Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Hissyspit

(45,788 posts)
Wed Dec 10, 2014, 11:21 AM Dec 2014

VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 3 OF GENEVA CONVENTIONS BAN ON TORTURE IS A WAR CRIME UNDER U.S. LAW

VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 3 OF GENEVA CONVENTIONS BAN ON TORTURE IS A WAR CRIME UNDER U.S. LAW

Transcript: http://www.torturingdemocracy.org


CONSPIRACY TO COMMIT TORTURE IS A WAR CRIME UNDER THE U.S. CODE PUNISHABLE BY UP TO 20 YEARS IN PRISON

http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/2340A



Just a reminder...
43 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 3 OF GENEVA CONVENTIONS BAN ON TORTURE IS A WAR CRIME UNDER U.S. LAW (Original Post) Hissyspit Dec 2014 OP
I brought this up years ago, and was told by someone that because 'Iraq' had never ratified the polly7 Dec 2014 #1
They were wrong. Reciprocity is only an issue in matters of extradition. n/t ColesCountyDem Dec 2014 #18
"It didn't make sense to me then, and still doesn't." - and rightly so. Veilex Dec 2014 #19
It didn't make sense because it was hogwash. sabrina 1 Dec 2014 #34
That's what I thought at the time, but was cut down by someone who 'knew polly7 Dec 2014 #43
It's funny how the law against revealing NSA documents is so steadfast. If you liberal_at_heart Dec 2014 #2
Very revealing... and sickening. deurbano Dec 2014 #11
"when exposing a crime is treated as a crime, you are ruled by criminals." n/t dixiegrrrrl Dec 2014 #16
Ooooh! Thats a good one! A big +1 from me on that quote! Veilex Dec 2014 #20
It's from Anonymous. dixiegrrrrl Dec 2014 #22
Good deal. Thanks for sharing! Veilex Dec 2014 #23
Didn't you hear ol' George (Tenet)??? Roland99 Dec 2014 #17
We must have a zero tolerance policy Tsiyu Dec 2014 #3
Yes, this would be the time for mandatory minimums! deurbano Dec 2014 #10
We're a post-statutory nation now. OnyxCollie Dec 2014 #4
It is getting very scary. We are now an authoritarian oligarchy. liberal_at_heart Dec 2014 #5
Since there are no repercussions for breaking the law, we should just go total rogue on the world. ChisolmTrailDem Dec 2014 #6
Haven't we done so already? Downwinder Dec 2014 #8
K & R & THANKS! ancianita Dec 2014 #7
Why are celebrities so quickly tried and convicted in the media...but not politicians accused of war Fred Sanders Dec 2014 #9
Right. As if beatings, hideous sleep deprivation, waterboarding and "rectal feeding" are torture. Orrex Dec 2014 #12
NOTHING WILL EVER HAPPEN TO BUSHCO WAR CRIMINALS!!!!! heaven05 Dec 2014 #13
Enhanced interrogation!!! joeybee12 Dec 2014 #14
Here: We NEED to stay on this, guys! calimary Dec 2014 #15
I have a question ... Martin Eden Dec 2014 #21
Where is "our" Ken Star? Autumn Dec 2014 #24
I'll be pleasantly shocked if anyone... FlyByNight Dec 2014 #25
Doesn't matter. atreides1 Dec 2014 #26
The United States of America SamKnause Dec 2014 #27
CIA ‘Torture’ Practices Started Long Before 9/11 Attacks dixiegrrrrl Dec 2014 #28
Indeed. SamKnause Dec 2014 #30
K & R malaise Dec 2014 #29
Kick nt Hissyspit Dec 2014 #31
Does somebody have that list of Fascism characteristics handy? JEB Dec 2014 #32
Kick nt Hissyspit Dec 2014 #33
kickety countryjake Dec 2014 #35
kick woo me with science Dec 2014 #36
Kicked Enthusiast Dec 2014 #37
kick woo me with science Dec 2014 #38
Laws don't apply to some people. We all know that. Vinca Dec 2014 #39
K&R Scuba Dec 2014 #40
kick woo me with science Dec 2014 #41
kick woo me with science Dec 2014 #42

polly7

(20,582 posts)
1. I brought this up years ago, and was told by someone that because 'Iraq' had never ratified the
Wed Dec 10, 2014, 11:29 AM
Dec 2014

United Nations Convention against Torture at the time, that somehow the U.S. didn't have to follow them. It didn't make sense to me then, and still doesn't.

 

Veilex

(1,555 posts)
19. "It didn't make sense to me then, and still doesn't." - and rightly so.
Wed Dec 10, 2014, 01:48 PM
Dec 2014

The Geneva Convention is not just about how signatories will treat each other, but also a governing methodology of how its signatories will act regardless of who is dealt with, unless specified otherwise.

sabrina 1

(62,325 posts)
34. It didn't make sense because it was hogwash.
Thu Dec 11, 2014, 04:19 AM
Dec 2014

Maybe Iraq could have made that claim, but the US certainly couldn't.

'We're going to shut down Iraq's Torture Chambers'!

Remember that? One of the ever changing reasons why we were going to war in Iraq. And within a few months, we had taken over Saddam's torture chambers and made them even wars!

polly7

(20,582 posts)
43. That's what I thought at the time, but was cut down by someone who 'knew
Mon Dec 15, 2014, 09:17 AM
Dec 2014

international law'. The poster tried to tell me that because Iraq had not ratified the agreement, it was null and void in that country. Thanks to you and the other two posters who explained they were full of baloney.

