General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsProtester Confronts Fox Station That Deceptively Edited 'Kill A Cop' Chant, Talking Points Memo
http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/fox-affiliate-apologizes-protester-chant
Baltimore Fox affiliate apologized Monday night for a report it ran over the weekend that deceptively edited protestors to look like they were chanting "kill a cop."
Gawker originally caught WBFF chopping up footage of a protest chant to sound like incitement to murder police on Monday.
The chant went "we won't stop, we can't stop, 'til killer cops, are in cell blocks," according to C-SPAN footage.
But WBFF cut the audio short and told viewers that the words were in fact "we won't stop, we can't stop, so kill a cop."
The station apologized both on its Facebook page and in an interview with one of the protestors leading the chant, Tawanda Jones
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________
You may watch the segment at the link above.
belzabubba333
(1,237 posts)Stuart G
(38,436 posts)It was no mistake, the idiots at that station should be fired and tried on character assignation.
elehhhhna
(32,076 posts)False reporting inciting violence wtf already?
Blue_Adept
(6,399 posts)I'm curious.
NoJusticeNoPeace
(5,018 posts)know that fox exists solely to advance the rightwing agenda of hate and destruction.
me b zola
(19,053 posts)A "news"organization that edits film to deliberately tell a lie, much less such an inflammatory lie should be illegal and punishable by imprisonment.
MadDAsHell
(2,067 posts)across the country? And under what guidelines will they determine what's a lie? And under which party's administration will those guidelines be set?
Those questions make all the difference.
me b zola
(19,053 posts)Editing a video to intentionally misrepresent people like what was done here does not need "guidelines" the altered video speaks for itself and the intent behind it.
Blue_Adept
(6,399 posts)What level is acceptable? Again, who determines and assures us that it's not misrepresented?
uponit7771
(90,347 posts)...would be charged with
LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)No one. Fox News successfully argued in court some years ago that they are under no obligation to either truth or accuracy.
sunnystarr
(2,638 posts)not to be confused with the regular Fox station which is local news and should be subject to FCC regulations.
think
(11,641 posts)There needs to be REAL consequences for a news agency deliberately fabricating the news.
Dustlawyer
(10,495 posts)it is ok for them to lie because they "are not news, they are entertainment." They can legal lie, distort, and fabricate whatever they want now without repercussions. This allows full on propaganda directed at Americans to be legal. Sorry Mr. Cronkite!
think
(11,641 posts)Thanks for the input. I'll have to look that up and file it....
Action_Patrol
(845 posts)But the court case wasn't involving Fox News but a local Tampa affiliate.
http://www.snopes.com/politics/business/foxlies.asp
Dustlawyer
(10,495 posts)Roy Rolling
(6,921 posts)The Fox station is owned by Sinclair broadcasting and FCC complaints and comments should be made against them.
maced666
(771 posts)NBC did so as an original source.
Stuart G
(38,436 posts)This one report about FOX station altering the news to fit its bias, becomes the news scandal of the decade..
Fred Sanders
(23,946 posts)with it, raised it repeatedly, even after we all here at DU knew the truth...and repeated his show in the evening long after....
Protest should be hel at all the major networks over this and much, much else.
They and many, many web news sites need to front page apologies.
Fred Sanders
(23,946 posts)Last edited Tue Dec 23, 2014, 01:15 PM - Edit history (1)
dangerous crime.
We should not let it go.
staggerleem
(469 posts)... that Comcast cares more about "journalism" than Fox does.
The time when one could take something on faith because they saw it on the TV news has been over for about a decade, Fred. Try to keep up.
Fred Sanders
(23,946 posts)merrily
(45,251 posts)daleanime
(17,796 posts)and soaked into the brains of the target audience(don't know how I said that with a straight face), should be required to issue a ten minute correction every hour for the next month. Undoing the damage that their help cause will not be easy.
jalan48
(13,873 posts)That's what FOX and most of right wing talk radio does. The purpose is to separate people. People united in communities educate themselves to solve problems. Educated people pose a threat to those in power. Strong, healthy communities pose a threat to those in power. People questioning the status quo and actively looking for ways to make their lives and communities better pose a threat to those in power. The job of FOX News and hate radio is to create divisions in society. People divided will expend all their energy hating and/or fearing others not in their group and they won't focus on the bigger picture of "society". FOX News is like heroin or meth, it destroys people and communities, that's it's sole purpose. FOX News leads citizens toward totalitarianism-"Your community and people are sick, you are incapable of making your community work, you need a strong government/police/leader to take care of your problems." Not hating is the only anti-dote to their venom.
classykaren
(769 posts)Then writing to Gawker,CNN etc.
