service animal", much like that pig a woman took on a flight recently as her "service animal".
Don't hold back, let those personal attacks and insults fly. I can understand why you have the need to do that, people without a a rational argument find themselves with nothing else.
liberal_at_heart
(12,081 posts)cleanhippie
(19,705 posts)But you believe what you need to feel outraged.
etherealtruth
(22,165 posts)I am looking for information that would interpret the ADA differently than below:
Seriously, if you have info please provide (I would prefer to be informed if wrong).
The info I can find:
There is no universally recognized certification for Service Dogs (or trainers).
There is no such thing as a universally or legally-recognized certification, registration or training standards for Service Dogs or trainers. While some trainers and organizations may say they certify their graduates, that status is something granted by them and is not recognized under law, and often not by other trainers or organizations. Anyone can call themselves a trainer and because there is such a wide variety of training techniques, styles, schools, online courses and more, there is no universally recognized standard. Some of the best trainers in the world have never graduated from a course, as well, some of the best Service Dog teams do not come from programs.
Dogs may be trained by an individual trainer, an organization or by the disabled handler themselves.
As said above, there are no universal standards for Service Dog trainers. Service Dogs may be trained by an individual trainer, an organization or by the disabled handler themselves.
http://www.anythingpawsable.com/service-animals/how-can-i-tell-if-a-service-dog-is-legitimate/#.VIHHdmea9JY
Some, but not all, service animals wear special collars and harnesses. Some, but not all, are licensed or certified and have identification papers. If you are not certain that an animal is a service animal, you may ask the person who has the animal if it is a service animal required because of a disability. However, an individual who is going to a restaurant or theater is not likely to be carrying documentation of his or her medical condition or disability. Therefore, such documentation generally may not be required as a condition for providing service to an individual accompanied by a service animal. Although a number of states have programs to certify service animals, you may not insist on proof of state certification before permitting the service animal to accompany the person with a disability.http://www.ada.gov/qasrvc.htm
cleanhippie
(19,705 posts)I agree with the mall Santa, and if this was not a professionally trained service dog but a family pet designated as one, it had no business in a crowded mall, regardless of its breed.
etherealtruth
(22,165 posts)i think the idea is to provide greter access to people with disabilities ... not place hurdles in their way.
cleanhippie
(19,705 posts)Douglas Carpenter
(20,226 posts)service dog? link?
Abcdes mom offered to take Pupcake out of the mall completely and even asked if Santa would just smile and wave at Abcde, but Santa said, No because they support those dogs. The family explained the laws regarding service dogs, at which point they say Santa suddenly said he was allergic.
http://wgntv.com/2014/12/03/mall-santa-elf-fired-after-turning-away-girl-with-autism-with-pit-bull-service-dog/
baldguy
(36,649 posts)And are just passing unfair judgement on someone you see as an inferior.
cleanhippie
(19,705 posts)Here's a mirror so you can reflect on the irony of your statement.
kelly1mm
(4,734 posts)purposes if this dog was professionally trained? If so, what is the basis for that belief?
dilby
(2,273 posts)to remove the dog from the premises he should not have a problem.
jillan
(39,451 posts)It does not make the original action go away.
hedgehog
(36,286 posts)dilby
(2,273 posts)But hey lets throw a Service Dog vest on the dog and give it free access to the world.
etherealtruth
(22,165 posts)TexasMommaWithAHat
(3,212 posts)just doing varying services for their human companions - some dogs are trained to pick up things, turn lights on and off, some help the visually impaired, some offer emotional support. And there's dogs who help people with diabetes. It's amazing what animals - especially dogs - can do.
A woman I mentioned up thread had a lot of anxiety and was looking for a large parrot for emotionally support, which no one thought was a very good idea. Even a beloved parrot that's been in the family for twenty years can get cranky and hormonal and give a nasty bite, which seems to go against the idea of offering support for anxiety!
missingthebigdog
(1,233 posts)What do you mean by "without knowing exactly how the dog was trained?"
There are no specific requirements under the ADA about how the dog is trained.
hedgehog
(36,286 posts)Edited to ask - how does one become "certified" to train service dogs?
minivan2
(214 posts)I expected that to happen since I live in a red county.
liberal_at_heart
(12,081 posts)to take the dog away the Santa still refused to take the girl's picture.
True Blue Door
(2,969 posts)Assuming there's nothing darker in the details, I hope this doesn't harm the guy's job for being afraid of a pit-pull.
liberal_at_heart
(12,081 posts)I'm afraid excuse to kill black people. Being afraid is not an excuse. Besides someone upthread said the parents offered to take the dog far away while the little girl got her picture taken.
