Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
57 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Crude is below $60. Literally everything you've been told before about energy is wrong right now. (Original Post) Recursion Dec 2014 OP
I think the sheiks have decided to cash out and forget it. MohRokTah Dec 2014 #1
267 billion barrels of proven oil reserves in Saudi alone makes your claim doubling entertaining. Fred Sanders Dec 2014 #9
Says who? The Saudis? CanonRay Dec 2014 #34
You're correct JonLP24 Dec 2014 #37
Definitely a tipping point for global climate change Fumesucker Dec 2014 #2
Literally everything? I was told E=mc2. That is wrong right now? DesMoinesDem Dec 2014 #3
Yes, those are also wrong. Recursion Dec 2014 #4
The latter has been known to be wrong since the Manhattan project. Donald Ian Rankin Dec 2014 #25
There are probably a lot of families that are making good use of the savings on gas prices. Travis_0004 Dec 2014 #5
Meaning what? oberliner Dec 2014 #6
there is another OP around here Mosby Dec 2014 #7
Actually it is Saudi Arabia trying to kneecap the shale oil producers hack89 Dec 2014 #14
makes sense Mosby Dec 2014 #16
Venezula and Russia are fucked hack89 Dec 2014 #17
No, that just makes it a twofer for the Saudis Nevernose Dec 2014 #33
And like I said in Nov, it makes no sense. joshcryer Dec 2014 #20
It makes sense in that the prices going back up is exactly what Saudi Arabia wants JonLP24 Dec 2014 #38
Actually, the Saudis may be more interested in knee-capping Iran and maybe Russia. amandabeech Dec 2014 #39
It was a bubble market. hunter Dec 2014 #8
So all that stuff about "peak oil" was nonsense? (nt) Nye Bevan Dec 2014 #10
In fairness, I did say that years ago (nt) Recursion Dec 2014 #11
All a bunch of lies to justify the artificially high prices. Jesus Malverde Dec 2014 #41
Yes well I rolled my eyes long ago on the oil FUD bullshit. Rex Dec 2014 #12
The spotted owl killing off the timber industry in the West theory was bullshit, too. Major Hogwash Dec 2014 #32
Is it really? Spider Jerusalem Dec 2014 #13
You've always struck me as a guy who knows his shit. If what you're saying is true. We're gonna Guy Whitey Corngood Dec 2014 #40
Yeah, it's a grenade. I don't think anybody knows what the effects will be. bemildred Dec 2014 #57
People said the same when oil plunged into the $40/barrel range during the Great Recession NickB79 Dec 2014 #15
That happened during a global recession with low demand. joshcryer Dec 2014 #19
... Spider Jerusalem Dec 2014 #22
The point is the trigger. joshcryer Dec 2014 #26
The trigger is the economic slowdown in China and Europe. Spider Jerusalem Dec 2014 #29
OPEC used to slow production with slowed demand. joshcryer Dec 2014 #44
Except when they didn't. Spider Jerusalem Dec 2014 #49
Do you think that's happening again? joshcryer Dec 2014 #50
I think it's certainly a possibility, considering the recent tensions with Russia over Ukraine. Spider Jerusalem Dec 2014 #53
I would be surprised if the US or Kerry had that influence anymore. joshcryer Dec 2014 #54
The US supplies Saudi Arabia with their military hardware. Spider Jerusalem Dec 2014 #55
China and Europe do not profit from high oil prices NickB79 Dec 2014 #42
The EIA report explicitly mentions Russia. joshcryer Dec 2014 #45
We're currently seeing falling demand from Europe and China as their economies slow NickB79 Dec 2014 #23
No, the lower forecast is due to projected economic slowdown. joshcryer Dec 2014 #24
A recession next year would be real convenient doc03 Dec 2014 #35
It's crazy land. joshcryer Dec 2014 #18
The Saudis are doing us a huge favor. Vinca Dec 2014 #21
It's killing Putin. dawg Dec 2014 #27
It's being manipulated Warpy Dec 2014 #31
Thanks. First one here to get it. n/t truth2power Dec 2014 #56
Any need now for the XL pipeline has vanished in to thin air!! Major Hogwash Dec 2014 #28
It's going to kill off the tar sands for a while Warpy Dec 2014 #30
Renewable energy relies more on natural gas. joshcryer Dec 2014 #46
I don't get it JonLP24 Dec 2014 #36
This guy obviously gets the credit.... Adrahil Dec 2014 #43
I see this as is a temporary political ploy herding cats Dec 2014 #47
The real danger is that declining prices will lead to increased use bhikkhu Dec 2014 #48
Everything except that current price is 'actual demand' House of Roberts Dec 2014 #51
Crude at $60/bl isn't a tipping point; dosn't change anything in the long run. Albertoo Dec 2014 #52
 

