Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

UglyGreed

(7,661 posts)
Tue Dec 16, 2014, 08:25 AM Dec 2014

Oakland cops disciplined 24 times for failing to turn on body-worn cameras

Punishments ranged from "written reprimand" to suspensions of a few days.

OAKLAND, Calif.—Over the last two years, the Oakland Police Department (OPD) has disciplined police officers on 24 occasions for disabling or failing to activate body-worn cameras, newly released public records show. The City of Oakland did not provide any records prior to 2013, and the OPD did not immediately respond to Ars’ request for comment.

The records show that on November 8, 2013 one officer was terminated after failing to activate his camera. Less than two weeks later, another resigned for improperly removing the camera from his or her uniform. However, most officers received minor discipline in comparison.


The OPD has used Portable Digital Recording Devices (PDRDs) since late 2010. According to the department's own policy, patrol officers are required to wear the cameras during a number of outlined situations, including detentions, arrests, and serving a warrant. At present, the city has about 700 officers.

This year the issue of body-worn cameras on police officers came to the fore after the tragic killings of Michael Brown in Ferguson, Missouri, and Eric Garner in New York City at the hands of local cops. In the aftermath of grand jury decisions to not indict the officers responsible, the Obama administration released a review of how local law enforcement agencies use equipment, proposing that the federal government spend $263 million over three years to "expand training for law enforcement agencies (LEAs)" and "add more resources for police department reform." The review included a proposal to dedicate $75 million over three years to buy up to 50,000 body cameras for local LEAs.


http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2014/12/oakland-cops-disciplined-24-times-for-failing-to-turn-on-body-worn-cameras/

3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Oakland cops disciplined 24 times for failing to turn on body-worn cameras (Original Post) UglyGreed Dec 2014 OP
As I've said elsewhere, civilian review boards need to be established that will suspend, unpaid, ancianita Dec 2014 #1
Is that really a surprise? djean111 Dec 2014 #2
Well, they were disciplined at least. Cameras are a start. Enthusiast Dec 2014 #3

ancianita

(36,060 posts)
1. As I've said elsewhere, civilian review boards need to be established that will suspend, unpaid,
Tue Dec 16, 2014, 09:23 AM
Dec 2014

anyone who fails to keep police equipment in working order. That includes anyone in the police department. If cops are responsible for keeping cars, uniforms, guns, computers and everything else they use in good working order, they or anyone who aids them should be penalized for failure to properly maintain body cams.

Civilian oversight and penalties can work.

 

djean111

(14,255 posts)
2. Is that really a surprise?
Tue Dec 16, 2014, 10:03 AM
Dec 2014

IMO, from now on, people will be tasered, manhandled, beaten, and shot out of range of dash cams and body cams, and any body cam showing anything bad will be broken or lost.
Body cams sound like a great idea, and I am sure a lot of money will be spent, but I am convinced the real stopper is other citizens with phones that can record this stuff. I think we will see those people gone after with gusto.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Oakland cops disciplined ...