Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

applegrove

(118,703 posts)
Mon Dec 22, 2014, 11:38 PM Dec 2014

NYPD Union Has Attacked Every Mayor In Recent History

NYPD Union Has Attacked Every Mayor In Recent History

By Simon McCormack at the Huffington Post

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/12/22/nypd-police-union-criticized-past-mayors_n_6368760.html?utm_hp_ref=politics&ir=Politics

SNIP.................


After the murder of two NYPD police by a man with a lengthy criminal history, NYC Patrolmen’s Benevolent Association president Pat Lynch said Mayor Bill de Blasio had blood on his hands.

Previously, the union had sought to have the mayor banned from the funerals of police killed in the line of duty.

The union said the request was made because of de Blasio's "consistent refusal to show police officers the support and respect they deserve."

But there hasn't been a mayor, Republican, Democrat or Independent, in at least the recent past who hasn't been met with scorn by the powerful police union.

As former New York Times reporter David Firestone pointed out in a series of tweets:




...................SNIP
45 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
NYPD Union Has Attacked Every Mayor In Recent History (Original Post) applegrove Dec 2014 OP
There's nothing benevolent about beating and murdering black youth. Gravitycollapse Dec 2014 #1
Well, they're benevolent towards themselves- LiberalElite Dec 2014 #43
pba is a far right group...... as in the late 1930's juxtaposed Dec 2014 #2
How Orwell of them.. "benevolent" Cha Dec 2014 #10
Lynch is a disgrace and has been since he started. hrmjustin Dec 2014 #3
NYPD has way too much power. LiberalFighter Dec 2014 #4
Apparently, strong and respected unions are only acceptable when they trend liberal. branford Dec 2014 #8
This message was self-deleted by its author marym625 Dec 2014 #25
"Certain demographics" are people. Is this why they are so popular because they oppress TheKentuckian Dec 2014 #37
Yeah, reactionary politics doesn't become OK just because you call it a "union". bemildred Dec 2014 #39
In this very particular case, I think the PBA has too much power, vocally. Raine1967 Dec 2014 #13
City unions, all City unions, fight with the mayor. branford Dec 2014 #5
"more nuance", Too much nuance for me. The NYPD has many issues. They are never addressed. nt Logical Dec 2014 #7
I do not disagree that the NYPD certainly has room for improvement. branford Dec 2014 #11
That "union" protects bad cops. That is their main purpose. nt Logical Dec 2014 #6
Remember your comment branford Dec 2014 #14
LOL, when the same teacher assaults citizens and the school board pays settlements for the.... Logical Dec 2014 #44
Pat Lynch is a craven person: Raine1967 Dec 2014 #9
The broadly progressive labor movement should begin to sever any KingCharlemagne Dec 2014 #12
We need to build bridges with them, not dig a trench. applegrove Dec 2014 #15
The spokesperson for the NYPD's PBA declared war on the people of KingCharlemagne Dec 2014 #19
With that lunatic, no. With the union itself...yes. applegrove Dec 2014 #20
Great, you want to effectively divide and conquer the labor movement. branford Dec 2014 #16
I don't want a schism in labor. DisgustipatedinCA Dec 2014 #18
I think you miss the point. branford Dec 2014 #29
I take no position on police officers organizing their collective bargaining units. But the KingCharlemagne Dec 2014 #21
Exactly. Police unions may be more to the right applegrove Dec 2014 #26
They are not 'workers'. Joe Shlabotnik Dec 2014 #17
They are 'workers' in the classic Marxist sense of the term, in that they have KingCharlemagne Dec 2014 #22
Said better than I Joe Shlabotnik Dec 2014 #24
Who can trust the Blue Meanies! imthevicar Dec 2014 #34
Time to neuter the police unions. Ykcutnek Dec 2014 #23
So we do the GOP dirty work for them - I think not. applegrove Dec 2014 #27
The RCMP want to unionize Joe Shlabotnik Dec 2014 #30
I do not think the two are mutually exclusive. Unions are applegrove Dec 2014 #32
Unions can be corrupted just like anything else. bemildred Dec 2014 #42
It is the police that are doing the GOPs dirty work for them, not us. nt bemildred Dec 2014 #40
The NYPBA is worse than you think. Dawson Leery Dec 2014 #28
A city union fights with the mayor over compensation. branford Dec 2014 #31
.... 840high Dec 2014 #35
All I can say is ... malokvale77 Dec 2014 #33
They seem to want blanket immunity moondust Dec 2014 #36
They are a criminal gang operating under color of authority. nt bemildred Dec 2014 #41
And the rich folk need their "protection" moondust Dec 2014 #45
In 1992 there was a police riot during the mayorship of David Dinkins in NYC (city's ellenrr Dec 2014 #38

