Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Omaha Steve

(99,665 posts)
Tue Dec 9, 2014, 10:25 PM Dec 2014

Congress just stuck one up the middle class rear end!!! (updated)


http://apnews.excite.com/article/20141210/us--congress_rdp-15b0b1309f.html

In an unexpected move, lawmakers also agreed on legislation expected to be incorporated into the spending measure that will permit a reduction in benefits for current retirees at economically distressed multiemployer pension plans. Supporters said it was part of an effort to prevent a slow-motion collapse of a system that provides retirement income to millions, but critics objected vehemently.


UPDATE info is based on just Illinois: Employers' woes push union pension plans to collapse: http://www.chicagobusiness.com/article/20141206/ISSUE01/312069985/employers-woes-push-union-pension-plans-to-collapse

Nearly 230,000 Chicago-area union workers and retirees risk not getting the pensions they've been promised, and some may not get any retirement benefits at all unless Congress comes up with a fix soon.

While lawmakers wrestled with the issue for at least 10 years, $6.26 billion in unfunded retirement obligations was racked up by 30 union-affiliated plans in the city and suburbs that are in financial danger. That doesn't count the Teamsters Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas pension fund, which alone is $17.55 billion short of what it needs to pay benefits for its nearly 408,000 members nationwide, including 30,000 in Illinois.

It has been a quiet, slow-moving crisis, but Central States could change that. If a solution isn't in place by 2017, the Rosemont-based plan is expected to go belly-up in 10 years or so, experts say.

“I've told politicians many times before, if you really want to know what the 800-pound gorilla in the room is for us, it's our pensions,” says John Bryan, president of Geneva Construction and chairman of the Illinois Road and Transportation Builders Association.

FULL story at link.

46 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Congress just stuck one up the middle class rear end!!! (updated) (Original Post) Omaha Steve Dec 2014 OP
Simple solution: Nationalize retirement, keep it solvent, expand social security. NYC_SKP Dec 2014 #1
I'm not Omaha Steve, but I can answer... antigop Dec 2014 #13
I agree!!!! LeftInTX Dec 2014 #2
Not to worry, Obama still has veto power Fumesucker Dec 2014 #3
Bwahahahahahahahahaha! nichomachus Dec 2014 #5
I suspect they put this in the spending bill that has to be signed in 48 hours or the government jwirr Dec 2014 #18
Correct. I saw an article today saying the budget deal benefits Republicans... riversedge Dec 2014 #31
Time to start a pool Doctor_J Dec 2014 #4
I am sorry to say, my guess would be no time soon. merrily Dec 2014 #26
When Americans can no longer get a new iWhatever. CrispyQ Dec 2014 #45
To many pension plans were burned by Wellstone ruled Dec 2014 #6
A thinking person would have to ask what the quid pro quo for the judge truedelphi Dec 2014 #43
And a judge has gone back and forth - already agreed w/ the City of Stockton Calif. that it truedelphi Dec 2014 #7
I have been retired for 4 years now and have a defined benifit plan. Every year doc03 Dec 2014 #8
PBGC already has the power to cut pensions Omaha Steve Dec 2014 #9
Im know the PBGC has cut some benfits that are above their limits doc03 Dec 2014 #10
From their FAQ kwijybo Dec 2014 #12
Good lord! Theft. How on earth can they do that? Ed Suspicious Dec 2014 #17
Heck, kwijybo Dec 2014 #23
My father-in-law worked for a company for the last 33 years. He'll be accessing his pension in the Ed Suspicious Dec 2014 #33
We went on stike in 1995 for 10 1/2 months in order to get a doc03 Dec 2014 #44
That Teamsters pension fund; office based in Rosemont has had numerous troubles lunasun Dec 2014 #11
This is our tax breaks at work ... aggiesal Dec 2014 #14
this is bullshit....if they can bail out the banks, they can bail out pension funds. antigop Dec 2014 #15
Exactly. Nt abelenkpe Dec 2014 #20
Absolutely. I Suppose Each Individual LarryNM Dec 2014 #22
Well, no. See the banks were deserving. "Workers", not so much. Enthusiast Dec 2014 #24
its not the same Amishman Dec 2014 #42
This is one of the most despicable... ReRe Dec 2014 #16
I have a feeling they are not done yet. They will get social security. Enthusiast Dec 2014 #25
You know... ReRe Dec 2014 #34
Yep. Ol' GHWB warned us he was creating a New World Order. I like the old one better. Enthusiast Dec 2014 #39
Well, I like the Old Order ReRe Dec 2014 #40
As long as they give the money the worker yeoman6987 Dec 2014 #29
I thought... ReRe Dec 2014 #35
That's what my company did benz380 Dec 2014 #38
What exactly would that mean? Hopefully they will get something! my morning pages Dec 2014 #19
Pensions are deferred compensation. Diremoon Dec 2014 #21
I wish I could remember who posted about a "bail in" that seems to be coming down the pike. merrily Dec 2014 #27
Here you go... from marmar one week ago... ReRe Dec 2014 #36
Thank you so much. This time I'll bookmark! merrily Dec 2014 #37
The need for lube and bending over has passed. SamKnause Dec 2014 #28
and this is before the GOP takes over the Senate. We cannot blame all our woes on liberal_at_heart Dec 2014 #30
But but GummyBearz Dec 2014 #41
"Supporters said it was part of an effort to prevent a slow-motion collapse of a system..." Brickbat Dec 2014 #32
Beyond sickening to sacrifice and defer compensation only to get hosed. TheKentuckian Dec 2014 #46
 

