Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Warren Stupidity

(48,181 posts)
Tue Dec 9, 2014, 06:01 PM Dec 2014

Discussionist: cross participation with DU.

How frequently do you read or post on Discussionist, if at all?

Use the last 30 days as a guide to your answer. So if you haven't accessed Discussionist in the last 30 days, the answer is "Never".

For the purpose of the poll accessed means read or responded to or created a message. So 2-5 times a day means you read or responded to or created 2-5 posts a day.


43 votes, 0 passes | Time left: Unlimited
Never
35 (81%)
Once per month.
2 (5%)
Once per week.
2 (5%)
Once per day.
2 (5%)
2-5 times a day.
1 (2%)
More than 5 times a day.
1 (2%)
Show usernames
Disclaimer: This is an Internet poll
93 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Discussionist: cross participation with DU. (Original Post) Warren Stupidity Dec 2014 OP
I read it when it was new Cali_Democrat Dec 2014 #1
pretty much my experience too. Warren Stupidity Dec 2014 #4
somewhere btw 1x/ month and never etherealtruth Dec 2014 #2
ditto... someone will inevitably link to something there and I'll end up cllicking without realizing hlthe2b Dec 2014 #71
I've posted there, but answered "never" per the instructions... stone space Dec 2014 #3
I prefer that place at times because, unlike here... TreasonousBastard Dec 2014 #5
lol. nt BootinUp Dec 2014 #18
I've had three hides over there for doing that, actually. NuclearDem Dec 2014 #19
Nor should you. TreasonousBastard Dec 2014 #52
Try calling a crazed gun nut an ammosexual there. stone space Dec 2014 #51
Haven't tried that yet, but will soon enough. TreasonousBastard Dec 2014 #53
I was banned for 90 days from Discussionist and from DU... stone space Dec 2014 #54
"Ammosexual" is a bannable offense? Then who are we... TreasonousBastard Dec 2014 #55
I have no problem criticising what they do over there. stone space Dec 2014 #56
Lessee how this ends... TreasonousBastard Dec 2014 #60
Never. H2O Man Dec 2014 #6
It was just under a month ago when I tried to talk to some there for a few days. DisgustipatedinCA Dec 2014 #7
profiles will tell you about 90 days hfojvt Dec 2014 #8
Never. Fuck that cesspit of misogynistic, racist assholes... truebrit71 Dec 2014 #9
About 2 to 5 times a day. hrmjustin Dec 2014 #10
That place is a sewer. nt cyberswede Dec 2014 #11
No desire or inclination to read or post there. n/t bluesbassman Dec 2014 #12
I gave it a shot for the first few months, City Lights Dec 2014 #13
I went to the B.S. that is discussionist ... 1StrongBlackMan Dec 2014 #14
All the time. PeteSelman Dec 2014 #15
I like Discussionist Algernon Moncrieff Dec 2014 #16
Once or twice in the last 4 months, no desire to go back ever. nt BootinUp Dec 2014 #17
A more wretched hive of scum and villainy would be hard to find Fumesucker Dec 2014 #20
I said 'never' then remembered I'd followed a link from a DUer to a racist thread over there Bluenorthwest Dec 2014 #21
I usually post 2-5 times a day on Discussionist. I enjoy bugging the conservatives there with Louisiana1976 Dec 2014 #22
it is a very pretty website for a place that is basically a sewer. CBGLuthier Dec 2014 #23
Sewer is a very apt description. NuclearDem Dec 2014 #25
Read it a few times when it started up ... never considered registering. lpbk2713 Dec 2014 #24
Never, as in never. panader0 Dec 2014 #26
Every primitive defense mechanism is utilized arthritisR_US Dec 2014 #27
Only one way. DU posts to Discussionist. Never back to DU on point Dec 2014 #28
Every onc treestar Dec 2014 #29
based on the reports of some of our brave souls who have ventured there rurallib Dec 2014 #30
At one time, I was a regular. However, it became clear that "Discussionist" is just Free Republic. Agnosticsherbet Dec 2014 #31
Never (nt) bigwillq Dec 2014 #32
It started with a promise of something of interest... 99Forever Dec 2014 #33
Haven't even signed up, let alone posted. AverageJoe90 Dec 2014 #34