LiberalFighter

(50,958 posts)
4. NYPD has way too much power.
Tue Dec 23, 2014, 12:05 AM
Dec 2014

That they continuously abuse. They should never be referred to as NY's finest. Especially as long as their police association has jerks like Lynch heading them.

 

branford

(4,462 posts)
8. Apparently, strong and respected unions are only acceptable when they trend liberal.
Tue Dec 23, 2014, 12:18 AM
Dec 2014

I'm not impressed by fair-weather labor supporters on a Democratic board. Such comments also are eerily reminiscent of conservative complaints about how the teachers unions have too much political power, and how it hurts our children. We should endeavor to see all unions as powerful as the police unions in NYC.

In any event, the police unions (which are very distinct from the NYPD itself) in NYC are powerful because of strong public support, not the other way around. Despite the opinions of many here on DU, as a lifelong and politically active NYC area resident, I can assure you that the NYPD is indeed very popular, although admittedly not always with certain demographics.

Whether you or I like Lynch's comments (and I most certainly don't) is not the real issue. What's important is how well the sentiment reverberates among New Yorkers. Mayor deBlasi is not calling for a pause in protests for no reason. He can read the polls and sense the political winds, and does not want to be a one-termer like David Dinkins.

Response to branford (Reply #8)

TheKentuckian

(25,026 posts)
37. "Certain demographics" are people. Is this why they are so popular because they oppress
Tue Dec 23, 2014, 06:41 AM
Dec 2014

"certain demographics"?

Is it reassuring and fun that the less pigmentally challenged and the poors get beat up, locked up, and killed with abandon and without consequences?

Liberals my ass. Kudos to them for not being a forced ultrasound loving bigots but most of us call that not being given a piece of shit. Monsters can be secular too.

bemildred

(90,061 posts)
39. Yeah, reactionary politics doesn't become OK just because you call it a "union".
Tue Dec 23, 2014, 07:25 AM
Dec 2014

The police have become a self-serving criminal gang, and we need to apply the Reagan solution and fire them all and start over.

Raine1967

(11,589 posts)
13. In this very particular case, I think the PBA has too much power, vocally.
Tue Dec 23, 2014, 12:26 AM
Dec 2014

This is going to be really interesting. in a sad way, but watching Pat Lynch, I am not willing to believe that he has such power of the NYPD with DeBlasio as Mayor.



 

branford

(4,462 posts)
5. City unions, all City unions, fight with the mayor.
Tue Dec 23, 2014, 12:05 AM
Dec 2014

That is hardly news. However, you cannot compare the relationship of Giuliani and Bloomberg to the NYPD to that of Dinkins and now deBlasio.

It can even be argued that Dinkins' horrible tenure as mayor was the result of his handpicked police chief and law enforcement polices, and what made Giuliani the more attractive candidate and perceived as far more successful in keeping NYC safe and secure. Events like the Crown Heights riots and Korean boycott irreparably damaged Dinkins, and deBlasio clearly wants to learn from Dinkins' mistakes. Hiring Bill Bratton, Giuliani's police commission, was obviously step 1. He probably now wishes he could have provided more nuance concerning his remarks after the grand jury did not indict on the Garner matter, and his call today for a pause in protests, at least until after the police funerals, is likely a public expression of very bad private polling and political advice.

