Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Karmadillo

(9,253 posts)
Thu Dec 4, 2014, 07:33 AM Dec 2014

Study: To Avert Climate Chaos, Meat Consumption Must Drop

http://www.commondreams.org/news/2014/12/03/avert-climate-chaos-meat-consumption-must-drop-study


Wednesday, December 03, 2014
To Avert Climate Chaos, Meat Consumption Must Drop: Study
Despite need to lower meat, dairy consumption, public awareness of livestock production's contribution to climate change low
by Andrea Germanos, staff writer

There is an "awareness gap" amongst the global public of the link between eating meat and climate change, and that presents a real obstacle to keeping global warming under the 2-degree threshold, a new study finds.

From the London-based policy institute Chatham House, Livestock – Climate Change’s Forgotten Sector: Global Public Opinion on Meat and Dairy Consumption explores how the livestock sector's contribution to climate change—14.5 per cent of total global greenhouse gas emissions—is failing to get the attention it warrants.

To assess public attitudes on the issue, Chatham House commissioned Ipsos MORI to conduct a multi-language, multi-country online survey. The results showed that 64 percent of respondents said exhaust emissions were a major contributor to climate change compared to just 29 percent who said livestock production was. Yet the two sectors' actual contribution to emissions is roughly the same.

From the paper: "Despite the scale and trajectory of emissions from the livestock sector, it attracts remarkably little policy attention at either the international or national level." It notes that few countries' mitigation plans submitted to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) reflect emissions reduction targets for livestock production.

By marginalizing livestock production's contribution to climate change, through, for example, lack of media attention, the lack of public awareness of the issue is not surprising, the authors write.

more...
41 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Study: To Avert Climate Chaos, Meat Consumption Must Drop (Original Post) Karmadillo Dec 2014 OP
K&R handmade34 Dec 2014 #1
Lets fix other areas first yeoman6987 Dec 2014 #2
The authors of the study do not call for meat eating to cease, they Luminous Animal Dec 2014 #10
I know we do, it doesn't help that meat tastes so good yeoman6987 Dec 2014 #13
LOL!!! greytdemocrat Dec 2014 #36
If recent threads are any indication, the joys of eating industrially Karmadillo Dec 2014 #39
Meat consumption will end.. sendero Dec 2014 #3
cigarette smoking handmade34 Dec 2014 #14
By that time.. sendero Dec 2014 #17
Yes, but the cost of smoking... fadedrose Dec 2014 #20
Get back to us when you've removed the chokehold the fossil fuel industry... 99Forever Dec 2014 #4
We are eating way, way less meat than we used to eat gollygee Dec 2014 #5
I stopped most meat purchases over a year ago. Starry Messenger Dec 2014 #6
We're just going to have to accept the fact that there are too many people and Zorra Dec 2014 #7
Going to be both n2doc Dec 2014 #8
oh give me a break. liberal_at_heart Dec 2014 #9
+1 Ykcutnek Dec 2014 #12
... handmade34 Dec 2014 #15
And as humans, we often dismiss the harsh realities of our world with little more than... LanternWaste Dec 2014 #16
Yep. I'm not going vegetarian. Period. closeupready Dec 2014 #19
Why not? Do you think you won't be able to survive without consuming meat? Avalux Dec 2014 #23
For me, it's not a question of survival; it's about enjoying life. closeupready Dec 2014 #25
Ending fossil fuel consumption Doremus Dec 2014 #30
Local. closeupready Dec 2014 #32
Care to flesh that out a bit? lol Doremus Dec 2014 #35
Have you confused me with your preferred deity? I mean, wow, closeupready Dec 2014 #37
Yet another nonsensical response Doremus Dec 2014 #41
I cannot eat a carbohydrate-based diet. ladyVet Dec 2014 #40
They blew it with the headline. RadiationTherapy Dec 2014 #11
Nope, nothing about 'factory farming' in the article. The headline is accurate. muriel_volestrangler Dec 2014 #26
Oh, ok. I mean, I read the piece and I still think it is about means of production. RadiationTherapy Dec 2014 #27
Ground beef was $4.99 lb, last week (SoCal)..More and more people will leave meat SoCalDem Dec 2014 #18
Produce is just as expensive as meat in your area? Doremus Dec 2014 #31
Russet potatoes are 0.99 a pound SoCalDem Dec 2014 #33
All those prices are lower than $4.99 lb ground beef Doremus Dec 2014 #34
We -are- eliminating fish farts as we do our best to drive fish stocks to zero. HereSince1628 Dec 2014 #21
This is old news. Read "Diet for a Small Planet" - first published in 1971. Avalux Dec 2014 #22
I'm going to eat two of each animal Capt. Obvious Dec 2014 #24
I'm doing my part because I am a vegetarian. Zero meat consumption. n/t RebelOne Dec 2014 #28
Reducing meat intake is also helpful. Quantess Dec 2014 #29
I think the price of meat will take care of that. jwirr Dec 2014 #38