Your "privilege theory" woud be right at home there. cyberswede Dec 2014 #43
So, I'm guessing you didn't actually read my post. Go figure. nt AverageJoe90 Dec 2014 #44
If I wanted to argue with misinformed conservatives I'd go home for the holidays. nt TeamPooka Dec 2014 #35
ROFLLLL!! That's me too. nt RiverLover Dec 2014 #36
Gotta wish you a happy holidays for that one rurallib Dec 2014 #58
:) TeamPooka Dec 2014 #69
I thought "never" would have the highest count, I didn't think it would be this lopsided. Warren Stupidity Dec 2014 #37
It's the 30 day window. (nt) stone space Dec 2014 #57
Checked it out a couple of weeks ago ucrdem Dec 2014 #38
After many years I've come to the conclusion that my smart phone is a fucking idiot. Warren Stupidity Dec 2014 #39
I heard so much about it Omaha Steve Dec 2014 #40
I tried when it was new Bettie Dec 2014 #41
Mine don't follow any particular pattern. Warren DeMontague Dec 2014 #42
I find it very lame that current DUers use Discussionist to attack DU/DUers and HoF and the BOG. seaglass Dec 2014 #59
This is a tree in the forest problem to me. Warren Stupidity Dec 2014 #66
Where did I say I never read it? n/t seaglass Dec 2014 #67
Ah, well then there is a simple solution. Warren Stupidity Dec 2014 #68
It is A solution. To me it would be like putting my head in the sand, not so simple. I agree that seaglass Dec 2014 #70
I find a lot of things lame, too many to list. Warren DeMontague Dec 2014 #78
And Meta at Discussionist! Yes it is funny. I liked Meta. :-) n/t seaglass Dec 2014 #79
One thing I've learned over 10 years here, the admins are smarter than people give them credit for. Warren DeMontague Dec 2014 #83
I agree with the idea that the admins wanted to try new ideas that wouldn't work here. I like the seaglass Dec 2014 #84
I couldn't have pipi_k Dec 2014 #61
Never really means never, in my case. Quantess Dec 2014 #45
Never. As In NEVER EVER. 2banon Dec 2014 #46
I go there to see what they're saying on AA-related issues steve2470 Dec 2014 #47
I enjoy posting on the Discussionist board Gothmog Dec 2014 #48
They truly are morons and imbeciles amuse bouche Apr 2015 #92
I agree with your analysis Gothmog Apr 2015 #93
what is discussionist? ellenrr Dec 2014 #49
Sorry, with shit like this passing as intellectual discussion: HughBeaumont Dec 2014 #50
check this out steve2470 Dec 2014 #62
That one's hilarious, but, thanks to reason, slightly more sane than the newer one. HughBeaumont Dec 2014 #64
None Of The Above ProfessorGAC Dec 2014 #63
That is option 1 "Never" Warren Stupidity Dec 2014 #74
I Missed the 30 Day Part ProfessorGAC Dec 2014 #87
I find that there are enough rightwing assholes on DU for me to get my quota. Arugula Latte Dec 2014 #65
Took one look. hifiguy Dec 2014 #72
I gave up after three days. Aristus Dec 2014 #73
Limit of visits if x is time is as x-->infinity = 0 stevenleser Dec 2014 #75
Tried DisgustingUs when it was new. Got fed up. Stopped. Scootaloo Dec 2014 #76
the place is like stepping in a big steaming pile of dog shit olddots Dec 2014 #77
I have only so many hours in a day Generic Brad Dec 2014 #80
Fuck that noise madokie Dec 2014 #81
Once I realized that my stalker (who went so far as to fellate an ex-boyfriend of mine to get msanthrope Dec 2014 #82
That is really fucked up. n/t seaglass Dec 2014 #85
The CC denziens are really, really fucked up. nt msanthrope Dec 2014 #86
I voted never. NCTraveler Dec 2014 #88
I read enough right-wing Third Way views here as it is LondonReign2 Dec 2014 #89
I used it early on, but as it became more and more like Stormfront I left Bjorn Against Dec 2014 #90
I get hides there all the time amuse bouche Apr 2015 #91
 

Cali_Democrat

(30,439 posts)
1. I read it when it was new
Tue Dec 9, 2014, 06:05 PM
Dec 2014

But I haven't been there in months.

I have no interest in reading posts from people who despise blacks, muslims, hispanics, and gays.