 

branford

(4,462 posts)
11. I do not disagree that the NYPD certainly has room for improvement.
Tue Dec 23, 2014, 12:23 AM
Dec 2014

However, when our side paints one of the most diverse police forces in the world, with 34,000 officers, with a broad and unflattering brush, it would be asinine to not expect the police and their numerous supporters to use similarly broad and unfair generalizations about the protesters and mayor in the event of a tragedy like the shootings.

Politics, particularly in NYC, is hardball.

 

branford

(4,462 posts)
14. Remember your comment
Tue Dec 23, 2014, 12:28 AM
Dec 2014

when conservatives proclaim that "the teachers union protects bad teachers, that is their main purpose" when the next Republican governor tries to pass new right to work laws.

Unions exist to protect and advocate for the interests of their members, and only their members, both good and bad. In fact, treating members differently is a breach of their fiduciary obligations. I should know, I worked on such claims at the NLRB (Region 29 - Brooklyn) while in law school.

 

Logical

(22,457 posts)
44. LOL, when the same teacher assaults citizens and the school board pays settlements for the....
Tue Dec 23, 2014, 10:53 AM
Dec 2014

teacher multiple times and the teacher still has a job I will say that teachers union is fucked up also.

Raine1967

(11,589 posts)
9. Pat Lynch is a craven person:
Tue Dec 23, 2014, 12:19 AM
Dec 2014
http://gawker.com/nypd-union-president-patrick-lynch-is-completely-nuts-1674178970

As I understand it, he is still in the employ of the NYPD as well as a Union head. HE could very well lose his job. (personally, as much as I support unions, he should, he is not acting as a Union Chief)


(this isn't a gotcha, I was listening to Democracy Now! Here is the part of the transcript that made me have a head twist: http://www.democracynow.org/2014/12/22/calls_for_calm_after_nypd_union

GRAHAM WEATHERSPOON: He had said a while back, and quite prophetically, he said, "If a police officer is shot, they will not be welcome at the funeral." Well, that was a reprehensible statement. And Pat is going to have to—I think Commissioner Bratton is going to have to sit down with him and rein him in. Pat Lynch is a member of the New York City Police Department. And to bring adverse criticism against the department is grounds for dismissal. So, he will only be a union president as long as he is a member of the police department. He is still a police officer. And I’m sure that Mayor de Blasio is going to sit down with Commissioner Bratton, and the three of them are going to have to come to terms.

And I think that Pat should bring it down, because no one in New York—nobody—my pastor spoke about the officers yesterday in church, and Brother Ramos, he had just completed his chaplaincy training. He goes to a church that’s the sister church to my church. He was due to get his certification this week. These are not bad guys. They weren’t bad guys. They weren’t part of the problem; they were part of the solution.

 

KingCharlemagne

(7,908 posts)
12. The broadly progressive labor movement should begin to sever any
Tue Dec 23, 2014, 12:26 AM
Dec 2014

connections it still has with police unions. As one of my Socialist comrades recently noted,

They are racist, anti-working class entities. What sort of union represents a profession that systematically terrorizes black and brown proletarian communities, breaks strikes, and defends the interests of the bourgeoisie at every single turn?

applegrove

(118,703 posts)
15. We need to build bridges with them, not dig a trench.
Tue Dec 23, 2014, 12:33 AM
Dec 2014

And not assume that all police unions cultures are exactly the same.

 

KingCharlemagne

(7,908 posts)
19. The spokesperson for the NYPD's PBA declared war on the people of
Tue Dec 23, 2014, 12:40 AM
Dec 2014

New York City two days ago. I assume you're not advocating building bridges to the NYPD's PBA?

 

branford

(4,462 posts)
16. Great, you want to effectively divide and conquer the labor movement.
Tue Dec 23, 2014, 12:33 AM
Dec 2014

I guess you must have known what the Republicans wanted for Christmas this year.

