International climate talks in Peru: Strange Climate Event: Warmth Toward U.S.
When it comes to global warming, the United States has long been viewed as one of the worlds worst actors. American officials have been booed and hissed during international climate talks, bestowed with mock Fossil of the Day awards for resisting treaties, and widely condemned for demanding that other nations cut their fossil fuel emissions while refusing, year after year, to take action at home.
Suddenly, all that has changed. At the global climate change negotiations now wrapping up in Peru, American negotiators are being met with something wildly unfamiliar: cheers, applause, thanks and praise. It is an incongruous moment, arriving at a time when so many aspects of American foreign policy are under fire.
The American policy that helped prod China and change the international perception of the United States is one of President Obamas most contentious domestic decisions. His June announcement that he would use his executive authority to push through an aggressive set of regulations on coal-fired power plants in the United States the nations largest source of greenhouse gas pollution set off a firestorm of legal, political and legislative opposition at home. Critics have called it a war on coal that could devastate the American economy.
But in the arena of international climate change negotiations, it has fundamentally transformed the feeling toward his administration. Countries got weary of negotiations with the U.S.; it got tough in negotiations, but it didnt deliver, said Yvo de Boer, the former executive secretary of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. Now the U.S. has policies in place to deliver on its word.
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/12/12/world/strange-climate-event-warmth-toward-the-us.html?partner=rss&emc=rss&smid=tw-nytimes&_r=0
"Suddenly, all that has changed."
It may change again when McConnell leads the republican charge next year to roll back to rollback Obama's "aggressive set of regulations on coal-fired power plants" announced on June 2.
If Mitch is not successful at it in the next 2 years, a republican president in 2017 would certainly restore the international view of the US as "one of the worlds worst actors" on environmental issues. "Resisting treaties" and "demanding that other nations cut their fossil fuel emissions while refusing, year after year, to take action at home" would once again become US policy.