Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

joeybee12

(56,177 posts)
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 11:17 AM Dec 2014

Mark Wahlberg should not be pardoned

In April,1988, Mark Wahlberg, 16, set upon a Vietnamese immigrant named Thanh Lam, and, with a wooden stick, beat him so severely that Lam fell to the ground, unconscious. Later that night, according to contemporaneous accounts, Wahlberg found another Asian man, Hoa Trinh, and, calling him a "gook" and "slant-eye," smashed in the face.

Trinh lost sight in his right eye.

Wahlberg was arrested, convicted, and spent 45 days in jail, an experience that hardened him for the rest of his younger days and provided him creative fodder for many of his later projects. He has insisted that, despite his liberal use of racial slurs, race did not motivate his attack. His intoxication, apparently, did.

Twenty-six years later, Wahlberg wants a formal pardon from the state of Massachusetts.

Why? He has devoted the rest of his life to being a model citizen. His movies do not glorify violence (apparently). He has contributed significantly to his community. He has mentored many young boys away from a life of crime. He has demonstrated, in deed, a respect for the police.

http://theweek.com/article/index/273108/mark-wahlberg-should-not-be-pardoned

I tend to agree...

93 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Mark Wahlberg should not be pardoned (Original Post) joeybee12 Dec 2014 OP
I am torn on this gopiscrap Dec 2014 #1
Redemption is one thing. A pardon is another. merrily Dec 2014 #4
Agreed! Euphoria Dec 2014 #7
Well, I agree to the extent nichomachus Dec 2014 #18
What would "expunging" his record do for him? merrily Dec 2014 #19
That's because the US is a hyper-punitive society n/t nichomachus Dec 2014 #20
45 days for beating someone till he loses vision doesn't sound hyper punitive to me. merrily Dec 2014 #22
Me either. cwydro Dec 2014 #49
with a long record already by age 16 to boot! merrily Dec 2014 #50
I heard on the news that he tried to obtain certain licenses but couldn't SummerSnow Dec 2014 #35
Ah, that explain$ it. merrily Dec 2014 #36
I never knew about this... hlthe2b Dec 2014 #2
Does Trinh get a pardon from being blind in one eye? merrily Dec 2014 #3
Exactly. Iggo Dec 2014 #13
+1 !! exactly lunasun Dec 2014 #80
A pardon is worthless at this point. LP2K12 Dec 2014 #5
That's what I think.... joeybee12 Dec 2014 #6
Even if he changed, lots of people change after serving time prison and merrily Dec 2014 #9
There's definitely a sense of entitlement in his case... joeybee12 Dec 2014 #12
Yeah, unless he's a rich campaign donor. alarimer Dec 2014 #8
Dude lost an eye. Iggo Dec 2014 #10
An eye for an eye frogmarch Dec 2014 #11
Agreed. truebrit71 Dec 2014 #14
How many people made mistakes much less violent and hateful when they were young gollygee Dec 2014 #15
A lot of us did a lot more time for a lot less crime. Iggo Dec 2014 #17
White privilege, yes, but did his family have money when he was 16? merrily Dec 2014 #37
he would not be considered nor would he think its possible gollygee Dec 2014 #61
Ok. I thought you were talking about the original 45 day sentence. That boggles my mind. merrily Dec 2014 #62
I like Mark Walberg and go to most if his movies yeoman6987 Dec 2014 #16
I don't see any contrition tularetom Dec 2014 #21
I certainly don't like him cpwm17 Dec 2014 #23
45 days for blinding a guy. truebrit71 Dec 2014 #63
Has he made any resitution to his victims csziggy Dec 2014 #24
He was 16 years old. elias49 Dec 2014 #25
You're right. Mr Wahlberg should just let it go. Iggo Dec 2014 #30
Well done. merrily Dec 2014 #43
Amazing how many of us avoided racial hate crimes at 16. n/t gollygee Dec 2014 #76
Lots and lots of us did... elias49 Dec 2014 #86
That isn't even a question here gollygee Dec 2014 #88
Yeah, there is usually a big difference between a 16 yo boy and a 42 yo man. I think he should be seaglass Dec 2014 #26
Lots of people have been 16. How many have Wahlberg's juvenile record? merrily Dec 2014 #41
Probably many do. And hopefully many have grown up and become productive members of society. seaglass Dec 2014 #53
No, not many at all. Not a majority by any stretch of the imagination. merrily Dec 2014 #54
Not many 16 yo criminals? Well I guess we could debate what is meant by many but it certainly seaglass Dec 2014 #56