handmade34

(22,756 posts)
1. K&R
Thu Dec 4, 2014, 07:41 AM
Dec 2014

"...the lack of public awareness of the issue is not surprising..."

what is surprising is the number of supposed liberal, environmentally aware people, who continue to defend their meat consumption...

 

yeoman6987

(14,449 posts)
2. Lets fix other areas first
Thu Dec 4, 2014, 09:35 AM
Dec 2014

Humans have been eating meat forever. We have other areas like fuel to worry about. If we fix those areas, meat eating may be allowed. I don't want to give up meat when we have other problems that need tending too.

Luminous Animal

(27,310 posts)
10. The authors of the study do not call for meat eating to cease, they
Thu Dec 4, 2014, 11:29 AM
Dec 2014

call for a reduction. We currently eat far more meat and dairy than is necessary for human health.

Karmadillo

(9,253 posts)
39. If recent threads are any indication, the joys of eating industrially
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 07:32 AM
Dec 2014

produced turkeys outweigh environmental concerns. Hard to figure given the catastrophe approaching.

sendero

(28,552 posts)
3. Meat consumption will end..
Thu Dec 4, 2014, 09:39 AM
Dec 2014

.... when the last cow and pig have died of global warming, and not one day before.

People who actually think they can influence public thinking with these sorts or pronouncements are delusional.

sendero

(28,552 posts)
17. By that time..
Thu Dec 4, 2014, 12:08 PM
Dec 2014

.... everyone realized that smoking had tangible and almost inevitable deleterious effects on one's health.

The idea that eating meat is unhealthy is pretty suspect all around. My point was not to argue that but to argue that human beings as a group never solve problems that have not manifested in a way that harms them.

They just don't do it, they are not ever going to do it and for the life of me I don't understand what about this fact the brain trust making these pronouncements doesn't get.

NOTHING IS GOING TO HAPPEN TO STOP GLOBAL WARMING. AS AN EXAMPLE THE CHINESE HARDLY DO ANYTHING ABOUT THEIR ENVIRONMENT EVEN THOUGH THOSE LIVING IN BEIJING ARE BREATHING PEA SOUP EVERY DAY.

If you want to do ANYTHING BIG in this world you have to understand what motivates masses of people. Telling people to give up meat while their "neighbor" doesn't won't cut it. Telling them to cut their use of carbon fuels while the developing countries continue to grow their use won't cut it.

fadedrose

(10,044 posts)
20. Yes, but the cost of smoking...
Thu Dec 4, 2014, 12:15 PM
Dec 2014

was a factor. I started rolling my own with a little machine because of the taxes on purchased cigarettes. Then, they put taxes on tobacco in bags that also wasn't within my budget.

Couple that with having to smoke outside, albeit with the nicest bunches of people you'll find anywhere, it was pretty damn cold. Laws were enacted that preventing smoking in restaurants, the very best place to have coffee with a couple of friends and BS...or in bars where cigarettes just went so naturally with a drink...

And people talked to me like I was a criminal because I smoked - people online that couldn't even smell the smoke.

After smoking for 53 or more years, my lungs were so clear that doctors' couldn't believe I smoked!

But the cost was just too high - not the cancer warnings. If I were sure I was going to die in a month, I would load up and smoke myself silly, but don't want to take a chance on getting readdicted in the unlikely event that I live to be 90. And anybody who didn't like it could just stay away...