True Blue Door
(2,969 posts)ProudToBeBlueInRhody
(16,399 posts)Maybe you should step back and rethink that.
liberal_at_heart
(12,081 posts)Assuming a pit bull service animal will attack is a fear based prejudice and I will not stand for it. What is the statistics to back up this fear of pit bull service animals? How many pit bull service animals have bitten people? What is the statistics to back up this prejudice against service animals for emotional support that are not dogs? Why do people even care if someone with an emotional problem have a service animal whether it is a dog or a parrot? To me it's a lot like the Republicans claiming there is wide spread voting fraud. There just isn't enough actual reports to back up the fear based prejudice and I will call people out on it when I see it. My husband had a guide dog and that guide dog was a better person than most humans I meet including some people on DU.
WorseBeforeBetter
(11,441 posts)I'm white, not afraid, and certainly haven't killed anyone.
TeamPooka
(24,256 posts)Socal31
(2,484 posts)That Santa, a couple of the posters in this thread, and George Zimmerman have more in common than they might think.
ProudToBeBlueInRhody
(16,399 posts)liberal_at_heart
(12,081 posts)ProudToBeBlueInRhody
(16,399 posts)However, the disregard in this thread for the possibility the man has had a traumatic incident with a dog or pit bull is amazing. Instead, he simply MUST be a right-wing, racist, teabagger, Zimmerman supporter (WTF?) etc. etc....
Is that based on an assumption because he's playing Santa, he's lily white too?
People can have bad experiences with animals. They can be afraid of them. They can even be traumatized by them. Does that make them all awful people? NO!
My friend has a daughter who is a teenager now who is absolutely afraid of dogs, since a German Shepherd attacked her when she was 7. She is not a bad person, or a teabagger, or any such thing. She's a nice young woman and a liberal and she likes most animals, but she is petrified of most large dogs. She had a incident working in a store a year ago that caused her to run to the back room when someone came in with a service dog, and that almost got her fired. She felt awful, but she did what she had to do to remove herself from the situation because otherwise, it would have been bad real fast.
I really expect better here. We can condemn the guy for crossing the line in making this child and her family feel awful, but can we also acknowledge the possibility that it's not always the worst that makes someone act like that??? Can we get another side of the story? If another child in the line was scared of dogs and it caused a scene, would we bash that little kid too?
helpmetohelpyou
(589 posts)I met someone like that once walking a trail .
I had my dogs off the leash and when he saw them he didn't just freeze his face lost all color
and he grabbed around a tree and put his face into it.
I never saw anything like that before.
But if her parents told Santa that they would take the dog outside I don't see a reason to refuse the child.
ecstatic
(32,731 posts)cleanhippie
(19,705 posts)designated by the family as the childs' "service animal."
The two are very, very different animals (pun intended).
liberal_at_heart
(12,081 posts)cleanhippie
(19,705 posts)Can't make a rational argument? Use ignore!
Coventina
(27,172 posts)Please provide proof of your claims:
1. Please provide links about what is the legal requirement of service animals for Autistic children
2. Please provide proof that this dog did not have that training.
You are the one insisting that the child be deprived of her service animal.
The burden of proof is on you.
cleanhippie
(19,705 posts)In this case, lack of evidence IS the evidence.
But you believe whatever you need to in order to justify the outrage that a mall Santa turned away a child that brought her family pet to the mall.
Coventina
(27,172 posts)You don't have evidence of what "certified training" is, nor any proof that the family lacks it.
I'm not outraged that a child was turned away from Santa.
I think teaching kids that Santa is real is wrong and should be discouraged.
But I am outraged at a child being punished for having a service animal.
cleanhippie
(19,705 posts)Coventina
(27,172 posts)I'm glad I don't know you personally.
on edit: see post 255. All your arguments have now been proven false.
Reter
(2,188 posts)Wow, you are hyper-sensitive to ignore that easily. It's not like we're debating abortion or gun-control. We can disagree on pit bulls and still be friendly here.
helpmetohelpyou
(589 posts)The dog probably was determined by her doctor that it helps her cope better.
The animal doesn't have to go through professional training for that .
But Like I said it sounds like the Santa just was scared of dogs
cleanhippie
(19,705 posts)And most require them to be professionally trained to be able to deal with crowds, strangers, and the person they are servicing.
