General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsMark Wahlberg should not be pardoned
In April,1988, Mark Wahlberg, 16, set upon a Vietnamese immigrant named Thanh Lam, and, with a wooden stick, beat him so severely that Lam fell to the ground, unconscious. Later that night, according to contemporaneous accounts, Wahlberg found another Asian man, Hoa Trinh, and, calling him a "gook" and "slant-eye," smashed in the face.
Trinh lost sight in his right eye.
Wahlberg was arrested, convicted, and spent 45 days in jail, an experience that hardened him for the rest of his younger days and provided him creative fodder for many of his later projects. He has insisted that, despite his liberal use of racial slurs, race did not motivate his attack. His intoxication, apparently, did.
Twenty-six years later, Wahlberg wants a formal pardon from the state of Massachusetts.
Why? He has devoted the rest of his life to being a model citizen. His movies do not glorify violence (apparently). He has contributed significantly to his community. He has mentored many young boys away from a life of crime. He has demonstrated, in deed, a respect for the police.
http://theweek.com/article/index/273108/mark-wahlberg-should-not-be-pardoned
I tend to agree...
gopiscrap
(23,761 posts)While I believe in the redemptive ability of all humanity, sometimes there are crimes so bad.... has he offered compensation to his victim or victims family?
merrily
(45,251 posts)Many criminals live good lives after serving their time. If Wahlberg gets a pardon now, why shouldn't everyone who does good deeds after prison get one?
It's not as though he can't support his family because he can't get a job without a pardon.
nichomachus
(12,754 posts)That I believe everyone who serves their time and shows good behavior for a sufficient period should have their past record expunged. If someone does something wrong, pays the price, and reforms has a criminal record, we are, in effect, punishing them for the rest of their lives. That's wrong. Granted, in this case, he's not suffering financially, but a lot of other people are. It even affects your ability to get an apartment in some places.
merrily
(45,251 posts)He has already served his time and everyone knows of his past.
A pardon would not expunge his criminal record, anyway.
As for others who have more anonymity, I don't think they should be deprived of jobs or the right to vote, but I don't think their records should be expunged, either.
nichomachus
(12,754 posts)merrily
(45,251 posts)I agree that we are that way as a society, but Wahlberg got off easy. No clue why.
cwydro
(51,308 posts)45 days for the loss of an eye???
merrily
(45,251 posts)I know that the family was on welfare, if not consistently, then on and off. (Lots of kids, Dad and mom split, Dad out of work a lot.)
It may be that Donnie had already started to make big bucks by the time Mark was 16 and helped out his brother somehow. If not, maybe the family had some connections in city government?
I am not interested enough to dig around the internet to try to find a reason, but it had to be money or connections or both.
SummerSnow
(12,608 posts)get them because of his felonies.So he wants this expunged from his record. Imo it has nothing to do with anything else.
merrily
(45,251 posts)FYI, a pardon is different from expunging a record. Juvenile records are expunged, meaning you can never look them up or use them against the former juvenile offender in court if he or she becomes an adult offender, etc. A pardon means the person doesn't get any more punishment.
hlthe2b
(102,301 posts)truly awful...
merrily
(45,251 posts)I never say racist things or beat the sight out of anyone when I am drunk, do many of you?
Wahlberg was incredibly lucky to get only 45 days in jail. Then, he was incredibly lucky to earn a fortune. What is a pardon going to for him at this point?
He should thank his lucky fucking stars it was only 45 days and just move on.
lunasun
(21,646 posts)LP2K12
(885 posts)I like the dude. I believe in rehabilitation as well. However a pardon at this point is useless as his career is doing just fine. How about instead of a pardon he tracks down his victims and earns an apology. Don't just ask for it, prove you've changed.
joeybee12
(56,177 posts)He needs to really show he's changed, and at least from this article one doesn't get that impression.
merrily
(45,251 posts)don't get pardons. Some even become clergy (the decent kind) and don't get pardons. What makes him a special case? His money? His celebrity? His sense of entitlement to special treatment?
joeybee12
(56,177 posts)I've never been a fan...the smugness has always bothered me.
alarimer
(16,245 posts)Then I guess pardon him, in keeping with past policy.