99Forever

(14,524 posts)
4. Get back to us when you've removed the chokehold the fossil fuel industry...
Thu Dec 4, 2014, 09:40 AM
Dec 2014

... has on our government and economy. Think I'll have a steak for breakfast.

gollygee

(22,336 posts)
5. We are eating way, way less meat than we used to eat
Thu Dec 4, 2014, 09:41 AM
Dec 2014

I bet we've cut consumption by 75%. This is partly for health, partly because we refuse to buy anything from factory farms now that we're aware of that - we only buy directly from local farmers where we can visit hte farms - and it's a great deal more expensive to buy meat that way.

It's been good. I've discovered how much I like other foods. We've talked about giving up meat completely, as it doesn't seem as important now that we're eating so little of it. We used to think of a meal as meat and stuff to go with it, but once you stop thinking of meals in that way, the meat becomes much less interesting.

Starry Messenger

(32,342 posts)
6. I stopped most meat purchases over a year ago.
Thu Dec 4, 2014, 09:42 AM
Dec 2014

Cheese is harder, but subbing meat wasn't very difficult. It's so expensive here that seitan and tofu are about the same or cheaper.

I don't know if family purchases of meat are what is driving climate change though. I'd guess fast food companies.

Zorra

(27,670 posts)
7. We're just going to have to accept the fact that there are too many people and
Thu Dec 4, 2014, 09:52 AM
Dec 2014

too many cows, and it's going to be either them, or us.

n2doc

(47,953 posts)
8. Going to be both
Thu Dec 4, 2014, 09:55 AM
Dec 2014

Unless we end population growth, eventual we will all be eating soylent green. And even then it won't be enough.

 

LanternWaste

(37,748 posts)
16. And as humans, we often dismiss the harsh realities of our world with little more than...
Thu Dec 4, 2014, 12:03 PM
Dec 2014

And as humans, we often dismiss the harsh realities of our world with little more than the petulant irrelevancy of "get over it."

Avalux

(35,015 posts)
23. Why not? Do you think you won't be able to survive without consuming meat?
Thu Dec 4, 2014, 12:34 PM
Dec 2014

Is it something that, if you give it up, will impact your life so severely you won't be able to cope?

That's the attitude that has us precisely where we are with factory farming. Humans enjoy eating flesh but we don't need to eat it to be healthy. It's time to change.

 

closeupready

(29,503 posts)
25. For me, it's not a question of survival; it's about enjoying life.
Thu Dec 4, 2014, 12:42 PM
Dec 2014

Eating, like breathing, is one of the most basic needs, and eating meat is something I look forward to. To attempt an analogy here, just like humans can survive and be healthy in humid climates, I prefer an arid one - it makes my daily life so enjoyable.

The change needs to be in ending fossil fuel consumption in all forms, and in reducing global human population (peacefully).

Doremus

(7,261 posts)
30. Ending fossil fuel consumption
Thu Dec 4, 2014, 06:24 PM
Dec 2014

How do you propose society accomplishes that, given that many of its members consider meat-eating an important part of a happy life?

BTW, carbon footprint of the meat industry is as large or larger than any other.

So, again, how do you suggest we end fossil fuel consumption when meat eaters insist on maintaining status quo?

Doremus

(7,261 posts)
35. Care to flesh that out a bit? lol
Thu Dec 4, 2014, 07:21 PM
Dec 2014

By "local" I assume you are implying that local meat sources don't use as much fossil fuel as those further away?

The cost of transportation is only a small portion of the overall fuel consumption of the meat industry.

 

closeupready

(29,503 posts)
37. Have you confused me with your preferred deity? I mean, wow,
Thu Dec 4, 2014, 08:29 PM
Dec 2014

who knew I had so much power in my hands that I could singlehandedly change our entire system of energy procurement, delivery, sources, and the global industry itself. LOL is right.

Doremus

(7,261 posts)
41. Yet another nonsensical response
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 01:35 PM
Dec 2014

One might start to think you haven't any facts to support your position or something.

ladyVet

(1,587 posts)
40. I cannot eat a carbohydrate-based diet.
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 01:17 PM
Dec 2014

I just can't. I tried. I was a vegetarian for a year, following a doctor's advice. I gained more than 60 pounds (instead of losing weight), and my health began to deteriorate. My arthritis kicked in years earlier than it could have, and I believe I was in a weakened condition that led to fibromyalgia, or something like it. I've never been able to get a diagnosis, but something's wrong and it's not in my head.