No thanks.

hlthe2b

(102,236 posts)
71. ditto... someone will inevitably link to something there and I'll end up cllicking without realizing
Wed Dec 10, 2014, 02:47 PM
Dec 2014

TreasonousBastard

(43,049 posts)
5. I prefer that place at times because, unlike here...
Tue Dec 9, 2014, 06:06 PM
Dec 2014

I can say "Fuck You" to an idiot on either end of the spectrum and get away with it.

 

stone space

(6,498 posts)
51. Try calling a crazed gun nut an ammosexual there.
Wed Dec 10, 2014, 10:15 AM
Dec 2014
I can say "Fuck You" to an idiot on either end of the spectrum and get away with it.
 

stone space

(6,498 posts)
54. I was banned for 90 days from Discussionist and from DU...
Wed Dec 10, 2014, 10:28 AM
Dec 2014

...at the same time for that particular offense.

I expect I'll eventually get banned from here again for doing it.

Probably from Discussionist, also, if I start posting there, again.

 

stone space

(6,498 posts)
56. I have no problem criticising what they do over there.
Wed Dec 10, 2014, 10:45 AM
Dec 2014

No more of a problem than I have in criticizing what we do here.

And yes, calling somebody who carries their guns into restaurants and stores an "ammosexual" is a bannable offense here at DU, as well as over at Discussionist.

Doesn't stop me from doing it.

I just know what to expect when I do it, that's all.

City Lights

(25,171 posts)
13. I gave it a shot for the first few months,
Tue Dec 9, 2014, 06:27 PM
Dec 2014

but it got increasingly disgusting as time passed by, so I no longer go there. Not even to lurk.

 

1StrongBlackMan

(31,849 posts)
14. I went to the B.S. that is discussionist ...
Tue Dec 9, 2014, 06:28 PM
Dec 2014

for the first time, the day before yesterday, when a DUer alerted me that they were discussing one of my posts.

PeteSelman

(1,508 posts)
15. All the time.
Tue Dec 9, 2014, 06:28 PM
Dec 2014

More than I do here now.

It can be a but exasperating at times but I like the back and forth and the not having to walk on eggshells.

Fumesucker

(45,851 posts)
20. A more wretched hive of scum and villainy would be hard to find
Tue Dec 9, 2014, 07:13 PM
Dec 2014

I get disgusted/burned out/annoyed with the whole online argumentation thing on a fairly regular basis and abstain for a while, I've posted quite a bit there but not in the last few weeks.

It's ultimately futile except in a "posting for the lurkers" sort of sense, none of the hard core posters on any side is suddenly going to flip their thinking 180 degrees.

Reminds me a lot of DU in more than a few ways but there aren't as many really funny posters, except maybe unintendedly. On the other hand possibly the single funniest example of troll fail I've ever seen online was on Discussionist.

 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
21. I said 'never' then remembered I'd followed a link from a DUer to a racist thread over there
Tue Dec 9, 2014, 07:14 PM
Dec 2014

recently. The whole thing was horrible. Not my idea of entertainment.

Louisiana1976

(3,962 posts)
22. I usually post 2-5 times a day on Discussionist. I enjoy bugging the conservatives there with
Tue Dec 9, 2014, 07:19 PM
Dec 2014

my socialist views.

 

NuclearDem

(16,184 posts)
25. Sewer is a very apt description.
Tue Dec 9, 2014, 07:25 PM
Dec 2014

It funnels shit away and keeps it out of view, and only the truly deranged visit it.

lpbk2713

(42,757 posts)
24. Read it a few times when it started up ... never considered registering.
Tue Dec 9, 2014, 07:24 PM
Dec 2014



Decided I'd rather engage Kindergartners in meaningful dialog instead
of the simps I found over there so I moved on and never looked back.

arthritisR_US

(7,288 posts)
27. Every primitive defense mechanism is utilized
Tue Dec 9, 2014, 07:34 PM
Dec 2014

over there by the righties. When projection and deflection aren't enough the devolve into personal attacks and insults.

Facts mean nothing to them, they simply ignore them. Reason is a foreign concept to them. Most of them are petty and small and more often than not discussion with them is akin to trying to reason with a child in the throes of a tantrum. I now keep my interactions with them to a minimum, when my disgust is at a minimum.

treestar

(82,383 posts)
29. Every onc
Tue Dec 9, 2014, 07:41 PM
Dec 2014

e in a while usually inspired by some mention of it here.

