General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsU.S. Tortured and Killed Innocent People for the Specific Purpose of Producing False Propaganda
http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2014/12/gov-tortured-killed-innocent-people-specific-purpose-producing-false-propaganda.htmlThe Washington Post reported the same year:
Despite what youve seen on TV, torture is really only good at one thing: eliciting false confessions. Indeed, Bush-era torture techniques, we now know, were cold-bloodedly modeled after methods used by Chinese Communists to extract confessions from captured U.S. servicemen that they could then use for propaganda during the Korean War.
So as shocking as the latest revelation in a new Senate Armed Services Committee report may be, it actually makes sense in a nauseating way. The White House started pushing the use of torture not when faced with a ticking time bomb scenario from terrorists, but when officials in 2002 were desperately casting about for ways to tie Iraq to the 9/11 attacks in order to strengthen their public case for invading a country that had nothing to do with 9/11 at all.
***
Gordon Trowbridge writes for the Detroit News: Senior Bush administration officials pushed for the use of abusive interrogations of terrorism detainees in part to seek evidence to justify the invasion of Iraq, according to newly declassified information discovered in a congressional probe.
deminks
(11,014 posts)Why else would you waterboard someone 183 times, literally into oblivion? One reason you want them to say something. Only one other reason I can think of but I don't want to go there just yet.
HomerRamone
(1,112 posts)GliderGuider
(21,088 posts)The experiments began in July 1961, three months after the start of the trial of German Nazi war criminal Adolf Eichmann in Jerusalem. Milgram devised his psychological study to answer the popular question at that particular time: "Could it be that Eichmann and his million accomplices in the Holocaust were just following orders? Could we call them all accomplices?"[3] The experiments have been repeated many times in the following years with consistent results within differing societies, although not with the same percentages around the globe.
In Milgram's first set of experiments, 65 percent (26 of 40)[1] of experiment participants administered the experiment's final massive 450-volt shock, though many were very uncomfortable doing so; at some point, every participant paused and questioned the experiment; some said they would refund the money they were paid for participating in the experiment. Throughout the experiment, subjects displayed varying degrees of tension and stress. Subjects were sweating, trembling, stuttering, biting their lips, groaning, digging their fingernails into their skin, and some were even having nervous laughing fits or seizures.
The thing that terrifies me is not that the torturers were sadists, but that they were probably fairly ordinary people.
Cracklin Charlie
(12,904 posts)Those guys thought they were masters at creating the narrative. They even bragged about it.
I have also been wondering about who were the persons that they chose to "interrogate" in this manner. Why were these individuals chosen? Did they know what really happened in September?
The whole thing makes me sick.
katmondoo
(6,457 posts)bemildred
(90,061 posts)nashville_brook
(20,958 posts)dixiegrrrrl
(60,010 posts)And everyone else who was complicit.
Explains why Gitmo prisoners could never be released, too.
90-percent
(6,829 posts)Not only is there a way, Vincent Bugliosi literally wrote the book on it:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Prosecution_of_George_W._Bush_for_Murder
It's a recipe for any State Attorney General to follow if any citizen of their state lost a person in Bush's Iraq War. I contributed to the election campaign of some Attorney General Candidate in Vermont or New Hampshire a few years ago because it was part of her platform to prosecute Bush Cheney if she got into office. Which she didn't.
Not a single solitary AG in any of our fifty states ever ran with it, though. We are all war criminals now
-90% Jimmy
Fred Sanders
(23,946 posts)90-percent
(6,829 posts)I think pardoning the entire 2000 to 2008 GW Bush White House would be a pretty magnificent thing to do to help America live down our international shame of torture.
Some atonement and acknowledgment that what our government did on our behalf was illegal and morally repugnant.
-90% Jimmy
heaven05
(18,124 posts)NO PARDON! Period.
Petrushka
(3,709 posts)DirkGently
(12,151 posts)... certainly argued that Cheney was frantic for evidence of WMD, no matter how valid, from the inception of the Iraq War, at exactly the same time the administration was pushing for these techniques to be put into place.
Can't see Bush / Rumsfeld / Cheney balking at manufacturing evidence via torture, which, incredibly, is even more vile and morally bankrupt than the still unsupportable rationale of using torture to get real information "to protect our families."
