Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsSen. Warren Warns That Spending Bill Sets Dangerous Precedent
Source: National Public Radio
Sen. Warren Warns That Spending Bill Sets Dangerous Precedent
Steve Inskeep December 15, 2014
The government opens this week after a dramatic weekend. The Senate approved a $1.1 trillion spending bill despite protests from the left and the right. The bill had already been passed by the House.
Sen. Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts fought against changes to banking regulations she's among this moment's most prominent Democrats.
[font size=1]-snip-[/font]
STEVE INSKEEP: You said they slipped it in, which is true it did get tacked on to this much larger legislation about something else. But isn't this a provision that did go through the regular legislative process in the House of Representatives? There were committee hearings. There were Democrats as well as Republicans who voted for it.
SEN. ELIZABETH WARREN: You know, it was literally never introduced in the Senate. It had no hearings. There was no discussion about this. And let's keep in mind about this provision, this is a provision that Citigroup lobbyists literally wrote. And then, just to make sure that everybody got the point, Jamie Dimon, the CEO of JPMorgan, personally made phone calls to House members to push for this change. I think that tells you what was really going on here. They want to be able to juice their profits. A half-dozen of the largest financial institutions in this country want to be able to take riskier bets, and, hey, if it doesn't work out, they want the U.S. taxpayer to bail 'em out. I think that's a bad idea.
[font size=1]-snip-[/font]
Steve Inskeep December 15, 2014
The government opens this week after a dramatic weekend. The Senate approved a $1.1 trillion spending bill despite protests from the left and the right. The bill had already been passed by the House.
Sen. Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts fought against changes to banking regulations she's among this moment's most prominent Democrats.
[font size=1]-snip-[/font]
STEVE INSKEEP: You said they slipped it in, which is true it did get tacked on to this much larger legislation about something else. But isn't this a provision that did go through the regular legislative process in the House of Representatives? There were committee hearings. There were Democrats as well as Republicans who voted for it.
SEN. ELIZABETH WARREN: You know, it was literally never introduced in the Senate. It had no hearings. There was no discussion about this. And let's keep in mind about this provision, this is a provision that Citigroup lobbyists literally wrote. And then, just to make sure that everybody got the point, Jamie Dimon, the CEO of JPMorgan, personally made phone calls to House members to push for this change. I think that tells you what was really going on here. They want to be able to juice their profits. A half-dozen of the largest financial institutions in this country want to be able to take riskier bets, and, hey, if it doesn't work out, they want the U.S. taxpayer to bail 'em out. I think that's a bad idea.
[font size=1]-snip-[/font]
Read more: http://www.wbur.org/npr/370817279/sen-warren-warns-that-spending-bill-sets-dangerous-precedent
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
3 replies, 742 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (9)
ReplyReply to this post
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Sen. Warren Warns That Spending Bill Sets Dangerous Precedent (Original Post)
Eugene
Dec 2014
OP
Autumn
(45,084 posts)1. I find it this little episode to be disgusting and unforgivable.
Liz is right to stay in the Senate to do the battle from there. Recommended
WillyT
(72,631 posts)2. K & R !!!
L0oniX
(31,493 posts)3. Well we are so happy that Hillary has made her stand on this well known...
or is still waiting to see which way the political wind blows.