It's fun to debate right wingers. Like shooting fish in a barrel.

rurallib

(62,411 posts)
30. based on the reports of some of our brave souls who have ventured there
Tue Dec 9, 2014, 07:44 PM
Dec 2014

I made a decision that this is more horse crap that I do not need in my life.
At my age I figure have have many fewer days ahead than behind me and I do not want to fill them with crap and angst.

Agnosticsherbet

(11,619 posts)
31. At one time, I was a regular. However, it became clear that "Discussionist" is just Free Republic.
Tue Dec 9, 2014, 08:01 PM
Dec 2014

I don't see a reason to bath myself daily in shit and acid.

99Forever

(14,524 posts)
33. It started with a promise of something of interest...
Tue Dec 9, 2014, 08:33 PM
Dec 2014

... but quite devolved into a festering cesspool, with the same exact contents. Why the site owners let it go to shit is baffling.

 

AverageJoe90

(10,745 posts)
34. Haven't even signed up, let alone posted.
Tue Dec 9, 2014, 08:36 PM
Dec 2014

Not sure I want to, either. You know why? I've had to put up with some pretty stupid bullshit here on DU, with me being attacked by a certain few people, every so often, over disagreements on privilege theory, or trying to debunk climate doomer nutjobbery, etc.(as well as one asshat who stalked me every so often for over a year and a half, before I finally permanently put his dumb ass on ignore), but at least I can handle a few *individual* trolls, malcontents, etc. once in a while.

But from what little I've been able to see at Discussionist, the RW trolls often seem to come in groups, and sometimes all at once. And I suspect that whatever enjoyment I *might* get over being able to debunk their whackery would probably be rather quickly overwhelmed by the frustration of just trying to fend them all off. And then there's the racism, misogyny, etc., that I've also spotted on occasion that'd make your average MRA blush in embarrassment.

So, yeah. DU has it's problems, but we're a lot better than Discussionist; that place turned into a shithole pretty quick, and has stayed like that.

rurallib

(62,411 posts)
58. Gotta wish you a happy holidays for that one
Wed Dec 10, 2014, 10:49 AM
Dec 2014

Thanks for the laugh and a very true statement for many of us

ucrdem

(15,512 posts)
38. Checked it out a couple of weeks ago
Tue Dec 9, 2014, 09:54 PM
Dec 2014

Doesn't seem much changed from early last summer and it didn't seem so bad then. Yeah there was that embarrassing thread that didn't get hidden, but the DI members seemed to be denouncing it. Basically it seems to function as a second chance for banned DU members and since but for the grace of dog etc I'm chary of knocking it, if you get my drift. But seriously, it's not that dissimilar from DU as far as I could tell, less fun though because there's no groups or forums. Or front page. It's sort of a Metro screen version of DU which I'm pretty sure was the original motivation -- DU for smartphones. Lacking a smartphone I can't confirm that tho.

 

Warren Stupidity

(48,181 posts)
39. After many years I've come to the conclusion that my smart phone is a fucking idiot.
Tue Dec 9, 2014, 09:58 PM
Dec 2014

All I want it to do is play the current podcast when I start the car. Just play the fucking podcast. I don't want to jab the fucking thing with my finger 8 times to get it to pay attention. It is likely that smart phones are suffering from the results of generational inbreeding.

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
42. Mine don't follow any particular pattern.
Tue Dec 9, 2014, 11:04 PM
Dec 2014

And anyone who is paying attention, knows who I am over there.

It's a different deal than DU, serves a different purpose. Obviously there are some disagreeable folks over there, including some illustrious or infamous names repeatedly banned from DU. But contrary to assertions that it is this, that, or the other, the posters seem to sit across various spectrums, ideologically.

One main and long-served purpose of DU is for us like-minded folk (mostly) to not have to argue with Right Wingers, and DU is good for that. However, that does not mean that all websites need to be like DU.

What I find particularly lame are the oft-repeated demands that it be shut down, or the not-so-subtle intimations that "good" DU members shouldn't ever post over there. Screw that. Every time I see that crap here, it makes me want to post over there more. I'll do what I want, thanks.

seaglass

(8,171 posts)
59. I find it very lame that current DUers use Discussionist to attack DU/DUers and HoF and the BOG.
Wed Dec 10, 2014, 10:55 AM
Dec 2014

I couldn't care less if Discussionist exists forever but I do not agree with allowing the attacks. Skinner obviously tried to redirect those "discussions" in the beginning but was unsuccessful. I'm sure he assumed that eventually people would tire of it, lol. At least Discussionist is no longer advertised over here.