MohRokTah

(15,429 posts)
1. I think the sheiks have decided to cash out and forget it.
Sun Dec 14, 2014, 02:11 PM
Dec 2014

They're to the bottom of the wells now, so open up the spigots to make some quick cash and quietly retire to whatever 8 or 9 figure mansion strikes their fancy that week.

CanonRay

(14,104 posts)
34. Says who? The Saudis?
Sun Dec 14, 2014, 07:20 PM
Dec 2014

They upped their "proven" reserves without finding a drop of new oil. The true reserve number is a state secret.

JonLP24

(29,322 posts)
37. You're correct
Sun Dec 14, 2014, 07:30 PM
Dec 2014

So many countries are projected to surpass Saudi Arabia's oil production. The US is actually projected to do so very soon if they haven't already. 2015 or 2016 I've seen reported projections.

Fumesucker

(45,851 posts)
2. Definitely a tipping point for global climate change
Sun Dec 14, 2014, 02:13 PM
Dec 2014

We are so far beyond screwed the light from screwed won't reach us for ten billion years.

 

DesMoinesDem

(1,569 posts)
3. Literally everything? I was told E=mc2. That is wrong right now?
Sun Dec 14, 2014, 02:16 PM
Dec 2014

I was also told energy can't be created or destroyed. Is that also wrong right now?

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
4. Yes, those are also wrong.
Sun Dec 14, 2014, 02:17 PM
Dec 2014

I have Maxwell's Equations tattooed on my arms, but I will need to add a new term to Ampere's law because of this.

Donald Ian Rankin

(13,598 posts)
25. The latter has been known to be wrong since the Manhattan project.
Sun Dec 14, 2014, 06:56 PM
Dec 2014

There is an entire industry dedicated to creating energy out of matter.

Mosby

(16,318 posts)
7. there is another OP around here
Sun Dec 14, 2014, 03:33 PM
Dec 2014

That talks about how shale oil producers are pushing down the price. Sounds reasonable but who knows. What I do know is that low gas prices are good for the economy, public and small business.

hack89

(39,171 posts)
14. Actually it is Saudi Arabia trying to kneecap the shale oil producers
Sun Dec 14, 2014, 05:08 PM
Dec 2014

To maintain market share. It cost the Saudis $30 to pump a barrel of oil. Shale oil is much more expensive to produce.

Mosby

(16,318 posts)
16. makes sense
Sun Dec 14, 2014, 06:14 PM
Dec 2014

The article I saw said shale oil costs about 50/barrel.

Venezuela is in opec right? If the goal is to put the shale oil producers out of business it's going to destroy the Venezuelan economy in the process. One important point to remember is the sunk costs the shale producers have incurred, like the article said, the price of production doesn't really matter after the fact, all the shale producers want to do is get the oil out of the ground, regardless of price.

Nevernose

(13,081 posts)
33. No, that just makes it a twofer for the Saudis
Sun Dec 14, 2014, 07:14 PM
Dec 2014

Kneecap their rivals in North Dakota and yet still keep their American allies happy by screwing over the Russians.

joshcryer

(62,276 posts)
20. And like I said in Nov, it makes no sense.
Sun Dec 14, 2014, 06:22 PM
Dec 2014

The shale producers will just ramp back up when the price goes back up. It's not like they're going away.

JonLP24

(29,322 posts)
38. It makes sense in that the prices going back up is exactly what Saudi Arabia wants
Sun Dec 14, 2014, 07:40 PM
Dec 2014

or any oil producer for that matter.

This actually hurts their rival Iran more but the global politics don't matter so much for the price war. Defending their market share which it lost a considerable amount will come in handy when the prices go back up.

