General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsNYPD Union Has Attacked Every Mayor In Recent History
NYPD Union Has Attacked Every Mayor In Recent HistoryBy Simon McCormack at the Huffington Post
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/12/22/nypd-police-union-criticized-past-mayors_n_6368760.html?utm_hp_ref=politics&ir=Politics
SNIP.................
After the murder of two NYPD police by a man with a lengthy criminal history, NYC Patrolmens Benevolent Association president Pat Lynch said Mayor Bill de Blasio had blood on his hands.
Previously, the union had sought to have the mayor banned from the funerals of police killed in the line of duty.
The union said the request was made because of de Blasio's "consistent refusal to show police officers the support and respect they deserve."
But there hasn't been a mayor, Republican, Democrat or Independent, in at least the recent past who hasn't been met with scorn by the powerful police union.
As former New York Times reporter David Firestone pointed out in a series of tweets:
...................SNIP
Gravitycollapse
(8,155 posts)LiberalElite
(14,691 posts)whether they deserve it or not.
juxtaposed
(2,778 posts)Cha
(297,339 posts)hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)LiberalFighter
(50,958 posts)That they continuously abuse. They should never be referred to as NY's finest. Especially as long as their police association has jerks like Lynch heading them.
branford
(4,462 posts)I'm not impressed by fair-weather labor supporters on a Democratic board. Such comments also are eerily reminiscent of conservative complaints about how the teachers unions have too much political power, and how it hurts our children. We should endeavor to see all unions as powerful as the police unions in NYC.
In any event, the police unions (which are very distinct from the NYPD itself) in NYC are powerful because of strong public support, not the other way around. Despite the opinions of many here on DU, as a lifelong and politically active NYC area resident, I can assure you that the NYPD is indeed very popular, although admittedly not always with certain demographics.
Whether you or I like Lynch's comments (and I most certainly don't) is not the real issue. What's important is how well the sentiment reverberates among New Yorkers. Mayor deBlasi is not calling for a pause in protests for no reason. He can read the polls and sense the political winds, and does not want to be a one-termer like David Dinkins.
Response to branford (Reply #8)
marym625 This message was self-deleted by its author.
TheKentuckian
(25,026 posts)"certain demographics"?
Is it reassuring and fun that the less pigmentally challenged and the poors get beat up, locked up, and killed with abandon and without consequences?
Liberals my ass. Kudos to them for not being a forced ultrasound loving bigots but most of us call that not being given a piece of shit. Monsters can be secular too.
bemildred
(90,061 posts)The police have become a self-serving criminal gang, and we need to apply the Reagan solution and fire them all and start over.
Raine1967
(11,589 posts)This is going to be really interesting. in a sad way, but watching Pat Lynch, I am not willing to believe that he has such power of the NYPD with DeBlasio as Mayor.
branford
(4,462 posts)That is hardly news. However, you cannot compare the relationship of Giuliani and Bloomberg to the NYPD to that of Dinkins and now deBlasio.
It can even be argued that Dinkins' horrible tenure as mayor was the result of his handpicked police chief and law enforcement polices, and what made Giuliani the more attractive candidate and perceived as far more successful in keeping NYC safe and secure. Events like the Crown Heights riots and Korean boycott irreparably damaged Dinkins, and deBlasio clearly wants to learn from Dinkins' mistakes. Hiring Bill Bratton, Giuliani's police commission, was obviously step 1. He probably now wishes he could have provided more nuance concerning his remarks after the grand jury did not indict on the Garner matter, and his call today for a pause in protests, at least until after the police funerals, is likely a public expression of very bad private polling and political advice.
Logical
(22,457 posts)branford
(4,462 posts)However, when our side paints one of the most diverse police forces in the world, with 34,000 officers, with a broad and unflattering brush, it would be asinine to not expect the police and their numerous supporters to use similarly broad and unfair generalizations about the protesters and mayor in the event of a tragedy like the shootings.
Politics, particularly in NYC, is hardball.
Logical
(22,457 posts)branford
(4,462 posts)when conservatives proclaim that "the teachers union protects bad teachers, that is their main purpose" when the next Republican governor tries to pass new right to work laws.
Unions exist to protect and advocate for the interests of their members, and only their members, both good and bad. In fact, treating members differently is a breach of their fiduciary obligations. I should know, I worked on such claims at the NLRB (Region 29 - Brooklyn) while in law school.
Logical
(22,457 posts)teacher multiple times and the teacher still has a job I will say that teachers union is fucked up also.
Raine1967
(11,589 posts)As I understand it, he is still in the employ of the NYPD as well as a Union head. HE could very well lose his job. (personally, as much as I support unions, he should, he is not acting as a Union Chief)
(this isn't a gotcha, I was listening to Democracy Now! Here is the part of the transcript that made me have a head twist: http://www.democracynow.org/2014/12/22/calls_for_calm_after_nypd_union
And I think that Pat should bring it down, because no one in New Yorknobodymy pastor spoke about the officers yesterday in church, and Brother Ramos, he had just completed his chaplaincy training. He goes to a church thats the sister church to my church. He was due to get his certification this week. These are not bad guys. They werent bad guys. They werent part of the problem; they were part of the solution.
KingCharlemagne
(7,908 posts)connections it still has with police unions. As one of my Socialist comrades recently noted,
applegrove
(118,703 posts)And not assume that all police unions cultures are exactly the same.
KingCharlemagne
(7,908 posts)New York City two days ago. I assume you're not advocating building bridges to the NYPD's PBA?
applegrove
(118,703 posts)branford
(4,462 posts)I guess you must have known what the Republicans wanted for Christmas this year.
