General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsBerkeley: I Don't Like The Police Tactic of Clearing of Observers
It's after midnight, so of course the anarchists, looters, vandals, random opportunists, possible agent provocateurs, etc. have come out of the woodwork to blaze various trails of anti-capitalist destruction between Oakland and Berkeley. And the police are closing in with the riot gear, tear gas, etc.
Here's what bugs me: the police seem overly focused on getting rid of observers. Instead of concentrating on the guys breaking windows and stealing stuff, the police are beating up the guy in the van with the camera. Before kettling groups of rowdy protesters, the police sweep around to make sure no one is documenting the incident.
From a tweet:
The targeting of photojournalist @timhussin and Stephen Lam + livestreamer @TruthCastersTV by police is a dangerous trend
I believe Stephen Lam was hit with a baton? It seems the Truth Casters guy was actually violently thrown from his van, and his phone wrenched away from him. He claims to have been beaten.
This is not cool.
Attention Police Dudes: when you act to get rid of observers, it just makes it look like you're trying to cover something up.
After being so careful to be "hands off" of the protest all night, do you really want your rep messed up by people *imagining* what you might be doing? Think CIA Torture Report!
Just leave the live-streamers alone and behave yourselves as you make orderly, lawful arrests of malefactors.
Please remember that perception of an expanding police state just invites escalation to the protests. All these confrontations are ABOUT documenting misbehavior by the police. The only way to respond to that is to be the best police officers you can be and earn the trust of your community.
951-Riverside
(7,234 posts)In Berkeley they called the livestreamer you're talking about out at gunpoint then threw his camera on the ground when he asked for their badge number and ID. Before the livestream went dark, he was heard yelling "They're beating me up, help me, help me" and now no one knows what happened to him or his PTSD Dog.
Very scary stuff.
daredtowork
(3,732 posts)I saw a lot of tweets about reduced media coverage. At first I thought it was just vanity complaints from people who were in it for the selfies, and the media had just moved on because bridge take-overs had gotten old.
But then I noticed Berkeleyside coverage stopped abruptly at 9:30, almost mid-sentence. That's just weird. I think it's plausible someone did say: "They will stop if the media isn't paying attention to them." Sort of like when parents ignore a child who is throwing a tantrum.
Perhaps that order even came from the White House, since the question about Berkeley was put to the Press Secretary. Withholding media coverage is preferable to sending in the National Guard.
But in this day and age the kids can make their own media. Propaganda can bubble up from below.
I think it's awesome that the assumptions of central control can be broken that way. If the cops think they can put the rabbit back in the hat by confiscating people's phones, they are very much mistaken. People will see what they do and cry "Police State!" - colossal backfire.
951-Riverside
(7,234 posts)daredtowork
(3,732 posts)Okay, if that's Berkeley PD, stop it.
Downwinder
(12,869 posts)If the Police wanted to collect evidence on the guys breaking windows, they would encourage observers. obviously they don't want those pictures.
Javaman
(62,531 posts)they don't want people to document anything. That leaves a paper trail, with no one to document anything the police then have free reign to do as they please.
RoccoR5955
(12,471 posts)I simply do not trust ANY officer any more. I don't care who they are.
reddread
(6,896 posts)during exercises of extreme violence for which he holds absolute responsibility.
abominable partisan lapse of perception.
he is a violent monster.
GreatGazoo
(3,937 posts)He said they gave them riot training that included watching video of riots after hockey games in Canada. Also that they taught them specifically to swing at cameras and smart phones early in any melee.
When I left, I jokingly told him "see you after the hockey game..."
daredtowork
(3,732 posts)The Berkeley Community should have had a chance to discuss their concerns about police tactics, and everyone should have had an opportunity for a group hug afterward because the Berkeley PD isn't so bad.
While we shouldn't tolerate police abuses of power, we wouldn't have rights without being able to call on the police to help defend them.
Constantly provoking the polices in hoping to create photo ops is uncool.
I'm sure it must be very stressful to think your every little mistake might be caught on camera. I wouldn't want to be in that position.
The City Council Meeting was where those concerns could have been mutually expressed.
In the meantime, though, the police can't just disperse the press - even the "people's press" through brute force. That's just the nature of this situation, and the police themselves set it up that way on Saturday. Now they should deal with the consequences by just doing their jobs in an upright, honest, and community-friendly manner. Just keep doing your job.
Read this article for a political rationale of looting that the police have to deal with:
http://thenewinquiry.com/essays/in-defense-of-looting/
The sad thing is the poverty aspect of that article sort of has a point in Oakland. There you can only get welfare for 3 months out of the year if you are able to work, whether you have a job or not - and that welfare is a $366/month loan (where rents are far higher and skyrocketing because of gentrification), and people are expected to pay back that loan on their minimum wage sporadic jobs when they are already in a toxic stress vortex of debt, appointments, and possibly court dates. I've been to an Oakland Supervisor's Committee meeting on General Assistance welfare, and the only "reform" they talked about is for small programs that help around 16 people, when caseworkers handle caseloads of 900!!! Of course people are falling through the cracks by the hundreds, if not the thousands - and this system does extend out to Berkeley, which is in the same county. This layer of poverty has been covered up by the press in recent years as they have preferred to focus on positive job growth and statistics. So if looting can bring attention back to certain realities, here, I can see why a few windows are being smashed - especially if they are focusing on chains that hire people for minimum wage and keep people working under full time hours so they can't earn benefits.
But, ultimately, we still need the police. We still want a society where there is someone to call when roving bands of vicious criminals are out to rape and pillage. We don't want civilization to be reduced to a smoking heap of rubble.
That's why we should have held the Berkeley City Council meeting - to find a way to bring the Berkeley Police back INTO the community.