No, I did not say criminals. I have consistently distinguished between his crimes and merrily Dec 2014 #58
Whoa slow down. I consider what Wahlberg did as a 16yo criminal and I think there are a lot seaglass Dec 2014 #64
Why debate a thing which has an actual answer... Bluenorthwest Dec 2014 #68
In 2011 1.5 mil people under the age of 18 arrested. That is a lot to me. Wahlberg obviously had seaglass Dec 2014 #70
I agree with you. Thanks for that post. nt elias49 Dec 2014 #87
Yes he turned his life around. christx30 Dec 2014 #90
Redemption Demsrule86 Dec 2014 #27
What did he do to make Mr Trinh's life better? Iggo Dec 2014 #31
He was one of the producers of Boardwalk Empire. Now if that doesn't still_one Dec 2014 #28
Sorry to say, there is plenty of precedent for arbitrary pardons where no injustice occurred. merrily Dec 2014 #40
I was just expressing my particular view. I can see someone pardoned from execution, because it can be still_one Dec 2014 #72
I agree with your personal opinion on both counts. There should be a reason, other than merrily Dec 2014 #73
His movies do not glorify violence? indie9197 Dec 2014 #29
No. no double standard. AngryAmish Dec 2014 #32
No pardon for mayhem. And redemtion is a continuing timeline. It has no finite stop point. marble falls Dec 2014 #33
Wealth and Fame and he wants this??? Mike Nelson Dec 2014 #34
He still strikes me as a menacing asshole. Arugula Latte Dec 2014 #38
"Wahlberg wants a formal pardon from the state of Massachusetts." 951-Riverside Dec 2014 #39
he should just be greatful he isn't black Takket Dec 2014 #42
Wow, this place is pretty harsh. Just like America in general. Comrade Grumpy Dec 2014 #44
No kidding. Too bad for Wahlberg he's not on Death Row. Dreamer Tatum Dec 2014 #45
Lots of righteousness nt elias49 Dec 2014 #51
I agree or maybe I'm just a bleeding heart. :-( Sounds like the same people who wouldn't seaglass Dec 2014 #55
Does he have a felony on his record? dilby Dec 2014 #46
In Massachusetts, felons are only disenfranchised if they're inmates. Iggo Dec 2014 #48
They haven't changed Capt. Obvious Dec 2014 #57
I think he should be. He was a kid at the time, has been mmonk Dec 2014 #47
He should get in line behind all the nonviolent offenders who have reformed. n/t Orsino Dec 2014 #52
Restaurant wants a liquor license, is that it???? MADem Dec 2014 #59
Nah Kalidurga Dec 2014 #59
People can change. Mark Wahlberg, based on our limited knowledge of him, has. chrisa Dec 2014 #65
Nineteen eighty fuckin' eight? Reter Dec 2014 #66
I disagree. He was a minor. Xithras Dec 2014 #67
How exactly does retaining the factual record 'punish' Wahlberg? He's got 200 million bucks. Bluenorthwest Dec 2014 #69
I couldn't give a damn about Wahlberg... Xithras Dec 2014 #71
That's fair enough. Bluenorthwest Dec 2014 #75
I agree 100% on that. Xithras Dec 2014 #78
What is he after that he can't because of his past crime? JHB Dec 2014 #74
Apparently a liquor license for a restaurant he wants to own... joeybee12 Dec 2014 #79
Thanks, joeybee12. And to Wahlberg: Try lobbying to get the law amended... JHB Dec 2014 #82
Changing the law would benefit other people... joeybee12 Dec 2014 #84
He is a misogynist, racist creep. Jamastiene Dec 2014 #77
I'd hate for people to judge me today...by the ass I was at 16 KinMd Dec 2014 #81
he wants to be able to carry a gun helpmetohelpyou Dec 2014 #83
why does he need a pardon ? it's not like he is being punished in society JI7 Dec 2014 #85
Do we believe in redemption? Inkfreak Dec 2014 #89
I do believe in redemption. Tell me, how has he redeemed himself? Iggo Dec 2014 #91
Ask him, I'm not privy to his personal life. Inkfreak Dec 2014 #93
This message was self-deleted by its author Warren DeMontague Dec 2014 #92

gopiscrap

(23,761 posts)
1. I am torn on this
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 11:21 AM
Dec 2014

While I believe in the redemptive ability of all humanity, sometimes there are crimes so bad.... has he offered compensation to his victim or victims family?

merrily

(45,251 posts)
4. Redemption is one thing. A pardon is another.
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 11:24 AM
Dec 2014

Many criminals live good lives after serving their time. If Wahlberg gets a pardon now, why shouldn't everyone who does good deeds after prison get one?