NYC_SKP

(68,644 posts)
1. Simple solution: Nationalize retirement, keep it solvent, expand social security.
Tue Dec 9, 2014, 10:31 PM
Dec 2014

There was a time not long ago that our retirements were held sacred, we could plan our golden years around them.

I guess nothing is sacred, they'll rob us of the value of our 401K plans (after virtually forcing us to invest), shrink Social Security, and now just cut or eliminate earnings invested into retirement plans.

How can they do this, Omaha Steve?

antigop

(12,778 posts)
13. I'm not Omaha Steve, but I can answer...
Wed Dec 10, 2014, 12:19 AM
Dec 2014

they are making a change to ERISA, which up until now protected retirees (and those with a vested pension) from benefit cuts.

jwirr

(39,215 posts)
18. I suspect they put this in the spending bill that has to be signed in 48 hours or the government
Wed Dec 10, 2014, 01:04 AM
Dec 2014

will shut down. Not much hope the President will veto it.

riversedge

(70,248 posts)
31. Correct. I saw an article today saying the budget deal benefits Republicans...
Wed Dec 10, 2014, 09:48 AM
Dec 2014

think it was on Politico

merrily

(45,251 posts)
26. I am sorry to say, my guess would be no time soon.
Wed Dec 10, 2014, 08:46 AM
Dec 2014

We don't seem to be a revolting people, so to speak.

 

Wellstone ruled

(34,661 posts)
6. To many pension plans were burned by
Tue Dec 9, 2014, 10:59 PM
Dec 2014

State and County rule changes that allowed delayed payments due to budgetary short falls. Another one was the hit with worthless Mortgage Bonds rated AAA and not worth the paper there printed on. Just ran across a situation were a outside fund consultant f----d over a fund for millions and got probation. Walked away with 12m and a slap on the wrist. Meanwhile the fund members get zero.

truedelphi

(32,324 posts)
7. And a judge has gone back and forth - already agreed w/ the City of Stockton Calif. that it
Tue Dec 9, 2014, 11:11 PM
Dec 2014

May not be necessary to bother about terms of city employees pensions.

Full story on how this judge has gone back and forth, and theelgal repurcussions affect everyone who holds a pension through any of the many Calif governmental bodies.

http://abovethelaw.com/2014/11/despite-earlier-ruling-stockton-judge-confirms-plan-leaving-pension-obligations-intact/

doc03

(35,351 posts)
8. I have been retired for 4 years now and have a defined benifit plan. Every year
Tue Dec 9, 2014, 11:27 PM
Dec 2014

the percentage of funding has dropped, it is obvious the company plans on dumping it on the PBGC. So does this mean
they can now reduce our benefits rather than default? What about the PBGC will they be able to also cut pensions? I have little faith in this President standing up to them and vetoing it. If the Republicans take the Whitehouse in 2016 the American working class is finished.

Omaha Steve

(99,665 posts)
9. PBGC already has the power to cut pensions
Tue Dec 9, 2014, 11:31 PM
Dec 2014


It will be a few days before detailed analysis is available on how this will play out.

doc03

(35,351 posts)
10. Im know the PBGC has cut some benfits that are above their limits
Tue Dec 9, 2014, 11:46 PM
Dec 2014

But can they cut your pension once you are receiving them. When they took over one of my pensions it was far under the limits at the time. I receive just $201 a month for 17 years service on that job.

kwijybo

(233 posts)
12. From their FAQ
Wed Dec 10, 2014, 12:15 AM
Dec 2014

"Q: What happens when PBGC takes over as trustee of my plan?