I don't know why anyone would object to how much you post over there.

 

Warren Stupidity

(48,181 posts)
66. This is a tree in the forest problem to me.
Wed Dec 10, 2014, 02:21 PM
Dec 2014

Why would you care about what somebody wrote on a message board you never read?

 

Warren Stupidity

(48,181 posts)
68. Ah, well then there is a simple solution.
Wed Dec 10, 2014, 02:25 PM
Dec 2014

The hate-fest over there is far worse than here, so I simply pulled the plug and stopped reading that crap. I suggest putting everyone on disgustingness on ignore.

seaglass

(8,171 posts)
70. It is A solution. To me it would be like putting my head in the sand, not so simple. I agree that
Wed Dec 10, 2014, 02:33 PM
Dec 2014

it is a hate-fest, I kind of think it's worse than conservative cave because it's both the left and right joining in on the hate.

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
78. I find a lot of things lame, too many to list.
Wed Dec 10, 2014, 07:53 PM
Dec 2014

Discussionist certainly has an element of what used to be meta, over here on DU.

It is funny, of course, that some of the people who enjoyed meta the most, then turned around and celebrated its demise, have been the most enthusastic promoters of continued meta-style shennanigans here on DU in the days hence.

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
83. One thing I've learned over 10 years here, the admins are smarter than people give them credit for.
Wed Dec 10, 2014, 10:19 PM
Dec 2014

i think DI is serving an important function, but part of it initially I suspect was just that elad had some neat ideas for tag-based discussions, that would have amounted to a far too massive overhaul if they had tried to impliment them as DU 4.

This is just speculation, of course. But because DI is structred that way, even though there are some objectionable- to say the least- folks over there, the more open system makes it VERY easy to personalize the experience and only see the shit one wants to.

seaglass

(8,171 posts)
84. I agree with the idea that the admins wanted to try new ideas that wouldn't work here. I like the
Wed Dec 10, 2014, 10:37 PM
Dec 2014

look of DI and the tags, just not most of the people. . Other than testing out new discussion board design I don't believe DI has any important function.

pipi_k

(21,020 posts)
61. I couldn't have
Wed Dec 10, 2014, 12:41 PM
Dec 2014

stated it better.

Also, in reference to your last paragraph, I just wanted to add that not only do I find it lame that so many here demand that it be shut down, I find it pathetic and obnoxious.

I'm sure that any random person coming across the site isn't going to connect it in any way to DU, so people who are worried about the place somehow reflecting negatively on DU can probably relax. Actually, there is much more that goes on here during the course of a normal day that would reflect badly on DU, and I'm not talking about ideology...rather, how a lot of DUers treat other people.

I guess my question for those who want to see DI shut down would be, "Why??"

Under what premise to people think they have...or should have...the right to silence other people, even if the opinions being expressed are objectionable...

 

2banon

(7,321 posts)
46. Never. As In NEVER EVER.
Wed Dec 10, 2014, 03:38 AM
Dec 2014

Once, not long after I noticed a mention of it, I went there for about 5 seconds. The comments reminded me of freepers.

Why anyone here would bother wasting precious time on discussing the time of day with morons from freeperville is disturbing.

steve2470

(37,457 posts)
47. I go there to see what they're saying on AA-related issues
Wed Dec 10, 2014, 04:06 AM
Dec 2014

Of course, they are all clueless. MrScorpio lays down the law.

Gothmog

(145,176 posts)
48. I enjoy posting on the Discussionist board
Wed Dec 10, 2014, 09:47 AM
Dec 2014

The conservatives on thie Discussionist board are idiots and need to be confronted with facts

ellenrr

(3,864 posts)
49. what is discussionist?
Wed Dec 10, 2014, 09:57 AM
Dec 2014

I take it, it is a discussion forum.
Why is there both a "DU" and a "discussionist"?

thanks.