It's not as though he can't support his family because he can't get a job without a pardon.

nichomachus

(12,754 posts)
18. Well, I agree to the extent
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 11:52 AM
Dec 2014

That I believe everyone who serves their time and shows good behavior for a sufficient period should have their past record expunged. If someone does something wrong, pays the price, and reforms has a criminal record, we are, in effect, punishing them for the rest of their lives. That's wrong. Granted, in this case, he's not suffering financially, but a lot of other people are. It even affects your ability to get an apartment in some places.

merrily

(45,251 posts)
19. What would "expunging" his record do for him?
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 11:56 AM
Dec 2014

He has already served his time and everyone knows of his past.

A pardon would not expunge his criminal record, anyway.

As for others who have more anonymity, I don't think they should be deprived of jobs or the right to vote, but I don't think their records should be expunged, either.

merrily

(45,251 posts)
22. 45 days for beating someone till he loses vision doesn't sound hyper punitive to me.
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 11:59 AM
Dec 2014

I agree that we are that way as a society, but Wahlberg got off easy. No clue why.

merrily

(45,251 posts)
50. with a long record already by age 16 to boot!
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 01:59 PM
Dec 2014

I know that the family was on welfare, if not consistently, then on and off. (Lots of kids, Dad and mom split, Dad out of work a lot.)

It may be that Donnie had already started to make big bucks by the time Mark was 16 and helped out his brother somehow. If not, maybe the family had some connections in city government?

I am not interested enough to dig around the internet to try to find a reason, but it had to be money or connections or both.

SummerSnow

(12,608 posts)
35. I heard on the news that he tried to obtain certain licenses but couldn't
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 01:11 PM
Dec 2014

get them because of his felonies.So he wants this expunged from his record. Imo it has nothing to do with anything else.

merrily

(45,251 posts)
36. Ah, that explain$ it.
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 01:15 PM
Dec 2014

FYI, a pardon is different from expunging a record. Juvenile records are expunged, meaning you can never look them up or use them against the former juvenile offender in court if he or she becomes an adult offender, etc. A pardon means the person doesn't get any more punishment.

merrily

(45,251 posts)
3. Does Trinh get a pardon from being blind in one eye?
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 11:22 AM
Dec 2014

I never say racist things or beat the sight out of anyone when I am drunk, do many of you?

Wahlberg was incredibly lucky to get only 45 days in jail. Then, he was incredibly lucky to earn a fortune. What is a pardon going to for him at this point?

LP2K12

(885 posts)
5. A pardon is worthless at this point.
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 11:30 AM
Dec 2014

I like the dude. I believe in rehabilitation as well. However a pardon at this point is useless as his career is doing just fine. How about instead of a pardon he tracks down his victims and earns an apology. Don't just ask for it, prove you've changed.

 

joeybee12

(56,177 posts)
6. That's what I think....
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 11:31 AM
Dec 2014

He needs to really show he's changed, and at least from this article one doesn't get that impression.

merrily

(45,251 posts)
9. Even if he changed, lots of people change after serving time prison and
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 11:39 AM
Dec 2014

don't get pardons. Some even become clergy (the decent kind) and don't get pardons. What makes him a special case? His money? His celebrity? His sense of entitlement to special treatment?

 

joeybee12

(56,177 posts)
12. There's definitely a sense of entitlement in his case...
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 11:43 AM
Dec 2014

I've never been a fan...the smugness has always bothered me.

alarimer

(16,245 posts)
8. Yeah, unless he's a rich campaign donor.
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 11:37 AM
Dec 2014

Then I guess pardon him, in keeping with past policy.

Pardons are a joke. They seldom go to who actually deserve it.