Pardons are a joke. They seldom go to who actually deserve it.
Not saying Mark didn't learn his lesson. He did, but it's not like he will have trouble finding a job or anything. But a pardon for being a celebrity is silly.
Iggo
(47,558 posts)Sorry Mark. You gotta own this one.
frogmarch
(12,154 posts)Come on, Mark, show us what you're really made of.
truebrit71
(20,805 posts)Plus, he is a truly shitty actor...
gollygee
(22,336 posts)and have never found and will never find a job because of it.
How many people were pressured to plead guilty for something they didn't even do when they were young and have never found and will never find a job because of it.
He did this, and he hasn't even had his life horribly affected by what he did. Talk about class privilege and white privilege and I suppose there's some kind of privilege associated with being famous as well, that anyone is even considering this. Huge example of privilege at work. I wouldn't be surprised if he actually got pardoned.
Iggo
(47,558 posts)45 days for beating a man senseless (and ultimately half blind) in a drunken racist rage?
Take the money and run, son.
merrily
(45,251 posts)Maybe Donnie was making big bucks by then? But, before NKOTB, that was a family on welfare.
gollygee
(22,336 posts)If he did not currently have class privilege.
merrily
(45,251 posts)We'll see if Governor Patrick grants a pardon. If not, the only thing current would be Wahlberg's sense of entitlement. I would love to know why he only got 45 days when he was 16, though.
yeoman6987
(14,449 posts)But perhaps having that record has helped and reminded him of the awful crime he committed. I think it should stand. One thing that would have changed my mind was that if he went into Asian communities the last 26 years on a weekly basis to volunteer to help them. Yep I would even allow time he is doing movies to exclude his volunteering. But unless I am wrong, it doesn't seem like he has done anything like that at all.
tularetom
(23,664 posts)45 days in prison for beating a guy so badly he lost sight in his eye and this jerk wants a pardon.
I think I'll contact the state of Massachusetts and request that they arrest him and make him serve an appropriate sentence.
Is he so delusional that he believes a pardon will absolve him of what he did?
Fuck him.
cpwm17
(3,829 posts)For these crimes, Wahlberg was charged with attempted murder, pleaded guilty to assault and was sentenced to two years in Suffolk County Deer Island House of Correction. He ultimately served only 45 days of his sentence. In another incident, the 21-year-old Wahlberg fractured the jaw of a neighbor in an unprovoked attack.
At 9:40 in this 60 Minutes interview he hits golf balls into his neighborhood (something he does regularly), totally unconcerned about what or who he hits:
truebrit71
(20,805 posts)And now he wants a pardon?
Fuck off with that shit...
csziggy
(34,136 posts)The article does not mention if he paid their medical bills, their loss of work during recovery, compensation for the loss of Mr. Trinh's eye, or a dime to make up for his vicious, racist acts. Even if he had no money at the time of the crimes, he has had money for a number of years, and could have compensated those men and their families. But nothing is said to indicate that he has.
Unless his victims received some token of Wahlberg's remorse, I don't see that he has proven that he really feels he did wrong.
elias49
(4,259 posts)That's one of the stupid years for American males.
I say 'let it go'.
Iggo
(47,558 posts)gollygee
(22,336 posts)elias49
(4,259 posts)and lots didn't. Should we scoop them all up and punish them? Humiliate them? I don't see the point. Just my opinion.
gollygee
(22,336 posts)It isn't whether he should be humiliated. It's whether he should be pardoned.
And my point was that a racial hate crime, and think about how much violence was involved, isn't just a stupid mistake kids make.
seaglass
(8,173 posts)pardoned - IF - he meets with those he hurt and apologizes and asks for their forgiveness.
merrily
(45,251 posts)This wasn't making out in study hall or trying pot.
seaglass
(8,173 posts)I'm guessing some didn't.
I'm not of the belief that a 16yo is an adult.
merrily
(45,251 posts)Obviously, a 16 year old is not an adult, but these were hateful, vicious violent crimes, not youthful indiscretions. He did all of 45 days for them and his record certainly did not prevent him from earning a living. He should sit down and shut up and thank his lucky stars.
seaglass
(8,173 posts)doesn't mean majority.