A: PBGC reviews your plan's records to determine the benefits each person will receive. The amount we pay is subject to limits set by law.

If you are already receiving a pension, we will continue paying you without interruption during our review. These payments are an estimate of the benefits that PBGC can pay under the insurance program. We will pay these benefits in the annuity form you chose at retirement, but they may be less than you were receiving from your plan."

(They did this to my Dad. Instead of the $1800/month he was supposed to get, he gets $120/month, thanks to the [7-pages of vulgarity deleted] Reagan and his Republicans...)

Ed Suspicious

(8,879 posts)
17. Good lord! Theft. How on earth can they do that?
Wed Dec 10, 2014, 12:35 AM
Dec 2014

Last edited Wed Dec 10, 2014, 09:51 AM - Edit history (1)

Rhetorical question. Don't bother replying, just know that I really feel for your dad. What they did should be criminal.

kwijybo

(233 posts)
23. Heck,
Wed Dec 10, 2014, 07:37 AM
Dec 2014

That was just the final screwing. What the bankruptcy judge allowed before that was truly criminal. You CAN be forced to work for a company for promissory notes, that can only be redeemed for stock (at pennies on the dollar) in a new company the CEO is starting (using the funds from the pension plan), to replace the company he bankrupted. I've always suspected this is the sort of thing you can do if you donate to the 'right' political party...

Ed Suspicious

(8,879 posts)
33. My father-in-law worked for a company for the last 33 years. He'll be accessing his pension in the
Wed Dec 10, 2014, 09:56 AM
Dec 2014

next couple. I'm afraid for him. They recently became a part of a much larger union that doesn't seem to represent his company employees quite as closely as the union they belonged to before. I know he has a 401k, but his planning for retirement including the date he will retire has been based on the idea of that pension being there. Frightening knowing that it can be negotiated away after taking concessions in pay for decades in order to bolster their retirement security. The pension offers little security at all in the end it would seem.

Sorry to hear about your dad's plight. Best of luck to him going forward.

doc03

(35,351 posts)
44. We went on stike in 1995 for 10 1/2 months in order to get a
Wed Dec 10, 2014, 07:07 PM
Dec 2014

defined benefit pension plan. Now some SOBs in Washington make it legal to cut our benefits. Why haven't we heard a fucking word from the media, Congress, unions or AARP?

lunasun

(21,646 posts)
11. That Teamsters pension fund; office based in Rosemont has had numerous troubles
Wed Dec 10, 2014, 12:09 AM
Dec 2014

Nothing new don't see an end to their troubles either

aggiesal

(8,919 posts)
14. This is our tax breaks at work ...
Wed Dec 10, 2014, 12:19 AM
Dec 2014

Everyone wants the services, but nobody wants to pay for them.

Plus society now days are so selfish they see no reason to raise their taxes to fund anyones pension.

LarryNM

(493 posts)
22. Absolutely. I Suppose Each Individual
Wed Dec 10, 2014, 01:31 AM
Dec 2014

Will have to Incorporate as a Financial Institution in order to be treated right.

Amishman

(5,557 posts)
42. its not the same
Wed Dec 10, 2014, 03:22 PM
Dec 2014

The banks overall had the ability to repay the bailout money, and enough have done to that TARP has turned a profit.

How would a pension plan repay a bailout?

ReRe

(10,597 posts)
16. This is one of the most despicable...
Wed Dec 10, 2014, 12:29 AM
Dec 2014

... frauds of our time. The nerve to take people's retirement savings away. It's theft. Outright theft. I don't care how they rationalize it. It's theft. High fucking crime.
Makes me want to spit nails.

Enthusiast

(50,983 posts)
25. I have a feeling they are not done yet. They will get social security.
Wed Dec 10, 2014, 08:29 AM
Dec 2014

Listen to their TV rhetoric. All we hear is how social security is going broke. Even though social security is the single fully funded part of government. This decision sets a precedent.