 

amandabeech

(9,893 posts)
39. Actually, the Saudis may be more interested in knee-capping Iran and maybe Russia.
Sun Dec 14, 2014, 07:45 PM
Dec 2014

The Saudis really hate the Iranians, and by keeping the price of oil low, they're making it difficult for Iran while Iran is trying to fight Isis.

hunter

(38,317 posts)
8. It was a bubble market.
Sun Dec 14, 2014, 03:34 PM
Dec 2014

Not good for those entered the game late.

Of course markets are entirely unrelated to any physical reality. It's impossible to distill every economic transaction down to a single measure of "hard" currency, dollar or otherwise.

The physical reality is that a high energy fossil fueled economy is unsustainable. One way or another, it collapses.

Jesus Malverde

(10,274 posts)
41. All a bunch of lies to justify the artificially high prices.
Sun Dec 14, 2014, 08:38 PM
Dec 2014

As they took money from the working and middle class and transferred it to energy speculators.

 

Rex

(65,616 posts)
12. Yes well I rolled my eyes long ago on the oil FUD bullshit.
Sun Dec 14, 2014, 04:34 PM
Dec 2014

A cartel artificially sets the price. And now we know that what they cried about for decades is pure bullshit...along with other FUD like 'peak oil'.

Major Hogwash

(17,656 posts)
32. The spotted owl killing off the timber industry in the West theory was bullshit, too.
Sun Dec 14, 2014, 07:07 PM
Dec 2014

But, George H.W. Bush rode that popular meme in to the White House in 1988.

 

Spider Jerusalem

(21,786 posts)
13. Is it really?
Sun Dec 14, 2014, 05:03 PM
Dec 2014

Do you know WHY crude oil is below $60? Weak demand from China and Europe because of slowing economies, which is a sign of a potential new global recession; this isn't really a good thing. (NB that oil hit $34 a barrel in December of 2008.) The Saudis are taking advantage of declining demand to drive prices down by maintaining production in order to put US fracking out of business. Fracking isn't very profitable at current prices; a lot of drilling rigs in North Dakota and Texas are idle, now. If US producers blink, then you can expect prices to rise as fracked oil production declines. However the fact remains that conventional crude oil production peaked nearly a decade ago.

Guy Whitey Corngood

(26,501 posts)
40. You've always struck me as a guy who knows his shit. If what you're saying is true. We're gonna
Sun Dec 14, 2014, 07:49 PM
Dec 2014

be pretty fucked soon. Not the ''masters of the universe'' types, but the rest of us for sure.

bemildred

(90,061 posts)
57. Yeah, it's a grenade. I don't think anybody knows what the effects will be.
Mon Dec 15, 2014, 07:41 AM
Dec 2014

But very destabilizing, that it will be.

NickB79

(19,253 posts)
15. People said the same when oil plunged into the $40/barrel range during the Great Recession
Sun Dec 14, 2014, 05:58 PM
Dec 2014

And then were made to look like fools when it went back over $100.

You'll have to show your work if you want to convince us that this time it's any different.

joshcryer

(62,276 posts)
19. That happened during a global recession with low demand.
Sun Dec 14, 2014, 06:20 PM
Dec 2014

This is happen literally because the OPEC cartel wants to redefine the market because it's lost its mind.

joshcryer

(62,276 posts)
26. The point is the trigger.
Sun Dec 14, 2014, 06:56 PM
Dec 2014

Of course if countries that produce oil have to compete with much cheaper oil their oil-related economic sectors will slow down thus reducing the demand for that very same oil.

OPEC is oversaturating.

Low demand is not a reason for the low prices, it's a response to the low prices' effect on economies that profit off of oil.

 

Spider Jerusalem

(21,786 posts)
29. The trigger is the economic slowdown in China and Europe.
Sun Dec 14, 2014, 07:01 PM
Dec 2014

Which brought prices down in the first place. OPEC (for which read, the Saudis) have elected not to reduce production to maintain prices at a higher level. And yes, low demand is a reason for the low prices; that's how market pricing works. If it weren't the reason we would have seen prices falling a year or more ago when US production was at eight million barrels a day.