Fred Sanders
(23,946 posts)NoJusticeNoPeace
(5,018 posts)that lie is now the truth.
You will NOT be able to tell ANY rightwinger or teaparty person the truth about this, they are NOT having it.
Like the IRS, Benghazi, Fast and Furious.
Fred Sanders
(23,946 posts)NoJusticeNoPeace
(5,018 posts)true, but if anything they are even more dug in now than ever.
NorthCarolina
(11,197 posts)Iggo
(47,558 posts)That shit was on purpose.
Fred Sanders
(23,946 posts)"Although last nights report reflected an honest misunderstanding of what the protesters were saying, we apologize for the error," the post read.
"We have deleted the story on our webpage and we offered to have Ms. Jones on Fox45 News at 5:00 tonight for a live interview," it continued.
In that interview, Jones called out the station several times for misrepresenting her words.
"The interesting part that really gets to me is, where you guys edited it and stopped like, how could that be a mistake?" she said.
"Once you play that whole thing, you would know that's not something that's being said," she added.
The interviewer apologized several times, and though Jones told the station she was grateful to come on, she also said she now fears for her reputation and her safety. Near the end of the interview she began to cry.
"At the end of the day, people's lives are on the line," she said. "Now, even though we're doing this, I still don't feel safe because I still feel like the message is out there."
"What if a crazed-out cop or a crazed-out supporter thinks I'm trying to get cops killed?" she later said, wiping tears from her face.
Rex
(65,616 posts)they don't give two shits about Ms. Jones or the fact that they might have ruined her life. I would say they should all end up in prison for trying to incite national riots, but this is the M$M as we know it now.
Fred Sanders
(23,946 posts)themselves for torturing words and the truth.
I wish the protestors would also protest in front of media corporate headquarters as well, because I can't breath with all those lies stepping on my neck.
Rex
(65,616 posts)None of us can breath with this amount of injustice.
PotatoChip
(3,186 posts)The Elements of Slander
There are two types of slander: slander and slander per se. In the first kind of slander, the plaintiff must prove the defendant made a defamatory statement to at least one other person (i.e. the essential defamation elements) and that the plaintiff suffered what are referred to as special damages as a result of the defamation. Special damages are actual harm like loss of customers, being fired, or some other financial harm.
A slander per se claim does not require that the plaintiff prove special damages. This is because slander per se claims involve categories of defamatory statements that are presumed to be damaging to the plaintiff. While the categories may change a little for state to state, and evolve over the years, some of the most common slander per se categories are:
-imputing criminal conduct to the plaintiff {emphasis mine}
-saying that the plaintiff has certain types of communicable diseases
-any harmful statement about the plaintiff's profession or business.
***snip***
Damages for Defamation
Once the plaintiff has successfully proved defamation, "general damages" are presumed. The plaintiff is not simply limited to damages reflecting his or her economic losses, but the mental anguish and other emotional harm that the law presumes to result from having ones reputation harmed. Depending on what the plaintiff proves about the defendants intentions, and the type of defendant, punitive damages may also be awarded to the plaintiff. For more, see our section on damages in a personal injury case.
Defenses to Defamation
Generally, if the defendant can prove that what he or she said or published about the plaintiff was true, the plaintiff will lose the case. In the case of defendants like certain media outlets (e.g. newspapers), the plaintiff must prove the statement was untrue -- the media defendant is not required to prove its publication was true to defend the case.
***snip***
http://www.alllaw.com/articles/nolo/personal-injury/defamation-libel-slander.html
If the lawsuit were to succeed, I assume the defendant would simply be ordered to pay some type of fine, though.
mn9driver
(4,426 posts)Knowingly broadcasting false information concerning a crime or a catastrophe may violate the rules of the Federal Communications Commission (FCC).
Specifics of the FCCs Rules
The FCCs rules prohibit holders of broadcast licenses from broadcasting false information concerning a crime or a catastrophe if:
the licensee knows the information is false; and
the licensee knows beforehand that broadcasting the information will cause substantial public harm. The public harm: (1) must begin immediately and cause direct and actual damage to property or the health or safety of the general public; or (2) divert law enforcement or public health and safety authorities from their duties.
http://www.fcc.gov/guides/broadcasting-false-information
freshwest
(53,661 posts)So there is no protection there.