HughBeaumont

(24,461 posts)
50. Sorry, with shit like this passing as intellectual discussion:
Wed Dec 10, 2014, 10:05 AM
Dec 2014
http://discussionist.com/1015296605

Forget it. I don't give revisionist horseshit the time of day, nor am I essay-trading with anarcho-crapitalist "teh leftits are at fawlt for everthin" assholes like Nixons_Ghost.

http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Hitler_and_socialism

An entirely US-centric argument, spurred on by certain batty ideologues and infamous websites, claims that Adolf Hitler was not the far-right, anti-communist nationalist that everyone else remembers him to be, but rather an egalitarian socialist. Much like the Discovery Institute and their assault on the theory of evolution, this attempts to evoke the association fallacy on anyone who practices left-wing politics, and by that standard, anyone who slightly leans to the left is an adherent of fascism. Eeek!

The fact that we even need to write this should tell you something about these people, but why not take a hack at it? While the Nazis did oppose capitalism as an "international" ideology out to destroy the German nation, he was not opposed to private enterprise within a national "sandbox." Furthermore, in order to get to power, he allied with people whose economic views were much more pro-business, distancing himself from alte kaempfer like Gottfried Feder and bringing people such as Hjalmar Schacht into his circle.

snip

For this argument to be even close to being solvent (fans of Erik von Kuehnelt-Leddihn, we're looking at you), good chunks of history need to be thrown out the window:

1.That the 96-member Social Democratic Party of Germany was Hitler's main opposition in the Reichstag, and the only political party that attempted to halt the laws that established him as dictator and brought down the Weimar Republic. In fact, all of the ideological predecessors of today's conservative and classically liberal parties voted unanimously for the law, while the SPD voted unanimously against despite the presence of SA 'guards' in the building.[2][3]

2.That the first political groups targeted during the Nazi ascendancy were pacifists, trade unions and communists;[4][5] and

3.That the Strasserites, the only strand of Nazism that could be referred to as left-wing (ie. pro-working class in nature), were all killed off (with a handful of conservative dissidents) in what we all know as the Night of the Long Knives.[6]

We're waiting.

HughBeaumont

(24,461 posts)
64. That one's hilarious, but, thanks to reason, slightly more sane than the newer one.
Wed Dec 10, 2014, 01:12 PM
Dec 2014


Banshee 3 Actual and Nixons_Ghost are proof positive that there is nothing more comedic than a Dunning-Krugertarian.
 

Warren Stupidity

(48,181 posts)
74. That is option 1 "Never"
Wed Dec 10, 2014, 05:56 PM
Dec 2014

I tried to clearly explain that this poll refers to visits over the last 30 days only. Obviously I failed. I signed up too, and for about two months I visited the site every now and then. Haven't been back since.

Aristus

(66,328 posts)
73. I gave up after three days.
Wed Dec 10, 2014, 03:10 PM
Dec 2014

While the desire to engage rationally with right-wingers is quixotic, to say the least, the reality is dismaying in the extreme. Right-wing extremists are so unintelligent, unenlightened, tawdry, petty, mean-spirited, provincial, parochial, small-minded, inadept and irrational that no amount of reason, logic or level-headedness will ever get through to them.

 

olddots

(10,237 posts)
77. the place is like stepping in a big steaming pile of dog shit
Wed Dec 10, 2014, 06:07 PM
Dec 2014

With your new pair of sneakers .Once was too much .

Generic Brad

(14,274 posts)
80. I have only so many hours in a day
Wed Dec 10, 2014, 09:24 PM
Dec 2014

I would rather check in for a few minutes here each day instead of venturing over there and getting all riled up.

madokie

(51,076 posts)
81. Fuck that noise
Wed Dec 10, 2014, 09:26 PM
Dec 2014

I've got a septic tank in my back yard I could take the top off of if I wanted to swim in piss and shit

 

msanthrope

(37,549 posts)
82. Once I realized that my stalker (who went so far as to fellate an ex-boyfriend of mine to get
Wed Dec 10, 2014, 09:30 PM
Dec 2014

info on me,) was posting there, I left....maybe the second day?

LondonReign2

(5,213 posts)
89. I read enough right-wing Third Way views here as it is
Thu Dec 11, 2014, 09:12 AM
Dec 2014

no need to go wade in amongst the truly crazy. We will never, ever, convince those people of anything.

amuse bouche

(3,657 posts)
91. I get hides there all the time
Tue Apr 7, 2015, 11:03 AM
Apr 2015

The RWNJs are bunch of alerting cry babies

They don't believe Tony Perkins fronts a Hate Group

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Discussionist: cross part...