 

DisgustipatedinCA

(12,530 posts)
18. I don't want a schism in labor.
Tue Dec 23, 2014, 12:40 AM
Dec 2014

I just want the pigs gone. I've seen you posting in several threads, talking about how you don't like the police union either. You always follow that with a full-throated defense of said union--neat trick. Fuck the police. I said it before Saturday, and I have no plans to stop now unless and until I quit seeing police brutality in my newsfeed on a daily basis.

 

branford

(4,462 posts)
29. I think you miss the point.
Tue Dec 23, 2014, 01:00 AM
Dec 2014

It's irrelevant whether I like the police unions or not. However, I do respect the fact that they have very strong and popular unions, and the labor movement should learn from their successes. And for the record, my problems are with Lynch's statements, not the entire union, because I believe them very counterproductive to both the union's and general public's goals and interests. I'm also not going to advocate the elimination of hard won union protections, no less constitutional rights, simply because this particular police union president is a moron.

You can "want the pigs gone" to your heart's content, although that sounds like a tired 1960's matra, and is not a sentiment shared by anything close to a majority of the public. However, their strong unions and incredible solidarity render the prospects of that happening downright laughable. I hope all unions are watching and learning.

There are many avenues to address racial disparities in the justice system. Attacking unions and proclaiming "fuck the police" might make you popular on DU, but will produce nothing positive in the real world.

 

KingCharlemagne

(7,908 posts)
21. I take no position on police officers organizing their collective bargaining units. But the
Tue Dec 23, 2014, 12:42 AM
Dec 2014

progressive labor movement, as represented by unions like SEIU and AFSCME, should have nothing whatsoever to do with police who attack workers and protect the interests of the bourgeoisie, your slur and slander notwithstanding.

applegrove

(118,703 posts)
26. Exactly. Police unions may be more to the right
Tue Dec 23, 2014, 12:52 AM
Dec 2014

than other labor unions and no doubt that is because the 1% covet them. We need to keep the discussion going with the police and other powers that be. If not we are ceding a part of ourselves. Which is the whole point of the demonstrations...the police serve and protect us. We have a right to non-violent protest. Organizers should put out a call to all followers to turn in anyone who demonstrates and calls for violence against the police. Or anyone who does anything to the police. The demonstrators have to police themselves too. And the police-government need to discuss amongst themselves and search their souls for answers, all the while listening to the people. We need to engage each other in listening. Hard. Not create wedges that only benefit the GOP and do not help either the people or the police.

Joe Shlabotnik

(5,604 posts)
17. They are not 'workers'.
Tue Dec 23, 2014, 12:37 AM
Dec 2014

Like you and I, though they may have started out that way. Their job is to serve and protect the status quo, as determined by the wealthy, connected and powerful; despite how unfair, corrupt, opportunistic that status quo may be. There is good reason that military is not unionized, because given their fire power, they'd be running the government.

The nypd has been proven time and again to be protecting their benefactors at wall street, not protecting protesting workers, or those who want change.

Police unions are a part of the machine, and therefore should be smashed along with the rest of it.

 

KingCharlemagne

(7,908 posts)
22. They are 'workers' in the classic Marxist sense of the term, in that they have
Tue Dec 23, 2014, 12:44 AM
Dec 2014

only their labor to sell and do not own or control the means of production. That said, though, they sell their labor to the very elements (bourgeoisie) devoted to smashing workers and keeping them divided and suppressed. As such, the progressive labor movement should have absolutely nothing to do with them.

Quoting another Socialist comrade,

Not all workers act in the interests of the working class. Most workers at some point act not in the interest of the working class, because perforce we have to contribute to the reproduction of capitalism. Cops are toward the extreme end of that spectrum.
 

Ykcutnek

(1,305 posts)
23. Time to neuter the police unions.
Tue Dec 23, 2014, 12:47 AM
Dec 2014

And to the gasps I hear from the "labor can do no wrong" section, I fart in your general direction.

