General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsAlways drive with your car doors locked. Regardless of your age, sex, or physical condition.
To keep unwanted people out of the car.
Years ago, a man I know had somebody try to get in his car when he was stopped at a traffic light.
Also, there are plenty of morans (sic) out there now who get road rage and want to fight you, and others who
may just want to rob you.
( http://www.democraticunderground.com/10025964166 inspired me.)
drm604
(16,230 posts)I was taught to always keep the doors locked so that they don't fly open in an accident, but you're right, potential road rage is another good reason.
I think most newer cars lock them automatically. I know that mine locks them when I pull out (I think it's when it hits around 7 mph).
madokie
(51,076 posts)I think it helps to keep the passenger compartment intact in an accident also.
rickford66
(5,524 posts)Locking the doors just keeps the outside handles from operating. It doesn't change the integrity of the passenger compartment.
Angleae
(4,484 posts)The doors on my Sentra can't be opened from the inside while it's locked.
rickford66
(5,524 posts)I was replying to the statement that implied it would be safer in a collision. In your case the inside handles would be disabled as you say. It doesn't change the integrity of the body strength.
longship
(40,416 posts)It often results in death in an accident when the first responders cannot get ones injured body out of the car in time to save ones life.
All because of paranoia? Not worth it.
Auto-magic door locks often result in auto-magic death in a collision. They don't call them jaws of life for nothing. If only such things did not take so long a time. In the case of trauma, time is everything. Tick, tick, tick,... Quick, get the jaws of life! Oopsie! Not quick enough. You are a goner.
I never, ever lock my doors when I am driving. Neither should anybody. And if yours lock auto-magically when you start driving, dump the damned car before it kills you.
customerserviceguy
(25,183 posts)I found out how to disable it, mostly because it's inconvenient. I didn't think about first responders trying to get my injured body out of a locked car, thanks for the tip.
I still will lock my doors in the big cities, when not on the highways. I wouldn't imagine that I'd be in a collision that knocked me unconscious at city speeds. And in some places, the paranoia is justified.
longship
(40,416 posts)Slow speeds do not stop flip over accidents there. In fact, they encourage them.
I keep my doors unlocked when driving. If one is that worried about driving, one should sell the damned car and hire somebody to do errands for you. Probably it would be cheaper that way, too. Plus, one doesn't have to wring ones hands all the time. Regardless, I suspect too many would still do that.
You are only much more likely to die in the wreck than a carjacking. But go ahead and ignore the wreck and protect against the car jacking. I see a Darwin Award in anybody's future who adopts that strategy. (At least statistically.)
Better advice... Keep doors unlocked and keep a tire iron under your seat.
Either that... Or Trunk Monkey!!!
Works every damned time.
customerserviceguy
(25,183 posts)but again, you've made me think. I guess the only rational time to lock the doors while you're in the car is if some kind of commotion is going on in the immediate area, and even then, it would not take a lot of doing to shatter your door glass. Best thing to do is get out of the area, if possible, if you feel the urge to lock the doors.
longship
(40,416 posts)customerserviceguy
(25,183 posts)I meant to comment on that, very amusing!
longship
(40,416 posts)My best.
I like the guy pitched off the bridge the best.
Travis_0004
(5,417 posts)It would probablty only slow a first responder down by a few seconds
elehhhhna
(32,076 posts)jberryhill
(62,444 posts)It's some person who might pull you out and doesn't have tools.
pipi_k
(21,020 posts)to the average driver.
I find it hard to believe that first responders don't have something similar, or even better, for breaking window glass in a dire emergency
tanyev
(42,564 posts)I try to remember to do it, but it's not habit yet.
easychoice
(1,043 posts)I threw her out of the truck by her hair and the ass of her pants when she refused to get out.I was pulled over and arrested 3 blocks later.True story.
Today I would have been killed I am sure,Seattle being homicide central for the cops in Washington state.My lawyer had a field day with them.
yallerdawg
(16,104 posts)The rule has never changed - watch out for the other guy!
"Stranger danger" is always out there.
bigwillq
(72,790 posts)hobbit709
(41,694 posts)And I don't move that fast.
pipi_k
(21,020 posts)the car is put into "Drive" and then unlock when it's stopped and put into "Park".