Not saying Mark didn't learn his lesson. He did, but it's not like he will have trouble finding a job or anything. But a pardon for being a celebrity is silly.

gollygee

(22,336 posts)
15. How many people made mistakes much less violent and hateful when they were young
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 11:48 AM
Dec 2014

and have never found and will never find a job because of it.

How many people were pressured to plead guilty for something they didn't even do when they were young and have never found and will never find a job because of it.

He did this, and he hasn't even had his life horribly affected by what he did. Talk about class privilege and white privilege and I suppose there's some kind of privilege associated with being famous as well, that anyone is even considering this. Huge example of privilege at work. I wouldn't be surprised if he actually got pardoned.

Iggo

(47,558 posts)
17. A lot of us did a lot more time for a lot less crime.
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 11:50 AM
Dec 2014

45 days for beating a man senseless (and ultimately half blind) in a drunken racist rage?

Take the money and run, son.

merrily

(45,251 posts)
37. White privilege, yes, but did his family have money when he was 16?
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 01:19 PM
Dec 2014

Maybe Donnie was making big bucks by then? But, before NKOTB, that was a family on welfare.

gollygee

(22,336 posts)
61. he would not be considered nor would he think its possible
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 02:49 PM
Dec 2014

If he did not currently have class privilege.

merrily

(45,251 posts)
62. Ok. I thought you were talking about the original 45 day sentence. That boggles my mind.
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 02:51 PM
Dec 2014

We'll see if Governor Patrick grants a pardon. If not, the only thing current would be Wahlberg's sense of entitlement. I would love to know why he only got 45 days when he was 16, though.

 

yeoman6987

(14,449 posts)
16. I like Mark Walberg and go to most if his movies
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 11:49 AM
Dec 2014

But perhaps having that record has helped and reminded him of the awful crime he committed. I think it should stand. One thing that would have changed my mind was that if he went into Asian communities the last 26 years on a weekly basis to volunteer to help them. Yep I would even allow time he is doing movies to exclude his volunteering. But unless I am wrong, it doesn't seem like he has done anything like that at all.

tularetom

(23,664 posts)
21. I don't see any contrition
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 11:59 AM
Dec 2014

45 days in prison for beating a guy so badly he lost sight in his eye and this jerk wants a pardon.

I think I'll contact the state of Massachusetts and request that they arrest him and make him serve an appropriate sentence.

Is he so delusional that he believes a pardon will absolve him of what he did?

Fuck him.

 

cpwm17

(3,829 posts)
23. I certainly don't like him
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 12:04 PM
Dec 2014
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mark_Wahlberg
Wahlberg had been in trouble 20–25 times with the Boston Police Department in his youth. By age 13, Wahlberg had developed an addiction to cocaine and other substances. At 15, civil action was filed against Wahlberg for his involvement in two separate incidents of harassing African-American children (the first were siblings, and the second incident was a group of black school children on a field trip), by throwing rocks and shouting racial epithets. At 16, Wahlberg approached a middle-aged Vietnamese man on the street and, using a large wooden stick, knocked him unconscious while calling him "Vietnam fucking shit".That same day, using another wooden stick, Wahlberg also attacked a second Vietnamese man, striking him in the face with such force that it left him permanently blind in one eye.

For these crimes, Wahlberg was charged with attempted murder, pleaded guilty to assault and was sentenced to two years in Suffolk County Deer Island House of Correction. He ultimately served only 45 days of his sentence. In another incident, the 21-year-old Wahlberg fractured the jaw of a neighbor in an unprovoked attack.


At 9:40 in this 60 Minutes interview he hits golf balls into his neighborhood (something he does regularly), totally unconcerned about what or who he hits:

csziggy

(34,136 posts)
24. Has he made any resitution to his victims
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 12:05 PM
Dec 2014

The article does not mention if he paid their medical bills, their loss of work during recovery, compensation for the loss of Mr. Trinh's eye, or a dime to make up for his vicious, racist acts. Even if he had no money at the time of the crimes, he has had money for a number of years, and could have compensated those men and their families. But nothing is said to indicate that he has.

Unless his victims received some token of Wahlberg's remorse, I don't see that he has proven that he really feels he did wrong.

 

elias49

(4,259 posts)
86. Lots and lots of us did...
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 07:05 PM
Dec 2014

and lots didn't. Should we scoop them all up and punish them? Humiliate them? I don't see the point. Just my opinion.

gollygee

(22,336 posts)
88. That isn't even a question here
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 07:13 PM
Dec 2014

It isn't whether he should be humiliated. It's whether he should be pardoned.