Yes he got a very mild sentence. He was fortunate. Maybe someone saw something in him and gave him a chance. Maybe he could have spent 2 years in prison and reentered society as a hardened criminal. Another wasted life.
merrily
(45,251 posts)youthful pranks or indiscretions. Surely, you noticed that. The practice of re-phrasing another poster's careful wording to suit your argument is not one I can admire.
seaglass
(8,173 posts)of 16 yo criminals. You don't, fine. I'm not rephrasing your statements and have no idea what you're going on about.
Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)In 2011, there were 4,367 arrests for every 100,000 youths ages 10 through 17 in the United States. That's all arrests. Less than 5% are arrested for anything.
seaglass
(8,173 posts)some family issues as 3 or 4 of his brothers and 1 of his sisters also ended up in jail.
Wahlberg's pardon or non-pardon is not something I am passionate about, what happens will happen. My feeling is that people can turn their lives around and it seems that Wahlberg has.
elias49
(4,259 posts)christx30
(6,241 posts)He's a world famous, wealthy actor. So that criminal conviction has not hurt him at all. But how many people that did something that terrible ever get a pardon for their crimes? Why should Marky Mark be any different?
Demsrule86
(68,600 posts)He should be pardonned ...what he did was awful, but he has changed his life ...he was but 16.
Iggo
(47,558 posts)Tell me that, and then we can talk about redemption.
still_one
(92,251 posts)Doesn't glorify violence I don't know what does
Pardon him for what?
Did he injure two Asians in an unprovoked attack?
A pardon should occur if an injustice has occurred. As far as I can see the injustice wasn't done to him
merrily
(45,251 posts)Nixon may be the most famous example. Guilty as charged.
The big campaign donor Clinton pardoned is another famous example. So was commuting Libbey's sentence.
As with anything else in the US, money and/or connections often trump justice.
still_one
(92,251 posts)argued as cruel and unusual punishment, but not for the crime itself. Just a personal opinion
merrily
(45,251 posts)you are rich and/or well-connected and the death penalty is enough reason. Those are my opinions, too. Unfortunately, people who have the power to pardon seem to think otherwise.
indie9197
(509 posts)Really? How about last year's movie "Pain and Gain" which actually tried to make a comedy out of brutal violence? Horrible movie, couldnt finish it.
AngryAmish
(25,704 posts)Glad he does well now but unless blanket pardons are handed out then no.
marble falls
(57,114 posts)Mike Nelson
(9,960 posts)...I'd never heard this story. He's stupid to bring it up at all... better hire a new publicist!
Arugula Latte
(50,566 posts)Can't stand that guy.
951-Riverside
(7,234 posts)No, asshole you should live with it just like Mike Tyson, Danny Trejo and Charles S. Dutton. Just because you're white and make a lot of money doesnt mean you should be able to sweep your racist attack under the rug.
45 days in jail for beating and blinding a man was PEANUTS for a race fueled attack.
Takket
(21,581 posts)he probably would not have survived the arrest process.
Comrade Grumpy
(13,184 posts)Dreamer Tatum
(10,926 posts)That's the only way he'd get some DU love.
elias49
(4,259 posts)seaglass
(8,173 posts)want ex-felons to be allowed to vote. How do ex-criminals have a chance in society when there is so little forgiveness?
dilby
(2,273 posts)I could understand wanting to get the Felony dropped so he could vote in Massachusetts.
Iggo
(47,558 posts)I just noticed the map is from 2010, so maybe things have changed.
Capt. Obvious
(9,002 posts)And I think inmates only lost the right to vote in the early 90's but that could be my faulty memory.
mmonk
(52,589 posts)contrite, and faced those he harmed seeking forgiveness.
Orsino
(37,428 posts)MADem
(135,425 posts)You know that's what is driving this train. They don't give liquor licenses to felons.
He needs to take his name off the list of owners--that'll solve his problem quicker than this pardon will.
I oppose giving him the pardon as well--not unless he compensates the man's family in Saudi-style fashion--drop a few million on him, and give him shares in his Wahlburger's restaurant.
We KNOW money talks, make it talk loudly....for a change. So everyone KNOWS what the deal is, here.