If we can't call this "evil," and cannot censure and punish it, we are utterly lost.
lark
(23,123 posts)How else was he going to get Haliburton all that extra work with no strings attached or competitive bids allowed? This action increased his personal wealth 400% during the 8 years he was in office. How else was he going to pressure Iraq to give all the oil leases to the US oil companies that he promised them long before the war started AND prior to 9/11?
Martin Eden
(12,872 posts)We are not a nation of laws until these criminals are brought to justice.
woo me with science
(32,139 posts)down to discussion boards on the internet.
Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)reddread
(6,896 posts)the difference is the goals.
we have become debased by unregulated and unlimited greed,
almost as far as we can be without being run through
the enhanced interrogation routines ourselves.
maybe someday water boarding will be a party game?
JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)According to NBC News:
Much of the 9/11 Commission Report was based upon the testimony of people who were tortured
At least four of the people whose interrogation figured in the 9/11 Commission Report have claimed that they told interrogators information as a way to stop being tortured.
The 9/11 Commission itself doubted the accuracy of the torture confessions, and yet kept their doubts to themselves
http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2014/12/gov-tortured-killed-innocent-people-specific-purpose-producing-false-propaganda.html
chrisa
(4,524 posts)Everything about the Iraq War was a cloak and dagger venture to make money for the defense industry (and Dick Cheney). The bandits told a big lie and it stuck. What Americans don't realize is that the next frontier of increasing the defense industry stocks could be anywhere, including their own doorsteps. These are traitors, and none of them were ever prosecuted because they own the system.
JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)FairWinds
(1,717 posts)as long as Chelsea Manning and John Kiriakou rot behind bars,
while pardons are demanded for the real criminals,
and Scooter Libby & Richard Armitage walk the streets.
Still another reason to join Vets For Peace
johnnyreb
(915 posts)The 2002 Joint Inquiry's classified 28 Pages, and the 9/11 Commission Report (bold emphasis added);
January 30, 2008
(....) an extensive NBC News analysis of the 9/11 Commissions Final Report (....).
The analysis shows that much of what was reported about the planning and execution of the terror attacks on New York and Washington was derived from the interrogations of high-ranking al-Qaida operatives.
The NBC News analysis shows that more than one quarter of all footnotes in the 9/11 Report refer to CIA interrogations of al-Qaida operatives who were subjected to the now-controversial interrogation techniques. In fact, information derived from the interrogations is central to the Reports most critical chapters, those on the planning and execution of the attacks.
http://web.archive.org/web/20080407223205/http://deepbackground.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/30/624314.aspx
Compare what Rep. Stephen Lynch (D-MA), said on September 9 2014, in advocating release of the 2002 9/11 Joint Inquiry's classified 28 Pages:
(at 35:30 of http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N4dbP2vwTEE)
Incidentally:
http://www.democracynow.org/2003/8/4/headlines
Perhaps the 9/11 Commission needed to deliver False Propaganda.
Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)JEB
(4,748 posts)Important stuff.
woo me with science
(32,139 posts)orpupilofnature57
(15,472 posts)about that in 5 yrs, instead of This, whatever THIS is then . But we didn't pony up the courage to do anything about it, it Wasn't " on the table " should have been a clue .
Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)Call attention to this thread!
True Blue Door
(2,969 posts)They called themselves that all the time, and it was one of their most infuriating practices.
orpupilofnature57
(15,472 posts)True Blue Door
(2,969 posts)I'm not sure anyone has ever met that standard in all of history.
orpupilofnature57
(15,472 posts)Polarizing people that would otherwise come together, Against Them .
True Blue Door
(2,969 posts)We would have had to create some unprecedented levels of unity to overcome it.
We should still blame ourselves, but also have compassion for our own limitations as human beings.
ReRe
(10,597 posts)I can't add anything. Everyone else said everything that's been going thru my mind. They are war criminals. Now what are we going to do with them? And who all is going to go on the war criminal list?
Octafish
(55,745 posts)What they almost most fear: They used torture to garner "evidence" Iraq was linked to attacks of September 11.
What they most fear: Answering for PREMEDITATED crimes of genocide, treason, and mass murder.
woo me with science
(32,139 posts)woo me with science
(32,139 posts)malaise
(269,067 posts)99Forever
(14,524 posts)Bush is the Torture President and Obama refuses to call for and pursue justice.
The ideals that this nation once was, is dead.