I think it's also a good idea for people to have a plan for what to do in various scenarios.
Like, for instance, being followed by another car (first confirm by making a series of random turns). Drive straight to a fire or police station.
Someone manages to jump into the passenger seat and forces me to drive someplace...first opportunity and when it's safest, my car gets turned into a fire hydrant or some other stationary object with the main focus being on wrecking the passenger's seat.
Someone corners me in a parking lot and tries to hijack my car with me in it... I hurl my car keys as far as I can and start screaming bloody murder.
I hope I'll never have to do any of those things, but if I ever do, I also hope that I'd have the presence of mind to do something to avoid being a victim.
apples and oranges
(1,451 posts)kelly1mm
(4,733 posts)their legal behavior just to lesson the likelihood that some other person will commit a crime?
Do you tell potential rape victims to change their behavior/actions/attire too?
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)kelly1mm
(4,733 posts)against others illegal behavior? Why should I alter my lifestyle in any way just because it may make me more likely to be the victim of a crime? Is that not the CRIMINALS fault?
ileus
(15,396 posts)kelly1mm
(4,733 posts)Matrosov
(1,098 posts)You can't eliminate carjackings but you can decrease your chance of getting carjacked.
WinkyDink
(51,311 posts)apples and oranges
(1,451 posts)are depending on you to protect them, then you should probably lock your doors. Sometimes carjackers kick the parents out and drive off with kids in the car.
Nuclear Unicorn
(19,497 posts)interdicting criminals tend to be 10-plus minutes away (only after you've taken at least 2 minutes on the phone with the dispatcher) anything that delays and frustrates the criminals is an advantage to their intended victims.
SalviaBlue
(2,917 posts)Xithras
(16,191 posts)There's a difference between blaming someone for their victimization, and giving advice about how to avoid becoming a victim in the first place.
kelly1mm
(4,733 posts)becoming a victim in the first place be appropriate? I think not. I think that would be victim blaming.
If someone carjacks me and the question becomes "Did you have your car doors locked?", how is that different than the asshats who ask a rape victim "What were you wearing?"?
raccoon
(31,111 posts)kelly1mm
(4,733 posts)JI7
(89,251 posts)Actually wanted it to happen.
Travis_0004
(5,417 posts)There are places in Chicago I wouldnt go at 2am. I see nothing wrong telling people not to go there at 2am.
That is different than after the fact saying "its your fault you were there at night"
JI7
(89,251 posts)The thing with rape is people actually do blame the victim in a way they don't with other crimes.
Even asking if door was locked usually doesn't result in blame for the actual act on the victim.
But with rape there is often the "she wanted it" type of attack on victim which isn't there with other crimes.
LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)I think that activating a security device and choosing a mode of dress are two wholly different concepts; neither one implicitly validating, nor invalidating the other.
"...and the question becomes "Did you have your car doors locked?"
That question being referenced by you alone, upon which, you predicate your entire premise.
Xithras
(16,191 posts)Victim blaming is the idea that the victim somehow shares responsibility for the attack because of something they said or did. That's a fundamentally different conversation than giving advice on how to avoid becoming a victim in the first place.
If someone carjacks you, whether or not you had your doors locked no longer matters. You have been victimized, and the fault lays with the carjacker. If someone rapes you, what you wore no longer matters. You have been raped, and the rapist is responsible for the crime. Those issues become irrelevant at that point. Before the attacks, however, there is nothing wrong with saying that you can lower the likelihood of becoming a victim by locking your car doors, or by not going commando in a miniskirt while visiting the sex offender ward of your local prison. Taking sensible precautions to prevent a crime is NOT the same thing as being responsible for the crime when it occurs.
If you forget to lock your front door, and someone walks into your house and steals all your stuff, is it your fault for not locking the door? Of course not. The unlocked door was not an invitation to be robbed. Going commando in a miniskirt is not an invitation to be raped. An unlocked car door is not an invitation to be carjacked. That doesn't mean that we shouldn't take protections by locking our front doors, securing our cars, and being wary of the people we're surrounding ourselves with while commando in a miniskirt. It's not victim blaming to suggest that others do the same.
uppityperson
(115,677 posts)Fail.
kelly1mm
(4,733 posts)a person entering someone else's car illegally has nothing to do with if the door is locked or not.
LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)"a person entering someone else's car illegally has nothing to do with if the door is locked or not."
What specifically leads you to believe that a locked, secure car door is irrelevant to an intruder entering that car? Applying your contention consistently would lead one to criticize the posting of swimming pool safety tips. If not, what then is the precise and relevant difference?
kelly1mm
(4,733 posts)WinkyDink
(51,311 posts)has nothing to do with vaulted or not vaulted funds.
A store or house robbery never has to do with a locked or unlocked door.
Your "logic" is not.
kelly1mm
(4,733 posts)makes you a criminal. Again, the victim of a crime has no responsibility for the criminal actions of another. That is my entire point/philosophy on this matter.
pipi_k
(21,020 posts)Your "point/philosophy" on the matter started out with the assertion that nobody should have to take extra (or any?) precautions to avoid being a victim of crime, not that victims have a responsibility for the criminal actions of another.
Which sounds sort of like, "I want this to be a perfect world" so I'm going to delude myself into thinking that it IS a perfect world by not taking precautions against being a victim.
Do you take any kind of precautions at all?
You know, like using malware/spyware on your computer.
Not giving out your Social Security number to anyone who asks for it.
Not giving out bank account numbers.
Not leaving your car running with the doors unlocked while you run into a store "just for a second".
If you refuse to take any precautions at all to avoid becoming a victim, then hooray for you. Take your chances and be prepared for a whole lot of aggravation...maybe even physical pain...if and when the inevitable happens.
I certainly am not going to blame a victim under those circumstances, but the only reaction I'm likely to have would be, "Oh well..."
Nuclear Unicorn
(19,497 posts)The Just have no need of the Law. The law is not for the Just but the Unjust. The Law does not make one Just but convicts the Unjust.
Yet, we know the Unjust are a fact of life and because of them we have the Law (and door locks).
uppityperson
(115,677 posts)Deserving of what happened to them as happens to rape victims? I understand your point of not blaming the victim of a crime, but your comparison is not comparable.
chrisa
(4,524 posts)deter someone who is going to commit a crime. It's the same type of advice as "lock your door at night." Also, everybody knows a women's attire does not deter or cause rape including the right wing jerks who say it. The far right pulls stuff out of their ass to appeal to their cold-hearted supporters.
WinkyDink
(51,311 posts)advise women to be aware of their surroundings, not to trust pushy males after you say "No, thank you," and to read the book "The Gift of Fear."
pipi_k
(21,020 posts)it's not how a woman dresses, or even her age, that will cause her to be a victim of rape.
Women in burqas can be victims of rape.
So can elderly women. And babies/children.
But if you're a woman who knows that rapists roam the streets looking for victims, you take certain precautions.
Like NOT getting into an elevator occupied by one or more males.
NOT walking alone down an unlit/poorly lit street or alleyway.
Being aware of one's surroundings. Having car keys ready to unlock one's car immediately.
If those things are too much trouble, then whatever. Take your chances.
ileus
(15,396 posts)that there are folks out there that wish to do you harm...and all you need to do is cross paths and appear to be an easy victim.
chrisa
(4,524 posts)It's more about protecting yourself.
nichomachus
(12,754 posts)Locking doors is a reasonable precaution. Changing your manner of dress isn't. If you're in a seedy bar, don't leave your wallet on the bar while you go to the men's room. If you're at the beach, don't leave you expensive watch on the beach towel while you go for a dip. Wear your seatbelts.
Ilsa
(61,695 posts)and you have your SSN tattooed on your forehead. The argument gets really exhausting when you have to argue your principles while you are recovering from an assault.
If you don't take simple, easy precautions to make it more difficult for criminals to hurt you, you are taking a big risk. Life-altering risks. Visit the Rape-recovery forum if you don't believe me. There is shit that can happen to you that can steal years of your life. And it isn't the victims' fault. But the fact is, we live in a violent world.
Renew Deal
(81,861 posts)NaturalHigh
(12,778 posts)while I was stopped at a stop light in Denver. It was a pretty spooky experience. Glad the door was locked. I didn't see a weapon, but he could easily yanked me out.