I do remember those words, and the incubator babies, and all the other crap that led up to it. The infamous 'shut down their torture chambers!' is particularly nauseous though, isn't it? Actually, the whole damn thing is. It was then, and even now - especially! when thinking about all they left out of the report they seem to have just casually tossed aside, still makes me sick.

liberal_at_heart

(12,081 posts)
2. It's funny how the law against revealing NSA documents is so steadfast. If you
Wed Dec 10, 2014, 11:29 AM
Dec 2014

reveal government documents, you are a traitor. And yet the law that states you cannot torture and kill people is so flexible.

Tsiyu

(18,186 posts)
3. We must have a zero tolerance policy
Wed Dec 10, 2014, 11:37 AM
Dec 2014

and mandatory minimums for all convicted of this.

If the Repukes think zero tolerance and mandatories are good for us for a teeny bag of weed, they should have no problem legislating the same for people who commit anal rape and other atrocities.

ZERO TOLERANCE and MANDATORY MINIMUM SENTENCING are suddenly awesome concepts if applied to the worst VIOLENT crimes.

liberal_at_heart

(12,081 posts)
5. It is getting very scary. We are now an authoritarian oligarchy.
Wed Dec 10, 2014, 11:47 AM
Dec 2014

Cops, banks, and government officials have immunity from prosecution and banks and other billionaires own the country. The cops can kill citizens. The banks can gamble billions and get government bailouts while social services get cut. Government officials can spy on citizens and torture and kill suspects. This is getting very, very scary.

 

ChisolmTrailDem

(9,463 posts)
6. Since there are no repercussions for breaking the law, we should just go total rogue on the world.
Wed Dec 10, 2014, 11:49 AM
Dec 2014

Throw out all treaties and morals and blow the fuck out of everything and take what we want.

Call it the NCFPI: "No Consequences Foriegn Policy Initiative"

Fred Sanders

(23,946 posts)
9. Why are celebrities so quickly tried and convicted in the media...but not politicians accused of war
Wed Dec 10, 2014, 12:36 PM
Dec 2014

crimes and crimes against humanity? The media wants solid evidence and a fair hearing for the accused war criminal, no rush to judgment in good old America.

Why does one get the Kangaroo Court and the other is immune in any court?

Orrex

(63,216 posts)
12. Right. As if beatings, hideous sleep deprivation, waterboarding and "rectal feeding" are torture.
Wed Dec 10, 2014, 12:49 PM
Dec 2014

It's just like a little harmless fraternity hijinx, right?

 

heaven05

(18,124 posts)
13. NOTHING WILL EVER HAPPEN TO BUSHCO WAR CRIMINALS!!!!!
Wed Dec 10, 2014, 12:58 PM
Dec 2014

Period. The RW in this country would rather drop the mask of democracy and go ahead and be the open fascist dictatorship it is is slowly devolving to rather than prosecute or allow to be prosecuted any, and I mean ANY of the BUSHCO war criminals. Just a fact. All our protestations and calls for justice falls on deaf ears,. But don't get me wrong, they sit in their comfy estates toasting the fact that the unwashed masses can at least complain and deflect some of that anger that could turn ugly and get their privilege to stay uber rich and rule the masses taken away. They give less than a damn about the law or codes, international or otherwise and even less about US. They are above such nonsense.............. .....:

 

joeybee12

(56,177 posts)
14. Enhanced interrogation!!!
Wed Dec 10, 2014, 12:58 PM
Dec 2014

Or so they say...I'd love to see them all in prison but it ain't gonna happen.

FlyByNight

(1,756 posts)
25. I'll be pleasantly shocked if anyone...
Wed Dec 10, 2014, 02:45 PM
Dec 2014

...of significance will be held accountable. (I sincerely doubt this will happen though, after all, we have to look forward.)

The higher one goes in either corporate or governmental circles, the less accountable one becomes.

atreides1

(16,081 posts)
26. Doesn't matter.
Wed Dec 10, 2014, 02:50 PM
Dec 2014

That law does not apply to the nobility and their contracted torturers...if this was still a country that believed in the rule of law, maybe!

But not anymore.

SamKnause

(13,108 posts)
27. The United States of America
Wed Dec 10, 2014, 02:54 PM
Dec 2014

is a rogue nation.

It has a history of not following the law.

It has no intention of following the law in the future.

When the people who hold power over the U.S. government don't like a law, they ignore it or pay to have it changed.

The CIA has been causing havoc the world over for decades.

I don't see anyway to change this.

The U.S. needs outside help.

dixiegrrrrl

(60,010 posts)
28. CIA ‘Torture’ Practices Started Long Before 9/11 Attacks
Wed Dec 10, 2014, 02:59 PM
Dec 2014
“The CIA,” according to the Senate Intelligence Committee, had “historical experience using coercive forms of interrogation.”
Indeed, it had plenty, said the committee’s report released Tuesday: about 50 years’ worth.
Deep in the committee’s 500-page summary of a still-classified 6,700-page report on the agency’s use of “enhanced interrogation techniques” after 9/11 there is a brief reference to KUBARK, the code name for a 1963 instruction manual on interrogation, which was used on subjects ranging from suspected Soviet double agents to Latin American dissidents and guerrillas.

http://www.newsweek.com/cia-torture-practices-started-long-911-attacks-senate-report-notes-290746
 

JEB

(4,748 posts)
32. Does somebody have that list of Fascism characteristics handy?
Wed Dec 10, 2014, 10:19 PM
Dec 2014

And what do all the Holy Roller christers have to say about their nation of torturers?

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 3 OF...