This dog probably was not and was the family pet, which should never had been allowed in the mall.
helpmetohelpyou
(589 posts)that are miniature poodles , pugs , etc
That are not trained service dogs but got their doctor to sign off it helps them cope with bi polar disorder
or other mental health issues
Are some of those people just using it to travel with their pets in a hotel?
You betcha.. but some are legitimate also
darkangel218
(13,985 posts)Poor guy!
Yes, some people have irrational fear if dogs. All dogs, no matter of breed.
helpmetohelpyou
(589 posts)But at the time it was nuts and I tried telling him from a distance the dogs were friendly
and they weren't paying him any mind.
They were just walking around sniffing bushes and trees like all dogs do.
What I ended up doing was I walked off the trail 40 feet or so
and called my dogs so he could walk by.
He wanted nothing to do with me but this is in the woods off a beating trail during winter time with 8" of snow on the ground.
People have to understand that are afraid of dogs that they might run into a couple walking on trails.
I guess I spoiled his hike.
BlueJazz
(25,348 posts)You will never see actual service dog organizations using pit bulls, or any terrier breeds for that matter, to do service work because of their hardwired genetic tendency toward reactiveness and animal aggression. In addition, using high risk breeds for service work creates too many issues for the handler, because the public is afraid of the dog, it draws too much unwelcome attention. Anyone can buy a "service dog" vest online.
Not sure of my thoughts on this.
baldguy
(36,649 posts)5 Adorable Pit Bulls Who Are Changing Minds. Pit Bulls make great service and therapy dogs, too!
Booker the Pit Bull Service Dog
Lucas the Pit Bull Service Dog
Pit Bull Discrimination Is Never OK -- Especially For A Superhero Therapy Dog
This Pit Bull Defies All Stereotypes As The Perfect Therapy Dog
Louisiana Family Fights To Save Beloved Pit Bull After Town Bans 'Vicious Dogs'
Whoever told you they weren't is lying to you.
irisblue
(33,033 posts)"Youre sitting in a cafe, enjoying a nice cup of coffee with your well-trained, well-mannered canine partner when someone waltzes in with a dog in tow. The dog is lunging at everyone who walks past, jumps up on the counter, gulps down a bagel and then whirls around to start barking at people when they walk in. The manager rushes forward and politely states, Were sorry, maam, but were going to have to ask you to take your dog outside. We dont allow pets."...snip...."The woman scoffs at the idea while reaching down to rub her dogs head. I dont need any papers. Federal law doesnt require me to carry any. Hes a Service Dog; thats all you need to know....snip..."As excerpted from U.S. Code of Federal Regulations § 36.202, there are two instances cited in federal law where a business may exclude a Service Dog:
1.The Service Dog is out of control and the handler isnt doing anything about it
2.The Service Dog isnt housebroken and urinates or defecates inappropriately
If a Service Dog team is asked to leave due to the dogs behavior, the business must provide the unaccompanied handler the opportunity to obtain goods or services. Only the dog can be excluded from the premises. If a dogs behavior infringes on the ability of other patrons to enjoy a safe, routine experience similar to one they would experience without a Service Dog on-site, then a business may be perfectly within their right legally to ask the team to leave. Before making that determination, though, check out the lists below detailing what Service Dogs in public should do and what Service Dogs in public shouldnt do."
I only excerpted 4 paragraphs, but there is more there to read.
I understand some people can never image a pitbull as a service dog, but they are some out there. Society has go to adjust. You get a truly trained service dog for a reason.
LostOne4Ever
(9,290 posts)[font style="font-family:papyrus,'Brush Script MT','comic sans MS',fantasy;" size=4 color=teal]Good Mall owners and a good dog I bet [/font]
Odin2005
(53,521 posts)madokie
(51,076 posts)they can be vicious dogs but then again so can anyone of us, or many I might want to put it. I mean the viciousness of the Pit is taught and have been breed into them for years now but I know that a Pit bull can be as sweet as the sweetest animal in the world. I raised one from itiny puppy to grown for my stepson. He spent all his days with me and my border collie. Sadly he's no longer with us.
RedCappedBandit
(5,514 posts)and was therefore afraid of the dog.
But why would he still refuse after they offered to take the pooch outside?
etherealtruth
(22,165 posts)RedCappedBandit
(5,514 posts)doesn't mean I can't empathize with a guy who may be afraid of dogs.
etherealtruth
(22,165 posts)... the dog from the area. when he refused my empathy vanished.