I don't eat excessive amounts of meat, but I do eat it. And will continue to do so. I hate factory farming but I can't afford to buy grass-fed beef or free range chickens (though I have my own chickens now, they are for eggs). I do eat some meatless meals, and lots of vegetables, but I have to eliminate wheat, rice and potatoes or I will continue to get fatter.

RadiationTherapy

(5,818 posts)
11. They blew it with the headline.
Thu Dec 4, 2014, 11:30 AM
Dec 2014

Look at people's walls going up because the header is about "meat consumption" rather than "factory farming" which is what the article is actually about. Oh well.

muriel_volestrangler

(101,347 posts)
26. Nope, nothing about 'factory farming' in the article. The headline is accurate.
Thu Dec 4, 2014, 01:50 PM
Dec 2014

Don't mistake "shifting all livestock farming to the least emissions-intensive production practices available within a particular region or agro-ecological zone" for 'ending factory farming' - intensive farming can sometimes produce less greenhouse gases. From the report:

Increasing productivity, whether through intensive farming, technology or improved animal husbandry, offers an opportunity to reduce emissions while raising farm profitability. Intensive rearing of cattle on feedlots is less emissions-intensive than pasture-based grazing systems because grass-fed cows tend to produce more methane and take longer to reach slaughter weight. However, this also raises the spectre of an unwanted ‘rebound effect’, whereby increased productivity drives down prices and increases demand for meat and dairy, potentially reducing the extent of emissions savings.

And anyway, the report says that changing farming methods isn't enough - we need less demand for meat and dairy, especially in the developed world.

RadiationTherapy

(5,818 posts)
27. Oh, ok. I mean, I read the piece and I still think it is about means of production.
Thu Dec 4, 2014, 01:55 PM
Dec 2014

But, fine, if one wants to reduce demand, then one ought to do a little research on how people knee-jerk react to such an idea. This will require a more subtle marketing campaign in order to even begin this conversation. Many here on this thread immediately threw up walls just from the header.

SoCalDem

(103,856 posts)
18. Ground beef was $4.99 lb, last week (SoCal)..More and more people will leave meat
Thu Dec 4, 2014, 12:12 PM
Dec 2014

because they cannot afford meat..unfortunately, produce is just as expensive..

what a dilemma..


noodles for everyone ( rice is quite pricey too)

Doremus

(7,261 posts)
31. Produce is just as expensive as meat in your area?
Thu Dec 4, 2014, 06:30 PM
Dec 2014

Wow, we must be fortunate here in Ohio then. We bought our potatoes and yams for 49 cents/lb. last week, beans were a couple dollars for a bag, rice a little more. A head of cauliflower was $3.99, we did splurge on the asparagus for $3.99 for a bundle and I also splurged on some cutup watermelon for $5.

At least in our area, it's an urban myth that fruits/vegs are more expensive than meat. Even if they were, they'd still be the better deal because they're healthful vs. disease-causing.

SoCalDem

(103,856 posts)
33. Russet potatoes are 0.99 a pound
Thu Dec 4, 2014, 07:10 PM
Dec 2014

lettuce is 1.99 a head
apples on SALE are 1.69 a pound..
tomatoes are 2.99 a pound
bananas were 0.69 a pound

If you are feeding kids, $1 an apple is no bargain

onions are still relatively cheap

and since Thanksgiving is past, yams may be on sale

I am so grateful that our boys are grown ups and we no longer have to pay to feed them

Doremus

(7,261 posts)
34. All those prices are lower than $4.99 lb ground beef
Thu Dec 4, 2014, 07:16 PM
Dec 2014

If you're trying to raise young ones today, the bargains are in the produce aisles not the meat cases. With the added bonus that you are raising healthy children and teaching them how to eat for optimum health.

HereSince1628

(36,063 posts)
21. We -are- eliminating fish farts as we do our best to drive fish stocks to zero.
Thu Dec 4, 2014, 12:24 PM
Dec 2014

We can only deplete them "so" fast.

It's really up to Australians and Scots to get rid of climate changing sheep burps.

Avalux

(35,015 posts)
22. This is old news. Read "Diet for a Small Planet" - first published in 1971.
Thu Dec 4, 2014, 12:31 PM
Dec 2014
http://www.amazon.com/Diet-Small-Planet-Anniversary-Edition/dp/0345321200

But of course, no one pays attention or takes this sort of thing seriously until it's too late. We will never learn as a species.
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Study: To Avert Climate C...