And my point was that a racial hate crime, and think about how much violence was involved, isn't just a stupid mistake kids make.

seaglass

(8,173 posts)
26. Yeah, there is usually a big difference between a 16 yo boy and a 42 yo man. I think he should be
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 12:30 PM
Dec 2014

pardoned - IF - he meets with those he hurt and apologizes and asks for their forgiveness.

merrily

(45,251 posts)
41. Lots of people have been 16. How many have Wahlberg's juvenile record?
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 01:28 PM
Dec 2014

This wasn't making out in study hall or trying pot.

seaglass

(8,173 posts)
53. Probably many do. And hopefully many have grown up and become productive members of society.
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 02:15 PM
Dec 2014

I'm guessing some didn't.

I'm not of the belief that a 16yo is an adult.

merrily

(45,251 posts)
54. No, not many at all. Not a majority by any stretch of the imagination.
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 02:18 PM
Dec 2014

Obviously, a 16 year old is not an adult, but these were hateful, vicious violent crimes, not youthful indiscretions. He did all of 45 days for them and his record certainly did not prevent him from earning a living. He should sit down and shut up and thank his lucky stars.

seaglass

(8,173 posts)
56. Not many 16 yo criminals? Well I guess we could debate what is meant by many but it certainly
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 02:22 PM
Dec 2014

doesn't mean majority.

Yes he got a very mild sentence. He was fortunate. Maybe someone saw something in him and gave him a chance. Maybe he could have spent 2 years in prison and reentered society as a hardened criminal. Another wasted life.

merrily

(45,251 posts)
58. No, I did not say criminals. I have consistently distinguished between his crimes and
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 02:25 PM
Dec 2014

youthful pranks or indiscretions. Surely, you noticed that. The practice of re-phrasing another poster's careful wording to suit your argument is not one I can admire.

seaglass

(8,173 posts)
64. Whoa slow down. I consider what Wahlberg did as a 16yo criminal and I think there are a lot
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 03:16 PM
Dec 2014

of 16 yo criminals. You don't, fine. I'm not rephrasing your statements and have no idea what you're going on about.

 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
68. Why debate a thing which has an actual answer...
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 03:54 PM
Dec 2014

In 2011, there were 4,367 arrests for every 100,000 youths ages 10 through 17 in the United States. That's all arrests. Less than 5% are arrested for anything.

seaglass

(8,173 posts)
70. In 2011 1.5 mil people under the age of 18 arrested. That is a lot to me. Wahlberg obviously had
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 04:14 PM
Dec 2014

some family issues as 3 or 4 of his brothers and 1 of his sisters also ended up in jail.

Wahlberg's pardon or non-pardon is not something I am passionate about, what happens will happen. My feeling is that people can turn their lives around and it seems that Wahlberg has.



christx30

(6,241 posts)
90. Yes he turned his life around.
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 11:43 PM
Dec 2014

He's a world famous, wealthy actor. So that criminal conviction has not hurt him at all. But how many people that did something that terrible ever get a pardon for their crimes? Why should Marky Mark be any different?

Demsrule86

(68,600 posts)
27. Redemption
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 12:33 PM
Dec 2014

He should be pardonned ...what he did was awful, but he has changed his life ...he was but 16.

Iggo

(47,558 posts)
31. What did he do to make Mr Trinh's life better?
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 12:42 PM
Dec 2014

Tell me that, and then we can talk about redemption.

still_one

(92,251 posts)
28. He was one of the producers of Boardwalk Empire. Now if that doesn't
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 12:34 PM
Dec 2014

Doesn't glorify violence I don't know what does

Pardon him for what?

Did he injure two Asians in an unprovoked attack?

A pardon should occur if an injustice has occurred. As far as I can see the injustice wasn't done to him

merrily

(45,251 posts)
40. Sorry to say, there is plenty of precedent for arbitrary pardons where no injustice occurred.
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 01:24 PM
Dec 2014

Nixon may be the most famous example. Guilty as charged.

The big campaign donor Clinton pardoned is another famous example. So was commuting Libbey's sentence.