RedCappedBandit
(5,514 posts)ErikJ
(6,335 posts)especially one that was bred for dog-fighting
baldguy
(36,649 posts)By that argument, every dog breed should should be banned then.
ErikJ
(6,335 posts)I have probably given $1000 's to help save wild species and their habitats but I wouldnt give a goddam dime to save any particular breed of dog.......... especially one originally bred for such an evil purpose.
And I'm a dog lover with 2 small dogs. Muts. Pure breds have too many genetic diseases thanks to unscrupulous greedy breeders.
baldguy
(36,649 posts)Simply because a small group of assholes treat them in a inhumanly brutal manner.
Your "solution" is not just to simply blame the victims but to propose mass genocide.
ErikJ
(6,335 posts)So there is absolutely NO ethical reason to preserve any breed of dog any more than an ethical reason to preserve a certain type of car.
baldguy
(36,649 posts)but living, breathing, feeling and LOVING creatures.
There's not much difference, morally, between advocating mass extermination of family pets and advocating mass extermination of families.
ErikJ
(6,335 posts)Human races were NOT artificially bred by humans. Dont even go there dude.
baldguy
(36,649 posts)What do you call grasping at straws while on a slippery slope?
ErikJ
(6,335 posts)Dog breeds are a product of artificial breeding for specific human purposes like cars or cell phones. U belittle human races by trying to draw a parallel.
baldguy
(36,649 posts)To put humanity on a pedestal while doing it is sheer arrogant hypocrisy.
ErikJ
(6,335 posts)Lots of cities have banned their breeding which is a good idea. Way too many small children and pets have been killed or scarred for life by pits with bad AND good owners.
baldguy
(36,649 posts)(and innocent dogs at that) then you're a fool as well bigot.
ErikJ
(6,335 posts)You belittle humans when you compare man-made things to them.
I love dogs as much as anyone but I refuse to equate them to humans or wildlife species. That belittles humans and natural species.
baldguy
(36,649 posts)It's that kind of irrational chauvinistic stupidity that really diminishes humanity.
ErikJ
(6,335 posts)Pit bulls are a man-made breed of a man-made species. Preserving them is no more ethically important than preserving the Edsel car.
baldguy
(36,649 posts)Sick & twisted. Sick & twisted. Sick & twisted.
ErikJ
(6,335 posts)Or are you a gun-nut too like u are a pro-lifer?
baldguy
(36,649 posts)Sick & twisted.
ErikJ
(6,335 posts)yet humans eat them or milk them. And nobody would care if one breed was not bred anymore as if that would be genocide like you pro fighting-dog advocates. Whats sick and twisted is monsters that bred them for killing each other. And for some sick and twisted reason u are a 1 issue person devoted to saving them.
baldguy
(36,649 posts)Do you fricassee up kittens & puppies for dinner?
Sick & twisted. Sick & twisted. Sick & twisted.
liberal_at_heart
(12,081 posts)discrimination advocated on this so called progressive website. But before I do I will say one more thing.
I am so incredibly grateful for the ADA. I am so thankful that there are laws to protect my son and my husband from the conservatives and the progressives that would discriminate against them if allowed to.
etherealtruth
(22,165 posts)Most people participating in this thread are HORRIFIED by the actions of the Santa and are equally HORRIFIED by the few posters that insisted on posting their nonsense throughout the thread.
Most folk want to improve access and quality of life for those with disabilities (NOT throw up roadblocks and hurdles for them). Don't reread the thread (it isn't any better going through it again) ....but keep in mind there are 3 or 4 posters willing to ignore the ADA/ believe it should not exist in its current form .... but the vast majority of posters feel like you do.
flvegan
(64,416 posts)I mean not the "DU reason" which is mostly based in ignorance, but the actual reason. Does it say anywhere why?
ErikJ
(6,335 posts)Google News "pitbull attack" All these within the last week or so!
2 Hospitalized After Pit Bull Dogs Attack in Fall River, Mass ...
NECN-Dec 2, 2014
Police say four pit bulls somehow got out of a dog pen at a home on Kilburn Street in Fall River, Massachusetts. (Published Tuesday, Dec 2, ...
Loose Pit Bulls Attack 3 In Fall River
CBS Local-Dec 2, 2014
Three people injured in Fall River pit bull attack
Providence Eyewitness News-Dec 3, 2014
Our View: A terrifying cautionary tale for all
Wicked Local Taunton-4 hours ago
Explore in depth (45 more articles)
Man lets pitbull attack dead roommate and gets life sentence
New York Daily News-19 minutes ago
A Manhattan judge Thursday sentenced a sicko to life behind bars for fatally beating his roommate before unleashing a pitbull on the ...