TorchTheWitch
(11,065 posts)My car has locks that can be locked from inside but not unlocked... the button is designed to go all the way down so there is nothing to grab hold of when you're in the car to unlock the door again. Stupid ass design meant to make it hard for people outside the car to break in by slipping a coat hanger in and pulling up the button.
There also isn't any way to unlock the trunk without using the key.
In any car I've had before I've always locked the doors when I was in it, and I REALLY hate it that I can't do this in the car I have now without having a way to unlock the car from the inside to get out.
Initech
(100,079 posts)Dash board cameras though are something that people should start investing in, you never know what can happen while you're on the road.
Donald Ian Rankin
(13,598 posts)It depends on your views on the relative likelihood of someone hostile trying to get in, and someone friendly needing to get you out after an accident.
But I suspect that in many areas the latter is less unlikely.
Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)You never know who is going to get in the car with you.
meow2u3
(24,764 posts)Thank God for power locks. With my old car, I had to lock them manually and if I forgot to lock a door, some criminal or road rager could have opened the door and God knows what would have happened to me.
JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)cwydro
(51,308 posts)on my bicycle. Or doors!
RebelOne
(30,947 posts)nichomachus
(12,754 posts)I'd rather they do it when I put it into drive.
Cleita
(75,480 posts)unsavory neighborhoods on my way to the job.
SummerSnow
(12,608 posts)Stopped at a traffic light.This man jumped into our car, we kicked his ass he got out the car.
hedgehog
(36,286 posts)the dreaded mythical carjacker. As soon as the road rage warrior was mentioned, I understood. My doors will be locked from now on.
WinkyDink
(51,311 posts)doors.
The OP is suggesting taking sensible precautions.
It is why we:
look in both directions before crossing a street;
install smoke alarms;
put an ID on and/or a microchip in pets;
wear a seat-belt in a car with air-bags;
test hair-dye before full application;
carry an umbrella when rain is forecast;
use a bank safety-deposit box;
have all types of insurance;
don't take candy from psychopathic Ted Bundys;
AND LOCK OUR DOORS.
Hate and refuse to take precautions? Good luck with that.
apples and oranges
(1,451 posts)don't leave them exposed with the doors open. Lock the doors.
cwydro
(51,308 posts)Would this be orange level, red?
I ride my bike almost everywhere. I run every morning.
I am a small woman (5'3" . I get off work after dark at night.
Oh yes, I have my eyes open at all times, but seriously? Should I give up my runs, my walks, my biking?
Nah. Ain't gonna happen.
liberal N proud
(60,335 posts)And with road rage, and the gun nuts, locking doors will only stop physical attacks.
raccoon
(31,111 posts)MillennialDem
(2,367 posts)tblue37
(65,394 posts)Yu should also lock your car doors when you start filling your gas tank, because thieves called "sliders" will crouch down where you cannot see them on the opposite side of your car and slip (slide) into the car to grab your purse that you have left on the front seat.
Here is a video of a TV news report, with security footage of such a theft:
Response to raccoon (Original post)
olddots This message was self-deleted by its author.
LWolf
(46,179 posts)if you live and drive in an area prone to risk. Higher population density, or something else?
I don't even always lock my doors when I park in public. I've been known to stop at one store, toss my bags in the bed of the truck, and leave them there when I stop at the next place.
When I bought this place 10 years ago, there were no keys. The previous owner hadn't locked a door for 20 years.
MillennialDem
(2,367 posts)Locking the doors tends to just result in me locking my keys in the car - I know your comment was about while driving, but I purposefully converted both my cars from power windows/locks to manual windows/locks. So locking the passenger side from the driver's side is difficult unless I get out and go into the passenger side. This always gives me a way to get myself back in if I F up and lock the driver's side door.
I lock my house door because it is never inconvenient to do so like it is with my car. When I leave house I go out through the automatic garage door - unless I'm just going running around the block or taking the trash out or something.
In order to lock myself out of the house I'd have to leave my keys inside and the garage door would have to stop working (there is a keypad outside so I can get in with a code as well). In order to lock myself out of my car... well... much easier!
jberryhill
(62,444 posts)Post it here, and then if you forget it, we'll remind you.