ReRe

(10,597 posts)
34. You know...
Wed Dec 10, 2014, 10:50 AM
Dec 2014

... I don't like GHWB's "New World Order." It gives me a feeling that we're being led around by a rope laced thru a ring in our noses. We have absolutely NO idea what the future is going to look like when they are through, or if they will EVER be through. They (TPTB) are calling all the shots as they go along. Hell I don't think they even know where we are going! Our lives are not our own.

And if we don't get a majority of REAL Democrats back in power, you can bet your sweet bippy that Social Security AND Medicare will be on the chopping block. I was thinking about all this last night, and my mind did venture into the future. What I seen was NOT pretty. I envisioned a time when we will have "economic plagues." The elderly and the needy will die in their homes or in the streets from a combination of no food, no meds, no heat, no shelter at all, no insurance of ANY kind. It will look like the "black death" returned in full force right here on the continent of North America. And the only "pension" we'll have is what we have been able to save in a non-flammable trunk or mattress or in a hole in the ground.

I am convinced that The New World Order is not leading us in the right direction. We digress-ing, instead of progress-ing.

ReRe

(10,597 posts)
40. Well, I like the Old Order
Wed Dec 10, 2014, 11:22 AM
Dec 2014

... as far as economics go. And since we're picking and choosing, we can leave all that dysfunctional shite from the old order day in file #86 (i.e., in the trash can.)

 

yeoman6987

(14,449 posts)
29. As long as they give the money the worker
Wed Dec 10, 2014, 09:42 AM
Dec 2014

Put into the retirement fund, the government/company is off the hook. They cannot keep the money the worker contributed to their retirement. That is why pensions went down from 1800 to 200 dollars. They took out the companies portion of the pension.

ReRe

(10,597 posts)
35. I thought...
Wed Dec 10, 2014, 10:53 AM
Dec 2014

... the contributions to retirement accounts were equal (1/2 by the employee and 1/2 by the employer?) And what happened to the contract? Does a contract not mean anything anymore?

benz380

(534 posts)
38. That's what my company did
Wed Dec 10, 2014, 11:08 AM
Dec 2014

They killed our pensions and gave our share back. We had a choice of check (30% taxed), transfer to our 401K, or have it put into a trust fund of THEIR choosing. Senior employees were hurt the most. I would never have come to work here if I knew this was going to happen. Now I'm too old to leave.

 

my morning pages

(14 posts)
19. What exactly would that mean? Hopefully they will get something!
Wed Dec 10, 2014, 01:10 AM
Dec 2014

They won't lose their pensions, will they? What a nightmare...

Diremoon

(86 posts)
21. Pensions are deferred compensation.
Wed Dec 10, 2014, 01:25 AM
Dec 2014

When they cut or eliminate our defined pension plans, they are stealing from us. Meanwhile, the CEO and CFO are getting bonuses for saving the corporation money. They are counting on all of the beneficiaries being too old and poor to put up a fight. That is usually a good assessment to the situation. Politicians will do nothing to help, particularly republicans, who would just as soon everyone else just hurry up and die. In my opinion, it really is time to start taking heads.

merrily

(45,251 posts)
27. I wish I could remember who posted about a "bail in" that seems to be coming down the pike.
Wed Dec 10, 2014, 08:49 AM
Dec 2014

Something about using depositors' funds to help out the poor dear banks.

Anyone else hear about that.

SamKnause

(13,108 posts)
28. The need for lube and bending over has passed.
Wed Dec 10, 2014, 08:55 AM
Dec 2014

We are accustomed to getting it from all directions.

Cuts, cuts, cuts.

Are they baiting us for a revolution ???

Those with the least are forced to give up the most.

They are killing the very soul of this country.

Poverty, hunger, unemployment, underemployment, low wages, long hours, and homelessness for the masses.

I am so disillusioned and ashamed of my country's government !!!!!!

liberal_at_heart

(12,081 posts)
30. and this is before the GOP takes over the Senate. We cannot blame all our woes on
Wed Dec 10, 2014, 09:48 AM
Dec 2014

the Republicans. We must demand accountability from the Democratic Party.

 

GummyBearz

(2,931 posts)
41. But but
Wed Dec 10, 2014, 11:31 AM
Dec 2014

Its the lesser of 2 evils! We can't be critical of our own team here! We are the LESSER evil!!

Brickbat

(19,339 posts)
32. "Supporters said it was part of an effort to prevent a slow-motion collapse of a system..."
Wed Dec 10, 2014, 09:51 AM
Dec 2014

Put into motion years ago.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Congress just stuck one u...