General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThomas Frank: The New Republic, the torture report, and the TED talks geniuses who gutted journalism
http://www.salon.com/2014/12/14/thomas_frank_the_new_republic_the_torture_report_and_the_ted_talks_geniuses_who_gutted_journalism/Between the crumbling of a landmark Rolling Stone story and the dynamiting of The New Republic, these have been a bad couple of weeks for journalism. But with the release of the Senate Intelligence Committees report on the CIAs torture program on Tuesday, the whole doleful parade took a turn toward the comical.
Chapter IV of that report describes the CIAs efforts to twist public perceptions of its torture program by revealing certain classified information to journalistsinformation that was wrong, per the report, because its object was to claim great successes for the torture program where few really existed. But said information, regardless of its truth value, was still classified. That, in turn, set up an awkward dilemma for all parties: certain CIA officials wondered whether to do something about the journalists in question for reporting these great dollops of bogusness; other spooks gently suggested that they shouldnt, since, er, the Agency leaked that stuff to them.
Behind this Keystone Cops farce was something deadly serious: Writers from some of the most reputable institutions in America were being conned into propagandizing for torture. One of the journalists named in the Senate Committee report, David Johnston of The New York Times, told the International Business Times how it worked: Another way of saying it is they basically lied to journalists and the journalists didnt have a lot of alternatives but to reflect their point of view in stories.
Tis ever thus with journalistic scandals. The thing of value that we writers possess is our independence, our trustworthiness; those with power, meanwhile, scheme endlessly to utilize these things for their own ends. David Johnston implies that he was led astray by the impulse to let each side say its piece. On other occasions, straight-up financial considerations do the trick, as in the case of the op-ed writers who did favors for Jack Abramoff. Sometimes the journalists motives are more complicated, as in the case of New York Times reporter Judith Miller, who used information provided by a Bush Administration favorite in order to persuade the world that Saddam Hussein possessed scads of WMDs.
daleanime
(17,796 posts)nashville_brook
(20,958 posts)wow!
KingCharlemagne
(7,908 posts)having been a friend of Zuckerberg, no form of literary genius matters any more. Compared to the puissance and majesty of the CIA, we amount to nothing. We are playthings of the powerful, churned out by the millions every year from the nations knowledge factories. We are zeroes to their ones, ready to rationalize monopoly or rectal hydration at a moments notice. Onto the hamster wheel, everyone. Let us heed the masters voice."
nashville_brook
(20,958 posts)it's a perfect word for what he's getting at.
i've had it with my wheel. left it out for AMVETS to pick up.
ewagner
(18,964 posts)It should be a "fire alarm" for us to pay attention to....
KingCharlemagne
(7,908 posts)door after . . . " But I agree with you that it is a powerful piece.
ewagner
(18,964 posts)that control of the media has already taken place. I think the point that Frank is trying to make is that the public isn't really aware of the depth of it and are "sleepwalking" through the reality of millionaire owned news.
BeanMusical
(4,389 posts)woo me with science
(32,139 posts)KoKo
(84,711 posts)His links to the "New Republic Articles" from the past that he found noteworthy.