Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

snooper2

(30,151 posts)
Thu Dec 18, 2014, 12:56 PM Dec 2014

So, if North Korea was really behind the hack, and they REALLY were to have agents attack theaters

What do you think the US response would be?


Kim Jong Un hasn't been declared suicidal has he? Sony- you are a weak ass punk beeyatch!

14 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
So, if North Korea was really behind the hack, and they REALLY were to have agents attack theaters (Original Post) snooper2 Dec 2014 OP
I wondered last night when I read that a WH official NoJusticeNoPeace Dec 2014 #1
Why is Sony the punk? Does it have a strike force? TreasonousBastard Dec 2014 #2
are you afraid of North Korea LOL snooper2 Dec 2014 #4
I'd like to laugh at them, but they are murderous shitheads... TreasonousBastard Dec 2014 #5
ISIS and North Korea aren't the same thing. NuclearDem Dec 2014 #8
Of course they aren't. And the point is...? TreasonousBastard Dec 2014 #9
...that drawing the idea of an ISIS attack is apples and oranges. NuclearDem Dec 2014 #10
That is applying reason and logic... TreasonousBastard Dec 2014 #11
The government (presumably) exists to defend its citizens. It's why we allow them to have Nuclear Unicorn Dec 2014 #12
We should keep an eye out for those Slytherine sleeper cells! JaneyVee Dec 2014 #3
Before they do: Cut the hard lines that connect us to NK and withdraw all our troops from Korea. onehandle Dec 2014 #6
what "hard lines" connect us to North Korea? snooper2 Dec 2014 #7
Glad I'm not your ally. FSogol Dec 2014 #13
I think there is more to this than that. parkia00 Dec 2014 #14

NoJusticeNoPeace

(5,018 posts)
1. I wondered last night when I read that a WH official
Thu Dec 18, 2014, 01:00 PM
Dec 2014

said the act would not go without some reaction by our government, what that reaction would be.


I feel sorry for the NK people.

TreasonousBastard

(43,049 posts)
5. I'd like to laugh at them, but they are murderous shitheads...
Thu Dec 18, 2014, 01:11 PM
Dec 2014

the only question is whether they can plant a bomb here.

But, hey, we got high school kids who can do a massacre at a theater, so NK couldn't figure it out?

(What would we do if ISIS threatened to blow up a theater?)

 

NuclearDem

(16,184 posts)
10. ...that drawing the idea of an ISIS attack is apples and oranges.
Thu Dec 18, 2014, 01:47 PM
Dec 2014

1) ISIS is a terrorist organization drawing motivation from fundamentalist Islam. Even excluding Shiites, that still includes a potential recruitment pool of tens of millions, many in Western countries.

North Korea, on the other hand, has its motivations from a fanatical devotion to its leader, a sentiment largely isolated to the peninsula. There aren't any North Korean sleeper cells in the US, and no significant recruitment pool in the West as with ISIS.

2) ISIS wants a fight with the US more than anything else. They don't care about potential casualties or reactions from the US, as long as they achieve their goal of dragging it back into a war in the Middle East.

North Korea, for all its bluster, knows provoking a conflict with the US is suicidal, and a deliberate attack would alienate its one last major benefactor in the world--China. The rank and file might be brainwashed, but the leadership isn't that stupid.

Those are the reasons we can't draw ISIS or al-Qaeda comparisons.

TreasonousBastard

(43,049 posts)
11. That is applying reason and logic...
Thu Dec 18, 2014, 01:55 PM
Dec 2014

which I suspect is not applicable to either of them.

I do remember back in the days when nuclear war was seen as a possibility, Mao said he he didn't fear it because if we threw all our nukes at China it would still leave at least half a billion Chinese to take over the US.

And we thought Mao was saner than this clown.

Nuclear Unicorn

(19,497 posts)
12. The government (presumably) exists to defend its citizens. It's why we allow them to have
Thu Dec 18, 2014, 02:00 PM
Dec 2014

police and military forces.

onehandle

(51,122 posts)
6. Before they do: Cut the hard lines that connect us to NK and withdraw all our troops from Korea.
Thu Dec 18, 2014, 01:27 PM
Dec 2014

China created the NK problem.

Let them have it back.

parkia00

(572 posts)
14. I think there is more to this than that.
Fri Dec 19, 2014, 12:10 PM
Dec 2014

Come on, once you think about it, since when has Hollywood been so afraid of making movies that paint foreign dictators in a bad funny light. It's pretty normal. I personally think that pressure was put on the distributors of said movie by the US government due to present yet unannounced diplomatic moves between the US and DPRK and the present administration doesn't want anything that might upset the easily up-settable North Koreans. Obama's tenure as president is coming to and end and every President wants to have a legacy. The surprise announcement about the thawing of relations with Cuba fits this theory. If Obama can get North Korea from out of the freeze, it would be one of the bigger jewels in his crown.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»So, if North Korea was re...