Kalidurga
(14,177 posts)Yes he was 16 years old. We should be aware 16 year olds that are raised in horrible ways can do horrible things to people. He isn't the only one who should face the public wrath though. He was on hard drugs well before the age of 16. That isn't the signal of a happy home or a functional family. Something was horrible screwed up for him from the jump.
That being said I think Wahlberg should talk about that a lot. But, like many abused children (yes I am assuming, it could have been a different horror for him) they don't get what has screwed them up. Most blame themselves, I think Wahlberg might have escaped that fate, not sure. He should maybe write a book and let people know that abuse has consequences outside of the home it happens in. It screws with people's heads and it can leave permanent scars.
Even with abusive parents people are going to have to be held accountable if the attack and maim someone. It's a tragic thing all around. But, no pardon. He can wear the conviction like a blind eye.
chrisa
(4,524 posts)I'm sure Mark Wahlberg hates what 16 year old Mark Wahlberg was. He also went to jail and paid his debt to society. He should be forgiven, imo.
Reter
(2,188 posts)He was a minor at 16. He hasn't done anything wrong since right? I forgive him.
Xithras
(16,191 posts)For nearly all crimes short of murder and rape, I believe that pardons should routinely be issued to people who were convicted of crimes as minors...if they can demonstrate a decade or two of upstanding citizenship after their sentence is completed. Punishing someone for life over an offense they committed when they were still minors and barely out of childhood is cruel.
Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)He sure as fuck does not look punished to me.
Xithras
(16,191 posts)Wahlberg isn't being harmed by his conviction, but there are millions of others in America who are still required to divulge crimes they committed as minors, or who have them pop up on various background checks, even after decades of living exemplary lives. I believe that pardons should be handed out for everyone convicted of a crime as a minor, except for people convicted of a handful of the most serious crimes. Few people are as lucky as Wahlberg.
I don't oppose Walhberg getting one because I think that everyone who qualifies should get one.
Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)The point you are advocating is the one Wahlberg should be advocating as a man of great wealth who has a past burden common to so many others who do not have his connections or resources. But he's not.
Xithras
(16,191 posts)Wahlberg has a lot of power, and he should be using it to help other people in his situation.
JHB
(37,161 posts)I mean legally, what is his record blocking him on?
joeybee12
(56,177 posts)So that's what's motivating him, not some contrition.
JHB
(37,161 posts)...to allow petitioning for removal of the prohibition after a long time, say 20-25 years after completion of the sentence. People might support you on that one.
But a pardon? Hell, no!
joeybee12
(56,177 posts)Doing that would show contrition...a pardon only for himself, not so much.
Jamastiene
(38,187 posts)He'll get no sympathy from me.
KinMd
(966 posts)helpmetohelpyou
(589 posts)JI7
(89,253 posts)if it was a non violent act i might agree but if i had done something like that and was sorry for it i would just try to be better for the rest of my life and not expect pardon, forgiveness, or anything else for the horrible things i had done.
what do the people who he attacked have to say about this ? do they agree that he should be pardoned ?
Inkfreak
(1,695 posts)Does anyone offering an opinion really know Mark W?
I believe in redemption & I do not know this man. Why must we forever point and condemn? What he did was horrible. But why must we look at one thing in a persons life and draw all conclusions from that. I believe people are complex.
Iggo
(47,558 posts)Contrition? Atonement? Amends?
Right now, the only info that I have is that he needs the pardon so he can get a liquor license.
You're right. I don't know him. If you have more info, I want to hear it.
For what it's worth, I think that a lot of the prohibitions against people who've been convicted of felonies and who have served their time, including the ones that make it so they can never own a restaurant that sells alcohol, are stupid. Not every felony should be a life sentence. If Mr Wahlberg wants to try to get those laws changed, I'm 100% with him.
But an actual pardon for a racist attack with permanent injury to the victim should be about something other than one man's desire to sell beer with his burgers, shouldn't it?
Inkfreak
(1,695 posts)My message is clear. It doesn't mean I'm taking up the banner for him.
I will add I'm curious what the victim has to say. His opinion would be more important than ours.
Response to joeybee12 (Original post)
Warren DeMontague This message was self-deleted by its author.