The less public ownership, the more private discretion, even if one thinks they can't trust the hemmed in government. Trying to get accountability from a corporation is like talking a mob boss who will ask you which leg you want capped if you don't like things.
It's the failure of participation and vision from individuals that allows this state of affairs, and it's been carefully crafted from years of media programming. It's all been normalized and the people let them get away with it because they want a quick fix and don't want to get their hands dirty with politics.
And that is where we are, with the dirtiest hands controlling the states where the worst of this goes on. Although FNN, CNN and now ABC, NBC and CBS are no better and have brought those mores to the entire nation.
The laws were changed so that about a half dozen rightwing billionaires control all the venues of information. And they have for a long time. We are camping on their property like the internet, just consumers and not producers, is their mindset.
That article is a nice idea if the FCC was in the same society it was when those laws meant the FCC could go out and police the private sector. They are all starved for funds, as people bought in the small government mantra. Meaning we would no longer have a We the People government, which had to be a big government to do the job, as there are over 300 million of us now who need solutions.
By such methods as tax cuts, they have allowed the crooks free rein in everything.
Oh, and Happy Holidays. Not snarking, really.
True Blue Door
(2,969 posts)Because of Nazi propaganda like that.
Rex
(65,616 posts)I doubt they will apologize or even acknowledge they were in error.
Fred Sanders
(23,946 posts)massive mass media propganda.
Rex
(65,616 posts)You are right, we need to protest right out in front of these news studios.
riversedge
(70,248 posts)turbinetree
(24,703 posts)I applauded the protester that confronted the hypocrisy of this right station and its right wing tools of deceit and deception and the people at this station knowingly providing misinformation to the public to continue to inflame a situation and to the outright propaganda.
But there needs to be more.
This station and other stations that are supposedly independently owned , so that they can provide cover from the Fox 20th Century brand and his (Murdoch) right wing empire, (just look at the murder of British girl in England and the Sun Newspaper) have no morality or conscience in there actions spreading and inciting fear and hate and what this blatant attempt of deception does for and too the community and the society is a disservice in journalism and other societal actions and wants and needs for transparency in the news source
grr:
This right wing propaganda machine is nothing more than an extension of Ailes time with a corrupt president by the name of Richard M. Nixon, when he (Ailes blamed the so called liberals for the actions transpiring in the 1969 -1974) he (Ailes) was and has been under Nixon's ,Reagan, Giuliani, G.H.W.Bush employ and under Murdoch (FIX Noise Chairman) as "media consultant", look at what the above have said in past remarks and there actions speak volumes of the hypocrisy for what was happening in the White House and New York, this is what needs to be protested on daily basis.
This so called apology is nothing more than an ACT to deflect there operating procedures which they will continue later on into the future, look no further than the crew like Hannity, Hasselbeck, Stossel, O'Reilly and the other team mates of deceit and deception.
This owner and its license needs to be pulled.
WE the public give this owner the privilege to operate under rules of OUR airwaves, and if they cannot fulfill that responsibility then questions and comments to the FCC need to be addressed to this, and done a strong coordinated function.
Stellar
(5,644 posts)after the fact. It's too bad we don't have people picketing their station immediately after their lies.
eta: we need to hire people just to picket their station, just like they hire people to to blog attack.
http://open.salon.com/blog/christopher_di_spirito/2009/08/10/gop_paying_trolls_to_blog_attack
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WTVT
Sunlei
(22,651 posts)Police, prison guards and all 'hired guns' already think and treat our society, "the people" like we are the enemy.
Stuart G
(38,436 posts)Will O Reilly will announce tonite that Fox News has fired the station manager and all who reported this insult to journalistic integrity?....
No he won't...it will not be mentioned at all....ever..and it was no mistake...
green917
(442 posts)Howard Stern gets fined thousands of dollars for saying the word fuck over the air but these clowns can simply manufacture their own propaganda? That doesn't make any sense to me. Once upon a time, creating and disseminating propaganda was a crime.
me b zola
(19,053 posts)daredtowork
(3,732 posts)This sort of cutting/splicing/manipulation happens all the time. Fox only apologized because Gawker made a big deal out of it. Most of the time, however, reporters get away with it.
There needs to be some sort of official watchdog group or ethics body that normal people can complain to without having to get a lawyer or have connections to Gawker.
underpants
(182,839 posts)olddots
(10,237 posts)Hearst discovered the power and we have been suffering for hundreds of years with media as master .