San Jose Animal Control Service Questioned After Pit Bull Attack
NBC Bay Area-Dec 1, 2014
A San Jose dog owner is asking some tough questions of Animal Control after she and her dog were attacked not once, but twice by a ...
Police: Pit bull attacked St. Albans man
BurlingtonFreePress.com-Dec 3, 2014
Police received a report at 8 p.m. from a St. Albans man who said he had been attacked by a pit bull. The man, Alfred Arel, 52, sustained ...
Police Investigating Alleged Pit Bull Attack
NECN-Dec 2, 2014
Explore in depth (4 more articles)
WCPO
Hundreds attend fundraiser for 6-year-old pit bull attack victim
WLWT Cincinnati-Nov 28, 2014
"What to do if pit bulls attack a little girl" is a scenario that never came up when District 3 Officer Kyle Strunk went through the police academy as ...
Newark father gets time served for pitbull attack on 10-year-old son
NJ.com-Dec 1, 2014
NEWARK A Newark man is expected to be released after being sentenced today to time served in a case where his 10-year-old son was ...
Man sentenced to time served, probation for pit bull attack that left ...
The Republic-Dec 1, 2014
Explore in depth (12 more articles)
Recent pit bull attacks in Portland area spark controversy in canine ...
The Oregonian - OregonLive.com-Nov 7, 2014
The Oct. 10 incident was one of several pit bull attacks in the Portland area in less than three weeks. On Sept. 24, a pit bull attacked and killed a ...
Edmond Man Acquitted In Pit Bull Attack
news9.com KWTV-Dec 2, 2014Share
Chris Birchmier's live-in girlfriend told Edmond Police he beat and strangled her, then commanded his pit bull named 'Butter' to attack her at ...
Son saves mom from pit-bull attack but dies of injuries
USA TODAY-Nov 6, 2014
MODESTO, Calif. The son of a 77-year-old woman saved her from a pack of pit bulldogs but died after being mauled himself.
Man saves mom from pit-bull attack, then dies
azcentral.com-Nov 6, 2014
Explore in depth (10 more articles)
Toddler's Ear Ripped Off in Attack by Family Pit Bull in Jurupa Valley ...
KTLA-Nov 5, 2014
The family dog apparently unprovoked attacked the little boy and ... dog, which was described by authorities as a 2-year-old male pit bull ...
Family Pit Bull Attacks Toddler, Bites Off Boy's Ear
CBS Local-Nov 5, 2014
Explore in depth (35 more articles)
baldguy
(36,649 posts)As well as those who are really responsible - the humans.
The blinders you choose to wear are truly blinding.
ErikJ
(6,335 posts)attack with near the frequency the fighting killer dogs do. Breeds will generally do well what they were BRED to do which was to tear flesh apart in the case of pits.
baldguy
(36,649 posts)So, unless you're trying to exterminate ALL dogs, your point is pointless.
Coventina
(27,172 posts)Breed discrimination is ugly and cruel.
Odin2005
(53,521 posts)ErikJ
(6,335 posts)With 20 yrs of dog owning experience I wont trust ANY pitbull no matter what. Seen too many attack mine and others.
-----------------------------
MAY 3, 2014
YAKIMA, Wash. A registered pit bull service dog is under quarantine after attacking three people and a dog Thursday in Yakima.
The incident came just two weeks after the City Council approved an exemption for service and therapy dogs under a city ordinance that otherwise bans pit bulls.
The incident started when the dog escaped out the front door of a home in the 1300 block of Garfield Avenue while its owner was in the backyard, said city Code Enforcement Officer Joe Caruso.
It attacked a dog at a home one block away on West Lincoln Avenue, then bit that dogs owner as he attempted to rescue his pet, Caruso said.
As the pit bull positioned itself for another attack on the dog, a second person tried to break up the fight, only to be bitten, he said.
A third person was also bitten trying to control the animal, Caruso said.
baldguy
(36,649 posts)And any dog of sufficient size can do harm.
THE WHOLE FUCKING POINT IS THAT MOST OF THEM DON'T AND NEVER WILL!!
And again - you lay none of the blame on the humans involved.
dorkzilla
(5,141 posts)Precisely why I don't even bother responding to any thread that mentions pit bulls anymore. I expect this kind of uninformed pile on in a yahoo article, not on DU.