Joe Shlabotnik

(5,604 posts)
30. The RCMP want to unionize
Tue Dec 23, 2014, 01:06 AM
Dec 2014

despite, their already awful and unaccountable behavior with missing aboriginal women, G20 protests, and failure to investigate parliamentary scandals etc. Do you think that their constitutional right to bargain collectively is more important than their duty to uphold the laws of Canada on an equal and consistent basis?

Don't get me wrong, I am 100% pro union: except when it creates a criminally negligent cartel of connected insiders.

applegrove

(118,703 posts)
32. I do not think the two are mutually exclusive. Unions are
Tue Dec 23, 2014, 01:17 AM
Dec 2014

a good thing. We live in a pretty safe country. Ive experienced evil crimes. But that is not the police fault but an act of god that created an animal called a psychopath. On the whole Canada works hard to be the safe country we are. So someone is doing something right. And those unsolved cases missing aboriginal women number about 150 women. The other 1000 cases are solved. They have gone back and counted all the murders or missing from 40 years. Still not acceptable. And I would think there should be a study. Do not know if it should be a public enquiry. I am not sure which would be more effective at stopping crimes against women.

I do not know about you but if I was living in a remote area of Canada and patrolling the highways and towns...alone.... NIGHT AFTER NIGHT, I would think that is all the qualifications one needs to have the right to unionize.

bemildred

(90,061 posts)
42. Unions can be corrupted just like anything else.
Tue Dec 23, 2014, 07:37 AM
Dec 2014

Just because it's a union, that's no guarantee. It is hilarious to watch you trying to defend police "unions", which have been one of the major forces of repression here, as being the ones oppressed, it's just classic victim blaming.

Dawson Leery

(19,348 posts)
28. The NYPBA is worse than you think.
Tue Dec 23, 2014, 12:58 AM
Dec 2014
http://www.nytimes.com/1997/02/17/nyregion/despite-police-union-troubles-officers-save-anger-for-giuliani.html?smid=tw-share

They fought with Giulianni even though he defended the worse offenders within the NYPD.
Their contention was Rudy did not give them absurd raises.

In short,the PBA demands total compliance to their demands. I do not see how any progressive can support such a horrible institution.
 

branford

(4,462 posts)
31. A city union fights with the mayor over compensation.
Tue Dec 23, 2014, 01:11 AM
Dec 2014

How exactly is that revelatory?

I wonder if you'll feel the same way when the teachers or other liberal unions complain about deBlasio when even he will not concede to all their compensation and other demands and it's written about in the NYT? Contract negotiations, particularly in places like NYC, are very adversarial.

There are certainly ample legitimate criticisms of the police unions, but their zealously, even ruthlessly, fighting for the highest possible compensation for their members, is something to be commended, not criticized.

moondust

(19,993 posts)
36. They seem to want blanket immunity
Tue Dec 23, 2014, 02:35 AM
Dec 2014

to do anything they want, right or wrong, just or unjust, legal or not, with the mayor's unconditional support. Very bad idea particularly in light of the twisted views of some of their "leaders" like Lynch in NY and Follmer in Cleveland.

moondust

(19,993 posts)
45. And the rich folk need their "protection"
Tue Dec 23, 2014, 12:52 PM
Dec 2014

Last edited Tue Dec 23, 2014, 01:23 PM - Edit history (1)

so the community probably turns a blind eye to a lot of the corruption and bad behavior.

I think that's called a "protection racket."

Ugh.

ellenrr

(3,864 posts)
38. In 1992 there was a police riot during the mayorship of David Dinkins in NYC (city's
Tue Dec 23, 2014, 07:03 AM
Dec 2014

first African American mayor.
some in the police crowd referred to the mayor as a "washroom attendant".

http://www.nytimes.com/1992/09/27/nyregion/rally-puts-police-under-new-scrutiny.html

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»NYPD Union Has Attacked E...