DisgustipatedinCA
(12,530 posts)I just want the pigs gone. I've seen you posting in several threads, talking about how you don't like the police union either. You always follow that with a full-throated defense of said union--neat trick. Fuck the police. I said it before Saturday, and I have no plans to stop now unless and until I quit seeing police brutality in my newsfeed on a daily basis.
branford
(4,462 posts)It's irrelevant whether I like the police unions or not. However, I do respect the fact that they have very strong and popular unions, and the labor movement should learn from their successes. And for the record, my problems are with Lynch's statements, not the entire union, because I believe them very counterproductive to both the union's and general public's goals and interests. I'm also not going to advocate the elimination of hard won union protections, no less constitutional rights, simply because this particular police union president is a moron.
You can "want the pigs gone" to your heart's content, although that sounds like a tired 1960's matra, and is not a sentiment shared by anything close to a majority of the public. However, their strong unions and incredible solidarity render the prospects of that happening downright laughable. I hope all unions are watching and learning.
There are many avenues to address racial disparities in the justice system. Attacking unions and proclaiming "fuck the police" might make you popular on DU, but will produce nothing positive in the real world.
KingCharlemagne
(7,908 posts)progressive labor movement, as represented by unions like SEIU and AFSCME, should have nothing whatsoever to do with police who attack workers and protect the interests of the bourgeoisie, your slur and slander notwithstanding.
applegrove
(118,703 posts)than other labor unions and no doubt that is because the 1% covet them. We need to keep the discussion going with the police and other powers that be. If not we are ceding a part of ourselves. Which is the whole point of the demonstrations...the police serve and protect us. We have a right to non-violent protest. Organizers should put out a call to all followers to turn in anyone who demonstrates and calls for violence against the police. Or anyone who does anything to the police. The demonstrators have to police themselves too. And the police-government need to discuss amongst themselves and search their souls for answers, all the while listening to the people. We need to engage each other in listening. Hard. Not create wedges that only benefit the GOP and do not help either the people or the police.
Joe Shlabotnik
(5,604 posts)Like you and I, though they may have started out that way. Their job is to serve and protect the status quo, as determined by the wealthy, connected and powerful; despite how unfair, corrupt, opportunistic that status quo may be. There is good reason that military is not unionized, because given their fire power, they'd be running the government.
The nypd has been proven time and again to be protecting their benefactors at wall street, not protecting protesting workers, or those who want change.
Police unions are a part of the machine, and therefore should be smashed along with the rest of it.
KingCharlemagne
(7,908 posts)only their labor to sell and do not own or control the means of production. That said, though, they sell their labor to the very elements (bourgeoisie) devoted to smashing workers and keeping them divided and suppressed. As such, the progressive labor movement should have absolutely nothing to do with them.
Quoting another Socialist comrade,
Joe Shlabotnik
(5,604 posts)imthevicar
(811 posts)Ykcutnek
(1,305 posts)And to the gasps I hear from the "labor can do no wrong" section, I fart in your general direction.
applegrove
(118,703 posts)Joe Shlabotnik
(5,604 posts)despite, their already awful and unaccountable behavior with missing aboriginal women, G20 protests, and failure to investigate parliamentary scandals etc. Do you think that their constitutional right to bargain collectively is more important than their duty to uphold the laws of Canada on an equal and consistent basis?
Don't get me wrong, I am 100% pro union: except when it creates a criminally negligent cartel of connected insiders.
applegrove
(118,703 posts)a good thing. We live in a pretty safe country. Ive experienced evil crimes. But that is not the police fault but an act of god that created an animal called a psychopath. On the whole Canada works hard to be the safe country we are. So someone is doing something right. And those unsolved cases missing aboriginal women number about 150 women. The other 1000 cases are solved. They have gone back and counted all the murders or missing from 40 years. Still not acceptable. And I would think there should be a study. Do not know if it should be a public enquiry. I am not sure which would be more effective at stopping crimes against women.
I do not know about you but if I was living in a remote area of Canada and patrolling the highways and towns...alone.... NIGHT AFTER NIGHT, I would think that is all the qualifications one needs to have the right to unionize.
bemildred
(90,061 posts)Just because it's a union, that's no guarantee. It is hilarious to watch you trying to defend police "unions", which have been one of the major forces of repression here, as being the ones oppressed, it's just classic victim blaming.
bemildred
(90,061 posts)Dawson Leery
(19,348 posts)They fought with Giulianni even though he defended the worse offenders within the NYPD.
Their contention was Rudy did not give them absurd raises.
In short,the PBA demands total compliance to their demands. I do not see how any progressive can support such a horrible institution.
branford
(4,462 posts)How exactly is that revelatory?
I wonder if you'll feel the same way when the teachers or other liberal unions complain about deBlasio when even he will not concede to all their compensation and other demands and it's written about in the NYT? Contract negotiations, particularly in places like NYC, are very adversarial.
There are certainly ample legitimate criticisms of the police unions, but their zealously, even ruthlessly, fighting for the highest possible compensation for their members, is something to be commended, not criticized.
malokvale77
(4,879 posts)as much as I support unions, cop unions suck.
Police are out of control.
moondust
(19,993 posts)to do anything they want, right or wrong, just or unjust, legal or not, with the mayor's unconditional support. Very bad idea particularly in light of the twisted views of some of their "leaders" like Lynch in NY and Follmer in Cleveland.
bemildred
(90,061 posts)moondust
(19,993 posts)Last edited Tue Dec 23, 2014, 01:23 PM - Edit history (1)
so the community probably turns a blind eye to a lot of the corruption and bad behavior.
I think that's called a "protection racket."
Ugh.
ellenrr
(3,864 posts)first African American mayor.
some in the police crowd referred to the mayor as a "washroom attendant".
http://www.nytimes.com/1992/09/27/nyregion/rally-puts-police-under-new-scrutiny.html