 

Spider Jerusalem

(21,786 posts)
49. Except when they didn't.
Mon Dec 15, 2014, 03:17 AM
Dec 2014

Such as the Saudis not reducing output in the '80's (as a result, partly, of diplomatic manoeuvring by the Reagan White House, aimed at depriving the Soviets of lucrative oil revenues).

 

Spider Jerusalem

(21,786 posts)
53. I think it's certainly a possibility, considering the recent tensions with Russia over Ukraine.
Mon Dec 15, 2014, 06:03 AM
Dec 2014

If it is, it's definitely a smarter move than any kind of direct military confrontation (and more effective than sanctions, in the short term at least).

joshcryer

(62,276 posts)
54. I would be surprised if the US or Kerry had that influence anymore.
Mon Dec 15, 2014, 06:11 AM
Dec 2014

I personally think that it is a reaction to US oil production, and an attempt to scuttle it, since it's been the main driving force for excess oil production. US / Canadian oil is profitable above $60 / barrel. They've hit the mythical sub-60 price point now but Bakken and Canadian production can continue until $55. And Bakken will continue for a year or so since most of the costs there are sunk costs.

I think it's a coincidence. It just so happened that Russia was meddling in another country when shale and tar sands brought prices down in the US. The US is reducing oil consumption by 100-200 million barrels a year. It's not a lot when you consider the billions the US consumes, but it's a slow and straight trajectory to zero, which isn't very palatable to middle eastern interests. I personally believe they're trying to keep us from getting there sooner rather than later. And they certainly fear the exploitation of harder to get shales in the Green River Formation, which renders foreign oil irrelevant.

 

Spider Jerusalem

(21,786 posts)
55. The US supplies Saudi Arabia with their military hardware.
Mon Dec 15, 2014, 06:24 AM
Dec 2014

And the Saudis are probably afraid of Arab Spring type uprisings. So I wouldn't be surprised if the US did in fact have some influence. And oil is traded on a global market. Weakening demand from slowing economies is behind the decline in the crude price, not US production (which has been rising steadily for the past five years without oil going below $100 a barrel, on average).

NickB79

(19,253 posts)
42. China and Europe do not profit from high oil prices
Sun Dec 14, 2014, 10:06 PM
Dec 2014

Other than Norway, there are no major oil exporters in Europe, and China has never been an oil-exporting nation. Low oil prices should benefit them greatly.

So why would their economies, and their oil consumption, slow in response to low global oil prices?

joshcryer

(62,276 posts)
45. The EIA report explicitly mentions Russia.
Mon Dec 15, 2014, 01:01 AM
Dec 2014

I don't know where I said anything about China and EU profiting from high oil prices.

NickB79

(19,253 posts)
23. We're currently seeing falling demand from Europe and China as their economies slow
Sun Dec 14, 2014, 06:48 PM
Dec 2014

Driving down the price of oil: http://www.theguardian.com/business/2014/dec/12/oil-price-plunge-brent-crude-iea-forecasts-weaker-demand-2015

Time will tell if this slow-down turns into a full-blown recession.

joshcryer

(62,276 posts)
24. No, the lower forecast is due to projected economic slowdown.
Sun Dec 14, 2014, 06:55 PM
Dec 2014

The economic slowdown is attributed to the lower price stuttering economies and sanctions on Russia.

These low prices aren’t spurring an uptick in demand,” John Kilduff, a partner at Again Capital LLC, a New York-based hedge fund that focuses on energy, said by phone. “Economies aren’t as energy intensive as they once were so the relationship isn’t that strong anymore.”

...

World oil consumption will expand by 230,000 barrels a day less than estimated in November, the Paris-based adviser to 29 nations said in a report today. Most of the reduction in next year’s outlook is attributable to Russia, where sanctions are hobbling growth, it said.

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2014-12-12/iea-cuts-global-oil-demand-forecast-for-4th-time-in-five-months.html

doc03

(35,345 posts)
35. A recession next year would be real convenient
Sun Dec 14, 2014, 07:21 PM
Dec 2014

to set up a Republican for the 2016 election. Koch brothers at work?