As with anything else in the US, money and/or connections often trump justice.

still_one

(92,251 posts)
72. I was just expressing my particular view. I can see someone pardoned from execution, because it can be
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 04:20 PM
Dec 2014

argued as cruel and unusual punishment, but not for the crime itself. Just a personal opinion

merrily

(45,251 posts)
73. I agree with your personal opinion on both counts. There should be a reason, other than
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 04:22 PM
Dec 2014

you are rich and/or well-connected and the death penalty is enough reason. Those are my opinions, too. Unfortunately, people who have the power to pardon seem to think otherwise.

indie9197

(509 posts)
29. His movies do not glorify violence?
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 12:34 PM
Dec 2014

Really? How about last year's movie "Pain and Gain" which actually tried to make a comedy out of brutal violence? Horrible movie, couldnt finish it.

Mike Nelson

(9,960 posts)
34. Wealth and Fame and he wants this???
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 01:02 PM
Dec 2014

...I'd never heard this story. He's stupid to bring it up at all... better hire a new publicist!

 

951-Riverside

(7,234 posts)
39. "Wahlberg wants a formal pardon from the state of Massachusetts."
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 01:22 PM
Dec 2014

No, asshole you should live with it just like Mike Tyson, Danny Trejo and Charles S. Dutton. Just because you're white and make a lot of money doesnt mean you should be able to sweep your racist attack under the rug.

45 days in jail for beating and blinding a man was PEANUTS for a race fueled attack.

seaglass

(8,173 posts)
55. I agree or maybe I'm just a bleeding heart. :-( Sounds like the same people who wouldn't
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 02:19 PM
Dec 2014

want ex-felons to be allowed to vote. How do ex-criminals have a chance in society when there is so little forgiveness?

dilby

(2,273 posts)
46. Does he have a felony on his record?
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 01:41 PM
Dec 2014

I could understand wanting to get the Felony dropped so he could vote in Massachusetts.

Iggo

(47,558 posts)
48. In Massachusetts, felons are only disenfranchised if they're inmates.
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 01:51 PM
Dec 2014
http://blogs.kqed.org/lowdown/2014/02/26/felon-voting

I just noticed the map is from 2010, so maybe things have changed.

Capt. Obvious

(9,002 posts)
57. They haven't changed
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 02:24 PM
Dec 2014

And I think inmates only lost the right to vote in the early 90's but that could be my faulty memory.

mmonk

(52,589 posts)
47. I think he should be. He was a kid at the time, has been
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 01:47 PM
Dec 2014

contrite, and faced those he harmed seeking forgiveness.

MADem

(135,425 posts)
59. Restaurant wants a liquor license, is that it????
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 02:30 PM
Dec 2014

You know that's what is driving this train. They don't give liquor licenses to felons.

He needs to take his name off the list of owners--that'll solve his problem quicker than this pardon will.

I oppose giving him the pardon as well--not unless he compensates the man's family in Saudi-style fashion--drop a few million on him, and give him shares in his Wahlburger's restaurant.

We KNOW money talks, make it talk loudly....for a change. So everyone KNOWS what the deal is, here.

Kalidurga

(14,177 posts)
59. Nah
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 02:30 PM
Dec 2014

Yes he was 16 years old. We should be aware 16 year olds that are raised in horrible ways can do horrible things to people. He isn't the only one who should face the public wrath though. He was on hard drugs well before the age of 16. That isn't the signal of a happy home or a functional family. Something was horrible screwed up for him from the jump.

That being said I think Wahlberg should talk about that a lot. But, like many abused children (yes I am assuming, it could have been a different horror for him) they don't get what has screwed them up. Most blame themselves, I think Wahlberg might have escaped that fate, not sure. He should maybe write a book and let people know that abuse has consequences outside of the home it happens in. It screws with people's heads and it can leave permanent scars.

Even with abusive parents people are going to have to be held accountable if the attack and maim someone. It's a tragic thing all around. But, no pardon. He can wear the conviction like a blind eye.

chrisa

(4,524 posts)
65. People can change. Mark Wahlberg, based on our limited knowledge of him, has.
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 03:20 PM
Dec 2014

I'm sure Mark Wahlberg hates what 16 year old Mark Wahlberg was. He also went to jail and paid his debt to society. He should be forgiven, imo.

 

Reter

(2,188 posts)
66. Nineteen eighty fuckin' eight?
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 03:26 PM
Dec 2014

He was a minor at 16. He hasn't done anything wrong since right? I forgive him.