NO one could ever convince me that 99.9% of them aren't sweet, loving and incredibly intelligent. At least that's what my pibble Darcy tells me!
baldguy
(36,649 posts)our killer cops. "I love all people, but you can't trust those n****rs," is the exact same thing as "I love all dogs, but you can't trust those Pit Bulls."
dorkzilla
(5,141 posts)And yet, even one of my family members--a card-carrying bigot if I ever met one--said after spending time with my little girl "I was SO wrong about these dogs. It really is a shame they have such a bad undeserved reputation".
One of my BFF's loves mine so much she just adopted a 4 year old male who has literally been in foster his whole life. He is the sweetest little guy who does the pit wiggle butt like nobody's business. He loves EVERYBODY.
ErikJ
(6,335 posts)I've had too many bad experiences. They are very aggressive players which upset many dogs and starts fights which can turn deadly as these monsters were bred by human monsters to kill other dogs.
baldguy
(36,649 posts)etherealtruth
(22,165 posts)... the vast majority of posters in this thread are equally sickened. There are a handful of poster that have an agenda and are spewing their nonsense over and over .... but, again, they are the minority of posters (noting that they have posted prolifically in this thread).
Yes they are willing to throw the rights of an adorable little girl with autism under the bus (based on the ADA, mercifully, they can't erase her rights) .... but, (in is not OK) I think they are allowing their hatred of a dog (a darling pit bull) outweigh their sense of what the ADA is meant to do and whom it is intended to protect.
Don't let idiots get you down
thucythucy
(8,086 posts)I think it was most likely being used as an excuse to justify prejudice against a kid with a disability.
If it was just the dog, "Santa" would have been okay seeing the girl without the dog. But he refuse, even when the family offered to take the animal away.
I think lots of times hatred of service animals (and other forms of accommodation) masks a hatred of people with disabilities. Ableism is still alive and well in this culture, which is precisely why we need a strongly enforced ADA.
But yeah, it's pretty discouraging to see all this reactionary crap about service animals.
thucythucy
(8,086 posts)with "Santa's" actions, since even with the offer to take the dog away he still refused to be with the little girl.
Since other posters here are indulging in "probably" (i.e. "probably this wasn't a 'real' service dog" I think I'll indulge in exploring some likely possibilities myself, which I think are probably more accurate.
Probably this Santa has a problem with kids with disabilities. Maybe he's afraid he'll catch something. Maybe they make him uncomfortable and he is disgusted at the sight of them. Maybe he thinks that this family is being punished for "not being right with Jesus" or the kid has "bad karma" or whatever other bullshit excuse ableist bigots use to discriminate against kids with disabilities. But I think the kid's disability is at the core of his action here, and not the dog.
I, and people I know, have run into enough of this bigotry to know it's still pretty widespread, and still needs to be challenged when it happens.
As others have said, thank Dog (and the disability rights movement) we have an ADA.
Douglas Carpenter
(20,226 posts)what could possibly have been the issue then?
Reter
(2,188 posts)Some of us don't like pit bulls. Get over it. I personally don't want to be anywhere near that breed of dog. I would have told the family to come back without the dog, and I'll take you first so they won't have to wait in line again.
thucythucy
(8,086 posts)The family did indeed offer to take the dog into another room while the child had her time with "Santa"--he refused to see her anyway.
I think this has more to do with the kid's disability than the dog. Some people just don't like the sight of people with disabilities. Used to be someone in a wheelchair could be turned away from a restaurant, be denied access to a school, even kept out of a courtroom, because they were "unsightly." That's why, among other reasons, we have an Americans with Disabilities Act.
Once "Santa" was offered the chance to see the kid without the dog, he had no reasonable excuse to say no. He said no anyway.
Douglas Carpenter
(20,226 posts)Douglas Carpenter
(20,226 posts)According to Hernandez, Rossis service pit bull Hercules a star on Pit Boss receives regular discrimination despite his famous reputation as a sweetheart.
Hernandez insists the clamor against pit bulls is nonsense because when dogs go through the training and certification process to become service animals, breed is out the window.
Its not a breed anymore, its a service dog, she said.
http://patch.com/california/lakeelsinore-wildomar/toms-farms-accused-of-discrimination-against-pit-bull-service-dog
However, even if he wasn't - once the little girl's family agree to take pup-cake away if she could just visit with Santa for a few minutes - why did "Santa" refuse unless perhaps he just doesn't want visit with an child like her?