Vinca

(50,276 posts)
21. The Saudis are doing us a huge favor.
Sun Dec 14, 2014, 06:40 PM
Dec 2014

By keeping the price low, shale oil (aka sludge) is too expensive to produce and there will be no need for a pipeline.

Warpy

(111,270 posts)
31. It's being manipulated
Sun Dec 14, 2014, 07:07 PM
Dec 2014

precisely for that reason, to kill Putin's ability to stay in office in the hope the next guy is more interested in improving Russia than expanding it.

My guess is it was instigated by a large release from the Strategic Petroleum Reserve, filled to overflowing by Stupid who was hot for more wars he didn't have to fight.

It was just enough to drop oil to a point where OPEC states didn't dare drop production since their own people would start to get squeezed if they did.

Major Hogwash

(17,656 posts)
28. Any need now for the XL pipeline has vanished in to thin air!!
Sun Dec 14, 2014, 07:01 PM
Dec 2014

I wonder what excuses the Republicans will make when they try to force it through BOTH Houses of Congress next year?

2016 is looking up for Democrats.

Warpy

(111,270 posts)
30. It's going to kill off the tar sands for a while
Sun Dec 14, 2014, 07:04 PM
Dec 2014

but it's also going to kill off a lot of research and implementation of renewable energy.

Gas price in north central NM: $2.12 as of 10 minutes ago.

joshcryer

(62,276 posts)
46. Renewable energy relies more on natural gas.
Mon Dec 15, 2014, 01:05 AM
Dec 2014

Bakken and tar sands don't produce it so much. Natural gas is needed to solve renewable energy intermittency with peaking plants.

It may delay the uptake of electric vehicles, though, and delay the upgrade to a smart grid. People won't spend the extra $10-20k on an electric car if gas is cheaper than milk again...

JonLP24

(29,322 posts)
36. I don't get it
Sun Dec 14, 2014, 07:27 PM
Dec 2014

What is and why? Do you mean peak oil? If so, you aren't clear to what it is about it you find wrong.

I always felt the concern was overblown but mainly when it came to talk about pricing, they assumed the prices would be high that would only work if there was still the demand, the high prices would only work if consumers still purchased at the price.

Peak oil generally focused on conventional oil--before the boom in the shale gas production of the 2010s. Prices fell as a result of the production as well as Saudi Arabia cutting its prices, also testing the sustainability of the US & Canada shale gas production at the current prices.`

herding cats

(19,565 posts)
47. I see this as is a temporary political ploy
Mon Dec 15, 2014, 01:25 AM
Dec 2014

With the business side effect of weeding out some smaller fish along the way. I don't see this as a long term change, but rather more of a momentary break in higher prices to effect an end goal. It's also a possible learning moment for some in how easily the oil market can be manipulated, but I doubt that lesson will sink in very deeply.

That's just how I'm seeing this event, of course your view may be different from where you're sitting. No matter how one views the creation of this event, it's a boon to the average person globally. It's as if we've all received a raise, or gotten a tax break. Suddenly there's a little bit more we can spend or put back each week.

bhikkhu

(10,718 posts)
48. The real danger is that declining prices will lead to increased use
Mon Dec 15, 2014, 02:55 AM
Dec 2014

which will lead to higher prices.

In the meantime, every big price drop in crude tends to wipe out alternatives, if sustained. That's more or less what happened in the 80's; Reagan's policies had a lot to do with it, but the politics follow the money in most cases.

House of Roberts

(5,177 posts)
51. Everything except that current price is 'actual demand'
Mon Dec 15, 2014, 04:19 AM
Dec 2014

and not a speculator-influenced level. Funny how low it goes when the only customers for crude left in the market are the actual users.

 

Albertoo

(2,016 posts)
52. Crude at $60/bl isn't a tipping point; dosn't change anything in the long run.
Mon Dec 15, 2014, 04:35 AM
Dec 2014

Short term, the Saudis are trying to break some shale oil operators. OK.

Reality stays that the proven oil reserves + the estimates of new finds don't cover till the end of this century. If we're lucky, shale oil will cover demand till that point.

The next generation of safe nuclear plants could bring us forward to the 24th century.

Four centuries is probably enough time to find much more efficient ways to release energy.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Crude is below $60. Liter...