Xithras

(16,191 posts)
67. I disagree. He was a minor.
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 03:29 PM
Dec 2014

For nearly all crimes short of murder and rape, I believe that pardons should routinely be issued to people who were convicted of crimes as minors...if they can demonstrate a decade or two of upstanding citizenship after their sentence is completed. Punishing someone for life over an offense they committed when they were still minors and barely out of childhood is cruel.

 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
69. How exactly does retaining the factual record 'punish' Wahlberg? He's got 200 million bucks.
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 03:55 PM
Dec 2014

He sure as fuck does not look punished to me.

Xithras

(16,191 posts)
71. I couldn't give a damn about Wahlberg...
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 04:14 PM
Dec 2014
I believe that pardons should routinely be issued to people who were convicted of crimes as minors


Wahlberg isn't being harmed by his conviction, but there are millions of others in America who are still required to divulge crimes they committed as minors, or who have them pop up on various background checks, even after decades of living exemplary lives. I believe that pardons should be handed out for everyone convicted of a crime as a minor, except for people convicted of a handful of the most serious crimes. Few people are as lucky as Wahlberg.

I don't oppose Walhberg getting one because I think that everyone who qualifies should get one.
 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
75. That's fair enough.
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 05:07 PM
Dec 2014

The point you are advocating is the one Wahlberg should be advocating as a man of great wealth who has a past burden common to so many others who do not have his connections or resources. But he's not.

Xithras

(16,191 posts)
78. I agree 100% on that.
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 05:29 PM
Dec 2014

Wahlberg has a lot of power, and he should be using it to help other people in his situation.

JHB

(37,161 posts)
74. What is he after that he can't because of his past crime?
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 04:30 PM
Dec 2014

I mean legally, what is his record blocking him on?

 

joeybee12

(56,177 posts)
79. Apparently a liquor license for a restaurant he wants to own...
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 05:36 PM
Dec 2014

So that's what's motivating him, not some contrition.

JHB

(37,161 posts)
82. Thanks, joeybee12. And to Wahlberg: Try lobbying to get the law amended...
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 06:17 PM
Dec 2014

...to allow petitioning for removal of the prohibition after a long time, say 20-25 years after completion of the sentence. People might support you on that one.

But a pardon? Hell, no!

 

joeybee12

(56,177 posts)
84. Changing the law would benefit other people...
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 06:22 PM
Dec 2014

Doing that would show contrition...a pardon only for himself, not so much.

JI7

(89,253 posts)
85. why does he need a pardon ? it's not like he is being punished in society
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 06:30 PM
Dec 2014

if it was a non violent act i might agree but if i had done something like that and was sorry for it i would just try to be better for the rest of my life and not expect pardon, forgiveness, or anything else for the horrible things i had done.

what do the people who he attacked have to say about this ? do they agree that he should be pardoned ?

Inkfreak

(1,695 posts)
89. Do we believe in redemption?
Fri Dec 5, 2014, 08:22 PM
Dec 2014

Does anyone offering an opinion really know Mark W?

I believe in redemption & I do not know this man. Why must we forever point and condemn? What he did was horrible. But why must we look at one thing in a persons life and draw all conclusions from that. I believe people are complex.

Iggo

(47,558 posts)
91. I do believe in redemption. Tell me, how has he redeemed himself?
Sat Dec 6, 2014, 04:39 AM
Dec 2014

Contrition? Atonement? Amends?

Right now, the only info that I have is that he needs the pardon so he can get a liquor license.

You're right. I don't know him. If you have more info, I want to hear it.

For what it's worth, I think that a lot of the prohibitions against people who've been convicted of felonies and who have served their time, including the ones that make it so they can never own a restaurant that sells alcohol, are stupid. Not every felony should be a life sentence. If Mr Wahlberg wants to try to get those laws changed, I'm 100% with him.

But an actual pardon for a racist attack with permanent injury to the victim should be about something other than one man's desire to sell beer with his burgers, shouldn't it?

Inkfreak

(1,695 posts)
93. Ask him, I'm not privy to his personal life.
Sat Dec 6, 2014, 08:16 AM
Dec 2014

My message is clear. It doesn't mean I'm taking up the banner for him.

I will add I'm curious what the victim has to say. His opinion would be more important than ours.

Response to joeybee12 (Original post)

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Mark Wahlberg should not ...